[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding drupal7-mod-jscommunicator_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Daniel, your debian/copyright says that this package is GPLv2, but according to COPYING it should be GPLv2+. Maybe you can correct this in one of the next uploads. Thanks! Thorsten PS same in drupal7-mod-jssip ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-iscroll_5.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Balint, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The file node-iscroll-5.1.1/demos/minimap/ermine.jpg does contain a copyright statement [1] but no license. So it seems that this file might not be distributed, at least an entry in debian/copyright is missing. Further lots of images are created by Gimp. Are you sure that there are no xcf-files as preferred form of modification? Thorsten [1] "Copyright 1995 Nicolas Pioch" === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-findup-sync_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, your package depends on node-lodash. Can you please tell me where I can find this package? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The directory "vendor" contains several modules with licenses that are not mentioned in debian/copyright. It would be nice if you also add the different copyright holders of these modules. You might also take care of: W: libjs-lodash: debian-changelog-has-wrong-weekday 2014-04-11 is a Friday Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package again. Your debian/copyright is not really complete: vendor/requirejs is BSD or MIT vendor/dojo is AFL or BSD (maybe others) and it would still be nice if you also add the different copyright holders of all modules. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Ping? Will there be another try with node-lodash? Otherwise I need to reject node-findup-sync as well ... Thanks! Thorsten On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package again. Your debian/copyright is not really complete: vendor/requirejs is BSD or MIT vendor/dojo is AFL or BSD (maybe others) and it would still be nice if you also add the different copyright holders of all modules. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, as I can see some improvements, I marked your package for accept now. Unfortunately the AFL of vendor/dojo/* is still not mentioned in debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#751583: missing license in debian/copyright
Package: node-lodash Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please mention the AFL of vendor/dojo/* in debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-finished_1.2.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi Leo, I marked your package for accept, but isn't your entry for node_modules/ee-first/* in debian/copyright superfluous? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-bl_0.8.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andrew, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The license in LICENSE does not match the license you use in your debian/copyright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-groove_2.2.4-1_amd64.changes
Hi Andrew, danse.ogg seems to be created by Kevin MacLeod. Normally he licenses his stuff under CC BY. Can you please confirm that he is the author and then add an entry to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-groove_2.2.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
license for danse.ogg is missing, new version is on its way to NEW === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-ms_0.6.2-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, wouldn't it be possible to create a bigger node-time package? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-uid-safe_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes
Dear Maintainer, this package should be also better part of a bigger one. Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-twitter-bootstrap-wizard_1.0.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Thomas, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the Apache license of bootstrap/* to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-prr_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uid-safe_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ms_0.6.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-connect-static_1.2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-mv_2.0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-errno_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
according to Andrew not needed anymore === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] prettify.js_2013.03.04+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of src/lang-matlab.js to your debian/copyright. Please also add the other copyright holders (e.g. Onno Hommes, Google Inc., Andrew Allen, ...). Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] prettify.js_2013.03.04+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-nwmatcher_1.3.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of: build\scripts\nwpacker.js test\jquery\qunit\testrunner.js test\jsvm\load_test.js to your debian/copyright. You might also want to update the list of copyright holders of different files. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-clarinet_0.9.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Andrew, I marked your package for accept, but please remove the samples and test directories from the source tarball (or take care of the minified files in it). Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-express-session_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Leo, will there be a package node-uid-safe? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#766037: missing licenses in debian/copyright
Package: highlight.js Version: 8.2+ds-3 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing licenses of: src/styles/kimbie.dark.css src/styles/kimbie.light.css src/styles/monokai_sublime.css to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding libjs-backbone-deep-model_0.10.4-2_amd64.changes
Hi Thomas, I marked your package for accept, but you might want to add some more copryright holders of test/* to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding libjs-backbone.stickit_0.7.0-1_amd64.changes
... same here. Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding libjs-cocktail_0.5.7-1_amd64.changes
... oh, come on, this time it is external/* Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-require-css_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Thomas, I am afraid this package needs a reject. The license of example/www/jquery.js example/www/text.js is missing in your debian/copyright. Maybe you can also take care of some lintian warnings: W: libjs-require-css: macos-ds-store-file-in-package usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/.DS_Store.gz W: libjs-require-css: embedded-javascript-library usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/jquery.js please use libjs-jquery W: libjs-require-css: symlink-is-self-recursive usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/require-css ../.. W: libjs-require-css: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/text.js W: libjs-require-css: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/style/style.css W: libjs-require-css: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/components/component.css W: libjs-require-css: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/app.js W: libjs-require-css: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/doc/libjs-require-css/examples/example/www/components/component.js Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding libjs-angularjs-smart-table_1.4.5-1_amd64.changes
