Re: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera

2002-10-16 Thread Joao Ribeiro
Hi Zami,

Sorry for the late reply.
The pinholes are 55 mm f 166 with a pinhole diameter of about 0.33 mm
and a 105 mm f 318.
Actually I prefer zone plate 35 mm photography, I don't like 35 mm
pinholes (At least I don't like mine).
I'll keep using the 4x5 cameras with pinhole. I transformed the 35 mm
pinholes into 2 new plastic lens to use with the camera. Now with this
35 mm camera and the extension bellows I am using 55 and 105 mm zone
plates and 390, 210 and 150 mm plastic lens, one of them in even a
composition of a positive and negative lens to give me a usable focal
distance.
Cheers
Joao

Zami Schwartzman wrote:

  Joaothanks for your reply Did you try a pinhole with it ? I wander
 whe hole size and focal lengt and what are the resultsZami

  -Original Message-
  From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
  [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of
  Joao Ribeiro
  Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:35 AM
  To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
  Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera
  Hi Zami,

  I have an old Yashica XYZ, I don't really remember the
  specs, but I found an adapter to use pentax thread lenses
  with it (it transforms the bayonet into a thread).
  I had some aluminum tubes made to fit this thread, so now it
  is easy to change focal distances and/or transform from Zone
  Plate to pinhole in no time. I even made a 300 mm plastic
  lens with an old pentax extension bellows, the aluminum tube
  and some black tape and it is working pretty well.
  Cheers
  Joao

  Zami Schwartzman wrote:

  Anyone has tried converting a 35 mm camera to pinhole ?
 
  I have modified  an old Pentax  Spotmatics Reflex camera ,
  the idea was that
  using a 35 mm format will make it easier to experiment
  with various types of
  films . film drive , sutter timing , tripod attachement
  and  release cable
  are already there  and any local photo shop will process
  the films  for me .
  I turned a lens boby on my lath that allows the metal
  foil be located 28
  mm from the film .
  I discovered that  with this camera  I can flip the mirror
  up permanently
  without disabling other camera functions ( except for the
  viewfinder that
  obviously is shut off )
 
  I use 0.02 mm copper foil .The pinhole  was made under a
  x70 stereo
  microscope by using a very sharp pin ( honed under the
  microscope  ) on hard
  back surface .
  the buurs on the oposit side had  to be very carefuly
  treated with no. 400
  sandpaper to get a perfect hole . Although not a sraight
  forward job , I can
  get perfect holes as small as 0.05 mm diameter ( I have
  scale on the
  microscope )  . there is no chance to get any smaller with
  manual pin
  puncturing tecniques .
 
  I experimented with a 0.1 mm hole , got some good close up
  pictures well
  exposed with Kodak gold 400 ASA( using f: 120 on the light
  meter ) but the
  results are  quite  out of focus  on 10x15  prints .
 
  I wander if going  further to a 0.05 hole will worth the
  panelty in  the f
  number .
  Is there an  optimun hole size  for best sharpness ?  or
  is it the smaller
  the better .
 
  I hear that some people are converting plastic 35 mm
  cameras  , I wander
  what holes they use  and how sharp is the resultant image
  they get .
 
  Zami
 
  -Original Message-
  From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
  [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of
  DAVID WALTERS
  Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:29 AM
  To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
  Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: New to the list and
  saying hello
 
  Evening, I apologize for the lag time on answering but
  I had a brief episode of file overload while trying to
  upload some pics (Sorry and thanks, Gregg). I have a
  pinhole from my last roll posted at
 
  
 http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/wal...@prodigy.net/lst?.dir=/Photo+art.src=ph;.
 
  order=.view=t.done=http%3a//photos.yahoo.com/
  (badge), along with some other pieces of mine. The
  body cap is on my Canon EOS, I measured the distance
  at 49 mm and I'm using a laser drilled opening of
  .0102, this gives an f/stop of 163, I reckon. Using
  the bulb setting has given me fairly good results with
  Kodak film, although it seems to be able to meter
  through the pinhole. The Polaroid pinholes are from a
  Polaroid 210 with a hand drilled pinhole, I had such a
  bad rolloff because of reciprocity that I have stuck
  with B/W since. I might go back to color with the 210
  and stick to extreme sun in the future, we'll see.
  Thanks for the welcome, David

RE: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera

2002-10-13 Thread Zami Schwartzman
Joao
thanks for your reply
Did you try a pinhole with it ? I wander whe hole size and focal lengt and
what are the results
Zami
  -Original Message-
  From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Joao Ribeiro
  Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:35 AM
  To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
  Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera


  Hi Zami,
  I have an old Yashica XYZ, I don't really remember the specs, but I found
an adapter to use pentax thread lenses with it (it transforms the bayonet
into a thread).
  I had some aluminum tubes made to fit this thread, so now it is easy to
change focal distances and/or transform from Zone Plate to pinhole in no
time. I even made a 300 mm plastic lens with an old pentax extension
bellows, the aluminum tube and some black tape and it is working pretty
well.
  Cheers
  Joao

  Zami Schwartzman wrote:

