Re: [PHP-DOC] a request to become editor
On 20 May 2007, at 7:07 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: Hi Philip, This is an excellent idea. Just yell if you want the code for the unofficial phpdoc's patch system ;) Regards --jm Yes, please! ;) Nuno - Original Message - From: "Philip Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PHPdoc List" Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 5:02 PM Subject: [PHP-DOC] a request to become editor Hello doc friends, We again could use an editor that is responsible for tackling our administrative tasks. It's been well over a year since Gabor stepped down and having a replacement to continue his legacy feels like a good idea. We've accomplished a lot since but are missing "the other things" being done. I humbly request taking over as editor and would be sure (and required) to complete the following tasks: * Manage and prioritize (and use) the TODO * Overhaul the dated doc HOWTO * Ensure that scripts/check_phpdoc/ is implemented, livedocs too * Document our build system and scripts/ so people understand how the magic happens * Write less documentation, but spend time finding people to write documentation * Follow the mailing lists and ensure that all questions receive responses * Discuss and propose an updated and manageable credits system * Manage docweb and encourage its use * Write monthly doc updates to the internals list * Make our dream of submissions|patches via the browser come true * Have the new doc style fully implemented in 2007 * Be diplomatic * Manage doc related CVS karma * Monitor QA and encourage non-native (but decent) English speakers to commit to en/ * Create topics for discussion, like our user notes and dead translations * Promote the ideas described in this book: http://producingoss.com/ * And in this talk: http://video.google.com/videoplay? docid=-4216011961522818645 The key is to have someone designated to do certain tasks, tasks that aren't always the most fun to perform. The title "editor" is not something to take lightly and as editor I know personally I'd "forget" less and do more. And although my duties with the php.net project have spread into many areas, the PHP Manual is my #1 priority. And it needs more love. I commit to at least one year and at that time we should reevaluate and hopefully we'll be ready to assign all tasks to individual members. I don't feel we're there yet as most of us have grown old and spend less time here now, but we'll get there if we want to. I hope everyone is happy with this as it means a fellow member (the old bearded guy) is promising and committing consistent focused time but if not then please feel free to speak up. Yay or Nay? Regards, Philip Olson
Re: [PHP-DOC] moving doc.php.net to pb11
On 16 Apr 2007, at 5:22 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote: Sean Coates wrote: Hi All, We've finally finished the move and sync of everything to pb11 for docweb (see http://doc.php.net.phpdoc.info/). Everything seems to be working. Please test that everything matches doc.php.net. Note: because of the domain difference, anything related to the MAGIC cookie isn't going to work. Looks good. Well the login system use a local cache and cvs access tests, so it should be ok to log in directly through: http://doc.php.net.phpdoc.info/login.php That at least gives possibilities to check the admin zone. So now that this machine is not located far away and administered by a ghost, I understand more people have access to it, so who should we bug for server-related problems, names, NAMES! :) If all is good, I'll ask someone with karma to switch the CNAME from Jacques server, to the php.net one. S Things have been crazy here. Work's keeping me extremely busy with work, and I'm nearing zombie mode here. Hopefully things should get back to normal soon, I hope! ;) Yell and I'll update where the CNAME point's to to point to pb11.php.net. Regards --jm -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction. -- Pascal
Re: [PHP-DOC] moving doc.php.net to pb11
On 16 Apr 2007, at 4:33 AM, Philip Olson wrote: On Apr 15, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Sean Coates wrote: Hi All, We've finally finished the move and sync of everything to pb11 for docweb (see http://doc.php.net.phpdoc.info/). Everything seems to be working. Please test that everything matches doc.php.net. Note: because of the domain difference, anything related to the MAGIC cookie isn't going to work. If all is good, I'll ask someone with karma to switch the CNAME from Jacques server, to the php.net one. Looks good! :) Regards, Philip Olson Don't forget to copy the latest version of the users sqlite database and the associated avatars. Sean has ssh access to the server, so he can do that. Regards --jm
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en bookinfo.xml make_chm_index.html
jacques Sat Dec 31 22:59:05 2005 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en bookinfo.xml make_chm_index.html Log: Updated copyright year http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/phpdoc/en/bookinfo.xml?r1=1.45&r2=1.46&diff_format=u Index: phpdoc/en/bookinfo.xml diff -u phpdoc/en/bookinfo.xml:1.45 phpdoc/en/bookinfo.xml:1.46 --- phpdoc/en/bookinfo.xml:1.45 Sun Aug 21 16:27:04 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/bookinfo.xml Sat Dec 31 22:59:05 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + &PHPManual; @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ &frontpage.editors; - 1997-2005 + 1997-2006 the PHP Documentation Group Copyright -Copyright © 1997 - 2005 by the PHP Documentation Group. +Copyright © 1997 - 2006 by the PHP Documentation Group. This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later. A copy of the Open Publication http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/phpdoc/en/make_chm_index.html?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&diff_format=u Index: phpdoc/en/make_chm_index.html diff -u phpdoc/en/make_chm_index.html:1.2 phpdoc/en/make_chm_index.html:1.3 --- phpdoc/en/make_chm_index.html:1.2 Sun Jul 10 18:10:56 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/make_chm_index.html Sat Dec 31 22:59:05 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + PHP Manual @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Go to http://www.php.net/docs.php";>http://www.php.net/docs.php to get the actual version. -Copyright © 1997 - 2005 the PHP Documentation Group +Copyright © 1997 - 2006 the PHP Documentation Group
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/appendices reserved.xml
jacques Sat Dec 10 14:48:27 2005 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en/appendices reserved.xml Log: this is a reserved in PHP 5 http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/appendices/reserved.xml?r1=1.58&r2=1.59&ty=u Index: phpdoc/en/appendices/reserved.xml diff -u phpdoc/en/appendices/reserved.xml:1.58 phpdoc/en/appendices/reserved.xml:1.59 --- phpdoc/en/appendices/reserved.xml:1.58 Fri Sep 2 08:10:44 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/appendices/reserved.xml Sat Dec 10 14:48:24 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + List of Reserved Words @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ old_function (PHP 4 only) +this (PHP 5 only)
Re: [PHP-DOC] CVS <-> Online Manual
Florian Anderiasch wrote: Hi Florian, > Hello there, > I've got a few things to say that bug me about building new versions of > the localized manual. I can only speak about the German translation, > because that's where I've done a bit of work lately. > > The online manual at http://de.php.net/ shows "Last updated: > Tue, 20 Sep 2005" and as I follow the commit-messages quite a bit has > been done in that time. > > Now I've heard that some days ago Derick started the build process, and > http://doc.php.net/php/de/revcheck.php seems to be up to date, but the > docs themselves haven't changed. > Derick's on holiday so I have no idea when he will be back. We used to get build logs on some php.net URL but I can't remember which URL it was. Ideally what we need is to do weekly builds per language over a weekend using multiple machines to make the builds take quicker :) > I may have done something wrong with de/reference/pdo/reference.xml for > example, but even the other changes didn't show up. > The revcheck script runs on a daily basis, checking out from CVS and updating sqlite databases on my one server. > Now the question is: Why is the manual always several months behind, > when the stuff already *is* available. I know that this DocBook stuff > takes ages to process, but would it be too much to at least run it every > 2 weeks? I count 11 commits to de/ in the last 10 days alone, that are > certainly ~15 updated pages. > There is a project called 'livedocs' in progress to make manual pages available in a faster fashion without having to rebuild the doc book stuff. > I'm sorry if I'm bugging the wrong people, but the doc-de list isn't > really active and I doubt that anyone there can give me details or even > check this update (that should've been completed after a few days..) > We need people to help improve the way we build docs from the current build the doc book stuff to almost real time with live docs! Regards --jm > Greetings, > Florian - Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] Web site translation?
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Hey, what do you guys think of taking advantage of our big > international doc team to translate the main web site pages as well? > It is a much smaller project than translating the manual and we > already have the language choosing mechanisms and everything in > place. The biggest problem is figuring out whether we should try to > pull the text parts out of the current pages and keep them somewhere > separate, or simply clone the pages in individual /en /fr /de /ja > top-level directories. > > -Rasmus > One also needs to look at the aspect of do we have the requirement where content is first added to the english version of the php.net website prior to it being translated or can translators add news to say the french version of the site and then to the english? Regards --jm -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] Web site translation?
Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote: > > We can start simple, with something that works for the > main site, but could be extended for the notes. The > notes management has improved over the years, but > there is still room to make it better. One thing that > might be useful is the old idea of having a mechanism > for an editor to express his/her interest in a > particular sections of the manual (e.g. the MySQL > section) and then get a notification when there is a > new note there. That way, if we tackle the wholesale > translation of the all notes (which might be a bit > daunting), this could be better spread among > everybody. > > Cheers. > > > Jim wrote some alert code some time ago which would require some work to get working on the master.php.net site so that users can subscribe to the alerts. It would be quite useful. Regards --jm -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/docweb main.ent
jacques Sat Jul 30 12:25:27 2005 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en/docweb main.ent Log: Stripped markup from *.users.* http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&ty=u Index: phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent diff -u phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.20 phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.21 --- phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.20 Sat Jul 30 12:12:56 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent Sat Jul 30 12:25:26 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + @@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ authentication, you will be redirected to this form automatically.'> -Username'> -Real name'> -Country'> + + +
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/docweb main.ent
jacques Sat Jul 30 12:12:58 2005 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en/docweb main.ent Log: Added user page entities. http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent?r1=1.19&r2=1.20&ty=u Index: phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent diff -u phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.19 phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.20 --- phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.19 Thu Jul 28 14:10:08 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent Sat Jul 30 12:12:56 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ + @@ -129,6 +130,11 @@ Note: If you just want to browse the website, you will not need to login. For all tasks that require authentication, you will be redirected to this form automatically.'> + + +Username'> +Real name'> +Country'>
Re: [PHP-DOC] Documentation comment sympathy
Randy Nielsen wrote: Hi All, My name is Randy Nielsen and I am a documentation manager at Macromedia. I mostly work on ColdFusion, JRun, and Flex, but along the way, I have inherited responsibility for our documentation commenting system, which we call LiveDocs (http://livedocs.macromedia.com/ ). This system is very similar to the one you use for PHP, and it has proven invaluable in a variety of ways. You’re probably wondering where I’m going with this. We are currently drowning in a sea of support questions, bug notifications, and feature requests. At least 60% of our comments have nothing to do with the docs and as part of figuring a way out of this problem, I looked at your site and came upon this page: http://www.php.net/manual/add-note.php?sect=function.base64-encode&redirect=http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.base64-encode.php <http://www.php.net/manual/add-note.php?sect=function.base64-encode&redirect=http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.base64-encode.php> I felt like I’d found a long-lost brother or sister. Do you mind if I ask you a few questions about how this is working? I imagine we can commiserate, too. Before I go any further, please let me know if you have time for this discussion. Thanks very much, Randy Nielsen Senior IMD Manager Macromedia, Inc Hi Randy, Please let us know what you have in mind. Regards --jm -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/docweb main.ent
jacques Sat Feb 12 19:08:58 2005 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en/docweb main.ent Log: Text for the login page. http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent?r1=1.16&r2=1.17&ty=u Index: phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent diff -u phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.16 phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.17 --- phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.16 Sat Feb 12 18:22:37 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent Sat Feb 12 19:08:57 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + @@ -118,6 +118,12 @@ notices in the respective manuals for more information. In case you have questions not handled in the licenses, please ask at &docweb.common.link.doc-license;.'> + + + +Note: If you just want to browse +the website, you will not need to login. For all tasks that require +authentication, you will be redirected to this form automatically.'>
[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/docweb main.ent
jacques Sat Feb 12 18:22:38 2005 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en/docweb main.ent Log: Added login header. http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&ty=u Index: phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent diff -u phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.15 phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.16 --- phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent:1.15 Mon Jan 31 10:28:56 2005 +++ phpdoc/en/docweb/main.ent Sat Feb 12 18:22:37 2005 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ +
[PHP-DOC] Re: REVISION COMPLETE: Thout Reader Update and Link on PHP
Mark D. Carey wrote: Hi Mark, Does the script you guys wrote work via cron without user intervention? Regards --jm
[PHP-DOC] cvs: livedocs / livedoc_funcs.php
jacques Thu Feb 10 07:23:32 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/livedocs livedoc_funcs.php
Log:
Committing http://www.powertrip.co.za/livedocs/viewpatch.php?patch=6
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/livedocs/livedoc_funcs.php?r1=1.25&r2=1.26&ty=u
Index: livedocs/livedoc_funcs.php
diff -u livedocs/livedoc_funcs.php:1.25 livedocs/livedoc_funcs.php:1.26
--- livedocs/livedoc_funcs.php:1.25 Wed Feb 9 17:48:14 2005
+++ livedocs/livedoc_funcs.php Thu Feb 10 07:23:32 2005
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
return '';
}
-$GLOBALS['special'] = array('gt' => 1,'lt' => 1,'quot' => 1,'amp' => 1);
+$GLOBALS['special'] = array('gt' => 1,'lt' => 1,'quot' => 1,'amp' => 1,'apos'
=> 1);
function handle_include($node)
{
[PHP-DOC] cvs: livedocs / getnotes
jacques Wed Feb 9 17:10:51 2005 EDT Removed files: /livedocs getnotes Log: No longer required.
Re: [PHP-DOC] State of Livedocs
Sean Coates wrote: Jacques Marneweck wrote: I'm busy working through the patches which were submitted over @ http://www.powertrip.co.za/livedocs/ and will be doing some commits later this week after testing. This is great news! I think this will be encouraging to everyone who's had any ambition to work on livedocs. Please remember to address (close) the livedocs bugs at http://bugs.php.net/ Thanks, S I haven't forgotten about our 12 livedocs bugs (http://bugs.php.net/search.php?search_for=&boolean=0&limit=10&order_by=&direction=ASC&cmd=display&status=All&bug_type%5B%5D=Livedocs+problem) Regards --jm
Re: [PHP-DOC] State of Livedocs
Sean Coates wrote: Well, I think a lot of us would be very happy with some progress if someone is working on it. I think livedocs has become stale, again. We're again limited by karma, and the developers are getting frustrated. There are a number of bugs (with patches) that should be analyzed by the karmic, and committed. Don't make me go on another livedocs rant (-: S Hi, I'm busy working through the patches which were submitted over @ http://www.powertrip.co.za/livedocs/ and will be doing some commits later this week after testing. Regards --jm
Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc / TODO
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:36:37 +, Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ehem, the problem with all this suffling is that impatient people > already set up a website on this ground and that the number of people > who set up websites but told that it will not be the official one is > increasing. Now Jacques has an online site based on docweb, and he seems > to be continually helping improving the stuff. > > BTW this conversation should go on the docweb list (cc-ed). > > Goba On the subject of what's happening with the livedocs related stuff. I'm busy putting some more effort into the "Livedocs Patch System" and have redone the header for the patch system to show a picture of the php.net website and one of the livedoc generated pages (in this case the page for Memcached). As always any suggestions would be appreciated in how to improve this interface to make it easier for the livedocs maintainers to find our patches and use the patches. Regards --jm -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] Livedocs CVSTrac?
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:02:34 -0400, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, wanted to see what others thought, before taking it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Seems there are a number of cvstrac vulnerabilities.. that's not good. > > S > I'll add a bugs page to the livedocs patch system I'm busy hacking up atm. Regards --jm > > > Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > >> Opinions? > > > > Fine with me. You need to convince systems@ about this anyway :) > > > > Goba > -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] Livedocs Status?
Hi Sean, Currently the way of getting changes commited to the 'livedocs' in CVS is to submit patches to those who have karma. When submitting patches, remeber to do 'cvs diff -u' and save this patch to your website and mail them the link and explain to them what you are trying to do with the patch. Certain patches will not be commited and sometimes they will only after the commiter has changed the code slightly for coding standards or for some performance issues, etc. Regards --jm On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:59:51 -0400, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > [This is a follow-up post to my previous post, "Livedocs woes".] > > What is the current status of livedocs development? > > My understanding is that anyone with phpdoc karma, also, once, had > livedocs karma. A commit was made that some maintainers did not like, > and karma was removed, and only granted to certain people (Currently: > iliaa,goba,wez,derick,sfox,alan_k). Please correct me if I am wrong. > > There are several outstanding issues with the livedocs code. As I said > in my post, last night, HEAD seems broken. Also, Nuno has a number of > patches available at http://livedocs.aborla.net/ > > My point? I'd like to determine the proper procedure for patching > (getting patches approved for) livedocs, or find an alternative > development method. > > I realize that livedocs is not ready for production, as it is intended. > It is, however VERY useful for doc team members (see Philip's posts re: > CHANGELOG and the EXIF changes he made for a practical example). > > I also understand that the original authors of livedocs don't want their > code messed with. Isn't this the beauty of CVS, though? > > I suspect this idea won't be well-received, but if we're not > willing/able to keep livedocs HEAD up to date, could we not branch the > module for testing purposes? Karma could be re-granted on a per-case > basis, with the condition that non-core developers do not commit to > HEAD, but to the dev branch. My understanding of the "staleness" of > livedocs is that Ilia and Wez are busy on PHP 5. I understand this. > People like Nuno, though, have demonstrated a knowledge of livedocs > code, and should be able to contribute, IMHO. I'd also like to see > livedocs tagged regularly so we can easily "rollback" to a previous > version (last night, while getting livedocs running, and failing > miserably, I was tempted to start pulling random dates out for cvs up -D ). > > I'm not trying to point fingers, here, I'd just like to see livedocs > move forward. Can we find a way to make this happen? > > > > S > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFBHijnWppknrQMxQIRAtiKAKCCWFtGKzlPxyn4Y3pMydqMVvCT0gCfXQsJ > YihNZTBf+dl39Ch7BAODaNc= > =UqpZ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/datetime/functions mktime.xml
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:07:41 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote: > > > vrana Fri Aug 6 15:45:40 2004 EDT > > > > Modified files: > > /phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions mktime.xml > > Log: > > Revert (1:00 CET is 0:00 GMT) > > Why not make it 00:00:00 GMT then? That would be the most obvious thing > to do. > > Derick > +1 -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] time to switch the install section?
You most likely want to use cvs update -d -P "Use the -d option to create any directories that exist in the repository if they're missing from the working directory. (Normally, update acts only on directories and files that were already enrolled in your working directory.) This is useful for updating directories that were created in the repository since the initial checkout; but it has an unfortunate side effect. If you deliberately avoided certain directories in the repository when you created your working directory (either through use of a module name or by listing explicitly the files and directories you wanted on the command line), then updating with -d will create those directories, which may not be what you want." On http://www.php.net/anoncvs.php we recommend that you configure CVS by putting the following in your ~/.cvsrc file: cvs -z3 update -d -P checkout -P diff -u Regards --jm -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] "Official" IRC chan?
