docutils.spec vs python-docutils.spec
They seem to be duplicates. Which one should be removed? -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC TODO [12/01/2006]
On Saturday 14 January 2006 12:28, Jan Rekorajski wrote: - I'm all for openldap 2.3, and if no one will step out to do it then count on me what's there different? just api changes? are databases binary compatible? i could help building if somebody produces PLD-doc/openldap-2.3-TODO.txt -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC TODO [12/01/2006]
On Saturday 14 January 2006 11:28, Jan Rekorajski wrote: Can we get my yesterday's rc-scripts/vserver clenup into AC? Sure, I'll put new rc-scripts. And: - what about openoffice? 2.x doesn't build on ppc (well, it builds but fails in %install stage on mkdiring some things) - what about java-dependant packages? I know we can't distribute java, bu we can distribute packages that depend on it, so what about installing java on builders and build java-dep packages? I'm all for it but afaik some redistributable packages require non-redistributable one and that would cause too many manual interventions on builders. There was once idea to create developers only distfiles and ftp resources for packages with NoSource. I have no idea how to deal with that java stuff without manual packages (!= java-sun) installation on builders. - I'm all for openldap 2.3, and if no one will step out to do it then count on me Start playing :) I'll give you info when builder request access will be restricted - that should be good time to update installer. Will test-builds be restricted also? It would be nice to send a test-build for AC to see if a package at least builds in AC environment. test-build access stays as is. Janek -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/ http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: AC TODO [12/01/2006]
Because that script was using rescue-cd which doesn't work on i386 machines. The case with bootdisks is different right? Right. All bootdisks are built for i386 :) M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
python qt
is python qt being broken package? PyQt-x11-gpl-3.15.1/examples2$ python aclock.py Traceback (most recent call last): File aclock.py, line 4, in ? from qt import * ImportError: No module named qt python-PyQt-3.15.1-1.amd64 -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: python qt
On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:08, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: is python qt being broken package? PyQt-x11-gpl-3.15.1/examples2$ python aclock.py Traceback (most recent call last): File aclock.py, line 4, in ? from qt import * ImportError: No module named qt python-PyQt-3.15.1-1.amd64 it doesn't look into right place at all $ strace -eopen python aclock.py 21|grep qt.so open(/usr/src/examples/python/PyQt/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/lib64/python24.zip/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/share/python2.4/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/share/python2.4/plat-linux2/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/share/python2.4/lib-tk/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/lib64/python2.4/lib-dynload/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(/usr/share/python2.4/site-packages/qt.so, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) $ l /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/qt.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6.0M Dec 25 20:51 /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/qt.so* -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: python qt
On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:21, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:08, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: is python qt being broken package? PyQt-x11-gpl-3.15.1/examples2$ python aclock.py Traceback (most recent call last): File aclock.py, line 4, in ? from qt import * ImportError: No module named qt python-PyQt-3.15.1-1.amd64 it doesn't look into right place at all [...] a workaround is: # rpm -Uhv python-PyQt-3.15.1-1.amd64.rpm --relocate /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages=/usr/lib64/python2.4/lib-dynload --force # rpm -Uhv --relocate /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages=/usr/lib64/python2.4/lib-dynload --force sip-4.3.2-1.amd64.rpm # rpm -Uhv --relocate /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages=/usr/lib64/python2.4/lib-dynload --force python-PyKDE-3.11.3-5.amd64.rpm -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
