Re: [PATCHES] Concurrent connections in psql patch
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Gregory Stark wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this something people are interested in? I am thinking no based on the lack of requests and the size of the patch. Lack of requests? I was actually surprised by how enthusiastically people reacted to it. I think it could form the basis of some concurrency testing, something we'll need more and more as time goes on. :) Gregory, Would you be up for getting this updated in the 8.3 cycle? Cheers, D However I don't think the patch as is is ready to be committed. Aside from missing documentation and regression tests it was only intended to be a proof-of-concept and to be useful for specific tests I was doing. I did try to do a decent job, I got \timing and server-tracked variables like encoding. But I need to go back through the code and make sure there are no other details like that. It would be nice to get feedback from other developers from looking at the patch to confirm that there aren't more fundamental problems with the approach and how it uses libpq before I go through the effort of cleaning up the details. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [PATCHES] Concurrent connections in psql patch
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this something people are interested in? I am thinking no based on the lack of requests and the size of the patch. Lack of requests? I was actually surprised by how enthusiastically people reacted to it. However I don't think the patch as is is ready to be committed. Aside from missing documentation and regression tests it was only intended to be a proof-of-concept and to be useful for specific tests I was doing. I did try to do a decent job, I got \timing and server-tracked variables like encoding. But I need to go back through the code and make sure there are no other details like that. It would be nice to get feedback from other developers from looking at the patch to confirm that there aren't more fundamental problems with the approach and how it uses libpq before I go through the effort of cleaning up the details. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [PATCHES] Concurrent connections in psql patch
Is this something people are interested in? I am thinking no based on the lack of requests and the size of the patch. --- Gregory Stark wrote: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: stark wrote: So I hacked psql to issue queries asynchronously and allow multiple database connections. That way you can switch connections while a blocked or slow transaction is still running and issue queries in other transactions. [snip] Can you please put the patch up somewhere so people can see what's involved? As promised: [ Attachment, skipping... ] -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
