Re: JAI in debian
Le 16 sept. 2009 à 16:00, Michael Koch a écrit : On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:38:48PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Does anyone knows where are the debian/* files. It seems Arnaud Vandyck did it at some point, according to: https://jai-core.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35 Nothing in pkg-java SVN. Perhaps Arnaud has them in his $HOME. I'm sorry, I don't find it :( -- Arnaud Vandyck avand...@gmail.com ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: [ECLIPSE] Vote for project management solution
I don't really care but don't forget to document whatever you choose. Thanks for taking care of Eclipse. Le 17-déc.-08 à 07:44, Pantelis Koukousoulas a écrit : Hello :) We need a project management system (aka bug tracker) to keep track of the tasks, who is doing what and our progress. We seem to have mostly 2 options for that: * An alioth project * A launchpad project I personally like launchpad a bit better due to a friendlier interface and because you can even assign milestones, but I 'm willing to go with whatever the team decides upon. IMHO the most important is to be able to get an account and start working with bugs painlessly and with no questions asked and no paperwork. It seems both the above solutions offer that? What would you prefer / be more comfortable with? Cheers, Pantelis ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers -- Arnaud Vandyck avand...@gmail.com ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: /usr/share/java as maven repository?
2007/12/29, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:35:54PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: Dalibor Topic wrote: I'm not sure if our ideas are really opposed: Certainly not, I'm all for doing rebuilds of reverse dependencies if possible. So do you have any plans on how to implement this? Should the rebuilding be done before uploading a new version, or will that take too long? Or should we just have an ongoing archive rebuild as a QA effort? I would vote for doing this before the upload to the archive. I have a buildd here configured to be able to rebuild all reverse dependencies of a package on request. I'm happy to to do this for everyone who asks. Unfortunately I cant put that machine available for everyone. Its a 4 way machine with a daily updated sid-mirror on disk. It can build amd64 and i386 currently. I work on being able to build for other archs too. This is excellent! ;-) Happy New Year! :-D -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: /usr/share/java as maven repository?
2007/12/18, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnaud Vandyck wrote: if mvn present: mvn install -DgroupId=... -DversionId=... -DartifactId=... /usr/share/java/my.jar If it's meant to be run in postinst then Maven might not be installed yet. Yes, I was thinking about putting the code in postinst... But I wonder how we are going to handle versioned dependencies. Maven projects tend to specify exact version numbers, right? That could be a real headache. I don't think we can ignore the version number, but we cannot use it as a hard dependency either. There is a -SNAPSHOT special versionning that could be used. But My first thought was to install the jar so: duplicate the jar with the exact version number: If you install liblog4j1.2-java 1.2.13-5, then, you'll have: /usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar - log4j-1.2.13 /usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.13.jar + /var/lib/maven/repository/log4j/log4j/1.2.13/log4j-1.2.13.jar (+sha, pom, etc) if you install liblog4j1.2-java 1.2.15-2, no more 1.2.13 in /usr/share/java but: /usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar - log4j-1.2.15 /usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.15.jar + /var/lib/maven/repository/log4j/log4j/1.2.13/log4j-1.2.13.jar (+sha, pom, etc) /var/lib/maven/repository/log4j/log4j/1.2.15/log4j-1.2.15.jar (+sha, pom, etc) The idea is to provide a local debian repo for maven. But maybe it's not the best idea! Other comments will be in other responses. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: /usr/share/java as maven repository?
2007/12/18, Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnaud Vandyck wrote: if mvn present: mvn install -DgroupId=... -DversionId=... -DartifactId=... /usr/share/java/my.jar The install:install-file plugin does almost what Arnaud suggests: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-installing-3rd-party-jars.html I know this plugin and that's why I proposed that solution ;-) I think if there is a correct settings.xml, we could do that. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: /usr/share/java as maven repository?
2007/12/19, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Paul Cager wrote: The install:install-file plugin does almost what Arnaud suggests: [...] But I wonder just how important it is to have a system-wide local repo? It would certainly reduce the number of Jars an end-user needed to download (clearly a good thing), but it seems like a lot of work (for us). I assume it's going to be a necessity for us for reproducible offline maven builds to inform maven about our own jars. That's the idea. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: /usr/share/java as maven repository?
Many thanks for the clarifications. So if we are talking about refactoring /usr/share/java, let's do it in some sort of Debian way. We'll write a wrapper around different build system to let them understand our layout. (is it what you meant?) ;-) 2007/12/19, Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnaud Vandyck wrote: To simplify things a bit I would suggest to convert /usr/share/java to something maven understands as repository instead of creating another repo. Maybe we can think about refactoring /usr/share/java, but why do we use the maven layout. I did not fully understand the remark from Dalibor about the undirection comments, but I understood don't bind to a specific way. Dalibor, was it what you explained (and I tried to understand)? There are several different build systems for java applications that support some form of a repository concept. They are also all kind of different in what the expected format of the repository is: Maven 1 Maven 2 Ivy bnd/OBR Raven JSR 277 Picking one over the other is hopeless, as we'll likely encounter applications and libraries using any of those in the future, in the same way how people just didn't stay happy with make/ant/etc. Such programs will likely depend on the same jars, just 'wrapped' suitably to make them 'visible' for each build system in the way it likes to see its repository, as poms, gems, ivy poms, bundles, jam files, etc. So I think the economical way forward is to add a layer of indirection between what the build tools see as their image of the repository formed by packages in /usr/share/java and the actual /usr/share/java binaries. That would let us support any current or future build system with any idea of what its particular repository layout should be, without having to pick one as a default, and having to switch to another default later, decoupling what we do inside /usr/share/java from a particular repository layout chosen by a build tool. I'd suggest solving the first problem on your list first, and only that problem for the next release. Once we have some experience with using maven to satisfy build requirements, I think we'll be able to make a more informed decision which of the three ways forward on the second problem to pick. cheers, dalibor topic -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: IBM JDK 6.0
Note that I have problems with this jdk and Tomcat6 + Struts2 + JPA + Spring. I got problems with JPA Transactions. Pointing to the old jdk6 from March 2007, everything work fine (like on x86 Sun's VM). 2007/12/17, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:36:48PM +0100, David Schmitz wrote: Hi, I only wanted to inform you that IBM has recently published its stable version of JDK 6.0. It would be nice if java-package would be capable to generate a working package of it. Do you know the URL for it? Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : Yes but not very active at the moment, but you are free to help of course: http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/TODO/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/package/tarballs$ svn co http://svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/package svn: Échec de la requête PROPFIND sur '/svn/pkg-java/package' svn: PROPFIND de '/svn/pkg-java/package': 405 Method Not Allowed (http://svn.alioth.debian.org) http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/argouml/debian/ http://svn.debian.org/ -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The goal was to awake mainteners... It seems to work. No it doesn't, I don't consider this bug serious and I merge it with two other bugs that were asking for new upstream. When you'll have your head in the build system and the hell dependencies, maybe you'll understand how a pain it is to package argouml. See the mdr license and source problem for example. Also, I don't have much time to dedicate to Debian ATM. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#439338: libtoolbar-java: new upstream 1.4
Package: libtoolbar-java Severity: wishlist Owner: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forwarded: http://toolbar.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Toolbar new upstream 1.4 will be available here: http://toolbar.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList When this bug http://toolbar.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13 will be solved. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#437136: tomcat5 (5.0.30) is not compatible with system installed ant 1.6.5
On 8/10/07, Cedric Veilleux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] On two different Etch installs, I had the following problem occuring when accessing JSP files that needed to be compiled: [...] What is: com.angkor.struts.filter.AngkorVersionAndLanguageFilter.doFilter(AngkorVersionAndLanguageFilter.java:109) [...] This looks like a bug in either Ant or Tomcat. I would suspect Ant, since the problem is that a NULL key is inserted into a Map inside the ant code base, which should be checked for. Does this error occured when disabling the Angkor Struts Filter? Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#419761: libstruts1.2-java new upstream 1.3.8
retitle 419761 libstruts1.2-java: new upstream 1.3.8 noowner 419761 thanks Hi, I had a look to this one but struts team changed the build system to Maven. Building Debian package with Maven is a work in progress AFAIK. Someone can reevaluation this bubg when building debian java package with maven will be more integrated. Thanks -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Account
You are in. I suppose michael added you. Welcome. On 7/31/07, Jan-Pascal van Best [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'd like to move the files in my private subversion repository (http://www.vanbest.org/websvn/) for the lucene2 and commons-csv Debian packages to the pkg-java svn repository on Alioth. I would like to have access to the pkg-java svn repository to do this and the java.debian.net site says I should ask on this list ... My Alioth account is janpascal-guest Cheers, Jan-Pascal ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#433745: libws-commons-util - FTBFS: You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory!
