Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set / 3.10.x longterm kernel?
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On 06.02.2014 10:36, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Really? You reported seemingly unfixable problem with 3.10 (100% CPU) without any solution and then switched to THAT kernel? You are pulling my leg here. 100% cpu problem exists only on one node. switched to 3.4 there, but some other hosts do have 3.10 already. now i wonder what to plan for those. It looks that no one besides us care about what the longterm will be ;) Then I have a question, if anyone has anything against 3.10.x being new longterm? For me 3.10.x is fine, is there anything that would cause problems? -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have vserver patch appliad. so what you suggests to users who have switched to 3.10 knowing it will be next longterm? i.e preferring the longterm rather bleeding edge kernel. Really? You reported seemingly unfixable problem with 3.10 (100% CPU) without any solution and then switched to THAT kernel? You are pulling my leg here. should go back to 3.4? use manual 3.10 builds, or try the HEAD? What works best for them, 3.4 or HEAD. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have vserver patch appliad. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set
On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have vserver patch appliad. so what you suggests to users who have switched to 3.10 knowing it will be next longterm? i.e preferring the longterm rather bleeding edge kernel. should go back to 3.4? use manual 3.10 builds, or try the HEAD? -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
