Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it)
[...]
-%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint
+#%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint
what about upstart and systemd users? :)
upstart users have mountpoint. systemd probably don't (does it work on
our system anyway?). Feel free to fix packages, so mountpoint will be in
util- linux only.
I'm not going to (-ENOTIME)
It was just notice.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, arekm wrote: Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it) [...] -%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +#%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint what about upstart and systemd users? :) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: xorg-xserver-server/xorg-xserver-server.spec - xorg-driver-video ...
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Fri Aug 26 03:42:59 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - xorg-driver-video virtual for video drivers - release 1 [...] +# Requires at least one video driver to run, see xorg.log which one exactly +Requires xorg-driver-video I don't think so. You can have network X-server which doesn't even have display. It should be Suggests -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires (prefered method). This is overkill. why? It's nice, IMHO. Wan't some completion? Install proper package. 1. one needs to know he wants the completion - as they exist for a very limited set of programs only. 2. one has to perform additional action - while it might just work OOTB. 3. it eats space (additional rpm/poldek indexes) and clutters rpm -q. As a conclusion of 1 and 2: if new completion arise, it won't automagically show up after upgrade. If you see better method right now - you are welcome. But DO THIS, don't talk about how rpm should work. Any of us know it. Otherwise why don't separate each man page? We could get rid of /usr/share/man from FHS (let's say we create FHS-man subpackage). Reductio ad absurdum Maybe each file in filesystem? :P -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, caleb wrote:
Author: calebDate: Tue Aug 23 11:10:00 2011 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- Up to 0.56
Files affected:
packages/etckeeper:
etckeeper.spec (1.5 - 1.6)
[...]
# - %{py_sitescriptdir}/bzrlib/plugins also created by qbzr package?
Summary: Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs
Name:etckeeper
[...]
+Requires:bash-completion
Are you sure?
IMvHO it shouldn't be more than Suggests... if any...
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
+Requires: bash-completion
Are you sure?
IMvHO it shouldn't be more than Suggests... if any...
No I'm not sure how to handle this, but it does provide a file for use
by bash-completion:
%{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name}
The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is installed,
resulting in an rpm error.
1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires
(prefered method).
2. Put %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d to some filesystem or something
package (unlikely).
Make your choice. IMO 1 is preffered one. Take a look at other packages
how to do it.
If there is a more graceful way to both package this file and not throw
rpm errors without requiring bash-completion I would love to learn how.
Require bash_completion for directory only is insane. I can even not have
bash...
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote:
%{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name}
The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is
installed, resulting in an rpm error.
1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires
(prefered method).
This is overkill.
why? It's nice, IMHO.
Wan't some completion? Install proper package.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ssh: send/accept GIT_* env vars
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote: What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied by ssh to remote session? I mean the following line in our default /etc/ssh/ssh_config. AcceptEnv LANG LC_* LANGUAGE TZ GIT_* I have just discovered that it break at least one feature in gitolite. you mean SendEnv not AcceptEnv? I mean SendEnv GIT_* in /etc/ssh/ssh_config and AcceptEnv GIT_* in /etc/ssh/sshd_config why it is problem for you to set it up with ~/.ssh/config ? My question is, do we really need/want to have it in default configuration? no. it's private glen's config in global stuff... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: rc-scripts-user
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Przemyslaw Iskra wrote: rc-scripts-user / userscripts allows normal users to schedule and execute tasks on system startup and shutdown. Please test and comment. Once it gets on any production system it will be hard to change interface without breaking user configuration. The interface is: * All scripts in ~/.config/init.d/ (hardcoded path, no xdg support) - any better ideas ? ~/.config/init/ * all *~ and *.bak files are ignored - ignore something else ? .rpmnew, .rpmsave... There is few more temporary filetypes. * executed in alphabetic order - maybe invert the order on shutdown ? I see no use. * Scripts must accept start and stop arguments. - I don't see any use for restart or reload, do you ? status should be, if state is noticed anywhere. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [PATCH] NetworkManager ModemManager
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: I think we should give you chance to work on your own account. me: +1 +1 Anyone else? :) do you know, that if you say +1, you must mentor his commits, i.e correct him and explain things, not just say yes Is it so hard to make search the list for patches sent by subject of that voting? IMO these are ok. What should I say more? I will watch for his commits, if you wish. We don't have many people as active developers, why shouldn't we look for new ones? -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: cairo/cairo-link.patch, cairo/cairo.spec - 1.10.0 - merged from d...
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Jakub Bogusz wrote: - modify libtool not to use *.la for dynamic linking and keep them in -devel Lets suppose we will have modification like that. Will mainstream accept it? If yes - lets do it. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: cairo/cairo-link.patch, cairo/cairo.spec - 1.10.0 - merged from d...
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Tomasz Pala wrote: - remove all library *.la and -static packages +1 - this also simplifies builds and releases storage. Do we have any FTP stats on *-static downloads? If noone uses them there's no point in wasting resources. Wrong. I've used few times static libs to build some binaries and I'm using it for years... Some may download it only once to do the build (like I did). FTP stats are not good indicator here... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: php/php.spec - fix timezone setup in php.ini - there's nothing to...
