Bug#970721: xom: new releases available

[tony mancill]

Hi Andrius,

On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 09:58:18AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:

> > * diffoscope_198: not enough disk space to rebuild locally, will look
> > for another machine.
> 
> Does not fail with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

I was also able to build diffoscope_199 successfully with xom 1.3.7:

(diffoscope-199) sbuild 
--extra-package=/data/debian/sponsor/xom/build-area/libxom-java_1.3.7+ds-2_all.deb

> > After sorting these out I will upload xom v1.3.7 to unstable, unless
> > there are objections, of course.
> 
> This is my plan after the weekend.

Thank you for the update and clear communications regarding your
progress.

Cheers,
tony

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#970721: xom: new releases available

[Andrius Merkys]

Hello,

On 2022-01-06 11:04, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> I have just uploaded xom v1.3.7 to experimental and pushed the packaging
> to a branch. Test-rebuild with ratt of 137 was successful except for
> RC-buggy packages plus the following ones:

I have uploaded xom_1.3.7+ds-2 to experimental, fixing resurfaced
#970723. It seems this upload has fixed the remaining problems:

> * starjava-ttools_3.4-2: not sure if xom-related, will sort out in
> experimental

No longer fails with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * libeuclid-java_1.6-1: new upstream release uploaded, upstream
> mentioned updating to xom v1.3.*, will check in experimental

Uploaded libeuclid-java_2.0-1 to unstable, builds with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * cifxom_1.5+git20211217.ca2412c-1: not sure if xom-related, will sort
> it out in experimental

No longer fails with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * cmlxom_3.5-1: new upstream release is out, upstream mentioned updating
> to xom v1.3.*, will check in experimental

Uploaded cmlxom_4.0-1 to unstable, builds with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * diffoscope_198: not enough disk space to rebuild locally, will look
> for another machine.

Does not fail with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> After sorting these out I will upload xom v1.3.7 to unstable, unless
> there are objections, of course.

This is my plan after the weekend.

Andrius

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#970721: xom: new releases available

[Andrius Merkys]

Hello,

I have just uploaded xom v1.3.7 to experimental and pushed the packaging
to a branch. Test-rebuild with ratt of 137 was successful except for
RC-buggy packages plus the following ones:

* starjava-ttools_3.4-2: not sure if xom-related, will sort out in
experimental

* libeuclid-java_1.6-1: new upstream release uploaded, upstream
mentioned updating to xom v1.3.*, will check in experimental

* cifxom_1.5+git20211217.ca2412c-1: not sure if xom-related, will sort
it out in experimental

* cmlxom_3.5-1: new upstream release is out, upstream mentioned updating
to xom v1.3.*, will check in experimental

* diffoscope_198: not enough disk space to rebuild locally, will look
for another machine.

After sorting these out I will upload xom v1.3.7 to unstable, unless
there are objections, of course.

Best,
Andrius

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#970721: xom: new releases available

[Markus Koschany]

Am Dienstag, dem 04.01.2022 um 16:45 +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
> Hello,
> 
> I have packaged successfully packaged xom v1.3.7 locally and launched
> ratt to test-rebuild the reverse dependencies. 81 of 137 of them are
> done at the moment, all of the failures happened in already RC-buggy
> packages.
> 
> Is it OK for me to:
> 
> 1. Push my packaging to a branch in xom repo on salsa?
> 
> 2. Upload xom v1.3.7 to experimental?


Sure. Thanks for preparing the update!

Cheers,

Markus


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#970721: xom: new releases available

[Andrius Merkys]

Hello,

I have packaged successfully packaged xom v1.3.7 locally and launched
ratt to test-rebuild the reverse dependencies. 81 of 137 of them are
done at the moment, all of the failures happened in already RC-buggy
packages.

Is it OK for me to:

1. Push my packaging to a branch in xom repo on salsa?

2. Upload xom v1.3.7 to experimental?

Andrius

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#970721: xom: new releases available

[Andrius Merkys]

Source: xom

Hello,

debian/watch for xom is failing, but the watched site does not seem to
be up-to-date enough. The watched site provides a link to GitHub [1],
which contains many more recent releases. I suggest switching
debian/watch to GitHub site, and package the newest upstream from there.

Andrius

[1] https://github.com/elharo/xom/tags

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.