Hi Thomas, accepted, but there is room for improvement: W: libjs-angularjs-smart-table: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l3:#XX Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-express-session_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, there seems to be no node-uid-safe available, so I reject this package for now. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-q_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes
Hi Bas, I marked your package for accept, but you might want to add Pivotal Labs as copyright holder for jasmine. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Small Node.js packages in NEW
Hi Bas, Debian is running on lots of different types of computers ranging from high end number crunchers to low end Raspberry PIs or embedded devices. While installing/updating a package all of them have to download the complete package information and parse it over and over again. This is not a problem for high end computers with good network connectivity, but low end computers might have a problem. As we have seen in the past there are memory constraints or the whole process just consumes too much time. I admit that there is lots of room for improvement in Debians package handling, but at the moment we just have what we have. Looking at the popcon statistic of nodejs, the numbers are growing but compared with the numbers of dpkg, they are still rather low. So I would say the overhead of those nodejs users that need to install a few kB of superfluous code is not as bad as the resource consumption of all other users. I don't have a better solution for small packages, but as long as there is no improvement in package handling, I think there should be no exception. I would still prefer the bundling of several small packages into bigger chunks. Isn't git able to handle several upstreams in one repository? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Small Node.js packages in NEW
Hi Bas, I'm reluctantly looking into this issue further, but I need to know what requirements an Node.js module must meet to be eligible for its own source package. What are your requirements for this? from my point of view only the size of the binary package (excluding /usr/share/doc and other meta information) is important. So the 120 bytes of node-isarry is far too little. Up to this point I draw the line at about 5kB. Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-isarray_0.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, as it makes no sense to let this package rot in NEW, I am going to reject it now. Only 120 bytes of content are not enough for a separate package. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-absolute-path_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
this has the same problem as node-isarray ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-absolute-path_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Bas, On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Thanks for finally rejecting packages too small to meet the criteria. What about node-nextback? I didn't want to spoil your weekend, so I started with only two packages. It's probably better to reject all remaining Node.js packages I've uploaded, as I'm giving up on the OpenLayers 3 packaging. Ok, sorry. Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ansi-regex_1.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-base64-arraybuffer_0.1.2+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-brace-expansion_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-concat-map_0.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-get-stdin_4.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-arraybuffer.slice_0.0.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-string-decoder_0.10.25-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-core-util-is_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-blob_0.0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-balanced-match_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-decompress-zip_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-jsonfile_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-request-progress_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-throttleit_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-after_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-supports-color_1.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-mkpath_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-binary_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-buffers_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages, Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-is-typedarray_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi Daniel, this package seems to be another candidate for a small-package-reject. Can't you merge this stuff into another package? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Small Node.js packages in NEW
Hi, thanks for all the arguments. I am afraid Debian is not yet able to handle merged packages. So, I give in. Nevertheless it would be great if you could improve our tools to get grid of small packages ... Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#797677: XS-Testsuite: in debian/control
Package: npm2deb Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: normal thanks Hi Leo, the package created by npm2deb contains a line XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest in debian/control. lintian complains about that with: I: node-xoauth2 source: xs-testsuite-header-in-debian-control xs-testsuite So maybe this line could be removed. Can you please also change the debhelper version to 9? Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#797677: XS-Testsuite: in debian/control
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Jérémy Lal wrote: Can you please also change the debhelper version to 9? I'm curious to know the reason if you have one. No, I don't have a reason, it is just the latest one and if you are at changing something ... Thorsten___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] packages without corresponding github tag
Hi, as you might have noticed I uploaded some packages, that are dependencies mentioned on the tasks pages. Now I found some packages that have a version in package.json, which does not have a corresponding tag on github. What is the best way to handle such packages? Ask upstream to create the needed tag? How do we notice new versions when upstream forgets new tags afterwards? Create a get-orig-source-target in debian/rules to download the current revision of the repository? How do we detect new versions in this case? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-text-encoding_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Julien, please add test/testharness*.js to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#798867: check NEW queue as well for package
Package: npm2deb
Version: 0.2.4-1
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
thanks
Hi Leo,
I am bit lazy with ITPs, so maybe npm2deb should also query NEW whether
something has been already uploaded.
