Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > - Creating a new configuration adds fileSystemLegacy and fuelMetalevel as > dependent projects Okay, I see that a baseline and version have been created with sample data. I thought Versionner was in a more usable state… I will be patient :) - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Strange-Versionner-behavior-tp4736758p4736763.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
Am 14.01.2014 um 20:31 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris : > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> - Creating a new configuration adds fileSystemLegacy and fuelMetalevel as >> dependent projects > > Okay, I see that a baseline and version have been created with sample data. > I thought Versionner was in a more usable state… I will be patient :) > I was asking myself the same. I used it in 2.0 for months but in 3.0 it doesn’t seem to work. Norbert
Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
Hi Sean, Le 14 janv. 2014 à 20:31, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> - Creating a new configuration adds fileSystemLegacy and fuelMetalevel as >> dependent projects > > Okay, I see that a baseline and version have been created with sample data. It is a side effect of this slice: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10578 It is not related to Versionner. Metacello ToolBox uses this template to create new configurations. It is wrong to add examples in this class. I will propose a fix. > I thought Versionner was in a more usable state… I will be patient :) You and I pay the price that Pharo3.0 evolves fast. Versionner is a high level tool and is dependent on tools with a lot of updates (spec, komitter, metacello, etc). To focus on Versionner, I do not have a lot of users and I need users to improve it. :) That said, thank you for being a beta-tester ;) Cheers, Christophe. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
Le 14 janv. 2014 à 20:12, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : > - Creating a new configuration adds fileSystemLegacy and fuelMetalevel as > dependent projects answered in a previous mail > - How do you save changes without committing? After adding a dependent > project to the baseline, "Update de" (sic, label cut-off) It works fine on my laptop. Can you send me a screenshot? > doesn't seem to do > anything. It should. It is the way to save changes. Maybe I should rename the button to "Save Changes" and just keep the "release" and "commit" buttons aside. > Clicking away from the baseline warns me of losing changes but > doesn't offer the opportunity to save. > - If I select a project in Versionner, and then click the "New prone" > button, the title of the window that pops is the name of the previously > selected project, not the newly-created one. Where will the changes actually > go? i.e. is it just a labeling error, or am I editing the wrong project? > - I reported before, but Versionner needs a standard repositoryChooser that > allows to select from known repos or create a new one from a template ( like > MC Browser, but hopefully better ;) ) It looks like a Spec problem. It worked well some days ago. I will investigate. Thanks, Christophe smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
Hi Norbert, Le 15 janv. 2014 à 00:38, Norbert Hartl a écrit : > Am 14.01.2014 um 20:31 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris : > >> Sean P. DeNigris wrote >>> - Creating a new configuration adds fileSystemLegacy and fuelMetalevel as >>> dependent projects >> >> Okay, I see that a baseline and version have been created with sample data. >> I thought Versionner was in a more usable state… I will be patient :) > > I was asking myself the same. I used it in 2.0 for months but in 3.0 it > doesn’t seem to work. I need user feedback so I will be happy to know what does not work for you. Regards, Christophe. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
Le 15 janv. 2014 à 10:54, Christophe Demarey a écrit : > > Le 14 janv. 2014 à 20:12, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : > >> - Creating a new configuration adds fileSystemLegacy and fuelMetalevel as >> dependent projects > > answered in a previous mail > >> - How do you save changes without committing? After adding a dependent >> project to the baseline, "Update de" (sic, label cut-off) > > It works fine on my laptop. Can you send me a screenshot? > >> doesn't seem to do >> anything. > > It should. It is the way to save changes. > Maybe I should rename the button to "Save Changes" and just keep the > "release" and "commit" buttons aside. > >> Clicking away from the baseline warns me of losing changes but >> doesn't offer the opportunity to save. >> - If I select a project in Versionner, and then click the "New prone" >> button, the title of the window that pops is the name of the previously >> selected project, not the newly-created one. Where will the changes actually >> go? i.e. is it just a labeling error, or am I editing the wrong project? > > It looks like a Spec problem. It worked well some days ago. > I will investigate. I forgot to answer this one: >> - I reported before, but Versionner needs a standard repositoryChooser that >> allows to select from known repos or create a new one from a template ( like >> MC Browser, but hopefully better ;) ) I planned to do that friday. I extracted the repository chooser from Komitter to share it with Versionner. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [Pharo-dev] Strange Versionner behavior
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:51 AM, Christophe Demarey [via Smalltalk] wrote: > I forgot to answer this one: > >>> - I reported before, but Versionner needs a standard repositoryChooser that >>> allows to select from known repos or create a new one from a template ( like >>> MC Browser, but hopefully better ;) ) > > I planned to do that friday. > I extracted the repository chooser from Komitter to share it with Versionner. Great! One place it's needed is when specifying the repository of a dependent project. For example, I loaded BabyMock via the config at MetaRepoFor20, but the main repo is sthub/.../BabyMock. Even though #2 is in the system, because the packages were loaded from there, it doesn't appear on the list - only #1 does. So I had to pick #1 and then copy/paste #2 in later. - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Strange-Versionner-behavior-tp4736758p4737315.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.