tag 433745 + patch thanks On 7/19/07, Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libws-commons-util [...] You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory! make: *** [ant-sanity-check] Error 1 Ant is missing from the deps. Also, why is this package called libws-commons-util and not libws-commons-util-java? -- Arnaud Vandyck Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (revision 3876) +++ debian/control (working copy) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Priority: extra Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: VladimÃr LapáÄek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs, ant Build-Depends-Indep: java-gcj-compat-dev Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Section: libs ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#433745: libws-commons-util - FTBFS: You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory!
On 7/19/07, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Also, why is this package called libws-commons-util and not libws-commons-util-java? package name is libwscommons-util-java, sorry ;-) -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: ArgoUML
[Cc to debian-java] On 6/20/07, Sylvere TEISSIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I just would like to know why the argouml package in Debian contrib (lenny/sid) is so old ? Have you stopped maintaining argouml? or do you have problem with this package ? or something else ? I'm unable to build it anymore as the depends on mdr which is not packaged in debian and is not free. If you wanna help, you can check the svn repo and submit patches (they are welcome). If you can build new upstream, I'll be glad to sponsor new upload (when I'll have some time). Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#426476: fop-ttfreader needs commons-logging.jar and commons-io.jar on classpath
On 5/29/07, Michalis Kamburelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fop-ttfreader script needs commons-logging.jar and commons-io.jar in CLASSPATH, just like the fop script for FOP 0.93. Otherwise I get errors like below. Hi Michalis, Thanks for your bug, can you try the attached fop-ttfreeader.sh script? Many thanks, -- Arnaud Vandyck fop-ttfreader.sh Description: Bourne shell script ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#426476: fop-ttfreader needs commons-logging.jar and commons-io.jar on classpath
On 5/29/07, Michalis Kamburelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I added pathSepChar=: on line 33, and then your script works fine. Yep! I forgot that! ;-) I patch and upload, thanks for your bug report. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#405851: Daemon fails to start with all JVMs; this is serious
On 5/19/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2007, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Also, a patch is already available. Yeah, kind of the point I was making; if you lack the time I can upload a package integrating this patch. No problem for me, I'm not the maintainer of jetty. Also, if you are interrested in the package, you could package new upstream, I filed a bug about it. Thanks, Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#425064: 0.93 don't works with asciidoc anymore
On 5/18/07, Alexander Wirt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] if I use fop to produce pdfs from asciioc I get a exception. If I use 0.20.5-8 everything works as expected. I'm no fop/xml expert so please enlight me where the problem is. Maybe it's something that hasn't been include in the package or in the classpath of the startup script. Can you try with the binary fop from the apache website so we can check if it's a problem with the new upstream or with the Debian package: http://www.apache.org/dist/xmlgraphics/fop/fop-0.93-bin-jdk1.4.tar.gz -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#425064: 0.93 don't works with asciidoc anymore
On 5/19/07, Alexander Wirt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The apache fop has the same problem. I don't see the bug in the database. Do you have the time to try to isolate the problem with the simpliest test case as possible and then file a bug in the Apache's Bugzilla? Then, we'll attach this bug to the apache one. Many thanks for your help and for filling this bug, Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#405851: Daemon fails to start with all JVMs; this is serious
On 5/18/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: How did you set the JAVA_HOME variable in /etc/default/jetty? I mean which value did you put in JAVA_HOME? I didn't set anything. And now that you set it to one of your jdk installed, is it working? Can I close the bug? -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#405851: Daemon fails to start with all JVMs; this is serious
severity 405851 normal thanks The package is usable when you set JAVA_HOME in /etc/default/jetty so I downgrade the severity of the bug. Also, a patch is already available. On 5/19/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2007, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: And now that you set it to one of your jdk installed, is it working? Can I close the bug? Uh, the bug is about the facts that Jetty doesn't start in the default install, even when people install the most common JVMs. This seems to be due to a hardcoded list of JDK_DIRS in /etc/init.d/jetty for which the original submitter provided a (now incomplete) patch. The fix should either be to update this list of JDK_DIRS or to use another way to set JAVA_HOME automatically. IOW, the bug is still present, please don't close. -- Loïc Minier -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#425152: jetty: New upstream 6.1.3
Package: jetty Severity: wishlist New upstream 6.1.3 available. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=7322package_id=208627release_id=505986 -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#405851: Daemon fails to start with all JVMs; this is serious
On 5/16/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Could not start Jetty servlet engine because no Java Development Kit (JDK) was found. Please download and install JDK 1.3 or higher and set JAVA_HOME in /etc/default/jetty to the JDK's installation directory. But I have gcj, java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.11, and java-6-sun-1.6.0.00... How did you set the JAVA_HOME variable in /etc/default/jetty? I mean which value did you put in JAVA_HOME? -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: tomcat5.5 package
On 3/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have installed tomcat5.5, and tomcat5.5-admin yesterday , and from there have strugled to use them. Yes, sorry for that. I have been put down by people at #tomcat at freenode for using debian's tomcat package since they are broken and have been for years You can sometimes come to #debian-java. Yes, we know and we are working to fix them. If you would like to help, please file bug reports for your problems, and in all cases don't forget to tell us exactly which version you are using. Also check the bug tracking system for known problems. Yes, don't hesitate to file bug reports! -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#423196: fop: libxmlgraphics-commons-java not available
Package: fop Version: 0.93.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal xmlgraphics-commons is a new lib needed by fop so it may take some time to enter the archive. As a temporary work around, you can add these lines in your /etc/apt/sources.list [EMAIL PROTECTED] deb http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/debian/ ./ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/debian/ ./ or just be patient and wait for xmlgraphics-commons to enter the official archive. Thanks for your understanding, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#423196: fop: libxmlgraphics-commons-java not available
block 423196 by 418996 thanks On 5/10/07, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] or just be patient and wait for xmlgraphics-commons to enter the official archive. this bug will disapear when xmlgraphics-commons will enter the archive -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: fop_0.93.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED
On 5/10/07, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16:33:08 man-di Ganneff: kannst du bitte fop in der NEW queue rejecten? 16:33:14 man-di reason: wrong section Thanks, sorry for that. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#422991: libgnumail-java: New upstream 1.1.2 fixes several bugs
Package: libgnumail-java Severity: normal From the annoucement: This is a bug fix and API compatibility fix release. Thanks to Boris Folgmann for discovering an issue with unique message-ids, and especially to Arend Freije for his work on API compatibility. ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/classpathx/mail-1.1.2.tar.gz -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Fwd: javassist_3.4.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED
Sorry, I forgot to reply to all... -- Forwarded message -- From: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: May 8, 2007 1:39 PM Subject: Re: javassist_3.4.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED To: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 5/8/07, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright file is buggy. You need to link to the full license texts in usr/share/common/licenses (or, if they arent there - include them). Sorry. I added a link to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1 and I upload it asap. Thanks for your time, -- Arnaud Vandyck -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#381128: argouml: sablevm isn't detected either
On 5/4/07, Eric Van Buggenhaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ argouml No JVM found to run ArgoUML ii sun-java5-jre [java 1.5.0-11-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment ( It should find this one but the startup script must be modified (see the one from eclipse). Anyway, sablevm couldn't start argouml AFAIK. JAVA_HOME=/path/to/your/vm argouml should work. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#421621: sid / tomcat5.5 dependencies
On 4/30/07, Vsevolod Krishchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In sid package tomcat5.5 depends on ecj-bootstrap, and ecj-bootstrap depends on ecj. So after installing tomcat5.5 I have ecj installed even if I got sun-java5 or sun-java6 or any other java already installed. Is it ok? Maybe we should depend on java2-compiler? and maybe ecj should provide java2-compiler Tomtac5 in not depend on ecj-bootstrap. sight. Thanks for your help, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#366783: Re: Bug#366783: fop works with gij and classpath
On 4/16/07, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, Hi Roger, Has any progress been made with getting fop to work with gij/classpath so it can move into main. I would like to Build-Depend on it, so it would be absolutely fantastic to have a fully free fop in main. Yes it'd be fantastic be it's not possible at the moment. I'm working on this and I packaged xmlgraphics-commons which is now needed by FOP. I realized that xmlgraphics-commons will need to be built by non-free jdk because of some jpeg and tiff codecs from Sun (they are not yet implemented in free class library). Also, as Sun is releasing openjdk, we can soon integrate parts of the api in other free libraries, then, it'll be possible to move it to main. Thanks for your interest, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Processed: Take ownership of some JTA bugs
I love this owner practice, now everybody knows who is working on which bugs! Lovely java team! :-D On 4/13/07, Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: owner 393377 ! Bug#393377: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Owner recorded as Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]. [...] -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#418962: tomcat5.5: Should not use relative symlinks
On 4/14/07, Mike Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The issue with symlinks still stands though, albeit a very minor issue now. Also, I am curious as to whether the changes made to /var/lib/tomcat should in fact be made to CATALINA_BASE or whether we should recommend that certain parts of CATALINA_BASE be pointed at their /var/lib/tomcat equivalents? after fixing the symlink error above, I am concerned that security patches and or updates might not make it to my system because of my choice to host the server under the /srv/ mount. In my POV, if you change the location of tomcat, you break the installation! I have multiple tomcat installed on my system and the Debian one just works fine. Marcus, if you have the time to investigate, thanks, otherwise, I think we should close the bug or tag it wontfix. Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#397562: batik: FTBFS: should use java-gcj-compat-dev instead of j2sdk1.4
On 4/13/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea, but you may run into trouble with #397817 (libgcj7: JPEG encoder missing in javax.imageio). It seems Thomas Fitzismon is taking care of the problem with batik (it should use xmlgraphics-commons) and about gcj, you are right :'( -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#397562: batik: FTBFS: should use java-gcj-compat-dev instead of j2sdk1.4
On 4/13/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems Thomas Fitzismon is taking care of the problem with batik (it should use xmlgraphics-commons) Do you mean that xmlgraphics-commons can replace the com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.* package? I am interested because I ran into the same problem with another package (stylebook). I'm not sure but it's a package where fop and batik will share code. About the jpeg codec, Roman Kenke told me it would be possible to put the one of openjdk in GNUClasspath in a mounth or two -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#418864: argouml: remove dependency against libxerces-java
Package: argouml Severity: wishlist Please remove dependency against libxerces-java. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#418865: libgef-java: remove dependency against libxerces-java
Package: libgef-java Severity: wishlist Please remove dependency against libxerces-java. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#418973: commons-io: New upstream 1.3.1
Package: commons-io Severity: wishlist new upstream 1.3.1 available: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-io.cgi -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#333164: libasm-java: Is there still work done on libasm2-java?
On 3/18/07, Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] So, is still someone working on libasm2-java (if possible 2.2)? The message that it should come in the next future is almost 2 years old... I think we'll need different versions of asm. I think Michael Koch is working on it. If somebody works on asm, please, change the lib version in API incompatibilities. I think there are incompatibilities between 1.x, 2.x and 3.x series. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#416674: libmx4j-java: New upstream release 3.0.2
tags 416674 - pending thanks On 3/29/07, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 06:30:05PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: [...] Version 3.0.1 is in the NEW queue and available from my repo at 3.0.1 is pending, not 3.0.2, sorry for the bad tag. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#416674: libmx4j-java: New upstream release 3.0.2
Package: libmx4j-java Version: 2.1.1-4 Severity: wishlist New upstream of mx4j should solve the build problem of c3p0 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#416674: libmx4j-java: New upstream release 3.0.2
On 3/29/07, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New upstream of mx4j should solve the build problem of c3p0 No, it'll not. Even if it'd be a good thing to have a new mx4j, the blocking bug here is missing java.lang.management.ManagementFactory#getPlatformMBeanServer method missing in gcj. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#412478: tomcat5.5: should load capability module if required
tag 412478 +wontfix thanks On 2/27/07, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tag 412478 -wontfix +upstream Marcus, I think you were right about the wontfix tag. Also, if it's upstream fix the bug, then we can close it. The wontfix tag means we don't want to fix it in the package, but if it's fixed upstream, it'll be ok. Don't close the bug so people with the same problem can see it and maybe comment it. Thanks, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Anybody working on Sun's JavaHelp .jar (GPLed)
On 1/14/07, Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my haploview ITP needs JavaHelp which is distributed as a GPL jar from Sun at https://javahelp.dev.java.net/. Has anybody of yours worked on that already? No ITP? Go and file one ;-) Another issue is the JIMI Java Imaging Library from http://java.sun.com/products/jimi/. Is there any .deb bringing it? JIMI is Sun Microsystems, Inc. Binary Code License, so it's non-free. It's super great that Sun goes freesoftware, but all their libs are not! :'( I don't know how we can ask or who?... .. Maybe Tom Marble ;-) Cheers, PS: See you at the FOSDEM Tom ;-) -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Possible bug in Xalan?
