Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-20 Thread Pedro B.
Hello.
I'm having difficulties on my first incursion through generate_series.

The details:

SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp '2006-02-01' )::DATE + s.d AS date,
      COUNT (o.04-sms) as totalcause98
      FROM generate_series(11,19) AS s(d)
 LEFT JOIN netopia o ON (substr(o.26-insertTime,1,10) = (DATE_TRUNC('month', 
timestamp'2006-02-01'  )::DATE + s.d) and o.cause01=98)
 GROUP BY s.d ORDER BY 1;


This query (although quite messed up on the date parameters), does exactly 
what i want: 
sum column 'cause01=98' for a specified date range, including 0's

date| totalcause98
+--
 2006-02-12 |0
 2006-02-13 |0
 2006-02-14 |0
 2006-02-15 |0
 2006-02-16 |   68
 2006-02-17 |  256
 2006-02-18 |  104
 2006-02-19 |   34
 2006-02-20 |   20

I'm using a left join because i really need the =0 sums.
The use of substr() is due to the fact the 26-insertTime on the 'netopia' 
table has a default of 'default (now())::timestamp(2) without time zone'.
So, i can make generate_series work with the left join using the substr.
I was getting ready to optimize this query, when i remembered i also have the 
need for another column, 'totalcause99', almost the same as this query, but 
with 'cause01=99' as condition.

The maximum i was able to do without syntax errors was:

SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp '2006-02-01' )::DATE + s.d AS date,
      COUNT (o.04-sms) as totalcause98,
      COUNT (p.04-sms) as totalcause99
      FROM generate_series(11,19) AS s(d)
 LEFT JOIN netopia o ON (substr(o.26-insertTime,1,10) = (DATE_TRUNC('month', 
timestamp'2006-02-01'  )::DATE + s.d) and o.cause01=98)
 LEFT JOIN netopia p ON (substr(p.26-insertTime,1,10) = (DATE_TRUNC('month', 
timestamp'2006-02-01'  )::DATE + s.d) and p.cause01=99)
 GROUP BY s.d ORDER BY 1;

Reading this one aloud, i feel the logic of what i'm trying to do, but the 
values of its output are.. scary to say the least, and the sums are exactly 
the same on the 2 columns, and that should never happen with the data i have 
on the table.

I'm starting to wonder if this is actually possible to be done on one single 
query...
Ideas, anyone?

Sorry for the long email.
Any and all help is deeply appreciated.

Regards,

-- 
\\pb

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-20 Thread Mark R. Dingee
Pedro,

Would something such as this suffice?

Mark 

create function get_date_range(date, date) returns setof date as '
DECLARE
    cur date;
BEGIN
    cur := $1;

    while cur = $2 LOOP
         return next cur;
         cur := cur + interval ''1 day'';
    end LOOP;
    return;
END;' language 'plpgsql';

dev=# select * from get_date_range('2/1/2006'::date, '2/28/2006'::date);
 get_date_range

 2006-02-01
 2006-02-02
 2006-02-03
 2006-02-04
 2006-02-05
 2006-02-06
 2006-02-07
 2006-02-08
 2006-02-09
 2006-02-10
 2006-02-11
 2006-02-12
 2006-02-13
 2006-02-14
 2006-02-15
 2006-02-16
 2006-02-17
 2006-02-18
 2006-02-19
 2006-02-20
 2006-02-21
 2006-02-22
 2006-02-23
 2006-02-24
 2006-02-25
 2006-02-26
 2006-02-27
 2006-02-28
(28 rows)

On Monday 20 February 2006 15:30, Pedro B. wrote:
 Hello.
 I'm having difficulties on my first incursion through generate_series.

 The details:

 SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp '2006-02-01' )::DATE + s.d AS date,
       COUNT (o.04-sms) as totalcause98
       FROM generate_series(11,19) AS s(d)
  LEFT JOIN netopia o ON (substr(o.26-insertTime,1,10) =
 (DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp'2006-02-01'  )::DATE + s.d) andcreate 
function get_date_range(date, date) returns setof date as '
DECLARE
cur date;
BEGIN
cur := $1;

while cur = $2 LOOP
 return next cur;
 cur := cur + interval ''1 day'';
end LOOP;
return;
END;' language 'plpgsql';

dev=# select * from get_date_range('2/1/2006'::date, '2/28/2006'::date);
 get_date_range

