RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning pics
Jan, Superb images! How do you fasten the film onto the inside cylinder? Also, would it not be possible to scan the images in 2 halves and join them in Photoshop? Regards, Brigitte. Chris Peregoy pere...@umbc.eduTo: Jan Kapoor jkap...@jankapoor.net, pinhole-discussion Sent by: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? pinhole-discussion-admin@ cc: p at ??? Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] scanning pics 12/08/2003 20:19 Please respond to pinhole-discussion = Original Message From Jan Kapoor jkap...@jankapoor.net = Right now, I'm working with a camera I made, it's a hexagonal 6-pinhole job, and the negatives are too big for the film scanner, 6 x 13, so I can't scan them. I'm making platinum/palladium prints, then I scan the prints in order to put them on my website. It's actually fun to be making prints by hand again rather than always cranking them out on the Epson. Jan, I liked you web page at http://www.jankapoor.net/HexCamera.html , nice images. I especially like The Grotto Series, #5. If anyone else want to try this I've found that a 1 liter brown plastic darkroom bottle, like the ones marked Datatainer will fit an 8x10 wrapped around it. I screw the cap in place on the bottom of a six sided piece of plywood. Making the plywood right is the hardest thing. Start off by drawing a circle first then mark it with a protractor every 60 degrees. Once thats done all you need is sides and top which are easy to cut out of black matt board, and of course six matching pinholes. chris Chris Peregoy pere...@umbc.edu http://www.pinholeblender.com ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zone plates pinhole sieves
Your choice of subject matter for zone plate is fabulous! You have inspired me greatly. Thanks. Regards, Brigitte. ch...@ellingerphoto.com Sent by: To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? pinhole-discussion-admin@ cc: p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zone plates pinhole sieves 25/04/2003 15:24 Please respond to pinhole-discussion On 24 Apr 2003 at 10:51, Rauch, Shelley wrote: I'm probably getting too far ahead of myself, but I've come across some references to these items. Anyone have any experience with either of these tools? Pros/cons/general .02 cents? I have been using a zone plate for about a year, and am extremely intrigued by the quality of image it produces. To me it, reveals the energy beneath the surface of things. My zone plate photos: http://www.ellingerphoto.com/ Chris Ellinger Ann Arbor, MI USA ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] 3-hole 4x5 pinhole cameras?
Chris, Do I see a film winding mechanism on the top of your camera? If so, how do you handle frame counting? Regards, Brigitte. Chris Peregoy pere...@umbc.eduTo: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 3-hole 4x5 pinhole cameras? inhole.com 19/07/2002 16:59 Please respond to pinhole-discussion Andrew Amundsen wrote: From: Gordon J. Holtslander hol...@duke.usask.ca Check out my web page http://cyano.usask.ca/pinhole/ - specifically the 1st and 2nd image. These were made with a 6 hole camera that takes a 360 degree panoramic made from 6 images superimposed on one piece of film. (a 4x10 negative) Might be able to make you one. Thanks Gordon, Although I want to stick to a 4x5 format (or other readily available commercial film) and just 3 holes max. I'll try to find an example of what I'm thinking of, or do a sketch, so the list can get a better idea what I mean. I'm still hoping someone will notice this post and have something ready made for sale! I've been working on a three hole 120 camera design but its more on the principle of Gordon's camera. With mine you get a 180 degree panorama of overlapping images with a negative about 5 inches long. You can even shoot 180 degrees and advance the film and shoot the other direction to get a 360 degree image. I posted a picture of it to the upload gallery and you can follow the other link to my pinhole day image taken with this camera. http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=pinhole_blender.jpg http://www.pinholeday.org/gallery/2002/?id=536 -- -- Chris Peregoy | http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~peregoy | http://imda.umbc.edu/ ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: Re[2]: [pinhole-discussion] Darkslide terminology
The darkslides are the part of the filmholders which 'slide' up and down to shield/expose the film. Regards, Brigitte. Scott Sellers scottsellers@mindspring.cTo: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? om cc: Sent by: Subject: Re[2]: [pinhole-discussion] Darkslide terminology pinhole-discussion-admin@p inhole.com 05/03/2002 15:32 Please respond to pinhole-discussion Hello Peter, On Monday, March 04, 2002, Peter Jones wrote: On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:11:23 -0500 (EST), you wrote: I just got a copy of an Ilford Manual of Photography from the 1920's. What we call filmholders are called dark slides in the book, and what we now call dark slides are called shutters. And a cable release is called an 'Antinous Release'. I always thought dark slides were called dark slides - in the UK at least. Hmm... if filmholders are dark slides, what are dark slides? -- Scott Sellers ___ Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] Silver Gem
Yes, I think someone has jumped onto the bandwaggon using a proven good design. Regards, Brigitte. Gary g...@airport.flyer.co.ukTo: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: [pinhole-discussion] Silver Gem inhole.com 16/01/2002 23:00 Please respond to pinhole-discussion Has anyone seen the recent press coverage in the UK for the Pinhole Factory's Silver Gem camera? Is it just my imagination or does it bear a striking resemblance to the Zero 2000? ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras?
