Bug#384507: libnsuml-java: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
tags 384507 + patch thanks Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:14:47PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: dpkg-source: extracting libnsuml-java in libnsuml-java-0.4.20 dpkg-buildpackage: source package is libnsuml-java dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.4.20-12 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386 dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 0.4.20-12 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean test -x debian/rules test `id -u` = 0 dh_clean You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [ant-sanity-check] Error 1 As debian/rules sets JAVA_HOME to /usr/lib/kaffe, kaffe has to be added as a build-dependency. The attached patch fixes this, and also corrects Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Indep. This package would probably need to be updated to use java-gcj-compat. Thomas --- debian/control- 2006-09-02 11:48:57.486717000 +0200 +++ debian/control 2006-09-02 12:31:45.403201750 +0200 @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), cdbs (= 0.4.21), jikes-kaffe (= 2:1.1.5), ant, libdtdparser-java (= 1.21), libjdom0-java (= 0.7b.20020216-3) +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), cdbs (= 0.4.21), kaffe (= 2:1.1.5), ant +Build-Depends-Indep: jikes-kaffe (= 2:1.1.5), libdtdparser-java (= 1.21), libjdom0-java (= 0.7b.20020216-3) Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: libnsuml-java ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#385727: marked as done (needs rebuild against libgcj7-0)
Your message dated Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:14:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#385727: Acknowledgement (needs rebuild against libgcj7-0) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gjdoc Version: 0.7.7-2 Severity: serious Hi, gcj-4.1 got uploaded to sid today changing libgc7 to libcj7-0. gjdoc needs to be rebuilt aginst libgcj7-0. Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-powerpc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gjdoc depends on: ii antlr2.7.6-6 language tool for constructing rec ii debhelper5.0.37.3helper programs for debian/rules pn java-gcj-compat | java1-runt none (no description available) ii libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-13 GCC support library pn libgcj7 none (no description available) ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime gjdoc recommends no packages. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.7.7-3 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has Looks fixed in 0.7.7-3 according to the changelog. Although it FTBSFed on ppc... Regards, Rene signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of ecj-bootstrap_3.2-3_powerpc.changes
ecj-bootstrap_3.2-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
ecj-bootstrap_3.2-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/e/ecj-bootstrap/ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.changes
gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb Override entries for your package: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: merge eclipse reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 356497 eclipse Bug#356497: libswt3.1-gtk-java: depends on mozilla-browser on i386 Bug reassigned from package `libswt3.1-gtk-java' to `eclipse'. forcemerge 356497 364368 Bug#356497: libswt3.1-gtk-java: depends on mozilla-browser on i386 Bug#364368: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), please transition to xulrunner Forcibly Merged 356497 364368. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: info on tomcat5 package
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:41:44AM +0530, Shobhit Jindal wrote: hello sirs, i wos disappointed to see that tomcat from debian repository is very old (5.0..30-10) wheras tomcat5.5(presently at 5.5.17) have been released long time back and thus requires a major upgradation am starting up as a debian new maintainer and would like to know if i can contribute in this package thanks -- Shobhit Jindal B.Tech. Part-III, Department Of Electronics Engineering, Institute Of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. Shobhit, I have replied to your ITP; tomcat5.5 is in experimental. The Debian Developers Reference is a great (and essential) guide to getting started; the specific secction on what to do before filing an ITP can be found here: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-newpackage While it only explicitly specifies checking the WNPP, the underlying assumption is that one will have checked the distributions as well for a pre-existing package. Best wishes in your endeavors and welcome aboard. Regards, -- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: http://www.alltc.com weblog: http://www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Bug#385678: ITP: Tomcat5.5 A Java Application Server
thanks Barry,am on way to package my first package :)plzz add me to the project tomcat5.5On 9/3/06, Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is already a tomcat5.5 package in experimental:i really missed on that and am definetly joiningDebian Java Packaging Project patches against the existing tomcat5.5 package are also welcome.the above package is based on tomcat 5.5.15 wheras the current is 5.5.17 and have been released in april is it possible on a upgrade to .17 or else should i work on the patch for .15 ?cheers-- Shobhit JindalB.Tech. Part-III, Department Of Electronics Engineering,ITBHUINDIA ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libglade-java REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the libglade-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.10.1-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon # 20060830; done 20060831 Bug #381648: FTBFS on ia64 (among other archs) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Bug#385678: ITP: Tomcat5.5 A Java Application Server
am still waiting for a response :(On 9/3/06, Shobhit Jindal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks Barry,am on way to package my first package :)plzz add me to the project tomcat5.5On 9/3/06, Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is already a tomcat5.5 package in experimental: i really missed on that and am definetly joiningDebian Java Packaging Project patches against the existing tomcat5.5 package are also welcome.the above package is based on tomcat 5.5.15 wheras the current is 5.5.17 and have been released in april is it possible on a upgrade to .17 or else should i work on the patch for .15 ? -- Registerd Linux User #426561-Shobhit JindalB.Tech. Part-III, Department Of Electronics Engineering, ITBHUINDIA ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