Anyone has tried converting a 35 mm camera to pinhole ?
I have modified  an old Pentax  Spotmatics Reflex camera , the idea was
that
using a 35 mm format will make it easier to experiment with various
types of
films . film drive , sutter timing , tripod attachement and  release
cable
are already there  and any local photo shop will process the films  for
me .
I turned a lens boby on my lath that allows the metal foil be located
28
mm from the film .
I discovered that  with this camera  I can flip the mirror up
permanently
without disabling other camera functions ( except for the viewfinder
that
obviously is shut off )

I use 0.02 mm copper foil .The pinhole  was made under a x70 stereo
microscope by using a very sharp pin ( honed under the microscope  ) on
hard
back surface .
the buurs on the oposit side had  to be very carefuly treated with no.
400
sandpaper to get a perfect hole . Although not a sraight forward job , I
can
get perfect holes as small as 0.05 mm diameter ( I have scale on the
microscope )  . there is no chance to get any smaller with manual pin
puncturing tecniques .

I experimented with a 0.1 mm hole , got some good close up pictures well
exposed with Kodak gold 400 ASA( using f: 120 on the light meter ) but
the
results are  quite  out of focus  on 10x15  prints .

I wander if going  further to a 0.05 hole will worth the panelty in  the
f
number .
Is there an  optimun hole size  for best sharpness ?  or is it the
smaller
the better .

I hear that some people are converting plastic 35 mm cameras  , I wander
what holes they use  and how sharp is the resultant image  they get .

Zami

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of DAVID WALTERS
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:29 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: New to the list and saying hello

Evening, I apologize for the lag time on answering but
I had a brief episode of file overload while trying to
upload some pics (Sorry and thanks, Gregg). I have a
pinhole from my last roll posted at

http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/wal...@prodigy.net/lst?.dir=/Photo+art.src=ph;.
order=.view=t.done=http%3a//photos.yahoo.com/
(badge), along with some other pieces of mine. The
body cap is on my Canon EOS, I measured the distance
at 49 mm and I'm using a laser drilled opening of
.0102, this gives an f/stop of 163, I reckon. Using
the bulb setting has given me fairly good results with
Kodak film, although it seems to be able to meter
through the pinhole. The Polaroid pinholes are from a
Polaroid 210 with a hand drilled pinhole, I had such a
bad rolloff because of reciprocity that I have stuck
with B/W since. I might go back to color with the 210
and stick to extreme sun in the future, we'll see.
Thanks for the welcome, David Walters

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera

2002-10-12 Thread Joao Ribeiro
Hi Zami,

I have an old Yashica XYZ, I don't really remember the specs, but I found an
adapter to use pentax thread lenses with it (it transforms the bayonet into a
thread).
I had some aluminum tubes made to fit this thread, so now it is easy to change
focal distances and/or transform from Zone Plate to pinhole in no time. I even
made a 300 mm plastic lens with an old pentax extension bellows, the aluminum
tube and some black tape and it is working pretty well.
Cheers
Joao

Zami Schwartzman wrote:

 Anyone has tried converting a 35 mm camera to pinhole ?

 I have modified  an old Pentax  Spotmatics Reflex camera , the idea was that
 using a 35 mm format will make it easier to experiment with various types of
 films . film drive , sutter timing , tripod attachement and  release cable
 are already there  and any local photo shop will process the films  for me .
 I turned a lens boby on my lath that allows the metal foil be located 28
 mm from the film .
 I discovered that  with this camera  I can flip the mirror up permanently
 without disabling other camera functions ( except for the viewfinder that
 obviously is shut off )

 I use 0.02 mm copper foil .The pinhole  was made under a x70 stereo
 microscope by using a very sharp pin ( honed under the microscope  ) on hard
 back surface .
 the buurs on the oposit side had  to be very carefuly treated with no. 400
 sandpaper to get a perfect hole . Although not a sraight forward job , I can
 get perfect holes as small as 0.05 mm diameter ( I have scale on the
 microscope )  . there is no chance to get any smaller with manual pin
 puncturing tecniques .

 I experimented with a 0.1 mm hole , got some good close up pictures well
 exposed with Kodak gold 400 ASA( using f: 120 on the light meter ) but the
 results are  quite  out of focus  on 10x15  prints .

 I wander if going  further to a 0.05 hole will worth the panelty in  the f
 number .
 Is there an  optimun hole size  for best sharpness ?  or is it the smaller
 the better .

 I hear that some people are converting plastic 35 mm cameras  , I wander
 what holes they use  and how sharp is the resultant image  they get .

 Zami

 -Original Message-
 From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
 [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of DAVID WALTERS
 Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:29 AM
 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
 Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: New to the list and saying hello

 Evening, I apologize for the lag time on answering but
 I had a brief episode of file overload while trying to
 upload some pics (Sorry and thanks, Gregg). I have a
 pinhole from my last roll posted at
 http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/wal...@prodigy.net/lst?.dir=/Photo+art.src=ph;.
 order=.view=t.done=http%3a//photos.yahoo.com/
 (badge), along with some other pieces of mine. The
 body cap is on my Canon EOS, I measured the distance
 at 49 mm and I'm using a laser drilled opening of
 .0102, this gives an f/stop of 163, I reckon. Using
 the bulb setting has given me fairly good results with
 Kodak film, although it seems to be able to meter
 through the pinhole. The Polaroid pinholes are from a
 Polaroid 210 with a hand drilled pinhole, I had such a
 bad rolloff because of reciprocity that I have stuck
 with B/W since. I might go back to color with the 210
 and stick to extreme sun in the future, we'll see.
 Thanks for the welcome, David Walters

 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/

 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera

2002-10-12 Thread G.Penate
- Original Message -
From: Zami Schwartzman zami...@netvision.net.il


 the buurs on the oposit side had  to be very carefuly treated with no. 400
 sandpaper to get a perfect hole . Although not a sraight forward job , I can
 get perfect holes as small as 0.05 mm diameter

FYI, such small pinhole would be optimum for a camera with a 1.85mm focal
length!!  A bit impractical, if you ask me!!

 I experimented with a 0.1 mm hole , got some good close up pictures well
 exposed with Kodak gold 400 ASA( using f: 120 on the light meter ) but the
 results are  quite  out of focus  on 10x15  prints .

-Your f/stop should be f/280 and not f/120.
-f/stop is given by dividing the focal length by the pinhole diameter (28/0.1 =
280)
-As pointed out by erick...@hickorytech.net, you should be using a pinhole
0.00784 which is equivalent to 0.2mm.  The 0.1mm pinhole is producing too much
diffraction.
-If you want relatively sharp 10x15 size results, I would suggest you shoot
medium format or larger.

 I wander if going  further to a 0.05 hole will worth the panelty in  the f
 number .

Only if you could mount that pinhole about 2mm from the film plane.  The
resulting image, BTW, would be a circular image no bigger than some 10mm in
diameter.

 Is there an  optimun hole size  for best sharpness ?  or is it the smaller
 the better.

Take a look to this http://members.rogers.com/penate/pinsize.htm

Guillermo






Re: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera

2002-10-12 Thread erickson
Yes, there is a pinhole diameter that will give best sharpness for each
distance from pinhole to film. The simplest version of the formula is
(distance to film in inches)(55) equals the square of the optimal diameter
in thousandths of an inch. In your case (1.12 inches)(55) equals 68.99, the
square root of which is 7.84 thousandths, or 0.00784 inches.- Original
Message -
From: Zami Schwartzman zami...@netvision.net.il
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 2:28 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm pinhole camera


 Anyone has tried converting a 35 mm camera to pinhole ?

 I have modified  an old Pentax  Spotmatics Reflex camera , the idea was
that
 using a 35 mm format will make it easier to experiment with various types
of
 films . film drive , sutter timing , tripod attachement and  release cable
 are already there  and any local photo shop will process the films  for me
.
 I turned a lens boby on my lath that allows the metal foil be located 28
 mm from the film .
 I discovered that  with this camera  I can flip the mirror up permanently
 without disabling other camera functions ( except for the viewfinder that
 obviously is shut off )

 I use 0.02 mm copper foil .The pinhole  was made under a x70 stereo
 microscope by using a very sharp pin ( honed under the microscope  ) on
hard
 back surface .
 the buurs on the oposit side had  to be very carefuly treated with no. 400
 sandpaper to get a perfect hole . Although not a sraight forward job , I
can
 get perfect holes as small as 0.05 mm diameter ( I have scale on the
 microscope )  . there is no chance to get any smaller with manual pin
 puncturing tecniques .

 I experimented with a 0.1 mm hole , got some good close up pictures well
 exposed with Kodak gold 400 ASA( using f: 120 on the light meter ) but the
 results are  quite  out of focus  on 10x15  prints .

 I wander if going  further to a 0.05 hole will worth the panelty in  the f
 number .
 Is there an  optimun hole size  for best sharpness ?  or is it the smaller
 the better .

 I hear that some people are converting plastic 35 mm cameras  , I wander
 what holes they use  and how sharp is the resultant image  they get .

 Zami




 -Original Message-
 From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
 [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of DAVID WALTERS
 Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:29 AM
 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
 Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: New to the list and saying hello


 Evening, I apologize for the lag time on answering but
 I had a brief episode of file overload while trying to
 upload some pics (Sorry and thanks, Gregg). I have a
 pinhole from my last roll posted at

http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/wal...@prodigy.net/lst?.dir=/Photo+art.src=ph;.
 order=.view=t.done=http%3a//photos.yahoo.com/
 (badge), along with some other pieces of mine. The
 body cap is on my Canon EOS, I measured the distance
 at 49 mm and I'm using a laser drilled opening of
 .0102, this gives an f/stop of 163, I reckon. Using
 the bulb setting has given me fairly good results with
 Kodak film, although it seems to be able to meter
 through the pinhole. The Polaroid pinholes are from a
 Polaroid 210 with a hand drilled pinhole, I had such a
 bad rolloff because of reciprocity that I have stuck
 with B/W since. I might go back to color with the 210
 and stick to extreme sun in the future, we'll see.
 Thanks for the welcome, David Walters

 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/



 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/