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, glen wrote:
Author: glen Date: Thu Aug 26 17:08:31 2010 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- fix timezone setup in php.ini
- there's nothing to ldconfig
Files affected:
packages/php:
php.spec (1.892 - 1.893)
Diffs:
Index: packages/php/php.spec
diff -u packages/php/php.spec:1.892 packages/php/php.spec:1.893
--- packages/php/php.spec:1.892 Thu Aug 26 19:00:17 2010
+++ packages/php/php.spec Thu Aug 26 19:08:25 2010
@@ -449,7 +449,6 @@
Summary(uk.UTF-8): Бібліотеки спільного використання для PHP
Group: Libraries
Requires(post): sed = 4.0
-Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
# because of dlclose() bugs in glibc = 2.3.4 causing SEGVs on exit
Requires:glibc = 6:2.3.5
Requires:php-dirs
@@ -2350,18 +2349,15 @@
fi
%post common
-/sbin/ldconfig
# PHP 5.3 requires timezone being setup, try setup it from tzdata
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/timezone ]; then
TIMEZONE=
. /etc/sysconfig/timezone
if [ $TIMEZONE ]; then
- %{__sed} -i -e s,^;date.timezone = .*,date.timezone =
$TIMEZONE, /etc/php/php.ini
+ %{__sed} -i -e s,^;date.timezone\s*=.*,date.timezone =
$TIMEZONE, /etc/php/php.ini
no.
It will break existing configurations...
Example file:
[...]
;date.timezone = dupa
date.timezone = GMT
;date.timezone = dupa
[...]
Do this only when option is not set.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [PATCH] NetworkManager ModemManager
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Przemo Firszt wrote: List of changes: - Add polkit option to ModemManager configure, - Add ifcfg-rh plugin to NetworkManager, - Add new config file for NM and remove obsolete one, - Add Suggests: ModemManager mobile-broadband-provider-info to NetworkManager.spec Tested on intel 2200 wifi connection and O2 Ireland 3G/UMTS connection on Nokia 5230 and an USB cable. NetworkManager needs more testing, but seems to work fine. And, as always,any volunteers to test add changes to PLD repo? I think we should give you chance to work on your own account. me: +1 -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: devel-hints-pl.txt thread
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: as seen by google translate: http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-pl/2010-June/thread.html#start it's not 1st of april to do those jokes, is it? hint: the source: http://translate.google.com/#pl|et|Pawel%20Golaszewski ROTFL! :D -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: devel-hints-pl.txt thread
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote: it's not 1st of april to do those jokes, is it? hint: the source: http://translate.google.com/#pl|et|Pawel%20Golaszewski Epic fail. For icing on the cake note that this translation is used in ANY target language. Apparently Elan Ruusamäe is the new Pawel Golaszewski world-wide? My second identity. :D -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Native upstart scripts
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: I think Upstart support should be implemented as an option, coexisting with current solution, so the administrator may choose what he prefers and even use init.d for some services and upstart for other. I was hoping for eventually dropping rc scripts for some services and moving them completely to upstart. I see why that might sound scary and am ok with having two solutions. -ENOWAY ! Don't remove working sollution. It can be done for new services, but not for existing-ones. I'd opt for having 2 separate -init subpackages, one with the current rc.d contents and one with an upstart job description and a simple rc.d wrapper that runs start $foo, stop $foo etc. I wanted to say something like that. What do you think? Should I try to prepare a proof-of-concept implementation? Ladies and gentlemen, we have a volunteer :) hip-hip, hura!!! ;) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Native upstart scripts
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Maybe we could make /etc/init.d a directory with symlinks to /etc/rc.d/init.d or the upstart wrapper, depending on what is used to handle the service? see how ubuntu made this. Every service is in that directory, some are links. I can see how does it looks like at home, later. I'd opt for having 2 separate -init subpackages, one with the current rc.d contents and one with an upstart job description and a simple rc.d wrapper that runs start $foo, stop $foo etc. Extra two subpackages for every daemon? I would prefer to avoid that. but you can make ignores in poldek with that and make it easy to use. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: $HOME of system users like nobody or stats
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: mount.davfs (provided by davfs2 package) does not allow non-root user to mount filesystem into another users home directory. Problem is that home directory of nobody and stats users (both provided by setup package) is /. I would like to change home directory of these users to /usr/share/empty. Will it break something? No, it won't. AFAIR it was discussed ages ago with kloczek (hundreds-of-mails-thread) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: mysql/mysql.spec, mysql/my.cnf (NEW) - add default ~/.my.cnf via ...
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, glen wrote:
Author: glen Date: Mon Dec 21 14:52:55 2009 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- add default ~/.my.cnf via /etc/skel
[...]
+cp -a %{SOURCE14} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/skel/.my.cnf
[...]
+%attr(600,root,root) %config(noreplace) %verify(not md5 mtime size)
/etc/skel/.my.cnf
[...]