 2006-02-01
 2006-02-02
 2006-02-03
 2006-02-04
 2006-02-05
 2006-02-06
 2006-02-07
 2006-02-08
 2006-02-09
 2006-02-10
 2006-02-11
 2006-02-12
 2006-02-13
 2006-02-14
 2006-02-15
 2006-02-16
 2006-02-17
 2006-02-18
 2006-02-19
 2006-02-20
 2006-02-21
 2006-02-22
 2006-02-23
 2006-02-24
 2006-02-25
 2006-02-26
 2006-02-27
 2006-02-28
(28 rows)
 o.cause01=98)
  GROUP BY s.d ORDER BY 1;


 This query (although quite messed up on the date parameters), does exactly
 what i want:
 sum column 'cause01=98' for a specified date range, including 0's

 date| totalcause98
 +--
  2006-02-12 |0
  2006-02-13 |0
  2006-02-14 |0
  2006-02-15 |0
  2006-02-16 |   68
  2006-02-17 |  256
  2006-02-18 |  104
  2006-02-19 |   34
  2006-02-20 |   20

 I'm using a left join because i really need the =0 sums.
 The use of substr() is due to the fact the 26-insertTime on the 'netopia'
 table has a default of 'default (now())::timestamp(2) without time zone'.
 So, i can make generate_series work with the left join using the substr.
 I was getting ready to optimize this query, when i remembered i also have
 the need for another column, 'totalcause99', almost the same as this query,
 but with 'cause01=99' as condition.

 The maximum i was able to do without syntax errors was:

 SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp '2006-02-01' )::DATE + s.d AS date,
       COUNT (o.04-sms) as totalcause98,
       COUNT (p.04-sms) as totalcause99
       FROM generate_series(11,19) AS s(d)
  LEFT JOIN netopia o ON (substr(o.26-insertTime,1,10) =
 (DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp'2006-02-01'  )::DATE + s.d) and
 o.cause01=98)
  LEFT JOIN netopia p ON (substr(p.26-insertTime,1,10) =
 (DATE_TRUNC('month', timestamp'2006-02-01'  )::DATE + s.d) and
 p.cause01=99)
  GROUP BY s.d ORDER BY 1;

 Reading this one aloud, i feel the logic of what i'm trying to do, but
 the values of its output are.. scary to say the least, and the sums are
 exactly the same on the 2 columns, and that should never happen with the
 data i have on the table.

 I'm starting to wonder if this is actually possible to be done on one
 single query...
 Ideas, anyone?

 Sorry for the long email.
 Any and all help is deeply appreciated.

 Regards,

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-19 Thread Henry Ortega
I was able to find a suitable 7.3.2 plpgsql.so and now plpgsql works. (supposedly)I am trying out some really basic function creation such as this:create function dng2(start_date DATE) returns setof date as $$
declareaa date:=start_date;But I always get thisERROR: parser: parse error at or near DATE at character 33before I can even finish.Any idea why this happens?
On 2/17/06, Owen Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That usually indicates that, for whatever reason, plpgsql.so is from a different version of PostgreSQL than the database server.If you installed PostgreSQL from source, make sure you configured the server to look in the same lib dir as its libs were installed to; if you've installed from package management of some kind (RPM?) make sure you have the same versions of all postgres-related packages.
You should also upgrade, if possible.7.3 is effectively obsolete (37 releases old); there are a number of bugfixes and performance improvements in more recent versions.-Owen-Original Message-
From: Henry Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 PMTo: Owen JacobsonSubject: Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.
This sounds good. I don't have plpgsql loaded though.I am trying to load plpgsql and it's giving me:ERROR:Load of file /usr/lib/pgsql/plpgsql.so failed: /usr/lib/pgsql/plpgsql.so: undefined symbol: xlateSqlType
createlang: language installation failedI have pgsql 7.3.2I am googling and can't seem to find the answer. Any help would be appreciated.On 2/17/06, Owen Jacobson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Henry Ortega wrote:(question about set of all days between two dates)I don't know of a builtin way to do it off the top of my head, but it's a pretty simple function to write:
create function days (start date, finish date) returns setof date as $$declarecurdate date;begincurdate := start;while (curdate = finish) loopreturn next curdate;curdate := curdate + 1;
end loop;return;end;$$ language plpgsql;# select * from days ('2006-02-01', '2006-02-07');days2006-02-012006-02-022006-02-032006-02-042006-02-052006-02-06
2006-02-07(7 rows)---(end of broadcast)---TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-19 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Henry Ortega wrote:

 I was able to find a suitable 7.3.2 plpgsql.so and now plpgsql works.
 (supposedly)

 I am trying out some really basic function creation such as this:

 create function dng2(start_date DATE) returns setof date as $$
 declare
 aa date:=start_date;

I don't think the beginning is a valid function definition in 7.3.x as I'm
pretty sure it didn't have the grammar support for named parameters.
Also, I think dollar quoting came in 8.0, so that's not going to work
either.  You may be looking at a different version of the docs than the
version you're using.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-19 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:47:21PM -0500, Henry Ortega wrote:
 I was able to find a suitable 7.3.2 plpgsql.so and now plpgsql works.
 (supposedly)
 
 I am trying out some really basic function creation such as this:
 
 create function dng2(start_date DATE) returns setof date as $$
 declare
 aa date:=start_date;
 
 But I always get this
 ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near DATE at character 33
 before I can even finish.

You're using features (named parameters, dollar quotes) that are
available only in 8.0 and later; see the 7.3 documentation for the
correct syntax in that version.  But as someone else mentioned, do
consider upgrading, if not to 8.1.3 or 8.0.7 then at least to 7.3.14.
Lots of bugs have been fixed in the three years since 7.3.2 was
released, some involving data loss.

-- 
Michael Fuhr

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


[SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-17 Thread Henry Ortega
Is there a real quick way to do a query that will show me all the dates given a startdate and an end date?Given: 02-01-2006 and 02-28-2006it should give me:02-01-200602-02-2006..02-27-2006
02-28-2006Can this be done by a built-in function perhaps? 


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-17 Thread Owen Jacobson
Henry Ortega wrote:

(question about set of all days between two dates)

I don't know of a builtin way to do it off the top of my head, but it's a 
pretty simple function to write:

create function days (start date, finish date) returns setof date as $$
declare
  curdate date;
begin
  curdate := start;
  while (curdate = finish) loop
return next curdate;
curdate := curdate + 1;
  end loop;
  return;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;

# select * from days ('2006-02-01', '2006-02-07');
days

 2006-02-01
 2006-02-02
 2006-02-03
 2006-02-04
 2006-02-05
 2006-02-06
 2006-02-07
(7 rows)


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-17 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:07:28PM -0500, Henry Ortega wrote:
 Is there a real quick way to do a query that will show me all the dates
 given a startdate and an end date?

You could use generate_series(), which is built-in since 8.0 and
easily written in earlier versions.

SELECT date'2006-02-01' + x
FROM generate_series(0, date'2006-02-28' - date'2006-02-01') AS g(x);

-- 
Michael Fuhr

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.

2006-02-17 Thread Owen Jacobson
That usually indicates that, for whatever reason, plpgsql.so is from a 
different version of PostgreSQL than the database server.  If you installed 
PostgreSQL from source, make sure you configured the server to look in the same 
lib dir as its libs were installed to; if you've installed from package 
management of some kind (RPM?) make sure you have the same versions of all 
postgres-related packages.

You should also upgrade, if possible.  7.3 is effectively obsolete (37 releases 
old); there are a number of bugfixes and performance improvements in more 
recent versions.

-Owen

-Original Message-
From: Henry Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 PM
To: Owen Jacobson
Subject: Re: [SQL] Given 02-01-2006 to 02-28-2006, output all days.


This sounds good. I don't have plpgsql loaded though.

I am trying to load plpgsql and it's giving me:
ERROR:  Load of file /usr/lib/pgsql/plpgsql.so failed: 
/usr/lib/pgsql/plpgsql.so: undefined symbol: xlateSqlType 
createlang: language installation failed

I have pgsql 7.3.2
I am googling and can't seem to find the answer. Any help would be appreciated.


On 2/17/06, Owen Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henry Ortega wrote:

(question about set of all days between two dates)

I don't know of a builtin way to do it off the top of my head, but it's a 
pretty simple function to write:

create function days (start date, finish date) returns setof date as $$ 
declare
  curdate date;
begin
  curdate := start;
  while (curdate = finish) loop
return next curdate;
curdate := curdate + 1;
  end loop;
  return;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;

# select * from days ('2006-02-01', '2006-02-07');
days

2006-02-01
2006-02-02
2006-02-03
2006-02-04
2006-02-05
2006-02-06
2006-02-07
(7 rows)


---(end of broadcast)--- 
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly