Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren

Christopher Browne wrote:

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Hi,
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 21:27 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:

I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in
Java... IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could
build off some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as
IzPack).  Just my 2 cents :)

Bundling Java is a pain, so we'd better stay away from that.


There's always gcj. It's pretty mature by now. I'm not sure about
availability compared to Python though, but I find it hard to believe
it would be more painful.


On several occasions, I have installed graphical Python apps; it has
never been the bag of worms involved in getting a Java environment
into place...


Install gcj and you're up and running, graphics and all. What's the problem (besides your 
obvious aversion to Java)?


Or take it one step further and use gcj to compile the Java code into statically linked 
binaries. Where's the pain, really?


Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Christopher Browne
> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 21:27 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>>> I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in
>>> Java... IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could
>>> build off some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as
>>> IzPack).  Just my 2 cents :)
>> Bundling Java is a pain, so we'd better stay away from that.
>>
>
> There's always gcj. It's pretty mature by now. I'm not sure about
> availability compared to Python though, but I find it hard to believe
> it would be more painful.

On several occasions, I have installed graphical Python apps; it has
never been the bag of worms involved in getting a Java environment
into place...
-- 
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'gmail.com';
http://linuxfinances.info/info/wp.html
Signs of a Klingon Programmer #7: "Klingon function  calls do not have
'parameters' -- they have 'arguments' -- and they ALWAYS WIN THEM."

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 21:27 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:

I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in
Java... IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could
build off some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as
IzPack).  Just my 2 cents :) 


Bundling Java is a pain, so we'd better stay away from that.



There's always gcj. It's pretty mature by now. I'm not sure about availability compared to 
Python though, but I find it hard to believe it would be more painful.


Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ

Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 21:27 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in
> Java... IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could
> build off some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as
> IzPack).  Just my 2 cents :) 

Bundling Java is a pain, so we'd better stay away from that.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-31 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 08:36 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:

> >>Are you going to work with the underlying system's package manager, or
> >>put everything in /usr/local?
> > 
> > 
> > We'll work with the package manager -- I'm an RPM guy ;)
> > 
> RPM isnt the only packaging system out there ;)

I used RPM as an alias to package managers :)

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren

Tino Wildenhain wrote:

Jonah H. Harris schrieb:
I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in 
Java... IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could 
build off some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as 
IzPack).  Just my 2 cents :)


Yes! Use Java for ultimate suckiness of the installer ;) I love to
install all X11, Java and stuff on a server to be able to install
a package with about 1/10 the size ;)



How about postponing choice of implementation language until it's clear what it is that 
should be implemented ;-)


Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 03:50 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> 
> > Devrim GUNDUZ schrieb:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> > ...
> >>> Are you going to work with the underlying system's package manager, or
> >>> put everything in /usr/local?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> We'll work with the package manager -- I'm an RPM guy ;)
> >> 
> > RPM isnt the only packaging system out there ;)
> 
> I thought that Linux had this 'Linux Standard File System' or some such 
> that described where files were supposed to be installed?  Or is this 
> another one of those Standards that nobody follows? :(

Package management goes beyond sticking the files in the right place.
If that were the only requirement, then tar(1) would be a package
manager.

As for the Linux Standards Base, that is little more than Red Hat and
their like-minded friends getting together in a committee and declaring
the way they already do everything to be a "standard".  Generally the
LSB holds the short-term needs of commercial Linux distributors above
other considerations.

-jwb


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Tino Wildenhain wrote:


Devrim GUNDUZ schrieb:

Hi,


...

Are you going to work with the underlying system's package manager, or
put everything in /usr/local?



We'll work with the package manager -- I'm an RPM guy ;)


RPM isnt the only packaging system out there ;)


I thought that Linux had this 'Linux Standard File System' or some such 
that described where files were supposed to be installed?  Or is this 
another one of those Standards that nobody follows? :(


I know under FreeBSD, its simple: --prefix=/usr/local and away you go ...


Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Jonah H. Harris schrieb:
I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in Java... 
IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could build off 
some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as IzPack).  Just my 2 
cents :)


Yes! Use Java for ultimate suckiness of the installer ;) I love to
install all X11, Java and stuff on a server to be able to install
a package with about 1/10 the size ;)

SCNR
Tino

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Tino Wildenhain

Devrim GUNDUZ schrieb:

Hi,


...

Are you going to work with the underlying system's package manager, or
put everything in /usr/local?