On 1/6/07, Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Samstag, den 06.01.2007, 14:44 +0100 schrieb Arnaud Vandyck: [...] And 2 different version of jaxp? [...] /usr/share/java/jaxp-1.3.jar /usr/share/java/jaxp-1.2.jar openoffice.org-java-common depends on libjaxp1.2-java Xalan2 and Xerces depend on libjaxp1.3-java (and openoffice.org-java-common again depends on Xalan2 and Xerces) So if openoffice.org is installed (which is the case for me), you will have both versions of jaxp on the system. Can you please file a bug against OpenOffice (and you can reference this buug report). They should not depend on jaxp1.2 if Xalan/Xerces depend on jaxp1.3 Thanks, Cheers, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: ITPs for packages in pkg-java ?
On 1/6/07, Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just browsed through the pkg-java svn and happened to find an entry for wsdl4j 1.5.x. I just submitted a package for a newer upstream version 1.6.2 to my sponsor but was not aware of your effort. And this happened although I am on the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list. What would have helped would have been an ITP. Maybe it would be reasonable to submit ITP for all the packages in svn at least? I was not aware of this package neither. Looking at the debian/changelog, it's tashiro, aka Stephan Michels who did this preliminary work back Januray 2006. I'm not sure how is the package and I don't know if Stephan want to maintain it. Maybe he'll voice, I'm cc'ing him. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Possible bug in Xalan?
On 1/5/07, Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I simply try to process an XML file with Xalan2/Xerces and I receive a segmentation fault with Sun Java and Exceptions with GCCs GIJ. The gij just says: Exception during runtime initialization Sun Java says # # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb792353f, pid=20827, tid=3084638432 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_10-b03 mixed mode) # Problematic frame: # V [libjvm.so+0x30853f] # # An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid20827.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp # The file is attached. What is your opinion? Where is the bug? The XML file is valid (tried several files). Is it reproducible for you? You have a lot of things in your classpath. Maybe you could try the same application or test class with only the xerces jars (and xalan if you want transformations). Also, why do you have libgcj [...] b4ad8000-b5636000 r-xs 03:43 3345035 /usr/share/java/libgcj-src-4.1.zip b567-b5e97000 r-xs 03:43 3344179/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.1.jar [...] And 2 different version of jaxp? [...] b5fc7000-b5ffb000 r-xs 03:43 3346275/usr/share/java/jaxp-1.3.jar b5ffb000-b601c000 r-xs 03:43 3346274/usr/share/java/jaxp-1.2.jar [...] and gnujaxp? b6413000-b64b5000 r-xs 03:43 3346259/usr/share/java/gnujaxp-1.3.jar and crimson? b67d7000-b680a000 r-xs 03:43 3346237 /usr/share/java/crimson-1.1.3.jar Maybe reducing the number of jar will do the trick. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#366808: libmysql-java: New upstream version
On 12/26/06, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Except it's a new upstream, did you make a lot of changes to the 'debian section' of the package? Yes, because I didn't initially target etch. Some changes were necessary because of the new version, some were just convenient. Ask Release Manager to get the new connector for Etch. Ok. If they don't accept it I'll try to make a version with smaller changes. Many thanks for your work Marcus, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#366808: libmysql-java: New upstream version
On 12/26/06, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The new version of the MySQL connector, which is about to be uploaded, will probably not make it to etch (since the upstream version changed). If the release managers do not make an exception, then I would rather let the package be dropped from etch altogether, which is why I have raised the severity to serious. Except it's a new upstream, did you make a lot of changes to the 'debian section' of the package? The current version of the MySQL connector does not work well with MySQL 5, the version of MySQL in etch. Releasing etch with the old version will only lead to irritated users and yet more bug reports. Are there any strong feelings about this? Ask Release Manager to get the new connector for Etch. If it's not possible, it's better to remove the old one. I also had some problems with the old connector and MySQL5. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#400791: gjdoc: uninstallable on arm
On 12/4/06, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I therefore propose to do a porter NMU. The diff is available below. I plan to upload it tomorrow evening if I got no news from you. Salut Aurelien, Thanks for your patch. I'm updating it right now and will upload it asap. diff -u gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/changelog gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/changelog --- gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/changelog +++ gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gjdoc (0.7.7-6.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Porter NMU. + * Use back gcj-dbtool-4.1 and gij-wrapper-4.1 on arm (closes: bug#400791). + + -- Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:17:57 +0100 + gjdoc (0.7.7-6) unstable; urgency=low * Use gcj-4.1, not gcj. diff -u gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/rules gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/rules --- gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/rules +++ gjdoc-0.7.7/debian/rules @@ -21,13 +21,8 @@ GCJ=$(GCJ) \ ANTLR_JAR=$(ANTLR_JAR) -ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),arm) - DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += JAVA=true - GCJ_DBTOOL = /bin/sh $(CURDIR)/debian/fake-dbtool -else - DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += JAVA=/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1 - GCJ_DBTOOL = /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.1 -endif +DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += JAVA=/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1 +GCJ_DBTOOL = /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.1 DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS = --disable-native --enable-xmldoclet -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#349779: Further Information
On 11/29/06, Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I'm interested in BCEL I thought I would do a little further investigation of this problem. [...] I have verified that this fix has been incorporated in the latest release of BCEL (5.2), so presumably we could close this bug by packaging the new upstream release. Thanks for your investigation -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#395400: please Provides: jar for the sdk packages
On 10/31/06, Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Users don't usually build the package themselves, do they? And if they do, they are supposed to install the required build environment. In this case the required dependency (fastjar) is really small too. Virtual packages in build-deps are evil. And MUST be avoid! -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#397045: ant: unable to locate tools.jar
On 11/4/06, commi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: ant Version: 1.6.5-6 Severity: important [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ant --version Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4 .1-1.4.2.0/lib/tools.jar [...] ii java-gcj-compat 1.0.65-7 Java runtime environment using GIJ Can you install 'java-gcj-compat-dev' and retry and give us some feedback? Many thanks for your help, -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#358712: Hints for changing thestart/stop level