Hi Tom, Thanks for the info. I agree that banding looks ok on some images and out of place in others. Just depends on the image. Regards, Brigitte. Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras? inhole.com 08/11/2001 17:05 Please respond to pinhole-discussion Hi Brigitte, Further in Jim Moninger's article he mentioned that he saw the banding using .5mm slits and so increased the slit width to 2mm thus making more diffuse images with less banding. I can't see banding in the images that accompany his article. The use or elimination of banding is up to the photographer. Marnie Cardozo's images in the same issue of PJ are much sharper, but include banding. I've dedided to keep the banding in the iconoclast images. Tom - Original Message - From: brigitte.har...@london.glencore.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras? Thanks guys. But what does it mean in pratical terms of constructing or pairing differently shaped slits. Is there anything I can do or avoid to do in order to eliminate or diffuse the problem? Regards, Brigitte. Guillermo pen...@home.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras? inhole.com 07/11/2001 13:08 Please respond to pinhole-discussion - Original Message - From: Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net Also, do you have any explanation why in some slit configurations there is a lot of banding (thin black lines) forming over the image? This quote is from Jim Moninger's article in the Pinhole Journal vol. 15 #1 : These are apparently caused by the light rays / waves with form the two separate images becoming out of phase with one another. Tom Not just out of phase but 180 degrees from each other. This -perhaps- are regions where light (wave) diffracted by one slit is at its maximum peak (+) and light (wave) diffracted by the other slit not just overlaps the former but happens to be at its lowest peak (-), the net effect is darkness, light from one slit canceling out with light from the other slit, weird, eh? This BTW, is called Destructive Interference. Guillermo ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message. ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/
Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras?
Thanks guys. But what does it mean in pratical terms of constructing or pairing differently shaped slits. Is there anything I can do or avoid to do in order to eliminate or diffuse the problem? Regards, Brigitte. Guillermo pen...@home.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras? inhole.com 07/11/2001 13:08 Please respond to pinhole-discussion - Original Message - From: Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net Also, do you have any explanation why in some slit configurations there is a lot of banding (thin black lines) forming over the image? This quote is from Jim Moninger's article in the Pinhole Journal vol. 15 #1 : These are apparently caused by the light rays / waves with form the two separate images becoming out of phase with one another. Tom Not just out of phase but 180 degrees from each other. This -perhaps- are regions where light (wave) diffracted by one slit is at its maximum peak (+) and light (wave) diffracted by the other slit not just overlaps the former but happens to be at its lowest peak (-), the net effect is darkness, light from one slit canceling out with light from the other slit, weird, eh? This BTW, is called Destructive Interference. Guillermo ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras?
Tom, I have found that the slit nearest to the film plane (i.e. the inner slit) shapes the image contortion significantly more than the other slit. Is this your experience as well? Also, do you have any explanation why in some slit configurations there is a lot of banding (thin black lines) forming over the image? Regards, Brigitte. Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras? inhole.com 07/11/2001 04:54 Please respond to pinhole-discussion Hi Mac, The format for the two images is 4x5. The rule of thumb I heard was to meter the scene at f90 and give it two more stops. This gives exposures of 1 or 2 seconds in bright sun with Ektachrome 64T (EPY). The few pinhole exposures I've made with 4x5 EPY were in the 16 second range. Naturally the slit exposure times can vary depending on the width and length of the slits; but I've found that this rule of thumb works well in almost all cases. (Also, I have a lab cross-process the EPY film to C41 and use the negative image to make color prints.) Tom - Original Message - From: SPRINGTYME font...@usa.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:24 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] slit cameras? Hi Tom! Thanks! What format? Was this 35mm? I think I'd like to give this a try. How do slit exposure times compare to pinhole? I'd gess a slit outputs a lot more light. Thanks Mac:-) ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] changing colours
OK, here is what I do: As a solvent I now use Seriwash which is a silk screen cleaner from Sericol. But I have used others in the past, i.e. various paint thinners like from Humbrol to thin enamel paints which come in tiny little pots, for painting models like tin soldiers, I believe.( I live in the UK so I don't know what other solvents are available elsewhere.) It is best to tape the watercolour paper onto a smooth surface (make sure the solvent doesn't harm the surface). I find glass is best. The xerox is then taped with masking tape (for more easy removal later on without tearing the paper) face down onto smooth surfaced or very lightly textured watercolour paper. Smooth is a must for beginners as it is difficult to get the colours into the dimples of the paper. The solvent is then applied to the back of the xerox with a cotton rag and pressure is applied with the back of the spoon. Some people use an extremely hard brayer. I find it easier to do a print in sections, i.e. to get the first inch transferred before moving onto the next one, and I only apply the solvent to a small section at a time because it takes some time to transfer and in the meantime the sections you are not working on are drying again and too many solvent applications sometimes make the colours run into each other. To check whether all you want to transfer has been transferred, carefully lift a corner of the xerox and take a look. Make sure to align it and tape it back down properly again. Also make sure that the no part of the sandwich moves during the transfer as you are applying quite a lot of pressure. The whole process has to be done in extremely good ventilation; I do it outside wearing rubber gloves and a face mask. Once a transfer is completed it takes a couple of days for the smell of the solvent to evaporate. I find it not an easy technique and to start with it requires a lot of patience until you have worked out the right solvent/paper/xerox combination . I use this process only for special images. You can transfer all or only parts of the image. I sometimes transfer only small parts of the edges of the xerox copy to give a feathered soft watercolour look edge. There might me some info on this process in the archives of the alt-photo-process list. Good luck, Brigitte. Guillermo pen...@home.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] changing colours inhole.com 16/08/2001 14:16 Please respond to pinhole-discussion - Original Message - From: brigitte.har...@london.glencore.com Or how about taking it further still. I get the xerox copies printed with the image reversed and then transfer the image with solvent onto watercolour paper. Prints done this way about 7-8 years ago show no visible changes in colour. Regards, Brigitte. I heard before of this technique but never sounded as a good thing to try, but now, it really does!! So let me ask you: could you give me specifics on the solvent you use and if possible the technique used to transfer the image? Pls, be as prolific as possible in your explanation. Many thanks Guillermo ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named
Re: [pinhole-discussion] changing colours
Or how about taking it further still. I get the xerox copies printed with the image reversed and then transfer the image with solvent onto watercolour paper. Prints done this way about 7-8 years ago show no visible changes in colour. Regards, Brigitte. Gordon J. Holtslander hol...@duke.usask.caTo: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] changing colours inhole.com 15/08/2001 15:42 Please respond to pinhole-discussion what about making a color xerox (or what ever brand copier) of the print. I don't know how archival the toners used in color copiers are, but they are likely better than the standard ink jet ink. These may be pigment based rather than dye based. If so there are likely far more stable. I knew a photographer once who was on a limited budget - shot everything on slides (a six by nine slides from a Makina - spent all his money on this camera!) - when he wanted a prints he took his slides to a color copying shop and made enlargments on the copier. He soon knew how to use the copiers better than most people who ran the shops. Took things a step further and cut up his color copies and made photo-collages, using his own and found images and copied the collage to make its final collage print. One could do this with a computer now. Oops but this isn't pinhole. That was ten years ago - I'll see if I have any of his color copy prints, and check whether they have degraded. On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Jan Hinderson wrote: Does anyone know a better alternative than Canons own colurs for their printers? I use a Canon BJC 7000 printer with Canon BC-60 Black ink and BC 62 Photo Color ink. I have not had any problems before, but in my last exhibition I hung my pinhole colour prints in a greenhouse where they have been exposed to direct sunlight all day for two months and upon that high humidity in the nights. And that was a bit too tough! In the last weeks of the exhibition the pictures began to lose some of the colour, they became paler and turned more to the green. The theme for the picuters is garden vegetation and from a philosophical point of view I can se the changes in the print colour as a parallell to the changes in nature when we are turning into late summer and autumn - but I don't think that the potential buyers of my pictures are willing to buy that kind of reasoning. So - is there a more resistant and safe printer ink on the market, that one can use in Canon printers? Jan Hinderson ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ - Gordon J. Holtslander Dept. of Biology hol...@duke.usask.ca 112 Science Place http://duke.usask.ca/~holtsgUniversity of Saskatchewan Tel (306) 966-4433 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Fax (306) 966-4461 Canada S7N 5E2 - ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the
Re: [pinhole-discussion] WWPD Gallery On Line: Thanks!
