Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote: Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: [...] +URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xulrunner/ 404 not found wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:43:57AM +0100, wrobell wrote: On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote: Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: [...] +URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xulrunner/ 404 not found BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
+URL:http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xulrunner/ 404 not found Fixed. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote: Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD [...] Index: SPECS/xulrunner.spec great. so it seems that this is the project, which galeon and epiphany should be compiled against. any comments? [...] wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho regards, wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
great. so it seems that this is the project, which galeon and epiphany should be compiled against. any comments? Both of them were incompatible with xulrunners typeahead feature. Galeon was fixed, but epiphany wasn't. And also both xulrunner specs should be reviewed/merged before using it for building other stuff. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho regards, On www.mozilla.org pages projects are referred as: Mozilla Firefox Project Mozilla Thunderbird Project The SeaMonkey Project XULRunner So IMO it should be xulrunner.spec. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 18:12 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: great. so it seems that this is the project, which galeon and epiphany should be compiled against. any comments? Both of them were incompatible with xulrunners typeahead feature. Galeon was fixed, but epiphany wasn't. And also both xulrunner specs should be reviewed/merged before using it for building other stuff. what version of epiphany? wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Marcin Król wrote: mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho On www.mozilla.org pages projects are referred as: Mozilla Firefox Project Mozilla Thunderbird Project The SeaMonkey Project XULRunner So IMO it should be xulrunner.spec. ...and source is called xulrunner. After all - we don't call nss and nspr as mozilla-nss and mozilla-nspr. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
what version of epiphany? Tested both HEAD and AC-branch yesterday. They both were failing at ./configure. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho I think we should rename mozilla-firefox to firefox and the same for thunderbird. We don't call libnotify galago-project-libnotify nor do we name other packages in a similar way. So seamonkey and xulrunner should be named by their project names, not their vendors (especially when seamonkey is not officially supported). ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
but the packages are still grouped, to avoid name collision or just easier to
locate them. or have strict naming (php-{pecl,pear}-, perl-}
They are not grouped. They are all separate packages and does not share
any files/libs. And SeaMonkey for example is even not maintained by
Mozilla AFAIK.
horde-APPNAME
python-
perl-
php-{pecl,pear}-
They all share something, mozilla stuff does not.
which is imho good. i even was there being renaming all horde apps to
horde-APPNAME.
Yeah, and you did it because of package name collision AFAIR :)
M.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho I think we should rename mozilla-firefox to firefox and the same for thunderbird. Sources are called just firefox and thunderbird, but full application names are Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird. And the latter is a companion to the first, so it's rational to keep them grouped. We don't call libnotify galago-project-libnotify nor do we name other packages in a similar way. So seamonkey and xulrunner should be named by their project names, not their vendors (especially when seamonkey is not officially supported). And the last remark was the reason I committed seamonkey.spec, not mozilla-seamonkey.spec. -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
Dnia 17-05-2006, śro o godzinie 00:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a): On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho I think we should rename mozilla-firefox to firefox and the same for thunderbird. Sources are called just firefox and thunderbird, but full application names are Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird. And the latter is a companion to the first, so it's rational to keep them grouped. Agreed but I still prefer Evolution to Thunderbird ;) BTW: other distros use firefox and thunderbird as package names. We don't call libnotify galago-project-libnotify nor do we name other packages in a similar way. So seamonkey and xulrunner should be named by their project names, not their vendors (especially when seamonkey is not officially supported). And the last remark was the reason I committed seamonkey.spec, not mozilla-seamonkey.spec. Ok then. -- Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLD Linux ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 01:24, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Agreed but I still prefer Evolution to Thunderbird ;) kmail here ;) BTW: other distros use firefox and thunderbird as package names. other distros can .. . !! -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