We'll work with the package manager -- I'm an RPM guy ;)


RPM isnt the only packaging system out there ;)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake

Marc G. Fournier wrote:


On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

On my RHEL boxes, I do never ever recompile the kernel since Red Hat 
does not provide support if I do so :)



Is everything 'loadable modules' then?  I can't imagine you have some 
mammoth kernel running on your system, do you?  with every conceivable 
piece of hardware configured in?


Yes except for "core" modules almost everything in Linux is a loadable 
module.


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Doug McNaught
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>
>> On my RHEL boxes, I do never ever recompile the kernel since Red Hat
>> does not provide support if I do so :)
>
> Is everything 'loadable modules' then?  I can't imagine you have some
> mammoth kernel running on your system, do you?  with every conceivable
> piece of hardware configured in?

Yes, vendor kernels are very modular--most drivers, packet filtering,
scsi etc are all loadable modules.  You can of course build your own
kernel with only the drivers you need built-in, but it usually doesn't
make very much difference.  The module system works, in general,
extremely well.

-Doug

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Jonah H. Harris
I had to deal with an installer written in python and several in Java... IMHO, Java would be a better language for this and you could build off some nice OSS installers that already exist (such as IzPack).  Just my 2 cents :)
On 1/30/06, Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 22:04 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:>> BTW, gcc is not installed on by default AFAIR.>> Wow, how do you update the kernel each week? :)>> More seriously, I know under FreeBSD, one of the first things that gets
> done after installing is to customize the kernel to get rid of all the> 'cruft' part of the generic kernel, I take it that this isn't something> that ppl do with Linux?On systems that have a packaging system, you are supposed to download
and install vendor kernels. There is "no need" to build the kernel.However, if you want to build, then you need to install developmentenvironment.On my RHEL boxes, I do never ever recompile the kernel since Red Hat
does not provide support if I do so :)Regards,--The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 supportManaged Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/---(end of broadcast)---TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend



Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan



Marc G. Fournier wrote:



More seriously, I know under FreeBSD, one of the first things that 
gets done after installing is to customize the kernel to get rid of 
all the 'cruft' part of the generic kernel, I take it that this isn't 
something that ppl do with Linux?




The Linux kernel has loadable modules, so it's much less of an issue. 
For example, I just installed the Cisco VPN s/w on my FC4 box.  I didn't 
have to rebuild the kernel, all I have to do is to load the kernel 
module that puts a wedge in the IP stack.


The parts of the kernel that are optional are almost all loadable modules.

Some people do build static kernels. That makes sense when you have 
tightly controlled hardware and software requirements. I mostly don't 
bother.


cheers

andrew

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

On my RHEL boxes, I do never ever recompile the kernel since Red Hat 
does not provide support if I do so :)


Is everything 'loadable modules' then?  I can't imagine you have some 
mammoth kernel running on your system, do you?  with every conceivable 
piece of hardware configured in?



Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 22:04 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>> BTW, gcc is not installed on by default AFAIR.
> 
> Wow, how do you update the kernel each week? :)
> 
> More seriously, I know under FreeBSD, one of the first things that gets 
> done after installing is to customize the kernel to get rid of all the 
> 'cruft' part of the generic kernel, I take it that this isn't something 
> that ppl do with Linux?

On systems that have a packaging system, you are supposed to download
and install vendor kernels. There is "no need" to build the kernel.
However, if you want to build, then you need to install development
environment.

On my RHEL boxes, I do never ever recompile the kernel since Red Hat
does not provide support if I do so :)

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:


BTW, gcc is not installed on by default AFAIR.


Wow, how do you update the kernel each week? :)

More seriously, I know under FreeBSD, one of the first things that gets 
done after installing is to customize the kernel to get rid of all the 
'cruft' part of the generic kernel, I take it that this isn't something 
that ppl do with Linux?



Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:31 -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:
> > You can install, but what if you need different configure options than
> > the package provides? This means a rebuild of the package. Instead, we
> > will build and install that package via the installer.
> 
> That's actually a pretty cool idea--compile and generate debs/rpms
> that reflect the user's choices, then install them.  But the
> dependency on a compiler adds a twist of complexity--"sorry, you need
> to install the following system packages (gcc, etc) before you can
> install Postgres as you've configured it."  Not horrible, but perhaps
> intimidating for the GUI crowd?  :)  Is gcc in the bog-standard
> default install on FC these days?

We can pre-check the prerequisites for building the package and raise an
error before beginning to build the package. It is not that hard. For
example, RPMs have BuildRequires tags and we can compare those with the
packages installed in the system.

BTW, gcc is not installed on by default AFAIR.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 21:34 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > OTOH, exluding Synaptic that I hate to use, FC / RH does not have a GUI
> > RPM interface for the repositories. So our installer will help them a
> > lot. Also, our installer will have an option to download and install the
> > prebuilt binaries from PostgreSQL FTP site (and possible other sites)
> 
> And pull down/build/install the various extensions on pgFoundry? :)

Another good idea. Thanks Marc.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:31 -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:
> 
> Certainly you can install pre-built binaries without a compiler, and
> let the user choose database location, autovacuum settings and stuff
> like that.

That's another good point. We can adjust many settings before
installing. 

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:


Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:03 -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:


We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas.


What value does this bring to systems that have a good package system
and up-to-date repositories?  I can install Postgres today on Ubuntu
using a GUI tool, and install another GUI tool to configure and
adminsiter it.


You can install, but what if you need different configure options than
the package provides? This means a rebuild of the package. Instead, we
will build and install that package via the installer.

OTOH, exluding Synaptic that I hate to use, FC / RH does not have a GUI
RPM interface for the repositories. So our installer will help them a
lot. Also, our installer will have an option to download and install the
prebuilt binaries from PostgreSQL FTP site (and possible other sites)


And pull down/build/install the various extensions on pgFoundry? :)


Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:27 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> >OTOH, exluding Synaptic that I hate to use, FC / RH does not have a GUI
> >RPM interface for the repositories. So our installer will help them a
> >lot. Also, our installer will have an option to download and install the
> >prebuilt binaries from PostgreSQL FTP site (and possible other sites) 
>
> There's yumex ... http://fedoranews.org/tchung/yumex/

Thanks for the info. I haven't heard about it before...

However none of them are PostgreSQL Installers,  none of them has the
ability to customize the packages and none of them has the ability to
install the community packages, etc. :)

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-30 Thread Doug McNaught
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:03 -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:
>
>> What value does this bring to systems that have a good package system
>> and up-to-date repositories?  I can install Postgres today on Ubuntu
>> using a GUI tool, and install another GUI tool to configure and
>> adminsiter it.
>
> You can install, but what if you need different configure options than
> the package provides? This means a rebuild of the package. Instead, we
> will build and install that package via the installer.

That's actually a pretty cool idea--compile and generate debs/rpms
that reflect the user's choices, then install them.  But the
dependency on a compiler adds a twist of complexity--"sorry, you need
to install the following system packages (gcc, etc) before you can
install Postgres as you've configured it."  Not horrible, but perhaps
intimidating for the GUI crowd?  :)  Is gcc in the bog-standard
default install on FC these days?

Certainly you can install pre-built binaries without a compiler, and
let the user choose database location, autovacuum settings and stuff
like that.

Good luck!

-Doug

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer

2006-01-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan



Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:


OTOH, exluding Synaptic that I hate to use, FC / RH does not have a GUI
RPM interface for the repositories. So our installer will help them a
lot. Also, our installer will have an option to download and install the
prebuilt binaries from PostgreSQL FTP site (and possible other sites) 

 




There's yumex ... http://fedoranews.org/tchung/yumex/

cheers

andrew

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

  http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi,

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:03 -0500, Doug McNaught wrote:

> > We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
> > an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
> > need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
> > if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 
> 
> What value does this bring to systems that have a good package system
> and up-to-date repositories?  I can install Postgres today on Ubuntu
> using a GUI tool, and install another GUI tool to configure and
> adminsiter it.

You can install, but what if you need different configure options than
the package provides? This means a rebuild of the package. Instead, we
will build and install that package via the installer.

OTOH, exluding Synaptic that I hate to use, FC / RH does not have a GUI
RPM interface for the repositories. So our installer will help them a
lot. Also, our installer will have an option to download and install the
prebuilt binaries from PostgreSQL FTP site (and possible other sites) 

> For systems like Solaris I can see it maybe being a win.

Agreed.

> Are you going to work with the underlying system's package manager, or
> put everything in /usr/local?

We'll work with the package manager -- I'm an RPM guy ;)

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI Installer for

2006-01-30 Thread Doug McNaught
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgnixinstaller/
>
> We are actively looking for developers for the project. Please drop me
> an e-mail if you want to join this project. We will use Python, so you
> need to be a Python guy to join the project. We are in planning phase,
> if you join us earlier, we will be able to share more ideas. 

What value does this bring to systems that have a good package system
and up-to-date repositories?  I can install Postgres today on Ubuntu
using a GUI tool, and install another GUI tool to configure and
adminsiter it.

For systems like Solaris I can see it maybe being a win.

Are you going to work with the underlying system's package manager, or
put everything in /usr/local?

-Doug

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly