Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /de Translators /de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml /en/functions satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml
Jouni Ahto wrote: > It would be interesting to hear something about Hartmuts thoughts, if they > are something not already discussed on this list. .o0(currently writing them up into a single piece of paper, should become visible by end of week)
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /de Translators /de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml /en/functions satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote: > > > yet another reason for putting each translation into > > > a CVS module of its own > > > > Indeed, what about your not-so-recent-anymore proposals for changing the > > set-up of translations? IIRC, people were enthousiast about it... > > > > What's thet status of it again? > > We can hear more about this at the PHPConf in Frakfurt. :)) > There will be a session named "The PHP Manual and beyond", > if I remember correctly... Then there will be some live > discussion about the subject with the people there. It would be interesting to hear something about Hartmuts thoughts, if they are something not already discussed on this list. There's a *lot* of bigger probability them being accepted as-is if we know something beforehand. And yes, I'm too lazy to browse through mail archives, unless someone clearly says RTFMLA. Hope I can be there in Frankfurt. Although, doesn't seem very probable. Have to save some money. Working like hell with my current project hoping I can get it finished. Stock exchange software seemed like a good idea 9 months ago. Doesn't seem so good now, at least in Finland. Possibbly unemployed within the next 3 months, like 30-40% of dealers. Hints about new possibilities would be appreciated. CV available at request. -- Jouni PS: Sorry for being a bit off-topic.
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /de Translators /de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml /en/functions satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml
> > yet another reason for putting each translation into > > a CVS module of its own > > Indeed, what about your not-so-recent-anymore proposals for changing the > set-up of translations? IIRC, people were enthousiast about it... > > What's thet status of it again? We can hear more about this at the PHPConf in Frakfurt. :)) There will be a session named "The PHP Manual and beyond", if I remember correctly... Then there will be some live discussion about the subject with the people there. Goba
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /de Translators /de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml /en/functions satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml
> yet another reason for putting each translation into > a CVS module of its own Indeed, what about your not-so-recent-anymore proposals for changing the set-up of translations? IIRC, people were enthousiast about it... What's thet status of it again? --Jeroen
Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /de Translators /de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml /en/functions satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Please don't mix en-commits and de-commits. I would appriciate it very much > if the en-diffs were separate, I am currently not really interested in > de-diffs since my german is quite bad ;-) yet another reason for putting each translation into a CVS module of its own
[PHP-DOC] Re: phpdoc /de Translators /de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml /en/functions satellite.xml wddx.xml zip.xml
> Modified files: > /phpdoc/en/functions zip.xml wddx.xml satellite.xml > /phpdoc/de/functions fdf.xml recode.xml satellite.xml wddx.xml > /phpdoc/de Translators Please don't mix en-commits and de-commits. I would appriciate it very much if the en-diffs were separate, I am currently not really interested in de-diffs since my german is quite bad ;-) --Jeroen