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+[client]
+user=mysql
Please, don't put you private configs into distro. It's not a good
default.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: _Maybe_ he shouldn't do this... But it's done now and we shouldn't reverse it. [...] but it's obvious that this change MUST be reverted in Ac. This line is frozen and there is NO PLACE for ANY changes, especially so invasive. I can agree with that. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: you're writing of yourself in third tense? what is this letter about? About broken PHP. Not by me. everybody is welcome to fix packages and stbr them to builders, there's even !stbr bot on irc for really everyone(?). There are already two votes to revert your change. The only mistake here is requires missing. php-common should require packeges that are in separate modules now. For few months, to satisfy existing instalations. After that is could be suggest only, if any. package spliting itself is ok, IMO. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: package spliting itself is ok, IMO. I don't really care if it's shared or not. I do care about working apps. The one who broke them and fellowship he gathers should do that BEFORE STBR. Although it definitely is bad idea. Let me repeat from -pl: I don't know a single installation not using sessions I do. Not only one. and so limited in resources that it makes a difference. It makes difference with apache in memory usage. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: Although it definitely is bad idea. Let me repeat from -pl: I don't know a single installation not using sessions I do. Not only one. What's the traffic volume? 2 of them - minimal 2 of them - big. and so limited in resources that it makes a difference. It makes difference with apache in memory usage. What's the footprint? I didn't checked but every php module loaded causes memory usage increase of each apache process. Crazy but it's the way apache works. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: What's the footprint? I didn't checked but every php module loaded causes memory usage increase of each apache process. Crazy but it's the way apache works. [...] There are arguments to make these modules as separate ones. Yes, memory overhead... OTOH I don't know any systems that don't use session isn't anything significant. You can talk about any module like that... But there are only a few I can't imagine PHP without. What can do large PHP traffic without sessions? A lot of things can be done without sessions. Don't think about webpage in internet only. php can do much more things... Make performance, memory tests and proof that it's not the right direction. ...now please step back and read first paragraph. It exists. Dunno how big - 10-200kB?. But this way we could end with one-big-php-lib because each module is unsignificant. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Wojciech Błaszkowski wrote: There is REALY a lots of packages / scripts / what_ever wich requres session. IMO excluding session to single package is NOT a good idea. goal is to write down deps in pkgs. too bad original spec developer didn't care writing down requirements. these are usually written in README files, etc. welcome to pld... so are packages broken with sense of requiring exact apache modules they use. and they still are since 2.0 split each module. nobody is in care to fix those. Oh, com on glen.. Just revert that change and every thing will be back to normal. We do NOT have to split everything just because we can. _Maybe_ he shouldn't do this... But it's done now and we shouldn't reverse it. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: Author: bluesDate: Thu Oct 29 08:15:20 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - TODO Files affected: packages/secpanel: secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO (NONE - 1.1) (NEW) [...] I don't find such way useful: - when I download package by builder, I don't have ANY idea, that there even is any TODO - TODO is not available in .src.rpm I second that. Blues please stop making this mess. i third that, and it will be even more mess, as i and some other devs do continue adding the todo in old fashion. resulting todo lists in two different formats. ok, let it be. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: It can be packaged as doc. Easy to do. Packaging it and putting as Source will fix previous issue... That would be really a mess. Consider conflicts with shipped TODO files. TODO-PLD, PLD-TODO, whatever... Debian uses that and there is no problem. Putting that TODO in package as doc can be guide for users what can change in future (split into subpackages, whatever) Please, look at lighttpd. It's packaged now. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Author: bluesDate: Thu Oct 29 08:15:20 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - TODO Files affected: packages/secpanel: secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO (NONE - 1.1) (NEW) Diffs: Index: packages/secpanel/secpanel.spec diff -u packages/secpanel/secpanel.spec:1.31 packages/secpanel/secpanel.spec:1.32 --- packages/secpanel/secpanel.spec:1.31Fri Apr 10 10:39:10 2009 +++ packages/secpanel/secpanel.spec Thu Oct 29 09:15:14 2009 @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ # $Revision$, $Date$ -# TODO: -# - some icon for desktop Summary: Visual management of SSH connections Summary(pl.UTF-8): Wizualna nakładka na klienta SSH Name: secpanel Index: packages/secpanel/TODO diff -u /dev/null packages/secpanel/TODO:1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Oct 29 09:15:20 2009 +++ packages/secpanel/TODO Thu Oct 29 09:15:14 2009 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# TODO: +- some icon for desktop I don't find such way useful: I do. You can put there a lot more info that in spec header, without any ^#. Compilation errors, whatever. I never liked long TODO's in spec headers. It's only noise. - when I download package by builder, I don't have ANY idea, that there even is any TODO True - it should be fixed. - TODO is not available in .src.rpm It can be packaged as doc. Easy to do. Packaging it and putting as Source will fix previous issue... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
Author: bluesDate: Thu Oct 29 08:15:20 2009 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- TODO
Files affected:
packages/secpanel:
secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO (NONE - 1.1) (NEW)
[...]
I don't find such way useful:
- when I download package by builder, I don't have ANY idea, that there
even is any TODO
- TODO is not available in .src.rpm
I second that. Blues please stop making this mess.
TODOs in spec is a mess...