I must say, I am very impressed by the gallery, it's very quick and easy to view, and by all the wonderful images, of which I only have seen a fraction but can't wait to get back to when I get a minute. Thanks and congrats to the organizers and the participants! Regards, Brigitte. Gregg Kemp gregg.kemp@pinholevisionsTo: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? .org cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] WWPD Gallery On Line: Thanks! pinhole-discussion-admin@p inhole.com 12/05/2001 00:49 Please respond to pinhole-discussion At 09:17 AM 5/11/01 -0700, you wrote: Every time I hit the WWPD Gallery to see what's new, there are always a few more images that are absolutely amazing. Very, very well done! Thanks to all who organized and publicized, thanks to all who made and submitted great images, thanks for all who worked to do the excellent web site... thanks, thanks, and more thanks! Michael Georgoff San Jose, CA Michael, If I may speak for the rest of the coordinating team, thanks for the compliments on the web site. And I join you in saluting everyone who made plans and took photos on pinhole day. The imagination and diversity of the work shared in the exhibit has been a real joy - and something new every day! Congratulations to us all! The idea was born on this list and it has been a real whirlwind of effort to bring it to life. Thanks especially go to the hard work of Guy Glorieux, Jean Daubas, and Diana Bloomfield. These three people in particular assumed much of the responsibility for getting out the word and coordinating the development of a multi-language web site (12 languages). It would be hard to find any organization anywhere in the world able to accomplish such a feat in such a short time! And without a budget! Thanks also go to coordinating team members Larry Fratkin, Ed Levinson, George Smyth, Zernike Au (who had the original idea), Pam Niedermayer, and Guillermo Penate, plus the many volunteers around the world who translated web pages and promotional material into their native languages, and those who helped spread the word about pinhole day in all kinds of ways. I encourage everyone to take a look at the list of people who contributed to this event at http://www.pinholeday.org/org/?page=team and shame on anyone who hasn't seen the on-line exhibit (is that possible?). I regret there isn't a guest book or some other means of discussion on the pinhole day photos. But, this morning I added a link to send an email to individual contributors to the exhibit, if anyone would like to do so. And, of course, this discussion list can serve as a place to share anything related to pinhole day or the exhibit. And please speak up with any ideas for next year. Gregg _ Pinhole Visions at http://www.??? Worldwide Pinhole Photograhy Day at http://www.pinholeday.org ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] Finney is Back!
Yes, but the camera is such a beautiful object amidst my homespun devices. It is so well made with choice materials; it's an absolute pleasure to work with it! Regards, Brigitte. George L Smyth glsm...@yahoo.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent by: cc: pinhole-discussion-admin@pSubject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Finney is Back! inhole.com 20/04/2001 12:45 Please respond to pinhole-discussion --- Jeff Dilcher dilc...@cueva.com wrote: I would love to get one, but justifying it to my wife might be tricky! Has anyone here actually seen a Finney? I like the idea of the pinhole turret, but, I am wondering, if the bellows extension has preset stops to coincide with the various focal lengths. Also, I wonder if the the ground glass viewing screen is usable with pinhole... Is there any reason why a conventional lens/shutter can't be interchanged on this camera? I saved myself all kinds of money by not buying the camera and simply making several different pinholes corresponding to different bellows extensions. I even made lens holders from pie pan bottoms. Whenever I use my Pacemaker Crown Graphic for pinhole, I understand that the money I saved by doing this will allow me to buy more film and (especially) paper. Cheers - george = Handmade Photographic Images http://members.home.net/hmpi/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole and lith printing - A natural complement?
