Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Josh Berkus wrote: Peter, I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't afford to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help! Install it from source if you cannot find a package. Hmmm ... still getting the Bison Too Old warning message. How can I tell where Postgres is looking for Bison? I got the same problem when I upgraded my SuSE 8.1. Try which bison to locate it; usually, SuSE will install in /usr/bin, while packages installed from source will install to /usr/local/bin, so the older bison would take precedence. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Tom, Really? 'cause I got the warning from the Beta4 tarball. If you mean the configure warning, sure, but the build won't fail. Might I suggest changing the wording in the final release, then? The warning sure looked dangerous; I aborted the build and went looking for bison 1.875 binaries. We should let people know that the warning is non-fatal so they don't repeat my experience. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Josh Berkus writes: Might I suggest changing the wording in the final release, then? The warning sure looked dangerous; It only looks dangerous to those who don't actually read the full text of the message. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Josh Berkus writes: I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't afford to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help! Install it from source if you cannot find a package. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Josh Berkus writes: I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't afford to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help! Install it from source if you cannot find a package. or build from an SRPM - the dependencies are quite modest, I believe cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Peter, I can't seem to find a Bison 1.875 RPM for a SuSE 8.1 machine I can't afford to upgrade right now. Does such an animal exist? Help! Install it from source if you cannot find a package. Hmmm ... still getting the Bison Too Old warning message. How can I tell where Postgres is looking for Bison? -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Peter, If you installed from source into /usr/local/bin and you have an older version in /usr/bin, you may need to run 'hash -r' or 'rehash' to make the shell forget about the old installation in the path. Yeah, that was it. Thanks! (I predict that we're going to get many more questions about Bison after we release 7.4, since many major Linux distros don't yet include 1.875) -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:43 am, Josh Berkus wrote: (I predict that we're going to get many more questions about Bison after we release 7.4, since many major Linux distros don't yet include 1.875) You only need bison if you are building from CVS - tarballs include the bison output files (AFAIK - correct me if I am mistaken anyone). Regards, Philip. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (I predict that we're going to get many more questions about Bison after we release 7.4, since many major Linux distros don't yet include 1.875) No, because it only matters to people who build from a CVS pull instead of using a tarball. I'd think most of the people in the first category have already dealt with the issue... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
TOm, No, because it only matters to people who build from a CVS pull instead of using a tarball. I'd think most of the people in the first category have already dealt with the issue... Really? 'cause I got the warning from the Beta4 tarball. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] Bison 1.875 for SuSE Linux 8.1?
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, because it only matters to people who build from a CVS pull instead of using a tarball. I'd think most of the people in the first category have already dealt with the issue... Really? 'cause I got the warning from the Beta4 tarball. If you mean the configure warning, sure, but the build won't fail. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