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: Compilation errors, whatever. Have never encoutered one. no? Look at openoffice.org.spec. Good luck. NOTE, TODO, MAYBE TODO, I never liked long TODO's in spec headers. It's only noise. I never liked multiple %desc or subpackages. Just get used to it. reductio ad absurdum It can be packaged as doc. Easy to do. Packaging it and putting as Source will fix previous issue... That would be really a mess. Consider conflicts with shipped TODO files. TODO-PLD, PLD-TODO, whatever... Debian uses that and there is no problem. Putting that TODO in package as doc can be guide for users what can change in future (split into subpackages, whatever) I don't want to fight for that but it can be very useful. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xz vs. lzma
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: xz has replaced lzma, Provides/Obsoletes it and install symlink lzma that points to xz. Unfortunatelly these programs are not compatibile. xz is unable to decompress file compressed with lzma. First of all - ask xz developers what they will do. Maybe it's just a bug. If not - we should do something about that. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xz vs. lzma
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: xz has replaced lzma, Provides/Obsoletes it and install symlink lzma that points to xz. Unfortunatelly these programs are not compatibile. xz is unable to decompress file compressed with lzma. First of all - ask xz developers what they will do. Maybe it's just a bug. If not - we should do something about that. #tukaani 09:23 pawelz Hello 09:24 pawelz New xz is unable to decompress file compressed using lzma. Is it a bug or feature? :) 09:26 pawelz Are you going to fix it? Or just file format has changed and new versions won't be compatibile with older ones?? 11:00 @Larhzu Hello 11:00 @Larhzu You got luck, I've been away over a week. 11:01 @Larhzu pawelz: How was that .lzma file created? XZ Utils supports all .lzma files that the lzma tool from LZMA Utils 4.32.x can create. 11:02 @Larhzu But there are types of .lzma files that are not supported by XZ Utils but are supported by LZMA Utils. Such files should be very rare. 11:03 pawelz Larhzu: I've created it using: tar acvf file.tar.lzma directory 11:04 @Larhzu What does lzma --version say? 11:04 pawelz Larhzu: ftp://distfiles.pld-linux.org/distfiles/by-md5/6/4/64c8be7214ca41b98180e7e81844cf10/telak-0.5.tar.lzma 11:06 @Larhzu pawelz: That's in an old development version of the new file format. You can decompress it only if you know what *exact* version the development code was used to create the file. 11:06 @Larhzu pawelz: In other words, someone made a major mistake by using unstable file format. (...) 11:10 @Larhzu They are easy to detect, the first byte is 0xFF. So it was our mistake, that this version was available in PLD. major pita... So... I think we should leave xz in current state. Old lzma should be placed in supported or so. With binary executable name changed (lzma_old_broken_format ?). even... lzma should be some script that tries to detect format and uses proper version. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: packages: util-vserver/util-vserver.spec, util-vserver/TODO (NEW) - move TO...
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 13:44:38 blues wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.225 2009/05/13 10:44:33 blues +- move TODO to separate file why? i liked the otherwise it's 1. in spec file, always around when you edit the file 3. nobody really goes to see what is in TODO, maybe i'm bored and i fix something. 2. PLD-doc/make-todo.sh scanned SPECS for TODO sections 4. if there are lots of SOURCES in package (like php for example), catching eye on TODO in `ls` is unlikely. Because: - it makes only noise in spec - nobody goes to see TODO in spec too :) - it's clean and nice - TODO can be not only for SPEC - TODO can be vry long... - you don't have to catch anything - you know it's there, like spec :D I think it's better way, easier to parse. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[geninitrd] LVM tools
[...] # rpm -ihv kernel-2.6.28.9-1.i686.rpm Przygotowywanie... ### [100%] 1:kernel ### [100%] geninitrd: ERROR: Can't determine LVM tools version. Please set LVMTOOLSVERSION and rerun geninitrd. [...] # rpm -q geninitrd geninitrd-1.10-2.noarch After instalation lvm2-initrd everything looks fine but I don't use LVM and geninitrd shouldn't force me to install lvm2-initrd, right? -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Whatever, but please don't invent some yet again base architecture
prefixes (there is %{_target_base_arch} already). Anyway there is no
need to use architecture name in %{_libdir} subdirectory (multilib is
already handled by different %{_libdir} value).
Simple: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10/ would do.
[...]
BTW, Debian doesn't use this part of path at all - just perl version
number.
...and we should follow that...
No, we have no obligation to follow Debian about this.
Sure, but this is good thing.
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: Why not try change it to something less problematic, for whole line: x86-pld-linux-thread-multi, x8664-pld-linux-thread-multi,... or maybe just arch-pld-linux-thread-multi (what about multilib in this moment?) -1: it's a major change and I can't see a good reason to warrant it. The pain will be much bigger, than the gain [1]. $ perl -le 'map print, @INC' | grep /lib/ /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i686-pld-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i686-pld-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i686-pld-linux-thread-multi We don't have to do it right now but on next bigger perl update? Why not? If we touch the first one, we'll screw over everyone who installed something using CPAN.pm. Who cares /usr/local entry? It can stay in that form. Anyway - can we add more paths to @INC? It will fix all the problems. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: I'm considering dropping athlon architecture since I see no real gain over i686. athlon would be deleted from ftp and athlon-i686 symlink created. Bad idea this way. It will destroy many systems (look at perl dirs). poldek:/all-avail rsearch -f /i686/ Przeszukiwanie pakietów..zrobione. [...] 367 package(s) found. Anyway - at least /etc/rpm/platform has to be fixed. In athlon dir should stay only rpm package which will make all the required changes: - /etc/rpm/platform - poldek sources fixes - something with patckages arch-dependant (paths, some hardcoded things). If we will make some nice way to do arch-switch it will be prepared for future moves -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Xorg requires hal daemon
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: I've installed the newest xorg and it didn't run. I've googled and found that the newest xorg needs hal daemon. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xorg_input_hotplugging#Requirements Besides installing a supported driver, both dbus and hal have to be running. Please correct in the spec-files! No, it does not require hal daemon. It's just default _configuration_. So imo we should add Suggests or %banner. It is a bit confusing that xorg does not work out of the box. There is no error message nor info about hal daemon. Not every user or even developer knows that. Please, use banners only as the-real-last-resort... These are really annoing. Suggests would be fine in that case, IMO. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Rationale: * only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support hardware 3 years is very old? Come on... I have 2 laptops, both are non-PAE... Only the newest one with C2D on board is. Only the Pentium M is problem. Sonoma with PAE was introduced in early 2005, but older versions were still on market. Dunno how long pre-Sonoma processors were produced (suppose ~1 year). IMO it's much too early to abbandon support for that processors... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: python-psycopg2.spec - Release 3. Killed nonworking mx bcond. Prepar...
