Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-20 Thread Jan Rękorajski 
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, Jan Palus wrote:

> On 18.12.2020 20:31, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, Jan Palus via pld-devel-en wrote:
> > 
> > > Looks like poldek does not recognize R:(post, postun) and fails to
> > > install packages even though dependencies are present:
> > > 
> > > $ ag '^R.*post' mpd.spec
> > > 86:Requires(post,postun): gtk-update-icon-cache
> > > 87:Requires(post,preun,postun):   systemd-units >= 38
> > > 
> > > $ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
> > > Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 
> > > 38
> > > Requires(un):   /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 
> > > 38
> > > 
> > > $ poldek -u mpd
> > > ...
> > > Processing dependencies...
> > > There are 1 package to install:
> > > A mpd-0.22.3-1
> > > This operation will use 1.4MB of disk space.
> > > Need to get 507.6KB of archives.
> > > mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl.rpm: digests OK
> > > Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define 
> > > _check_dirname_deps 1...
> > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > >   gtk-update-icon-cache is needed by mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl
> > > 
> > > Manual installation of gtk-update-icon-cache followed by installation of
> > > mpd is all fine.
> > 
> > Works for me.
> > Maybe it's rpm4 that does not produce deps for R:(post, postun)?
> > 
> > [r...@pldmachine-rpm.org ~]# rpm -q rpm poldek
> > rpm-4.16.0-0.12.x86_64
> > poldek-0.42.2-3.5.x86_64
> > 
> > 
> > poldek:/all-avail> install -t mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 
> > Processing dependencies...
> > mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 marks gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64 (cap 
> > gtk-update-icon-cache)
> 
> Is this by any chance mpd from main th repo built with rpm5? The
> difference is most likely here:
> 
> > > $ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
> > > Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 
> > > 38
> 
> With rpm4 + poldek(rpm4) gtk-update-icon-cache lands in Requires(pre):
> while with rpm5 + poldek(rpm5) it's just in Requires:. I suppose poldek
> ignores Requires(pre).

I can't figure out what's missing there, opened poldek bug

https://github.com/poldek-pm/poldek/issues/17

-- 
Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux
SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-18 Thread Jan Palus 
On 18.12.2020 20:31, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, Jan Palus via pld-devel-en wrote:
> 
> > Looks like poldek does not recognize R:(post, postun) and fails to
> > install packages even though dependencies are present:
> > 
> > $ ag '^R.*post' mpd.spec
> > 86:Requires(post,postun):   gtk-update-icon-cache
> > 87:Requires(post,preun,postun): systemd-units >= 38
> > 
> > $ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
> > Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38
> > Requires(un):   /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38
> > 
> > $ poldek -u mpd
> > ...
> > Processing dependencies...
> > There are 1 package to install:
> > A mpd-0.22.3-1
> > This operation will use 1.4MB of disk space.
> > Need to get 507.6KB of archives.
> > mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl.rpm: digests OK
> > Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define _check_dirname_deps 
> > 1...
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> > gtk-update-icon-cache is needed by mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl
> > 
> > Manual installation of gtk-update-icon-cache followed by installation of
> > mpd is all fine.
> 
> Works for me.
> Maybe it's rpm4 that does not produce deps for R:(post, postun)?
> 
> [r...@pldmachine-rpm.org ~]# rpm -q rpm poldek
> rpm-4.16.0-0.12.x86_64
> poldek-0.42.2-3.5.x86_64
> 
> 
> poldek:/all-avail> install -t mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 
> Processing dependencies...
> mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 marks gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64 (cap 
> gtk-update-icon-cache)

Is this by any chance mpd from main th repo built with rpm5? The
difference is most likely here:

> > $ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
> > Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38

With rpm4 + poldek(rpm4) gtk-update-icon-cache lands in Requires(pre):
while with rpm5 + poldek(rpm5) it's just in Requires:. I suppose poldek
ignores Requires(pre).
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-18 Thread Jan Rękorajski 
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, Jan Palus via pld-devel-en wrote:

> Looks like poldek does not recognize R:(post, postun) and fails to
> install packages even though dependencies are present:
> 
> $ ag '^R.*post' mpd.spec
> 86:Requires(post,postun): gtk-update-icon-cache
> 87:Requires(post,preun,postun):   systemd-units >= 38
> 
> $ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
> Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38
> Requires(un):   /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38
> 
> $ poldek -u mpd
> ...
> Processing dependencies...
> There are 1 package to install:
> A mpd-0.22.3-1
> This operation will use 1.4MB of disk space.
> Need to get 507.6KB of archives.
> mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl.rpm: digests OK
> Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define _check_dirname_deps 
> 1...
> error: Failed dependencies:
>   gtk-update-icon-cache is needed by mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl
> 
> Manual installation of gtk-update-icon-cache followed by installation of
> mpd is all fine.

Works for me.
Maybe it's rpm4 that does not produce deps for R:(post, postun)?

[r...@pldmachine-rpm.org ~]# rpm -q rpm poldek
rpm-4.16.0-0.12.x86_64
poldek-0.42.2-3.5.x86_64


poldek:/all-avail> install -t mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 
Processing dependencies...
mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 marks gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64 (cap 
gtk-update-icon-cache)
There are 2 packages to install (1 marked by dependencies):
A gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64  mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64
This operation will use 1.8MB of disk space.
Need to get 661.4KB of archives (661.4KB to download).

poldek:/all-avail> install mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 
Processing dependencies...
mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64 marks gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64 (cap 
gtk-update-icon-cache)
There are 2 packages to install (1 marked by dependencies):
A gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64  mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64
This operation will use 1.8MB of disk space.
Need to get 661.4KB of archives (661.4KB to download).

[1/2] th::gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64.rpm [20.7K (20.7K/s)]  
  
gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64.rpm: digests OK
[2/2] th-test::mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64.rpm [640.6K (640.6K/s)]  
  
mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64.rpm: digests OK
Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define _check_dirname_deps 1...
warning: 
/root/.poldek-cache/ftp_ftp1.pld-linux.org.dists.th.PLD.x86.64.RPMS/gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1.x86_64.rpm:
 Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID e4f1bc2d: NOKEY
warning: 
/root/.poldek-cache/ftp_ftp1.pld-linux.org.dists.th.test.x86.64.RPMS/mpd-0.22.3-2.x86_64.rpm:
 Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 857607c0: NOKEY
Verifying...  # [100%]
Preparing...  # [100%]
Updating / installing...
   1:gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.23-1  # [ 50%]
Adding group mpd GID=204.
Adding user mpd UID=204.
   2:mpd-0.22.3-2 # [100%]
poldek:/all-avail> 

-- 
Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux
SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-18 Thread Jan Rękorajski 
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:

> On 12/14/20 5:20 PM, Jan Palus wrote:
> 
> > If commit message includes '%' then rpmbuild spawned by builder script
> > fails. See ie test.spec which includes '%prep':
> >
> > error: line 40: second %prep
> >
> > builder creates spec copy with %changelog appended. Apparently rpm.org
> > evaluates macros in %changelog while rpm5 does not. Not sure whether
> > we're supposed to escape macros in changelog now or whether rpm.org
> > should read %changelog as is.
> 
> looks like we're back to 10+ years old issues that pld solved.

20.

commit 0a6e9fd18fb9abecd65b1b8e94de0fa0a27415ba
Author: filon 
Date:   Thu Aug 30 22:42:55 2001 +

disables expanding of rpm macros in %changelog and %description section

Rebased for 4.16.

-- 
Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux
SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-14 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 

On 12/13/20 10:30 PM, Jan Palus via pld-devel-en wrote:


Looks like poldek does not recognize R:(post, postun) and fails to
install packages even though dependencies are present:

$ ag '^R.*post' mpd.spec
86:Requires(post,postun):   gtk-update-icon-cache
87:Requires(post,preun,postun): systemd-units >= 38

$ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38
Requires(un):   /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38

$ poldek -u mpd
...
Processing dependencies...
There are 1 package to install:
A mpd-0.22.3-1
This operation will use 1.4MB of disk space.
Need to get 507.6KB of archives.
mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl.rpm: digests OK
Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define _check_dirname_deps 1...
error: Failed dependencies:
gtk-update-icon-cache is needed by mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl

Manual installation of gtk-update-icon-cache followed by installation of
mpd is all fine.


another 10+ year old issue, the feature that landed on rpm5
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-14 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 

On 12/14/20 5:20 PM, Jan Palus wrote:


If commit message includes '%' then rpmbuild spawned by builder script
fails. See ie test.spec which includes '%prep':

error: line 40: second %prep

builder creates spec copy with %changelog appended. Apparently rpm.org
evaluates macros in %changelog while rpm5 does not. Not sure whether
we're supposed to escape macros in changelog now or whether rpm.org
should read %changelog as is.


looks like we're back to 10+ years old issues that pld solved.

pld (and later rpm5) had a patch to disable macro expansion in 
%changelog section


___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-14 Thread Neal Gompa 
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jan Palus  wrote:
>
> If commit message includes '%' then rpmbuild spawned by builder script
> fails. See ie test.spec which includes '%prep':
>
> error: line 40: second %prep
>
> builder creates spec copy with %changelog appended. Apparently rpm.org
> evaluates macros in %changelog while rpm5 does not. Not sure whether
> we're supposed to escape macros in changelog now or whether rpm.org
> should read %changelog as is.