On 11/14/06, Andreas Beckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Arnaud, Hi Andreas, to change the update-rc.d invocation in the postinst script, add the following line to debian/rules: Thanks, I'll try to apply this asap. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#395525: rhino: FTBFS: fails to build if no network access is available
tags 395525 + confirmed thanks On 10/27/06, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package failed to build on i386. Relevant parts: get-swing-ex: This is needed for the debugger tool. A solution could be to drop the debugger tool from the package. We have to patch the file: toolsrc/org/mozilla/javascript/tools/debugger/build.xml or the toolsrc/build.xml file. -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#396334: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: /libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/build.xml:46: Error running jikes compiler
tags 396334 + pending tags 396334 + confirmed thanks On 11/3/06, Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] with the attached patch 'libcommons-jexl-java' can be built on unstable. Thanks for your patch, sorry for the 'uncomplete cleanup' of the latest upload. I'm building it and will upload it asap (I'm commiting the modifications to subversion right now) -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#395366: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: sablevm: cannot create vm
tags 395366 + pending thanks On 10/26/06, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] sablevm: cannot create vm make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1 I'll build with java-gcj-compat-dev Thanks for the report -- Arnaud Vandyck ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#393905: tomcat5.5: JSP broken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Better wrote: This is caused by an incorrect tagPlugins.xml file, as pointed out here: And the reason is that this file was taken from libservlet2.4-java which is based on an older Tomcat package, with an incompatible tagPlugins.xml. This bootstrap situation with libcommons-el-java needs to be resolved somehow. As a first step I suggest removing the servlet and JSP examples from libservlet2.4-java, they do not seem to belong there. Agreed, Marcus, can you do that? Many thanks, - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFOO5k4vzFZu62tMIRAqnJAKCl6fJJYF+b3QGLMxzIEwrdbQxh9ACggu/y a+20CQzx8xGkzRoKOwXUqUM= =UjGD -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#390148: libxalan2-java: serializer.jar is missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Better wrote: Arnaud, could you commit the source for the experimental Xalan2 package to the svn repository please? I would like to fix this bug, it's blocking other stuff. done. You can upload it to unstable, thanks, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFNLVZ4vzFZu62tMIRAoFPAKCP83X4sx7I+6h+2TdUZkGiY1kZAQCgkl5L e8W+H69Rb3hP5ePjg++Iufo= =2smP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#390148: libxalan2-java: serializer.jar is missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Better wrote: Arnaud Vandyck wrote: done. You can upload it to unstable, thanks, I'm ready, but first we need to upload the experimental libxerces2-java to unstable. Can you do that please? libxerces2-java's just been uploaded. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFNQSn4vzFZu62tMIRAlo4AJ0fKx5zn+1/wUzj9TqFytlH1c0m0wCfUY2x tHfaAMrh2bp1uBbGnTCJRBU= =BXDN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#388617: tomcat5.5: fails to start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 388617 + pending thanks Andrew Vaughan wrote: On Friday 22 September 2006 20:58, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Shobhit Jindal wrote: [...] /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.08: tomcat5.5. It's a strange location... /usr/lib/jvm is used a couple debian packages on my mixed testing/unstable system. Seems a fairly logical place to group jvm implementations. [...] $ ls -al /usr/lib/jvm/ [...] lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root23 2006-07-18 13:10 java-1.5.0-sun - java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.07 drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 2006-07-18 13:10 java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.07 The strange location is ...1.5.0.08. I've added /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0 in the path, but not the .08. Cheers, - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFKlb94vzFZu62tMIRAlHaAKCZXGvEdC0Eo7uU1W1LoCan1p7y0wCeO1ry bOvlsj/9n/GkwEv9ILdf+ts= =/767 -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: RFS: xml-im-exporter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Baumann wrote: Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Are you still looking for a sponsor to upload xml-im-exporter? I sponsored it a while ago, it's sitting in NEW. Thanks. - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFGOkT4vzFZu62tMIRAieSAJ4+kWhKVVrjFfBVTOPjf18gqEHPDQCfVfVU b6tGHJRfpnGR6wsUFgYxlHI= =fI9N -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#388617: tomcat5.5: fails to start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 388617 minor thanks Shobhit Jindal wrote: [...] /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.08: tomcat5.5. It's a strange location... offcourse i can set JAVA_HOME in as suggested by the scripts message but it must do so automatically :) Yes, you can ;-) I downgrade the severity of this bug because it's related to the path of a non-free package. Cheers, - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFE8Hy4vzFZu62tMIRAkNdAJ0b7nCzCrg5kaueeHbCYBy+B53eMgCfbWlt PjKdRxM5TxPxIM0q9pHaOvw= =n1tG -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Hijacking JaxMe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Better wrote: Hi, since the packaging of JaxMe seems to have stalled and it's blocking other things, I'm thinking of simply finishing it up and getting it uploaded, starting from Wolfgang's work: http://www.home.uos.de/wbaer/downloads/ForUpload/ Any objections? Maintainer: pkg-java? ok. - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDrCv4vzFZu62tMIRAq71AJ94O86FER7c85ABvPai/eQn9AP/RQCcCQsR eSHwpXBsIIegyK+h/kk5tlw= =Aa2G -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#387835: diff for 2.8.5-1.1 NMU of libgtk-java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luk Claes wrote: Attached is the diff for my libgtk-java 2.8.5-1.1 NMU which I'll upload to DELAYED-2. Thanks for your help, - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDrFZ4vzFZu62tMIRAjXxAKC7EA9NEDjpFo1i4A1v7ZefMceEtACgss39 9tTlF38BoeqsWhh6i24CTFs= =mhP7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#376219: Current status?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Brakhane wrote: What's the current status of 3.2? Any chance that it will be included in Debian soon? Michael is working on it. He is very busy, but I think he is nearly ready to upload (if it's not been done yet). - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDrMr4vzFZu62tMIRAp9pAJ9dBlUltVv3blBbYEIa5I0QQzB9xgCgqTgv zlnoktSAhxnVBnQgyobkjEQ= =i2t7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#384357: Intent to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Margarita Manterola wrote: I have reviewed Arjan's patch, and it is correct, thus, I intend to upload it as an NMU to fix the bug and allow the package to build correctly. Thanks for your work. - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDrSh4vzFZu62tMIRAqzkAKCL90lNyh7bx9ejJ79bWlD/Q4Kr+wCgl3DI XObcxn7pod5oU430D7rF44A= =Fhig -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#386421: Fixed in NMU of libnsuml-java 0.4.20-12.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: [...] libnsuml-java (0.4.20-12.