Re: error: File(s) packaged into both ...
On Nov 11, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:06:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >> Note that having a file "replace" another package's content >> on same path > > What do you mean by that? Installing two packages containing the same > path with '--force'? > Nope. For starters --force isn't any one functionality. If you've never queried a file state, then you simply will not care. Even if you *have* queried a file state, using alternatives rather than obscure rpm functionality that has never worked quite right is likely saner. 73 de Jeff ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: error: File(s) packaged into both ...
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:06:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Note that having a file "replace" another package's content > on same path What do you mean by that? Installing two packages containing the same path with '--force'? Greets, Jacek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: error: File(s) packaged into both ...
On Nov 11, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Michael Shigorin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:06:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >> Note that having a file "replace" another package's content >> on same path has been ripped out @rpm5.org. >> >> Never worked well, mostly obscure functionality, and quite >> costly to compute are the reasons for the removal. > > Argh, I've used that rarely but IIRC for a reason with ALT-RPM. > Too bad for you. Note "quite costly to compute" means exactly that. 73 de Jeff ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: error: File(s) packaged into both ...
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:06:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Note that having a file "replace" another package's content > on same path has been ripped out @rpm5.org. > > Never worked well, mostly obscure functionality, and quite > costly to compute are the reasons for the removal. Argh, I've used that rarely but IIRC for a reason with ALT-RPM. -- WBR, Michael Shigorin -- Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: error: File(s) packaged into both ...
On Nov 11, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Since when is this an error? RPM5? >> >>> error: File(s) packaged into both bacula-console-wx-5.2.12-1.x86_64 and >>> bacula-console-qt4-5.2.12-1.x86_64: >>> /usr/share/pixmaps/bacula.png >> >> from: >> http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&name=bacula&id=9c2d1726-4c45-4a22-8b84-2d616936e040&action=tail >> >> It was often very handy to package a file into several packages ??? no >> need to create a 'common' subpackage every time a few, possibly >> alternative, sub-packages required the same file. >> >> Is such behaviour an error now? Or have I missed some more serious problem? > > Since RPM5. It's configurable, the default is an error in PLD. > Probably can be disabled in spec. > Yes. Note that having a file "replace" another package's content on same path has been ripped out @rpm5.org. Never worked well, mostly obscure functionality, and quite costly to compute are the reasons for the removal. 73 de Jeff ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: error: File(s) packaged into both ...
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Hello, > > Since when is this an error? RPM5? > > > error: File(s) packaged into both bacula-console-wx-5.2.12-1.x86_64 and > > bacula-console-qt4-5.2.12-1.x86_64: > >/usr/share/pixmaps/bacula.png > > from: > http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&name=bacula&id=9c2d1726-4c45-4a22-8b84-2d616936e040&action=tail > > It was often very handy to package a file into several packages ??? no > need to create a 'common' subpackage every time a few, possibly > alternative, sub-packages required the same file. > > Is such behaviour an error now? Or have I missed some more serious problem? Since RPM5. It's configurable, the default is an error in PLD. Probably can be disabled in spec. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
error: File(s) packaged into both ...
Hello, Since when is this an error? RPM5? > error: File(s) packaged into both bacula-console-wx-5.2.12-1.x86_64 and > bacula-console-qt4-5.2.12-1.x86_64: >/usr/share/pixmaps/bacula.png from: http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?dist=th&arch=x86_64&ok=0&name=bacula&id=9c2d1726-4c45-4a22-8b84-2d616936e040&action=tail It was often very handy to package a file into several packages – no need to create a 'common' subpackage every time a few, possibly alternative, sub-packages required the same file. Is such behaviour an error now? Or have I missed some more serious problem? Greets, Jacek ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [packages/lighttpd] the systemd service file actually added
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, jajcus wrote: > commit b4a3acf23fb992d9e8fb7a3bb5a415bc535c1f9b > Author: Jacek Konieczny > Date: Sun Nov 11 12:26:05 2012 +0100 > > the systemd service file actually added [...] > +[Service] > +EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/lighttpd > +ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/lighttpd-angel -t -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf > +ExecStart=/usr/sbin/lighttpd-angel -D -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf > $HTTPD_OPTS > +ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID Coś mi się wydaje, że w przypadku systemd angel jest kompletnie zbędnym ficzerem i sam systemd załatwi sprawę.. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