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: - if distro line bconds (whatever you call it) are allowed on HEAD, forbidding it, is like forbidding commits to SPECS module, i'll continue add them if i find it better than making AC-branch, Ok, but AC-branch must exist in this place. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac bcond in xulrunner.spec? I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple things. it is messy as you need to look at distro line i 3 ways - trunk (no changes) - ac branch - and now ac bcond No, there should be always AC branch/tag for last version that s prepared for AC. It's easier to move tag/branch than merge changes. and i bet it will kick our asses sooner or later. people will abuse the bcond thing. moreover, it already happens with python-psycopg2.spec to build psycopg with python 2.4. we will end up with mess. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like ra, ac, and ti. yep. Just not bconds - conditions. there shall be no th bconds as it is trunk forever. Byt default HEAD is for Th. OTher lines can use conditions for simplicity. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac bcond in xulrunner.spec? I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple things. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: sshd vs openvpn
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: we had suffered one incident when one server did not came up because openvpn had server certificate which was protected by password and therefore it was waiting for password input and no other service (sshd was crucial) was not brought up until someone pressed enter. $ l /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/*vpn lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2008-09-02 00:08 /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S11openvpn - /etc/rc.d/init.d/openvpn* l /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/*sshd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2008-07-28 22:14 /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S55sshd - /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd* perhaps cchange start priorities so that sshd is started before openvpn? then there could be other services that block startup same way? apache with certificate password protected? change sshd to be as early as possible? Yes, sshd is critical and we should do everything to make it available. out of my mind came that sshd should be after random and network initscripts... nothing else should matter... however if you depend sshd being visible also in openvpn device we can't do this... It could be problem in some configurations. I.e. all routing daemons should start earlier... maybe it would be possible to setup some timeout for openvpn key input and then proceed further if no passphrase was input within that time period? That kind of thing should be done for _every_ service started. Few days ago I had problem with hc-cron which hung while starting. /etc/nologin has left and all the users had problems. It's good that root can login apart nologin, but the problem stays. Every service should have some period of time (lets say... 5 minutes). After that time it's killed. any other toughts? -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: nrss.spec (NEW) - initial
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, uzsolt wrote: Author: uzsolt Date: Mon Aug 18 11:17:11 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - initial Files affected: SPECS: nrss.spec (NONE - 1.1) (NEW) [...] +URL: http://www.codezen.org/nrss According to that page: I’ve completed the rename, and put up a new site for Canto, which is the renamed NRSS 0.4.0. nrss should be removed IMO and canto spec should be created. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: kvm.spec - don't require external qemu, doesn't make sense.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.41 2008/07/08 21:41:32 blues +- don't require external qemu, doesn't make sense. why so? the /usr/share part is common, binary from kvm is just patched. No response = reverting. There was response. Have you tried to build qemu? do it... Maybe some parts should be in some common subpackage with conflict/obsoletes itself but... I don't want to play it... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Split coreutils?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: however i'd had liked the change, that way i could had vserver system without any suid-root programs present. Feel free to split again and handle all the unhappy devs :) how about split, but have strict dep for some time? (this question already was here, but now goal is little different) How about Suggests in base coreutils? even better, don't have to change it in the future then. Suggests won't help if you are making automatic upgrade... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Split coreutils?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: I'd vote for adding Suggests but somewhere else than coreutils (as it re-adds the circular dependency) or adding Requires to rc-scripts (as daemon --user foo uses su). All th builders are now broken due to split. su was used there and coreutils upgraded automaticly. It's a matter of adding it in the appropriate place, not reverting the change :) That change is not wrong but causes A LOT of problems It can't stay in current state because it will spoil a lot of systems with very little gain. IMO there should be added R: coreutils-su in main coreutils and leave it for, let's say, 6 months. All current systems will be updated in this time, without any problems. After the 6 months that requires could be changed into Suggests. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Split coreutils?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote: IMO there should be added R: coreutils-su in main coreutils and leave it for, let's say, 6 months. All current systems will be updated in this Don't forget about purpose of this separation - it has been done to break R loop, so this way makes no sense. In short period of time - sure. But it allows to make smooth change. Current configs won't be broken, with new instalation you have to keep in mind that su needs to be installed. Anyway - now whole discussion is pointless. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: PLD-specs-TODO
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: [pl] Co myślicie o przeniesieniu PLD-doc/PLD-specs-TODO na wiki? Lub o jakiejś integracji z wiki? Każdy wtedy mógłby dodawać propozycje nowych specy, nie tylko deweloperzy. Wiecie, nie każdy użytkownik PLD jest developerem;) Jeżeli to będzie działało w ten sposób, że na wiki będą pobierane na bierząco dane z cvs-u to jasne, jestem jak najbardziej za :) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: tex in pld
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote: Unmaintained tetex will finally dissapear from ftp... that is why I'm asking what will be lost/broken when replacing tetex with texlive... If so - better ask about incompatibilities. I was thinking about incompatibilities saying broken :) I've got dozens of macros, workarounds and other solutions for LaTeX, but some of them may be tetex specific, dunno. I will take a look how is it made in ubuntu in a few days... They have livetex... Anyway - we won't see it if we won't try... :( If nothing and one can replace another we could consider putting tetex to (un)supported and texlive to main... There were differences even between tetex versions - after transition to 3.0 I compared dvi files generated by former tetex 2.0 and I've noticed different kerning (IMO it got worse). Well - docs I was generating were better after switch 2-3 I think it depends what are you using... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: tex in pld
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote: What is the difference in functionality? I mean - what will be lost because this is most important... Why 'lost'? It's all about creating texlive* packages, not removing tetex* ones. Unmaintained tetex will finally dissapear from ftp... that is why I'm asking what will be lost/broken when replacing tetex with texlive... If nothing and one can replace another we could consider putting tetex to (un)supported and texlive to main... But first of all texlive should appear on ftp at all :D -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SOURCES: lighttpd-mod_staticfile.conf - revert, put this to new pa...
