Re: Review Request 102983: Added support for rfkill

2015-07-12 Thread David Rosca

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102983/#review82377
---


Can you please discard this review? libbluedevil is not used in recent Plasma 
release (replaced with bluez-qt which have support for rfkill), and there won't 
be any more KDE4 nor Plasma 5.2.x releases.

- David Rosca


On July 11, 2015, 8:43 p.m., Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102983/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 11, 2015, 8:43 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Plasma and Solid.
 
 
 Repository: libbluedevil
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 rfkill is a subsystem of the Linux Kernel to disable radio transmitters 
 (including Bluetooth). This patch adds support for rfkill to libbluedevil. An 
 interface is added to the Manager class.
 
 rfkill support is important because gnome uses rfkill to deactivate 
 bluetooth. Therefore if bluetooth is currently disabled in the 
 gnome-control-center it can not be used by kde. With this patch the proper 
 API to reenable bluetooth is provided.
 
 Disabling bluetooth with rfkill has the advantage that some computers switch 
 off the bluetooth LED. Which does not happen (at least on my Thinkpad) if 
 it's just powered off (as kde does at the moment).
 
 rfkill can also detect if bluetooth has been deactivated by a hardware switch.
 
 btw. please mark https://gitorious.org/libbluedevil/libbluedevil as obsolete 
 and update http://projects.ufocoders.com/projects/libbluedevil/wiki. I used 
 the old gitorious code base at first.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   bluedevil/bluedevilmanager.h 0386b8e 
   bluedevil/bluedevilmanager.cpp 594d3bd 
   bluedevil/test/bluedeviltest.cpp 2d3d0e2 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102983/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 I added a test to bluedeviltest and it works for me.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Rüdiger Sonderfeld
 


___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: on review process again.. phabricator?

2015-07-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
One issue from 'many projects sharing the same phab' is that the main
page gets populated with 'Unbreak now!' issues from other projects.

Nothing really problematic, but it would be nice if these would be
filtered on the projects a user is interested on.

Cheers,
Ivan

On 8 July 2015 at 23:20, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote:
 On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Marco Martin wrote:

 Some projects are trying out phabricator (looking at kactivities) how do
 they find it?


 Krita developers, testers and designers all feel Phabricator is pretty fab.
 Newbies take to it easiliy. It takes getting used to because it's more than
 a reviewboard replacement, it also has project management, task management
 and much more.

 The way different projects/repos share the website is a bit of a put-off at
 the moment. You don't get kactivities.phabricator.kde.org, but you find all
 repos in one website.

 Unfortunately there is little we can do about this - it, like most
 software out there, is designed for one project sharing a very closely
 related group of tasks, repositories, etc. KDE doesn't really fit that
 pattern anymore, but having multiple instances of it is totally
 infeasible.

 I'd like to know more about where this falls down though to see if it
 can be remedied to a certain extent.


 can it go more large scale? (more a sysadmin question) If it doesn't have
 big obvious problems I would like to try it on plasma-framework at least. To
 eventually have plasma-workspace et al too, but not yet (at least I would
 never want gerrit on those projects..)


 Boudewijn

 Cheers,
 Ben


 ___
 Plasma-devel mailing list
 Plasma-devel@kde.org
 https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
 ___
 Plasma-devel mailing list
 Plasma-devel@kde.org
 https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel



-- 
Cheerio,
Ivan

--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 123828: Fix KF5 port regression in kcm_standard_actions

2015-07-12 Thread Simon Persson

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123828/
---

(Updated July 12, 2015, 1:19 p.m.)


Review request for Plasma, David Edmundson, Martin Gräßlin, and Michael Jansen.


Changes
---

Add plasma group as reviewer, hope to get more eyes on it that way... This is 
really quite a bad bug.


Bugs: 343665
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343665


Repository: plasma-desktop


Description
---

The KShortcutsEditor reads the property defaultShortcuts from the assigned 
QAction. Fill it in with default hardcoded shortcuts. Appending the defaults 
to the list of active shortcuts just creates shortcut lists that grow longer 
and longer every time user saves settings in this KCM.

Still does not have a solution for upgrade of existing users' configuration. If 
the user has a messed up kdeglobals file now, after installing upgrade with 
this fix user will have to open up this KCM and hit Defaults button to reset 
settings. After that things should work ok. I don't have any idea for solution 
of automatically correcting broken config file after upgrade.


Diffs
-

  kcms/standard_actions/standard_actions_module.cpp d1c4ad3 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123828/diff/


Testing
---

Basic testing to see how the config file kdeglobals look after saving some 
changed shortcuts, looks correct to me. Now only the shortcuts that are not 
default are saved, and they are saved correctly (verified that by closing kcm, 
opening it again and saw that my settings were still intact).


Thanks,

Simon Persson

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Jenkins-kde-ci: plasma-desktop master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 74 - Fixed!

2015-07-12 Thread no-reply

GENERAL INFO

BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL: 
https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-desktop%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/74/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:51:45 +
Build duration: 16 min

CHANGE SET
Revision 87d53433b511a0bab0f9ad2161e42546f356f70f by lueck: (Update kcmstyle 
docbook to Plasma 5 REVIEW:124283)
  change: edit doc/kcontrol/kcmstyle/index.docbook


JUNIT RESULTS

Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 6 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 6 
test(s)

COBERTURA RESULTS

Cobertura Coverage Report
  PACKAGES 7/7 (100%)FILES 36/38 (95%)CLASSES 36/38 (95%)LINE 2370/3410 
(70%)CONDITIONAL 1784/3081 (58%)

By packages
  
kcms.cursortheme.xcursor
FILES 4/4 (100%)CLASSES 4/4 (100%)LINE 90/187 (48%)CONDITIONAL 
18/34 (53%)
kcms.keyboard
FILES 20/22 (91%)CLASSES 20/22 (91%)LINE 800/1526 
(52%)CONDITIONAL 771/1270 (61%)
kcms.keyboard.preview
FILES 4/4 (100%)CLASSES 4/4 (100%)LINE 503/584 (86%)CONDITIONAL 
511/994 (51%)
kcms.keyboard.tests
FILES 5/5 (100%)CLASSES 5/5 (100%)LINE 251/253 (99%)CONDITIONAL 
242/364 (66%)
kcms.krdb
FILES 1/1 (100%)CLASSES 1/1 (100%)LINE 357/410 (87%)CONDITIONAL 
108/178 (61%)
kcms.lookandfeel
FILES 1/1 (100%)CLASSES 1/1 (100%)LINE 269/350 (77%)CONDITIONAL 
82/137 (60%)
kcms.lookandfeel.autotests
FILES 1/1 (100%)CLASSES 1/1 (100%)LINE 100/100 
(100%)CONDITIONAL 52/104 (50%)___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


Re: Review Request 124283: Update kcmstyle docbook to Plasma 5

2015-07-12 Thread Burkhard Lück

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124283/
---

(Updated July 12, 2015, 2:51 p.m.)


Status
--

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for Documentation and Plasma.


Changes
---

Submitted with commit 87d53433b511a0bab0f9ad2161e42546f356f70f by Burkhard Lück 
to branch master.


Repository: plasma-desktop


Description
---

see Summary

appmenu commented in docbook, because it is not available in Plasma 5, is this 
correct?


Diffs
-

  doc/kcontrol/kcmstyle/index.docbook a0b456b 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124283/diff/


Testing
---

builds


Thanks,

Burkhard Lück

___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel