Re: alsa vs bacula

2016-01-22 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:01:41PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On 2016-01-22 17:59, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > file /usr/bin/bat from install of alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64
> > conflicts with file from package bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64
> > file /usr/share/man/man1/bat.1.gz from install of
> > alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> > bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64
> 
> I have noticed that too.
> 
> The 'bat' from ALSA is a test tool, the one from bacula is an end user
> application. Also, we have had Bacula's BAT in PLD longer, so I think
> ALSA side should be 'fixed'.
> 
> I can see two options:
> - separate ALSA bat into a new package. Still conflicting, but a chance
> that someone would need ALSA bat and Bacula bat at the same time are small
> - rename the ALSA utility ? it will be a bit more difficult to find it,
> when someone expects 'bat', but there would be no conflict any more.

I propose renaming alsa's bat to alsa-bat.

The others:
Fedora uses alsa-utils-bat subpackage.
Debian doesn't have ALSA 1.1.0 yet.


-- 
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


Re: alsa vs bacula

2016-01-22 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On 2016-01-22 17:59, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> file /usr/bin/bat from install of alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64
> conflicts with file from package bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64
> file /usr/share/man/man1/bat.1.gz from install of
> alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64

I have noticed that too.

The 'bat' from ALSA is a test tool, the one from bacula is an end user
application. Also, we have had Bacula's BAT in PLD longer, so I think
ALSA side should be 'fixed'.

I can see two options:
- separate ALSA bat into a new package. Still conflicting, but a chance
that someone would need ALSA bat and Bacula bat at the same time are small
- rename the ALSA utility – it will be a bit more difficult to find it,
when someone expects 'bat', but there would be no conflict any more.

Jacek

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


alsa vs bacula

2016-01-22 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
file /usr/bin/bat from install of alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man1/bat.1.gz from install of 
alsa-utils-1.1.0-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
bacula-console-qt-5.2.13-4.x86_64





--
glen

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en