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, glen wrote: [...] - revert, put this to new package if really needed [...] lighttpd-mod_staticfile.conf (1.9 - 1.10) [...] -# .fcgi, .php, .pl are most often handled by mod_fastcgi or mod_cgi -static-file.exclude-extensions = ( .fcgi, .php, .pl ) +# .pl, .fcgi are most often handled by mod_fastcgi or mod_cgi +static-file.exclude-extensions = ( .pl, .fcgi ) What is the rationale for putting it into new package? If so - fcgi and pl should be as separate package too... php is the same case as pl or fcgi (I think that cgi and inc should be too). It shouldn't be handled as pure static file, no matter if server has support for parsing it or not. Why this way [...] Index: SOURCES/lighttpd-mod_cgi_php.conf diff -u SOURCES/lighttpd-mod_cgi_php.conf:1.3 SOURCES/lighttpd-mod_cgi_php.conf:1.4 --- SOURCES/lighttpd-mod_cgi_php.conf:1.3 Sun Apr 27 13:41:16 2008 +++ SOURCES/lighttpd-mod_cgi_php.conf Sun Apr 27 19:11:03 2008 @@ -6,3 +6,5 @@ .php = /usr/bin/php.cgi, .php4 = /usr/bin/php4.cgi, ) + +static-file.exclude-extensions += (.php) [...] -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: libfuse.spec - revert - it creates fuse group...
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: Author: bluesDate: Fri Apr 18 07:43:58 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - revert - it creates fuse group... [...] +Provides: group(fuse) [...] so why not: a) add provides: group(fuse) also to setup It is. b) require setup = ver_with_fuse c) let fuse group created/removed by all packages that use it (currently group is really removed if no installed package Provides the group (via %userremove macro) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [Th] emerald.spec - up to 0.7.4, add missing BuildRequires
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, kiesiu wrote: The only available emerald version on ftp (Th) doesn't want to work well with new compiz in th-test. In attachment I send a patch which upgrades emerald spec file to 0.7.4 version and adds missing BuildRequires. It works well. Please somebody with w+ access add this to CVS and if it's possible send a STBR to th-test. Well, I think this one should also make commits on it's own +1 -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Package with make-request.sh?
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: Separate spec Really simple and ugly spec. Ugly becouse: - I dont know what version it should have (now its revision number) It's fine. revision in cvs is for that purpose. - I dont know on what license it is Every spec is GPL. We can assume it's too (there was something about that in PLD-docs. - Missing requires (R: /usr/sbin/sendmail ?) Can be easy filled. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: Package with make-request.sh?
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: What do you think about adding make-request.sh script to rpm-build-tools package or to separate package/spec make-request.spec? Separate spec -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: High Performance Enabled SSH/SCP [PSC]
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/faq.php let's compile our openssh NONE Cipher support on? Hm. After upgrade Ac to openssh-4.7p1-3 with HPN putty (windows ssh client) can not connect to server. Wrote connection closed. Downgrade to 4.7p1-2 helps. Yes, I had the same problem on AC. Downgrade helped. Which version? 0.60 was reported to support HPN IIRC No matter - it shouldn't require fixed client version in any way. There is often not possible to fix anything on clients... (even some old systems). -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: wireshark.spec - ghost soname symlinks
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, qboosh wrote:
Author: qboosh Date: Sat Jan 5 15:08:17 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- ghost soname symlinks
[...]
+%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libwireshark.so.0
Shouldn't rpm generate these entries automagically?
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: wireshark.spec - ghost soname symlinks
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, qboosh wrote:
Author: qboosh Date: Sat Jan 5 15:08:17 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- ghost soname symlinks
[...]
+%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libwireshark.so.0
Shouldn't rpm generate these entries automagically?
how? i mean how would rpmbuild make the decision that this symlink:
1. shouild be added automatically to %files
2. rpmbuild would know this symlink is ldconfig ghost
You have full list of files. After that you can make ldconfig in buildroot
and you have differences :) only ghost it.
so far only thing automatic is %find_lang
you want to introduce %find_ldconfig ? :)
yep, would be nice ;)
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SOURCES: logrotate.conf - do log rotation daily and keep 2 weeks.
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Author: bluesDate: Mon Dec 24 12:34:17 2007 GMT Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD Log message: - do log rotation daily and keep 2 weeks. It's too short period :-( First of all - where's rationale for this change? Few things: - it's easier to compress 5MB file than 35MB. This is significant on desktops, but on server systems could be too. - each day is one file. simple. - many services are producing a lot of logs and that was why glen has started putting different settings to each rotate file. I don't think it's good solution. I won't fight for that setting but lets talt about them... This was PLD default for a long time, ...we should consider changing it :) 2 months would be great, 1 month is +- ok but 2 weeks it too short. And daily is too frequent for ordinary (i.e. using defaults) system. Agreed. And I don't. logrotate's default is rotate 4 weekly. There is many other defaults we don't follow ;) Replacing it distribution-wide with significantly different private configuration without strong rationale is not acceptable. It's not my private config. P.S.: Merry Christmas, ho-ho-ho ;) -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: BR-s and R-s policy
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Marcin Król wrote: So is this some kind of policy, to require newest packages possible at the time of upping spec? It seems so. no, it's not. It was done sometimes for things like KDE, gnome, etc to force the updates and ensure that libraries will be upgraded. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: vim languages
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Mariusz Mazur wrote: any comments? The basic packages should be 'low reqs' and 'high reqs' (which translates to -- no langs and all langs). Anything in between should be left to ppl directly interested. All-or-nothing isn't the best choice... I think that there should be 3 possibilities: - vim like in current packages we know. It would be nice to keep it. - vim-tiny (or minimal) - for monks - vim-full - for those who like all the bells and whistles I'm not however sure whether calling it 'vim-lang-all' is the right choice. It sounds kind of counterintuitive. The whole 'vim-lang' also sounds too far fetched -- I seriously doubt anyone's going to actually create those 'vim-langs', so imho it'll be better to call the full version vim-full, vim-loaded, or 'vim-whatever'. (Anyone got any bright ideas?) Debians choice: vim - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor vim-addon-manager - manager of addons for the Vim editor vim-common - Vi IMproved - Common files vim-doc - Vi IMproved - HTML documentation vim-full - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - full fledged version vim-gnome - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with GNOME2 GUI vim-gtk - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with GTK2 GUI vim-gui-common - Vi IMproved - Common GUI files vim-latexsuite - View, edit and compile LaTeX documents from within vim vim-lesstif - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with LessTif GUI vim-perl - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with Perl support vim-python - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with Python support vim-ruby - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with Ruby support vim-runtime - Vi IMproved - Runtime files vim-scripts - plugins for vim, adding bells and whistles vim-syntax-gtk - Syntax files to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim vim-tcl - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with TCL support vim-tiny - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - compact version vim-vimoutliner - script for building an outline editor on top of Vim vimhelp-fr - Vi IMproved - Documentation files (French translation) -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: vim languages
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Mariusz Mazur wrote: any comments? The basic packages should be 'low reqs' and 'high reqs' (which translates to -- no langs and all langs). Anything in between should be left to ppl directly interested. All-or-nothing isn't the best choice... I think that there should be 3 possibilities: - vim like in current packages we know. It would be nice to keep it. - vim-tiny (or minimal) - for monks - vim-full - for those who like all the bells and whistles What's the difference between current vim and vim-full? AFAIR current vim has only perl enabled by default. Or only perl was enabled some time ago... -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: vim languages
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, wrobell wrote: speaking about ruby/python/tcl/perl support in vim. i would like to switch off above languages support by default (as it was almost always before, excluding perl for some reasons). if one needs support for specific language, then please create new subpackage (i.e. vim-python). the reason is that i doubt that any of us writes scripts in *all* above languages for vim. but if one really needs all of them, then please create vim-lang-all (or something). any comments? Only two: - additional package have to be build from the same spec to have every type of vims in sync. Otherwise all of that will fail. - please, look at debian. They have something like that... -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [BUG] exclude confuses /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: It seems that /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is confused when in spec is used %exclude. Files excluded aren't shown as unpackaged. Should they? I allways thought of unpackaged files as of those which you may have missed - %exclude means you know the file exists but just don't want to package it. You don't want it in _that_ package where %exclude is specified. It doesn't mean that you don't want to package it at all. Maybe there should be another tag %ignore when you don't want something at all? Now we are deleting files while installing... but I don't think it's good solution. Not clean, for sure. Jeff? -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [BUG] exclude confuses /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
It seems that /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is confused when in spec is
used %exclude. Files excluded aren't shown as unpackaged.
Should they? I allways thought of unpackaged files as of those which
you may have missed - %exclude means you know the file exists but
just don't want to package it.
You don't want it in _that_ package where %exclude is specified. It
doesn't mean that you don't want to package it at all. Maybe there
should be another tag %ignore when you don't want something at all?
Now we are deleting files while installing... but I don't think it's
good solution. Not clean, for sure. Jeff?