The attached patch works at least for me ...
Thanks!
Thorsten
diff --git a/npm2deb/helper.py b/npm2deb/helper.py
index 5e8c1c3..c51a3a5 100644
--- a/npm2deb/helper.py
+++ b/npm2deb/helper.py
@@ -78,6 +78,31 @@ def search_for_bug(module):
continue
return result
+def search_in_new(module):
+if isinstance(module, _Npm2Deb):
+module = module.name
+my_print('Looking for packages in NEW:')
+_debug(1, "calling new-check")
+found = False
+formatted = " {0:20} {1:>3}"
+url = "https://api.ftp-master.debian.org/sources_in_suite/new";
+_debug(1, "opening url %s" % url)
+data = _urlopen(url).read().decode('utf-8')
+data = _parseJSON(data)
+result = []
+for package in data:
+name = package['source']
+version = package['version']
+if not module in name:
+continue
+found = True
+result.append(package)
+my_print(formatted.format(package['source'],
+ package['version']
+ ))
+if not found:
+my_print(" None")
+return result
def search_for_reverse_dependencies(module):
if isinstance(module, _Npm2Deb):
diff --git a/npm2deb/scripts.py b/npm2deb/scripts.py
index b908216..673d144 100644
--- a/npm2deb/scripts.py
+++ b/npm2deb/scripts.py
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ def main(argv=None):
'-d', '--debian', action="store_true",
default=False, help='search for existing package in debian')
parser_search.add_argument(
+'-n', '--new', action="store_true",
+default=False, help='search for existing package in NEW queue')
+parser_search.add_argument(
'-r', '--repository', action="store_true",
default=False, help='search for existing repository in alioth')
parser_search.add_argument(
@@ -139,10 +142,11 @@ def main(argv=None):
def search_for_module(args):
_helper.DO_PRINT = True
# enable all by default
-if not args.bug and not args.debian and not args.repository:
+if not args.bug and not args.debian and not args.repository and not args.new:
args.bug = True
args.debian = True
args.repository = True
+args.new = True
node_module = get_npm2deb_instance(args).name
if args.debian:
print("\nLooking for similiar package:")
@@ -154,6 +158,9 @@ def search_for_module(args):
if args.bug:
print("")
_helper.search_for_bug(node_module)
+if args.new:
+print("")
+_helper.search_in_new(node_module)
print("")
_show_mapper_warnings()
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-bootstrap-tour_0.10.2+dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi Julien, according to README.md the documentation is under CC BY 3.0. So please add this to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-recast_0.10.32-1_amd64.changes
Hi Julien, I marked your package for accept, but you should add the copyright holder of backbone.js to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-mousetrap_1.5.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] cleanup
Hi, I am trying to put node-mocks-http into stretch. Unfortunately it depends on node-type-is, which does not migrate to testing due to node-mime-types, which FTBFS. Does anybody mind if I do some cleanup and upload new versions of node-* packages or at least take care of FTBFSs? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#800096: FTBFS node-raw-body
The linked logfile does not look that bad, at least it does not contain the error from the report!? So this bug could be closed, right? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Fwd: How to handle JavaScript npm + gulp web GUI packaging?
Hi Thomas, On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote: P.S: I'm not afraid of packaging all individual libjs-* and nodejs-* (build-) dependencies, even if there's a big number of them. as there are maybe other packages who could benefit from all those dependencies, I would say this is the way to go. Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#787924: node-crc: test failure Error: Use CoffeeScript.register()
Hi Andreas, On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Andreas Beckmann wrote: this package FTBFS in a similar way in jessie: yes, version 3.0.0-2 works on Jessie but FTBFS on Sid and 3.0.0-3 works on Sid but fails on Jessie. I think there has been some change in coffeescript... Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-pre-gyp_0.6.25-1_amd64.changes
Hi Jeremy, your package Recommends: node-pkg-tar Do you want to upload that as well? Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-pre-gyp_0.6.25-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
bad Recommends: === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#826882: create package from git
Package: npm2deb
Version: 0.2.5-1
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
thanks
Hi Leo,
as you know, not every developer of npm modules does release a tarball for
new versions. Some of them commit something to github and just put the new
version in their package.json.
