Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz format or such? Or was it plaintext? Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:08:08PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz format or such? Or was it plaintext? Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. Then I have no clue. If you can, get your mailserver logs (including the remote queue id) and send it to Marc, hopefully he can find out where they went. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. Then I have no clue. Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. Then I have no clue. Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments. I think the filter is not on the name or actual contents of the file, but what MIME content-type it's labeled with. (Which is actually pretty sensible, because the point is to reject anything that Microsloth mail readers might try to auto-execute.) Plain ol' application/octet-stream always gets through for me. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Dave Page wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email dates are not a valid method of authenticating the sent date. Perhaps FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating them. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Bruce Momjian wrote: Dave Page wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email dates are not a valid method of authenticating the sent date. Perhaps FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating them. ;-) Darn, busted! After all that lobbying for a short release cycle we had to conspire with FAST to extend it again ;-) /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Tom Lane wrote: Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. Then I have no clue. Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments. I think the filter is not on the name or actual contents of the file, but what MIME content-type it's labeled with. (Which is actually pretty sensible, because the point is to reject anything that Microsloth mail readers might try to auto-execute.) It certainly would be, if the list of blocked MIME-types had anything to do with reality. But really - windows doesn't even know what .tar.gz *is*. Can't even open it. Much less execute it. Having it block things like .exe, .bat etc makes a lot of sense. (And to be fair, it might've been fixed by now, but I've never seen any confirmation on whether it has been, even though I've asked several times, so I expect it's not). Plain ol' application/octet-stream always gets through for me. Yeah, but that kinda assumes your MUA can change it. Microsoft ones certainly don't let you do that, and many others (Thunderbird, for example) don't either. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Dave Page wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Dave Page wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email dates are not a valid method of authenticating the sent date. Perhaps FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating them. ;-) Darn, busted! After all that lobbying for a short release cycle we had to conspire with FAST to extend it again ;-) Yep, I suspected a conspiracy from the start. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
[PATCHES] Blocked post
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post
Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz format or such? Or was it plaintext? //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
