Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set / 3.10.x longterm kernel?
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On 06.02.2014 10:36, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Really? You reported seemingly unfixable problem with 3.10 (100% CPU) without any solution and then switched to THAT kernel? You are pulling my leg here. 100% cpu problem exists only on one node. switched to 3.4 there, but some other hosts do have 3.10 already. now i wonder what to plan for those. It looks that no one besides us care about what the longterm will be ;) Then I have a question, if anyone has anything against 3.10.x being new longterm? For me 3.10.x is fine, is there anything that would cause problems? -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have vserver patch appliad. so what you suggests to users who have switched to 3.10 knowing it will be next longterm? i.e preferring the longterm rather bleeding edge kernel. Really? You reported seemingly unfixable problem with 3.10 (100% CPU) without any solution and then switched to THAT kernel? You are pulling my leg here. should go back to 3.4? use manual 3.10 builds, or try the HEAD? What works best for them, 3.4 or HEAD. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have vserver patch appliad. -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [ANN] New Kernel packages set
On 05/02/14 19:05, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jan Rękorajski wrote: Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver A recent update of the Linux-Vserver patch, let us postpone the 3 kernels scenario. Thanks to vserver developers nothing will change wrt out kernel packaging. 3.4 stays as longterm and mainline will have vserver patch appliad. so what you suggests to users who have switched to 3.10 knowing it will be next longterm? i.e preferring the longterm rather bleeding edge kernel. should go back to 3.4? use manual 3.10 builds, or try the HEAD? -- glen ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[ANN] New Kernel packages set
Hi, Because of some seemingly unfixable problems reported for 3.10, I decided to stay with 3.4.x line as longterm kernel for Th. But more important changes will apply to main kernel package, we are currently 3 releases behind because of slow updates of the Linux-Vserver patch. So there will be an additional package set - kernel-vserver which will be the latest mainline kernel supported by vserver community (currently it's 3.10.x). This means that main kernel packages WILL NOT HAVE VSERVER SUPPORT! To sum it up: - kernel-longterm - 3.4.x as long as maintained upstream - kernel-vserver - latest upstream supported by Linux-Vserver - kernel - mainline, without Vserver -- Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl bagginsatpld-linux.org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. I couldn't load i915 module. Here's dump from dmesg: [22176.695418] mtrr: no MTRR for d000,1000 found [22179.628596] [drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 [22179.690085] [drm:i915_initialize] *ERROR* can not ioremap virtual address for ring buffer Could someone else confirm? If you need any other info, just let me know. Regards, Lukasz ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. fglrx is not available. I've built 8.10.1 successfully, but fglrx_drv.so it cannot find a symbol on startup. And 8.10 fails to build with 2.6.27 kernel :-( -- regards, Michał Łukaszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Michał Łukaszek wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. fglrx is not available. I've built 8.10.1 successfully, but fglrx_drv.so it cannot find a symbol on startup. And 8.10 fails to build with 2.6.27 kernel :-( fglrx is not ready (see Paweł Sikora mail on -pl on what's needed). -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:07:46 +0100 Lukasz Kies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. I couldn't load i915 module. Here's dump from dmesg: [22176.695418] mtrr: no MTRR for d000,1000 found [22179.628596] [drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 [22179.690085] [drm:i915_initialize] *ERROR* can not ioremap virtual address for ring buffer Could someone else confirm? If you need any other info, just let me know. nothing special, xf86-intel-2.5.0 doesn't not cooperate correctly with kernel 2.6.27.x. -- Fryderyk Dziarmagowski ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote: 2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. I couldn't load i915 module. Here's dump from dmesg: [22176.695418] mtrr: no MTRR for d000,1000 found [22179.628596] [drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 google says it's harmless. It's test for GEM which doesn't exists in older kernels than 2.6.28rcX. [22179.690085] [drm:i915_initialize] *ERROR* can not ioremap virtual address for ring buffer That's real problem and google finds no solution and only 3-4 reports. Uh. Even freedesktop bugzilla has nothing about this. -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: ANN: New kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4
2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 04 of November 2008, Lukasz Kies wrote: 2008/11/4 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, There is a new kernel in Th - 2.6.27.4. It supports (+/-) the same stuff as 2.6.25.x was + additionally grsec_full and apparmor by default. Please test it and report bugs. 0.1 rel runs on carme for last few days without problems. I couldn't load i915 module. Here's dump from dmesg: [22176.695418] mtrr: no MTRR for d000,1000 found [22179.628596] [drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 [22179.690085] [drm:i915_initialize] *ERROR* can not ioremap virtual address for ring buffer Could someone else confirm? If you need any other info, just let me know. Which xorg intel driver? You will need recent intel 2.5.0 (or patched 2.4.x). [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q libdrm xorg-driver-video-intel xorg-xserver-server libdrm-2.4.1-1.i686 xorg-driver-video-intel-2.5.0-4.i686 xorg-xserver-server-1.5.2-3.i686 Regards, Lukasz ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: new kernel
Dnia piątek, 19 maja 2006 09:46, Elan Ruusamäe napisał:
you should collect the files after this line:
find '(' -name '*~' -o -name '*.orig' ')' -print0 | xargs -0 -r -l512 rm -f
but imho this rm -f should be moved to %prep instead, after all patches
applied (that's where the backup files came from)
commit, please.
Processing files: kernel-module-build-2.6.16.16-2
error: File not found:
/home/glen/tmp/kernel-2.6.16.16-root-glen/usr/src/linux-2.6.16.16/crypto/Kc
onfig.~1~ error: File not found:
(...)
2.6.16.16-2 kernel builds fine on the TH builders.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