+1 for the freenode #phpdoc On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 19:02:50 +0200, Tom Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ken Tossell wrote: > > > +1 for freenode/#phpdoc :P > > #php.doc on EFNet is the place to be now :) > > // Tom > -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
Re: [PHP-DOC] I have uptodate commiter stats
Wez, An alphabetical list most likely would work better, considering various other places use alphabetical lists by surname, firstname. Regards --jm
Re: [PHP-DOC] I have uptodate commiter stats
Does anyone know where one can get a copy of the bonsai data? Regards --jm On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:47:40 + (GMT), Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought we were going to scrap this whole "raw number of > commits" thing in favor of individual credits per page. Or > will both be used? In the very least I thought we agreed > to never use raw numbers and to be an author you must > prove it yourself. Quality versus Quantity. Show me the > money! Computers dumb, humans smart. User note editors is > one thing but being an author of the PHP manual? It just > doesn't feel right but maybe that's because I'm not an > author ;) > > Someone needs to fix Bonsai so we can actually view these > commits. > > Regards, > Philip > > > > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > > > http://goba.hu/commiters.html (beware 376 Kbyte html file!) > > > > Additionaly to this, here is the data of how many commits people had in > > the last half year (since january 1 actually) (with only those CVS > > accounts who had at least one commit). > > > > I propose we put a line above baoengb and add the people above it to the > > frontpage authors list (this is nearly the same as the magic 100 mark we > > use). I exclude baoengb here, because I know he achieved this high > > commit number mostly by adding translated stuff to the EN tree, and then > > reverting (multiple times AFAIR). Others are mostly respected people > > here AFAIK, and they deserve to be listed as top authors. Dave is > > someone to think about a bit, as he mostly achieved a top commiter > > rating by mass fixing small mistakes (html->HTML, php->PHP, PHP3->PHP 3, > > and such). > > > > Still I keep suggesting that the historical author list should contain > > people above the 100 commit mark from the list presented at the URL > > above (with a bit of human correction if needed). > > > > Funny that I am just above the line :)) > > > > OK, now provide your suggestions! > > > > +---+--+ > > | didou | 1291 | - Mehdi Achour > > | nlopess | 573 | - Nuno Lopes > > | georg | 245 | - Georg Richter > > | betz | 244 | - Friedhelm Betz > > | tony2001 | 243 | - Antony Dovgal > > | dave | 233 | - Dave (? - mostly done search&replace) > > | vrana | 219 | - Jakub Vrana > > | dams | 194 | - Damien Seguy > > | irchtml | 189 | - Kenneth Schwartz > > | goba | 172 | - Gabor Hojtsy > > > > +===+==+ (suggested crediting mark) > > > > | baoengb | 106 | > > | wez | 64 | > > |derick | 58 | > > | moriyoshi | 44 | > > |mg | 41 | > > | pollita | 37 | > > | progcom | 34 | > > | vincent | 31 | > > |kennyt | 28 | > > |et | 26 | > > | yannick | 21 | > > |philip | 19 | > > | derek | 18 | > > | hholzgra | 14 | > > | sean | 13 | > > | dickmeiss | 11 | > > | ali |8 | > > | abies |6 | > > | jan |5 | > > | thetaphi |4 | > > | samesch |4 | > > | helly |4 | > > | gui |4 | > > | vlad |4 | > > | curt |3 | > > |mj |3 | > > | stas |3 | > > | cucinato |3 | > > |andrei |3 | > > | alindeman |3 | > > | jdonagher |2 | > > | hirokawa |2 | > > | joey |2 | > > |leszek |2 | > > | conni |1 | > > | poz |1 | > > |ae |1 | > > |rasmus |1 | > > | amt |1 | > > | hakan |1 | > > |rioter |1 | > > |nathan |1 | > > | jsjohnst |1 | > > | cece |1 | > > |sp |1 | > > +---+--+ > > > -- http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/
[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] reviewing the installation documentation (we need help)
On Fri Jun 11 21:46:08 2004 Gabor Hojtsy wrote: Hi Gabor, I'm going to start hacking up some instructions for installing PHP4 / PHP5 under FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X. Would there be a problem if I added a freebsd.xml file as I go along? Regards --jm
RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: distribution of INI information in the manual
Hi all, I'm willing to host the livedocs site if everyone would like me to host it. Regards --jm -Original Message- From: Wez Furlong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 May 2004 04:13 PM To: 'Nuno Lopes'; 'Gabor Hojtsy' Cc: 'Mehdi Achour'; 'PHPdoc'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: distribution of INI information in the manual I know you guys are overly prejudiced against systems@, but why not run it on our own systems?? --Wez. > > SF does not allow you to host some website which is not > closely related > > to the project you run on SF. We are not going to move the CVS to > > SF.net, so it is not justifyable to put any services there. > It does not > > fit into the terms of service AFAIK. > > Of course we aren't going to move CVS to SF.net servers, but... > We need a server to at least test livedocs. As belong to a > big open source > project... Let's wait for their answer! > > Nuno >