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Patch from Thomas Girard: + Build-Depend on kaffe. (Closes: #384507) + reorder Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Indep. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.2. * Make linda happy: + to use debhelper.mk you currently must Build-Depend on at least debhelper (= 4.1.0). Thanks for your work. Why did you put ant and kaffe in build-dep and not in build-dep-indep? - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDraf4vzFZu62tMIRAgDaAKCP/uqu6bXplRwGNbve02BcZHXd4gCdGZs9 Gam0vYy2gdCrc2dC65FKmlY= =kbc7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#316580: tomcat4 with kaffe and security manager does not start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This bug should have been close with new upload of kaffe - -- Arnaud http://www.ressource-toi.org Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFCn0h4vzFZu62tMIRAlSuAJ9kIxrRPYtEySTJU0lvO++dKtgaKQCeJrtg IjYAg4XoTc332wAc9BehRyU= =5X74 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#279839: tomcat4: Server dies reproducibly with cannot open, display when using JButton in .jsp.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Eugen, Can you please test this bug with tomcat5.5 and an up-to-date 'unstable' distribution? We are dropping tomcat4 from Debian and I'd like to know if the bug is still present in tomcat5.5 (can you then reassign the bug to tomcat5.5) or if you can just close it. Many thanks for your help. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFCUra4vzFZu62tMIRAt2SAJ9VtU6DMW8smYrP37rWJpQXpGlbkwCeJpY3 s2U0xliNIh0lnGEaY0Nn6CE= =XLDJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#294741: Foreign characters lost at start (Bad UTF-8 decoding)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reassign 294741 tomcat5 stop Stephane Leclerc wrote: I Arnaud! I no longer use Tomcat4 but I still have the same bug with Tomcat5 5.0.30-10 and Sarge uptodate. May be this can be transfered to Tomcat5? I've not tried the 5.5 version. Thanks. - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFCWnn4vzFZu62tMIRAvk9AKCAHaMG+T2ETbLP8fZX5iwkRhT0owCfVX96 3GOVvaPS9eJ0UFdLNmf+Tvg= =alge -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kalle Kivimaa wrote: Ruben Puettmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes this would be the best way. Cause so it is posible that tomcat5 and tomcat5.5 runs on the same Server with different users. But if you do you must keep the people in mind that already has installed the package. I think the better way would be to check at remove/purge if the other package is installed, and if yes, not to remove the tomcat5 user. That way we could even replace it with a (IMO) more sane tomcat users. OK, I'll try to patch the postrm script - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFCB2g4vzFZu62tMIRAhrNAKCVtkv+AB8x6uX1//5UJRft2NAtvwCgodIp WszQn6qkaqwaqjG62QAEJwo= =qZsT -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: tomcat5.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kalle Kivimaa wrote: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And does it work with tomcat5.5? Haven't tested it against it, has the webapp config changed at all from 5.0? - From 4.x to 5.5 yes. I think there are things that used to work with t5.0 that are no more allowed with t5.5 - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFBrCx4vzFZu62tMIRAkg7AJ4/An1IhSDng5A6d3b5UwiXXOO9VgCdGZtc nSDL9cIEds+bmHwDB/swKTY= =XuJs -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#383637: FTBFS: tomcat5.5 from experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthias Klose wrote: [javac] 6. ERROR in /home/packages/java/tomcat5.5-5.5.15/container/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/an [javac] t/jmx/JMXAccessorTask.java [javac] (at line 41) [javac] import javax.management.remote.JMXConnector; [javac]^^^ Hi Matthias, It's strange, I don't have the FTBFS here. This class is in mx4j-remote.jar which is in package libmx4j-java. Can you try to reproduce with the tomcat package I'm uploading in unstable? - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFBrGY4vzFZu62tMIRAvUuAJ9zE3yvnW7t1JuozTejVc7yO6E06gCgn/b1 zMj3EATaqI6a/gkMshViwPg= =BPei -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 386831 + help thanks Ruben Puettmann wrote: Package: tomcat5.5 Version: 5.5.15-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental I installed tomcat5.5 on an system which hast tomcat5 from etch installed. After that I want remove the tomcat5 packages, cause tomcat5.5 is runnig well. tomcat5 removed the user tomcat5 so that the tomcat5.5 could not be startet anymore. I don't know how to solve this issue. A solution could be to change the user of tomcat5.5 as tomcat5-5. Thanks for help on this bug. - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFBraF4vzFZu62tMIRAkHbAJ99x1rILRCjsEPYdh8W0OdRGvyCugCfZO9S 7Y9elPYvPGOJ8YdpWq9d4Qw= =rXry -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Arnaud Vandyck n:Vandyck;Arnaud org;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 de Li=C3=A8ge;STE-Formations Informatiques adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:B=C3=A2timent C1;;Rue Armand St=C3=A9vard, 2;Li=C3=A8ge;;4000;Belgique email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title;quoted-printable:Attach=C3=A9 (formateur) tel;work:+32 4 366 90 55 tel;fax:+32 4 366 90 59 tel;home:+32 4 349 09 69 tel;cell:+32 486 31 10 47 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ste.fapse.ulg.ac.be/ version:2.1 end:vcard ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#355240: tomcat5: Recursive Tag files modification check causes StackOverflowError
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think I found the patch in the subversion repository, I'll try to apply it... - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFBtQj4vzFZu62tMIRAjLIAJ9Bn3yCmKmwY2Whn9wFkb3JISPbmACfWH38 yITsx921ZjFNXDGKScbZV9M= =BYJ0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: tomcat5.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kalle Kivimaa wrote: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please note that we want the tomcat5.5 package to be in main so it must be buildable und runable with a JDK from main. ... a free one (as in DFSG). There are only free JDK's in main :) ;-) ObShamelessPlug: JSPWiki is finally in main. And does it work with tomcat5.5? - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE/+0q4vzFZu62tMIRAqlQAJ0f8IDMAUxDzrpETvQ8jPcmVvA1kgCfY79M XRYexTjzkhRmNCy0XaXSVLA= =ZEKW -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#385678: ITP: Tomcat5.5 A Java Application Server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shobhit Jindal wrote: am still waiting for a response :( On 9/3/06, *Shobhit Jindal* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks Barry, am on way to package my first package :) plzz add me to the project tomcat5.5 You don't need to be on pkg-java to get the svn work, read is public. You don't need to be part of pkg-java to send patches and to subscribe to mailing lists (please continue the discussions on debian-java) On 9/3/06, *Barry Hawkins* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] patches against the existing tomcat5.5 package are also welcome. the above package is based on tomcat 5.5.15 wheras the current is 5.5.17 and have been released in april is it possible on a upgrade to .17 or else should i work on the patch for .15 ? I don't think there is a need for a patch, using the new upstream tarball should be enough. I'll try to be in sync with my Debian packages asap. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE/VSb4vzFZu62tMIRAiRUAJ4jRU8qJTpoCbz15tTlwg7dc9u+dgCgsFxC eJ7FDhvXHy9Frml3YfBYGWw= =PFd1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#315038: tomcat5: Tomcat5 doesn't start after installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adeodato Simó wrote: * Timo Juhani Lindfors [Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:04:57 +0300]: Package: tomcat5 Version: 5.0.30-10 Followup-For: Bug #315038 This bug seems to still affect tomcat5 5.0.30-10 in unstable. Test for /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/jdb seems to succeed if I apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev. How about making java-gcj-compat-dev a dependency? Hi, any news on this bug? I wanted to note that it's currently showing in the RC bug list for Etch... I'll try to work on it this week, Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE4H1l4vzFZu62tMIRAgeQAKC2jE1RSYz9RrykDz0EgyInfzH5owCggHCd sbfln0NyJWS1c0nziWeIkRw= =awFm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#381128: argouml: ArgoUML does not detect Sun JVM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mikhail A Gusarov wrote: Argouml complaints about missing JVM on startup if only Sun JVM installed (Debian package of Sun JVM). Hi Mikhail, Which version of Sun's VM is installed? Thanks, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE0fp14vzFZu62tMIRAiYhAJ9geWTmUZ2G1oI4h8QDlWa5n96qSwCguhdY b1FLRwwZnR/arFMfWwVrTy0= =tlTE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: libmsv-xsdlib-java_0.0.0.20060319-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi Maintainer, rejected, please put the -doc package into non-free too, not into contrib. Sorry for the extra work. Next upload will be ok ;-) - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE0bcy4vzFZu62tMIRAgmUAJ9aOJRlW4/WNji7oUZtO1azno4UBACggh1w LHgbKLyDmyvSD6XErmEIkRA= =qCrA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#378607: libgnujaxp-java - FTBFS: 8 problems (2 errors, 6 warnings)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bastian Blank wrote: Package: libgnujaxp-java Version: 1.3-7 Severity: serious I'm reading a thread in pkg-java-maintainer's list from december 2005 where we wonder why gnujaxp is still in it's own package (it's integrated in classpath now). I've just file a removal request against ftp.debian.org[0]. Thanks for your bug report. Cheers, [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=381014 - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE0fvL4vzFZu62tMIRAu4uAKCAWGwHu9bCchPzdyZAu9nX6G0fYgCfVrvn 4q9TFPbx5L8rff09BCXxRaQ= =VouR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#379530: libjaxp1.3-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gcj'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jochens wrote: On 06-Aug-01 15:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: [...] Is java-gcj-compat-dev installed? Yes. The problem is that gcj is not pulled in by java-gcj-compat-dev. java-gcj-compat-dev depends on gcj-4.1 but _not_ on gcj. Consequently, the gcj command is not available without an explicit Build-Depends on gcj. I thought I was building the package with ant, so, now that I investigate the debian/rules, I see the problem ;-) I've just upload a package to solve it. Many thanks for your bug report, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE0b4A4vzFZu62tMIRAtqqAJ9Eg0vh2QyoLOrM+Kl7mZDq+CPDEQCfToOa A7jJ4bBYVrs/9DzIoPDq7N8= =R+Lz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#379530: libjaxp1.3-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gcj'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jochens wrote: Hello, Hi, On 06-Jul-31 14:50, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: [...] How did you try to build the package? Can you provide the exact command you type to build the package? I used the following commands: # apt-get remove gcj # apt-get build-dep libjaxp1.3-java # dpkg-buildpackage Is the option APT::Get::Arch-Only is set to no? - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEzw6Q4vzFZu62tMIRAn90AKCnqpznG7r5eUiYYNYxpzcv+De9mgCgrzjO dC+32xHZDcvECIWEY42EIXE= =6vA7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#152180: Split libbatik-java and make command line tools available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: tags 152180 + patch thanks I believe this patch is one step of the way, making shell script wrappers available in /usr/bin/ as part of the libbatik-java package. I did not try to split out into separate packages, nor split the jar file. I leave that decision to the package maintainer. Note, several of the programs do not work with SUN JDK, and not surprisingly with Classpath either. Hi pere, Can you commit your changes to the repository? - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEz1qc4vzFZu62tMIRAtY4AJ0bJGVKZTe1jxQydqVZWSKa/AhShQCdFdxP tW6tgF9+aKsIjj9yOkT8SWQ= =8U42 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#380361: tomcat5: CVE-2006-3835: remote directory listing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Berryman wrote: Package: tomcat5 Severity: serious Tags: security CVE-2006-3835: Apache Tomcat 5 before 5.5.17 allows remote attackers to list directories via a semicolon (;) preceding a filename with a mapped extension, as demonstrated by URLs ending with /;index.jsp and /;help.do. The original report to full-disclosure [1] indicates that the 5.0.x series is also affected. The reporter claims to have verified it with 5.0.28; I have not tried to reproduce it with Debian's 5.0.30. I can't reproduce the attack with 5.0.30. I'll upgrade the 5.5 serie. Thanks for your report. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEz2jG4vzFZu62tMIRAtPjAJ4kjCAUEqnHYKdri/008izRCJIyMwCfWrkA z9v3b2DVjksqDfx1IwpWNgE= =tu5o -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#152180: Split libbatik-java and make command line tools available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Arnaud Vandyck] Can you commit your changes to the repository? Done. Thanks pere, Also, you can upload the package, aren't you in pkg-java group?.. I mean you can upload the package if you have the time to do so of course ;-) Thanks, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEz2U64vzFZu62tMIRAraCAJ9D7Pf3WoDdFFiaP8FJ2d/PmOBrGQCcDgFB xwLdYTP4t/dPh5blp+8IN8c= =mkqZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#380376: tomcat5.5: CVE-2006-3835: remote directory listing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Berryman wrote: CVE-2006-3835: Apache Tomcat 5 before 5.5.17 allows remote attackers to list directories via a semicolon (;) preceding a filename with a mapped extension, as demonstrated by URLs ending with /;index.jsp and /;help.do. I can't reproduce the attack with tomcat5.5.15, I'm closing the bug. If you are able to reproduce the attack, thanks to re-open the bug. Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEz2s44vzFZu62tMIRAu9hAJ9nodZhEIOot3mxd9SEBP1YzkAO9QCgl01W ijocRJRisINxwQ/Ts3sIZLA= =O5L0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#379088: gjdoc: Resolving some links to the Java library
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: [...] This bug has been reported to the upstream. Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24723 I report it here for easier tracking. Many thanks for your report, it really helps, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEzf044vzFZu62tMIRApaSAJ9Fv8j3b3RqlMQxGrNujmZm5J5FngCfdAMC 6zg4jqkbopLs2/m3RPh8SIk= =8t8/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Packaging Java apps for Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Schuster wrote: Hi, I am Robert Schuster and the company I am working for is interested in getting their Java applications packaged for Debian (and derivates :)) - including all of their own and the 3rd party dependencies. Hi Robert, glad to see you here ;-) I am going to package the rest and would like to see them going (at least) into pkg-java's SVN repository. If you let them into Debian that would be fantastic. :) Give me your account name and I'll add you to the project. ... Welcome! Then, commit your patches and new packages in our subversion repository and I'll be glad to review and upload if I have the time to do so. For packages not in Debian repository, just give an url with the original tarball, I'll checkout the debian part from subversion to build the package. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEvgau4vzFZu62tMIRAiWLAJ4j0iTooi23/JPSex/xLCT646mXUwCdFHMc hZRqVK1i5GI4WXvLS8m3BKk= =0Mjn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: RFC: jcommon-1.0.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Schuster wrote: Hi, lets start simple. This patch updates libjcommon-java to 1.0.5 and makes it use java-gcj-compat-dev and ecj-bootstrap for building. Comments? Thanks... Index: libjcommon-java/debian/control === --- libjcommon-java/debian/control(Revision 2278) +++ libjcommon-java/debian/control(Arbeitskopie) @@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.2.30), cdbs, kaffe, ant +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.2.30), cdbs, java-gcj-compat-dev, ecj-bootstrap, ant, libservlet2.4-java This should be break into Build-Depends (cdbs and debhelper) and Build-Depends-Indep for the rest Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Should be updated to 3.7.2 [...] -Depends: kaffe | java1-runtime | java2-runtime +Depends: java-gcj-compat | java1-runtime1 | java2-runtime [...] Index: libjcommon-java/debian/rules === [...] -DEB_JARS := $(ANT_HOME)/lib/ant-launcher.jar +DEB_JARS := \ + ant-launcher \ No more needed with current version of cdbs + junit \ + servlet-api-2.4 + +# Build compiler +DEB_ANT_COMPILER := org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDTCompilerAdapter +ifneq (,$(findstring eclipse,$(DEB_ANT_COMPILER))) +DEB_JARS += ecj.jar /usr/share/ant/lib/ecj-adapter.jar +endif I think it's the default gcj compiler, isn't it? [...] Index: libjcommon-java/debian/ant.properties === [...] Good work. I'm correcting some parts and I'll upload the new upstream. Many thanks for your work. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEvgmr4vzFZu62tMIRAkB/AJsE2rFV0m61veqYL2vhOOdYJ3apjgCglhRg GMFElf94tZHIMqvMVcMRBJY= =vAd7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: r2224 - in trunk/tomcat5/debian: . patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Excellent, many thanks! Michael Koch wrote: Author: mkoch Date: 2006-07-01 14:33:35 + (Sat, 01 Jul 2006) New Revision: 2224 Log: tomcat5 (5.0.30-10) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/30_memory-leak_368864.patch: New patch to fix OutOfMemoryError issue (Closes: #368864). Thanks to Steinar H. Gunderson for the patch. * debian/rules: Build with java-gcj-compat (Closes: #375883). * debian/control: Moved cdbs and debhelper to Build-Depends. * debian/control: Build-Depends-Indep on java-gcj-compat-dev. * debian/tomcat4-admin.postinst, debian/tomcat4-admin.prerm, debian/tomcat4-webapps.postinst, debian/tomcat4-webapps.prerm: Use invoke-rc.d instead of calling /etc/init.d/tomcat5 directly. * Updated Standards-Version to 3.7.2. * Added myself to the Uploaders field. -- Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:32:19 + - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEqMiP4vzFZu62tMIRAj+VAJ4tBLURPi7qaT6PPA7xezdlUF3o1QCeLTqW 0zohtTWJwF/tfKRBfZ+Xnis= =nkvo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#372880: eclipse can't start: problem opening page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:35:04PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: [...] I can't reproduce this here on i386. Can you please make the output of /usr/bin/eclise -debug -consoleLog available? Attached. Note that when I click OK on the error window, everything disapears, but I have to C-c to stop the process (but it's not eating the cpu). Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEkU+R4vzFZu62tMIRAk34AJ92QREw7PdYyLsK1OkId5KcPakAlwCgsBFT T2gInsqwmzvF6U4nDWYzWK4= =zoZl -END PGP SIGNATURE- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ rm -fr .eclipse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/eclipse -debug -consoleLog searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found Start VM: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.1/classmap.db -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never -Dosgi.locking=none -jar /usr/share/eclipse/startup.jar -os linux -ws gtk -arch ppc -launcher /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse -name Eclipse -showsplash 600 -exitdata 3c70023 -install /usr/share/eclipse -debug -consoleLog -vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -vmargs -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.1/classmap.db -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never -Dosgi.locking=none -jar /usr/share/eclipse/startup.jar Install location: file:/usr/share/eclipse/ Configuration file: file:/usr/share/eclipse/configuration/config.ini loaded Configuration location: file:/home/arnaud/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/configuration Configuration file: file:/home/arnaud/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/config.ini not found or not read Shared configuration location: file:/usr/share/eclipse/configuration/ Framework located: file:/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.2.jar Framework classpath: file:/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.2.jar Splash location: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/splash.bmp runCommand: /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse-nameEclipse-showsplash600/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/splash.bmp Debug options: file:/home/arnaud/.options not found Time to load bundles: 37 Starting application: 3441 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#372880: eclipse can't start: problem opening page
Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi Michael, I have problem running eclipse in Etch (it was also the case with Sid). When launching /usr/bin/eclise, I have the splash screnn, then an error window appears with: Problems Opening page. When I want more details, I have: empty document, with no root element. Do you have an idea about this problem? This render eclipse package unusable for me. Note: an upstream installation works with jamvm from Sid. Cheers, Arnaud -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages eclipse depends on: ii eclipse-jdt 3.1.2-2Java Development Tools plug-ins fo ii eclipse-pde 3.1.2-2Plug-in Development Environment to ii eclipse-source3.1.2-2Eclipse source code plug-ins eclipse recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: Tomcat 5.5 ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 04:57:36PM +0200, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: I tried to find information about Debian packages for Tomcat 5.5 but did not find what I was looking for. I did not even find a RFP. Any suggestions? Would it be reasonable to file a RFP? Arnaud is working on them. If I find some time I will help him. The packages are already in pkg-java SVN repository just not uploaded because they need some more love and polishing. I updated informations on my debian's website: http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/tomcat5/ The upstream is 5.5.15 and has been hacked to work with j2sdk1.4 (a patch from the tomcat's website). Wolfgang worked on the package, I did not have the time to test it at the moment, but I think the package only needs testing, I don't know if there are problems about it. Please, use debian-java@lists.debian.org for asking questions and so, this list is more for maintainer alias. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEhTI44vzFZu62tMIRAlimAJ9FkXzRwEWjbB0kXouubAtI/VfcdQCfbkR6 dWS7dtmLyJ1trmq1dRQ/UXg= =Xegj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: ArgoUML versions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Morris a écrit : [...] I'd encourage Debian to only redistribute stable releases. They are the only ones which get focused testing. I'll be working on this asap. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEdu1b4vzFZu62tMIRAsrKAJ9AzwpSQK+Uq/OmYcbQUCxHwEqiYgCgspvj ZFdm3E/g2SxD/7L3b/CsPl4= =8LLh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
