Re: [Piglit] Status of Glean test rewrites?
Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 18:17:19) > On 15/06/17 10:57, Dylan Baker wrote: > > I have (a now fairly old) series to port either the arb fp or vp tests to > > shader_runner on the list. I have no idea how much work they'd need to > > land, or > > if they're really relavent. > > > > Ian had patches (I have no idea how far done) to generate arb_fp and arb_vp > > tests which would superscede both glean and my work. I don't think those > > patches > > ever went to the list or how much work was remaining. > > They seem mostly ok, and I'd been keen to land them but there are > comments about changing the input/output values that were never addressed. I think I mostly got side tracked with other things. I'll have a look back through the comments and see about re-spinning when I have a chance. > > Was there any reason for not sending a new series? As far as I can see > it shouldn't be too much work to get these commit worthy. > > > > > > Dylan > > > > Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 17:48:24) > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I recently got a cpu with more than 2 cores \o/ and it's become even > >> more obvious just how much of a bottle neck the glean tests are. > >> > >> Anyway what is the currently status of the rewrite? Have all the current > >> patches landed or are there still patchs waiting review/yet to be finished? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tim > >> ___ > >> Piglit mailing list > >> Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit signature.asc Description: signature ___ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
Re: [Piglit] Status of Glean test rewrites?
On 15/06/17 10:57, Dylan Baker wrote: I have (a now fairly old) series to port either the arb fp or vp tests to shader_runner on the list. I have no idea how much work they'd need to land, or if they're really relavent. Ian had patches (I have no idea how far done) to generate arb_fp and arb_vp tests which would superscede both glean and my work. I don't think those patches ever went to the list or how much work was remaining. They seem mostly ok, and I'd been keen to land them but there are comments about changing the input/output values that were never addressed. Was there any reason for not sending a new series? As far as I can see it shouldn't be too much work to get these commit worthy. Dylan Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 17:48:24) Hi All, I recently got a cpu with more than 2 cores \o/ and it's become even more obvious just how much of a bottle neck the glean tests are. Anyway what is the currently status of the rewrite? Have all the current patches landed or are there still patchs waiting review/yet to be finished? Thanks, Tim ___ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit ___ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
Re: [Piglit] Status of Glean test rewrites?
I have (a now fairly old) series to port either the arb fp or vp tests to shader_runner on the list. I have no idea how much work they'd need to land, or if they're really relavent. Ian had patches (I have no idea how far done) to generate arb_fp and arb_vp tests which would superscede both glean and my work. I don't think those patches ever went to the list or how much work was remaining. Dylan Quoting Timothy Arceri (2017-06-14 17:48:24) > Hi All, > > I recently got a cpu with more than 2 cores \o/ and it's become even > more obvious just how much of a bottle neck the glean tests are. > > Anyway what is the currently status of the rewrite? Have all the current > patches landed or are there still patchs waiting review/yet to be finished? > > Thanks, > Tim > ___ > Piglit mailing list > Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit signature.asc Description: signature ___ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