In my experience, the definitive book on lith printing is by Tim Rudmann. I think it is called 'A Master Course in Lith Printing'. Regards, Brigitte. Guy Glorieux guy.glori...@sympatico.caTo: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole and lith printing - A pinhole-discussion-admin@pnatural complement? inhole.com 16/04/2001 13:55 Please respond to pinhole-discussion Jean Daubas wrote: I wanted to post a very interesting resource book about lith printing where you could find excellent comparisons between conventional and Lith prints from the same negative. The book, which I find excellent on many other subjects (especially toning procedures) is : BEYOND MONOCHROME, a Fine Art Printing Workshop by Tony Worobiec and Ray Spence, (c) 1999 ; Published by : Fountain Press Ltd, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, UK ISBN 0 86 343 313 8 Thanks Jean, I looked for it at Amazon.com and they have it at just a little under $30.00. This is clearly on my list of books to get. Guy ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
RE: [pinhole-discussion] body as camera
The last issue of the Pinhole Journal had a nice drawing of just such a camera! Regards, Brigitte. |+--- || Andy| || Schmitt | || aschmitt@war| || wick.net| || | || 21/12/2000 | || 15:59| || Please | || respond to | || pinhole-discu| || ssion| || | |+--- | || | To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? | | cc: (bcc: Brigitte Harper/london/glen) | | Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] body as camera | | a butt cam...now there is a visualization that interfered with my cup of coffee... 8o) a self portrait perhaps? Wearing a pair of light tight pantaloons (speedos?)would give you a shutter. This should definitely be interesting andy -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Barry Muscavelli Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:49 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] body as camera I am considering using bodily orifices for pinhole photo's. Yeah I know that french guy used his mouth as a camera and that was pretty cool but it's been done. I will probably be limited to smaller formats so you can expect some graininess. I'll go into the darkroom hide a (400 ASA) 35mm black and white negative where the sun don't shine (I'll probably just load one frame at a time, not the entire roll as I have no film advance) then cover my cheeks w/ duct tape which I have pierced with a .025 mm pinhole, well grainy gritty images are what I'm gonna get! It will suit the whole thing quite well (don't try this at home , I have labored to find the correct location for the pinhole, and duct tape is designed to be difficult to remove) maybe I could use that camera tape that was discussed earlier. Any ideas? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole and polaroid
Mark, Yes to both questions. What do you need to know? Regards, Brigitte Harper |+--- || MARK POWER | || mpower@coven| || try.ac.uk | || | || 04/11/2000 | || 13:54| || Please | || respond to | || pinhole-discu| || ssion| || | |+--- | || | To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? | | cc: (bcc: Brigitte Harper/london/glen) | | Subject: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole and polaroid | | I'm interested in hearing from anyone who has used or is using Polaroid material in their pinhole photogrphy. Also would like to hear from anyone in the uk who is using pinhole. Mark Power, Coventry. ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
[pinhole-discussion] Re: Rain drives my PC crazy (was :Re: [pinhole-discussion] Newcomer)...
I thought it was quite funny! Regards, Brigitte. |+- || Jean Daubas | || jean.daubas@fr| || eesbee.fr | || | || 02/10/2000 | || 16:56 | || Please respond | || to | || pinhole-discuss| || ion| || | |+- | || | To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? | | cc: (bcc: Brigitte Harper/london/glen) | | Subject: Rain drives my PC crazy (was :Re: [pinhole-discussion] | | Newcomer)... | | Damned ! some surrealistic linguage transformations seemed to occur in my answer to Herbert'spost ! My eyes could not believe the strange words created by my PC -neither english, nor french- in my previous message : falling down all night long an thés mornifle toi. it. dis not privent me from. gong outsider on y mounda biche vit sevrage hand cameras : watt I lice in bade weber fis te opportunité to world vit vert long exposures The best readers have probably succeeded in retrieving the original truth (!) : (...) ...falling down all night long and this morning too. It did not prevent me from going outside on my mountain bike with several hand-made cameras : what I like in bad weather is the opportunity to work with very long exposures... (...) I begin to believe that my Text software is a pinhole text software, bringing us a vision upon words as strange and impredictable than the new reality of the world offerred to us pinholers by our funny black holes cameras. Apologizes for these distorsions (added to my bad use of english linguage!). Jean - Original Message - From: Jean Daubas jean.dau...@freesbee.fr To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Newcomer Original Message - From: Herbert Josef Gruenbauer hgr...@attglobal.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 1:19 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Newcomer Hello black hole experts ;-) . All the best to all of you from Munich City, Germany. Today it's rainig cats and dogs ;-) - no weather for pinhole camera photographers ;-). Have a nice day smile --- HERBERT Hello Herbert, welcome to the pinhole list ! About the weather : here, in the east of France, rain has been going on falling down all night long an thés mornifle toi. it. dis not privent me from. gong outsider on y mounda biche vit sevrage hand cameras : watt I lice in bade weber fis te opportunité to world vit vert long exposures recording lines of rain drops and the subtilities of rain drops hitting the ground just in front of the black hole as you name it... Wish you happy pinholing rainy hours !!! Jean -- -- Jean Daubas, auteur - photographe Rue de Bourg-Sec 25440 LIESLEFrance 03 81 57 50 13 jean.dau...@freesbee.fr Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ ___ Pinhole-Discussion mailing list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??? unsubscribe or change your account at http://www.p at ???/discussion/ STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message.