I'm not sure I see the usage case for explicit %ignore. One can
certainly enumerate files/directories explicitly in %files, and just
delete undesired elements.
We are doing that right now.
But it makes things like --short-circuit difficult to use. And is not
nice.
And if ease of packaging is the issue, then pattern rule based content,
like, say,
*.h
*.a
*.la
*.so
from %{buildroot}, to send files that match pattern always into *-devel
subpackage.
Replacing external check-files script using a %{buildroot} Fts(3) walk
internal to rpm is achievable. The functionality of detecting files that
have been overlooked in %files manifests is too important to leave to a
script, and an Fts(3) implementation is likely the same order of
magnitude of effort as arranging for %{_tmppath} (or %{_tmpdir} ;-)
lists to be used by a script, with results sucked and parsed from stdout
for display purposes. Likely not the answers you wanted to hear ;-)
The answer like many others. ;)
That one is good too ;)
But %ignore can be added to rpmbuild if you wish.
Can be very useful.
--
pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[BUG] exclude confuses /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
Hello, It seems that /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is confused when in spec is used %exclude. Files excluded aren't shown as unpackaged. -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: make-3.81 in AC
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: could you explain or copy paste some log? as twittner (yours) request failed, while mine (test and ready) succeeded. and your request as no log at this time [...] 42738. 2007.07.04 23:01:42 from twittner 60ffabe3-12f1-4d1c-8462-2c480e83e2a6, 2, upgrade make-3.81-1.src.rpm (make.spec -R AC-branch ) [ac-i686:OK ac-i586:OK ac-i386:OK ac-athlon:OK ac-alpha:OK ac-sparc:OK ac-amd64:OK ac-ppc:OK] ^ 42737. 2007.07.04 22:32:15 from twittner b11b97e0-1e2a-495b-88c0-e0b114b9efaa, 2, test-build make-3.81-1.src.rpm (make.spec -R HEAD ) [ac-i686:FAIL ac-i586:FAIL ac-i386:FAIL ac-athlon:FAIL ac-alpha:FAIL ac-sparc:FAIL ac-amd64:FAIL ac-ppc:FAIL] This is the reason. -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kernel-vanilla.spec - fix for PPC failing when ...
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marcin Król wrote: But it's not vanila now :D How about replacing with sed instead of using patch? :) sed was used on makefiles anyway (for extraversion). vanilla means unmodified. And you are changing that kernel. Doesn't matter if it's cosmetics or not. No matter if it's patch or sed. It's just mine 0,03€ about kernel-vanilla in general :D -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [webapps] PHP files owner
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Tomasz Pala wrote: I was considering a bug in any of shipped webapps. Even though the server can be safe_mode enabled ...which will be droped in future php releases :) safe_mode is considered to be obsolete in PHP. there is possibility to read information that should remain confidential, like valuable for spammers users list from passwd. I leave other restrictions out deliberately, as ACLs, open_basedir etc. are not part of our default policy. I see that you have started implementing open_basedir and I think that we should follow this way. Any restrictions, even very wide by default, would be nice. Currently system-wide package creates bigger threat than any user script, no matter how the environment IS secured (safe_mode, suexec PHP as CGI etc.). Shouldn't we change default root:root owner to some webapps:webapps? What will it give us? I don't get the point in this moment... -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SOURCES: postgresql-module-plphp-nophp_test.patch - updated for 1.3.3
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: Author: bluesDate: Fri Apr 20 14:15:15 2007 GMT Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD Log message: - updated for 1.3.3 [...] -# Checks for libraries. -AC_CHECK_LIB([php5], [php_module_startup],[], [have_php5=no], [$PHP_LDFLAGS]) This is pointless. Should be s/php5/php_common/. I know - it was the first thing I've checked. But it's pointless too - look at TODO and link there... I won't bother with that, I don't need it so much :) -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: PLD 2.0 (Ac) marked as stable
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: 2. Here should be provides+obsoletes for old names to allow smooth upgrade. [...] STLport-4.6.2-4 zostanie zastąpiony przez STLport-5.1.2-2 błąd: libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 jest wymagany przez openoffice-1.1.5-2 błąd: libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 jest wymagany przez openoffice-libs-1.1.5-2 błąd: libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 jest wymagany przez openoffice-libs-gtk-1.1.5-2 [...] Next one: [...] błąd: openoffice = 1.0.2 jest wymagany przez openoffice-thesaurus-pl-alt-0.8b-1 [...] It seems that this thesaurus isn't obsoleted anywhere... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
pine in utf8 ([th] mc utf8)
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Tomasz Pala wrote: Can you try latest mc from Th (2007-03-09-18)?. It looks like something improved in this snapshot. mc-4.6.2-0.2007.03.09.18.2 and unfortunatelly the problem still exists. Apropos... Please, test on utf console pine Build --without distributable, with all of the patches. BTW - maybe someone would like to mail again to pine-developers and gain license for distribution...? Of course, if the patches are ok (on my utf console it works perfect :) ). -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: pine in utf8 ([th] mc utf8)
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Marcin Król wrote: BTW - maybe someone would like to mail again to pine-developers and gain license for distribution...? Of course, if the patches are ok (on my utf console it works perfect :) ). We are allowed to distribute pine with all versions of PLD with patches that were accepted. Check license file for details. look at _current_ spec... I'm asking because there is a lot more patches added... -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
