[pinhole-discussion] slightly off topic - fresnel lens photography and a "scanner camera back"

2001-05-02 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
In particular I am looking at lenses such as sheet magnifiers found in OfficeMax
or a fresnel lens from an overhead projector.

This is related to pinhole photography in that both allow you to build an
extremely cheap cameras with unique photographic characteristics.  Pinholes give
your photos qualities related to diffraction focus.  I would imagine fresnel
lens photos would:

- have an extremely small depth of field due to a huge aperture (though an
aperture could, theoretically, be built)
- allow you to shoot in low light conditions due to a huge aperture
- produce a concentric ring pattern on the image due to the physical
construction of the fresnel lens (I don't know how I feel about this yet.  Maybe
there is an upside to this.)

Does anyone know of resources regarding fresnel lens photography?  It would be
great if someone has tried it or has some inspiring commentary.

One could use this with film.  I actually plan to use a flatbed scanner as a
high resolution digital camera back for this.  Not to worry, I will try pinhole
as well with the "scanner camera back" and report on the results in the future.

Thanks,

Jarred




[pinhole-discussion] materials for fiber optic pinhole

2001-04-16 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
If someone has time to try this out that would be great.  I play the
guitar in my spare time.  I went to buy a set of nylon strings for a
classical guitar and to my surprise 3 strings in the package were
clear-- long clear solid "fiber optic" tubes-- it's not what they were
intended for, but it will probably work if the material has an
appropriate index of refraction (I used to know the physics behind this,
I'd have to look it up).

Basically go buy yourself a set of classical guitar strings (make sure
it says "clear nylon"... also without the ball end would be best, though
either can be used if you cut the ball end off) and you will have
materials for three distinct cameras.  The three clear strings measured
exactly .0403", .0322", and .0280".  You can get other thicknesses as
well.  The strings cost about $8.00 for the pack (they come in sets of 6
for a guitar) and are about 4 feet long.

You want to cut both ends of your new fiber optic tubes perpendicular to
the length of the tube to ensure you have the flattest ends possible.
You do not want to round these because that will make a lens
(interesting to try later).  To get the pinhole effect, I believe you
will want the ends to be as flat as possible.

Good luck.  I wish I had the time to try this myself and report on the
results.  I can see some great pictures coming from the new equipment.

Jarred
http://www.cs.uml.edu/~jmccaffr/




[pinhole-discussion] fiber optic pinhole

2001-04-09 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
I have had an idea in the back of my mind for about a year and I am
wondering if anyone has tried it yet in an artistic way.  I am a college
student (studying computer science), so I have not had time to try it
myself.

Fiber optic tubes are the thin plastic tubes often used in fiber optic
decorations like false plant and light displays or fancy Christmas tree
toppers, etc.  Fiber optic tubing and cable is also used, in many
different forms and factors, in the electronics industry.  Light enters
one end of the tube, reflect off from the insides of the tube until it
reaches the other end, then exits the tube and is "focused" as a pinhole
would be.  You could think of it as a very long pinhole (not wide, but
long rather).

Fiber optic tubing would make a great pinhole.  Tubing is cheap, of a
known aperture, flexible, comes in lengths up to hundreds of feet
(inches are probably enough), and it is small enough to allow extreme
perspectives otherwise unachievable (imagine looking up at an ant using
an ultra thin fiber optic tube lens).

It is already in use in the "spy cam" industry, but I have yet to see
the art world take this up.  If anyone has tried (or does try) this, I'd
love to hear about it.  I am especially interested in what people do
with the extreme perspectives that are possible using thin fiber optic
tubes.

Have a great day,

Jarred McCaffrey




Re: [pinhole-discussion] December Mailing

2000-12-20 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
Just to clarify, I meant digital downloads.

Any thoughts?

Jarred McCaffrey wrote:

> How about making some high resolution prints available.  There are some 
> issues with
> distributing print quality files, but there is an audience (at least me, 
> probably
> more) that wants to view the photos close up and possibly honor the artist by
> printing for personal use.
>
> Jarred
>
> Guy Glorieux wrote:
>
> > Great idea!  Count me in also!
> >
> > Guy Glorieux
> > Montreal, Canada
> >
> > George L Smyth wrote:
> >
> > > --- James Kellar  wrote:
> > > > I would also like to announce that I will be organizing a print swap in 
> > > > the
> > > > up coming year. If your interested in participating start sending me 
> > > > your
> > > > ideas.
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.p at ???/discussion/
<>

Re: [pinhole-discussion] December Mailing

2000-12-20 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
How about making some high resolution prints available.  There are some issues 
with
distributing print quality files, but there is an audience (at least me, 
probably
more) that wants to view the photos close up and possibly honor the artist by
printing for personal use.

Jarred

Guy Glorieux wrote:

> Great idea!  Count me in also!
>
> Guy Glorieux
> Montreal, Canada
>
> George L Smyth wrote:
>
> > --- James Kellar  wrote:
> > > I would also like to announce that I will be organizing a print swap in 
> > > the
> > > up coming year. If your interested in participating start sending me your
> > > ideas.
> >
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/
<>

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Cracker Cam

2000-12-01 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
Personally, I like the larger images.  They take a bit longer, but I like
the extra detail.  One site had small images with the option to download or
view extremely large images (Megabytes).  I liked this very much.

Jarred

Andy Schmitt wrote:

> old post was...
> andy
> Hello Again,
>
> The URL is http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/divided.jpg
> .And again I'm sorry the image is s big. I hope I won't make that
> mistake again!
>
> "Keep on Pinholin'",
> Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
> [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of
> font...@usa.net
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 5:24 AM
> To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Cracker Cam
>
> Hello!
>
> Could I get the link again for the picture from the Cracker Cam. I can't
> seem to find the original post.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mac
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] zone plate image quality

2000-11-29 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
I have not done any experiments, but I am very interested in this topic.  
Ideally,
a physics person should be contacted for numerical answers (perhaps someone on
this list is a professor at a university and knows someone in the physics
department?).

Unfortunately, one of the qualities of zone plates and pinholes is that they
always have a single optimum wavelength of light, depending upon their
configuration.  Focus would not be perfect with that wavelength, but focus
decreases with wavelengths farther from the optimal.

It would be interesting to see the difference in focus between a pinhole or zone
plate used with full spectrum light versus using a filter to create 
monochromatic
light of the optimum wavelength.  The difference would likely be noticeable,
perhaps remarkable (or perhaps not : ) ).

Jarred

"Richard M. Koolish" wrote:

> I can think of a few things that might affect zone plate image quality,
> the number of zones, the density of the dark and light zones, the thickness
> or characteristics of the zone plate film.  Has anybody done some experiments?
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] OOps

2000-10-23 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
just type in the url exactly the way it is in your browser.  Cut and paste
is easiest.  For example:

http://www.yahoo.com

I typed in exactly "http://www.yahoo.com"; and your mail reader is smart
enough to realize it should be a link to a website.

Hope this helps!

Jarred McCaffrey

Tom Lindsay wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I forgot to tell you where to see the "51" Caddy. It's on the
> disscussion/upload list.
>
> "Keep on Pinholin'",
> Tom
>
> P.S. If someone would tell me how to do this the "correct" way I'd sure
> appreciate it. Because I see other peoples URLs to their uploads and
> wasn't quite sure what to do?
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] What wood you use???

2000-10-05 Thread Jarred McCaffrey
Whatever wood you use, there will be a possibility of warping.  Warping
occurs because not all parts of the wood dry (or absorb moisture if wood is
dryer than the air around it) at the same rate.  Professionals work with
warping by letting the wood acclimate to the environment (during which it
will do 99% of its shape changing) and then working the wood.  Though many
do not have the patience (or the time) it is recommended that you store your
wood in your environment for a full month before doing any work.

Jarred

HypoBob wrote:

> I recently make a pinhole camera out of 3/8 inch plywood and found,
> somewhat to my surprise, that I was having troubles with warps and bends
> in the plywood.  I had always thought that one of the pluses of plywood
> was that the plies canceled out the wood's tendency to warp.
>
> Therefore I am wondering what woods, or wood-like products, others have
> found to be good for constructing a sturdy, light-tight box.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
> ___
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.p at ???/discussion/