With this patch npm2deb is able to work with such repositoies.
If you do something like (the -b is new):
./npm2deb.py create -b hashish
it will create a different debian/watch file (just saying that you can not
use uscan to get a new version), it will add a new target get-orig-source
to debian/rules and it will create a debian/get-orig-source script that
pulls the latest commit from the repository, creates a orig.tar and puts
something like X.Y.Z~git as version in debian/changelog.
What do you think of it?
Thanks!
Thorstendiff --git a/npm2deb/__init__.py b/npm2deb/__init__.py
index 1eabf0b..bb6d182 100644
--- a/npm2deb/__init__.py
+++ b/npm2deb/__init__.py
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ class Npm2Deb(object):
self.debian_standards = STANDARDS_VERSION
self.debian_debhelper = DEBHELPER
self.noclean = False
+self.build_from_git = False
if args:
if 'upstream_license' in args and args['upstream_license']:
self.upstream_license = args['upstream_license']
@@ -51,6 +52,8 @@ class Npm2Deb(object):
self.debian_debhelper = args['debhelper']
if 'noclean' in args:
self.noclean = args['noclean']
+if 'build_from_git' in args:
+self.build_from_git = args['build_from_git']
self.read_package_info()
self.debian_name = 'node-%s' % self._debianize_name(self.name)
@@ -79,6 +82,7 @@ class Npm2Deb(object):
self.create_dirs()
self.create_examples()
self.create_watch()
+self.create_get_orig_source()
self.create_manpages()
if not self.noclean:
self.clean()
@@ -103,6 +107,16 @@ class Npm2Deb(object):
content = _os.path.normpath(self.json['man'])
utils.create_debian_file('manpages', content)
+def create_get_orig_source(self):
+args = {}
+args['debian_name'] = self.debian_name
+args['url'] = self.upstream_repo_url
+args['module'] = self.name
+args['version'] = self.upstream_version
+if self.build_from_git:
+content = utils.get_get_orig_source('build_from_git') % args
+utils.create_debian_file('get-orig-source', content)
+
def create_watch(self):
args = {}
args['debian_name'] = self.debian_name
@@ -110,20 +124,24 @@ class Npm2Deb(object):
args['url'] = self.upstream_repo_url
args['module'] = self.name
try:
-if self.upstream_repo_url.find('github') >= 0:
-content = utils.get_watch('github') % args
+if self.build_from_git:
+content = utils.get_watch('build_from_git') % args
+utils.create_debian_file('watch', content)
else:
-# if not supported, got to fakeupstream
-raise ValueError
-
-utils.create_debian_file('watch', content)
-# test watch with uscan, raise exception if status is not 0
-info = _getstatusoutput('uscan --watchfile "debian/watch" '
-'--package "{}" '
-'--upstream-version 0 --no-download'
-.format(self.debian_name))
-if info[0] != 0:
-raise ValueError
+if self.upstream_repo_url.find('github') >= 0:
+content = utils.get_watch('github') % args
+else:
+# if not supported, got to fakeupstream
+raise ValueError
+
+utils.create_debian_file('watch', content)
+# test watch with uscan, raise exception if status is not 0
+info = _getstatusoutput('uscan --watchfile "debian/watch" '
+'--package "{}" '
+'--upstream-version 0 --no-download'
+.format(self.debian_name))
+if info[0] != 0:
+raise ValueError
except ValueError:
content = utils.get_watch('fakeupstream') % args
@@ -249,7 +267,10 @@ class Npm2Deb(object):
args['overrides'] += "override_dh_installchangelogs:\n" + \
"\tdh_installchangelogs -k %s\n" % filename
break
-content = utils.get_template('rules') % args
+if self.build_from_git:
+content = utils.get_rules('build_from_git') % args
+else:
+content = utils.get_rules('normal') % args
utils.create_debian_file("rules", content)
_os.system('chmod +x debian
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#826882: Bug#826882: create package from git
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Mike Gabriel wrote: With this patch npm2deb is able to work with such repositoies. If you do something like (the -b is new): ./npm2deb.py create -b hashish it will create a different debian/watch file (just saying that you can not use uscan to get a new version), it will add a new target Is that a good idea? Yes, it is. Of course npm2deb already creates a watch file similar to your suggestion. But it can only do this if the author of the npm-module does some kind of release management. My patch, which introduces the -b option (--build-from-git), is only for those modules where there is no release management. In this case there are no tags and DDPO won't get anything to track, so a watch file makes no sense This we may need to improve. E.g.: o pull latest tag, not HEAD from a Github repo Depending on the contents of package.json, npm2deb already does this in "normal" operation mode, doesn't it? o pull HEAD from a non-default branch I don't think this is a common use case. If you want to have such a behaviour, you might edit the get-orig-source-script ... Thorsten ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding libjs-jquery-stupidtable_1.0.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
Hi Sergio, I marked your package for accept, but please mention all authors of files in test/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-tv4_1.2.7+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Ivan, please mention all licenses/copyright information in your debian/copyright. For example libjs-tv4-1.2.7+dfsg1/component.json mentions MIT, libjs-tv4-1.2.7+dfsg1/try/ace/theme-tomorrow.js and others are under BSD3, libjs-tv4-1.2.7+dfsg1/try/ace/mode-rdoc.js and others are under AGPL-3 Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-tv4_1.2.7+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Thomas, please add a list of files to each license block and not just one file. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-deep-is_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked you package for accept, but please add all copyright holders to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-livescript_1.5.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, according to LICENSE copyright holder for "File: *" are three people. So better put them instead the entry from package.json into your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-jsonselect_0.4.0+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention: JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/css/droid_sans.tt JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/js/showdown.js JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/index.html: "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/";>(cc) BY-SA" JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/src/build/lib/parse-js.js JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/src/build/lib/process.js JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/src/test/js/doctest.js JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/src/test/js/jquery-1.6.1.min.js in your debian/copyright. You might also want to exclude src/test/js/jquery-1.6.1.min.js or provide the sources. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-os-homedir_1.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention snapdragon-0.8.1/lib/source-maps.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention at least package/runtime.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, according to https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt/issues/1478 and an entry in the CHANGELOG, the copyright holder is no longer Ben but the jQuery Foundation. So please update your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-lodash 4.16.6
Hi, On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Sruthi Chandran wrote: I have updated node-lodash to 4.16.6 and pushed to Alioth. Please review and upload. is there someone already working on this? Thorsten -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-lodash 4.16.6
Ok, I uploaded the version and hopefully didn't break anything. Thorsten On Sat, 12 Nov 2016, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi, On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Sruthi Chandran wrote: I have updated node-lodash to 4.16.6 and pushed to Alioth. Please review and upload. is there someone already working on this? Thorsten -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-buffer-shims_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please take care of all FIX_MEs. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-nodeunit_0.10.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention TJ Holowaychuk in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-to-fast-properties_1.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, to-fast-properties-1.0.2/license seems to contain a different person than your debian/coypright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-core-js_2.4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please take care of all FIX_MEs in debian/* Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-window-size_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, this doesn't work, does it? W: node-window-size: unusual-interpreter usr/lib/nodejs/window-size/cli.js #!node Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yargs_6.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please take care of all FIX_MEs in debian/*. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yargs_6.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
almost done: Andrei Mackenzie is missing ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-shelljs_0.7.5-1_amd64.changes
Hi, I marked the package for accept, but when you mention src/rm.js, you should also mention src/cp.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] jqueryui_1.12.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention the CC 3.0 license of some jpegs that are referenced from jquery-ui-1.12.1/demos/tooltip/custom-content.html Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-gulp_3.9.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi, please mention: "All the documentation is covered by the CC0 license *(do whatever you want with it - public domain)*." in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-gulp-sourcemaps_1.9.1-1_amd64.changes
Hi, this package depends on acorn. Will that be uploaded soon? Thanks! Thorsten -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uid-safe_2.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Paolo, there seem to be some copyright holder missing in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