Macros are supposed to be escaped.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-14 Thread Jan Palus 
If commit message includes '%' then rpmbuild spawned by builder script
fails. See ie test.spec which includes '%prep':

error: line 40: second %prep

builder creates spec copy with %changelog appended. Apparently rpm.org
evaluates macros in %changelog while rpm5 does not. Not sure whether
we're supposed to escape macros in changelog now or whether rpm.org
should read %changelog as is.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-12-13 Thread Jan Palus via pld-devel-en 
Looks like poldek does not recognize R:(post, postun) and fails to
install packages even though dependencies are present:

$ ag '^R.*post' mpd.spec
86:Requires(post,postun):   gtk-update-icon-cache
87:Requires(post,preun,postun): systemd-units >= 38

$ poldek --cmd desc -r mpd |grep gtk-update-icon-cache
Requires(pre):  /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38
Requires(un):   /bin/sh, /bin/sh, gtk-update-icon-cache, systemd-units >= 38

$ poldek -u mpd
...
Processing dependencies...
There are 1 package to install:
A mpd-0.22.3-1
This operation will use 1.4MB of disk space.
Need to get 507.6KB of archives.
mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl.rpm: digests OK
Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define _check_dirname_deps 1...
error: Failed dependencies:
gtk-update-icon-cache is needed by mpd-0.22.3-1.armv6hl

Manual installation of gtk-update-icon-cache followed by installation of
mpd is all fine.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-27 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 


On 11/27/20 4:57 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:

On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:


All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.

can't install packages built with 4.15 to install upgrade packages on 
rpm 4.5



error: php53-zip-5.3.29-51.1.x86_64: req rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 
4.6.0-1 not found, upgrade rpm
error: php53-common-5.3.29-51.1.x86_64: req rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 
4.6.0-1 not found, upgrade rpm



it was possible to upgrade ac->th using rpm/poldek on ac pointing 
poldek to th repos and run poldek --upgrade-dist


i guess have to use ac->th-2019->th in the future if distro packages 
built with rpm 4.16



to revert to previous state:

#   Algorithm to use for generating file checksum digests on build.
#   If not specified or 0, MD5 is used.
#   WARNING: non-MD5 is backwards incompatible with rpm < 4.6!
#   The supported algorithms may depend on the underlying crypto
#   implementation but generally at least the following are supported:
#   1   MD5
#   2   SHA1
#   8   SHA256 (default)
#   9   SHA384
#   10  SHA512
#
%_source_filedigest_algorithm   1
%_binary_filedigest_algorithm   1
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-27 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 

On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:


All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.

can't install packages built with 4.15 to install upgrade packages on 
rpm 4.5



error: php53-zip-5.3.29-51.1.x86_64: req rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 
not found, upgrade rpm
error: php53-common-5.3.29-51.1.x86_64: req rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 
4.6.0-1 not found, upgrade rpm



it was possible to upgrade ac->th using rpm/poldek on ac pointing poldek 
to th repos and run poldek --upgrade-dist


i guess have to use ac->th-2019->th in the future if distro packages 
built with rpm 4.16


___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 


On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:

All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.


the "Obsoletes: foo" pattern to replace a package does longer seem to work.

php*-devel packages obsolete each other, so if you install php70-devel 
it will remove installed php74-devel, etc


but now it fails, because it does not like the reverse dependency 
(php74-devel also obsoletes php70-devel).



Processing dependencies...
php74-devel-7.4.12-2.x86_64 obsoleted by php70-devel-7.0.33-8.x86_64
There are 1 package to install, 1 to remove:
A php70-devel-7.0.33-8.x86_64
R php74-devel-7.4.12-2.x86_64
This operation will free 1.3MB of disk space.
Need to get 463.0KB of archives (463.0KB to download).

th-arch::php70-devel-7.0.33-8.x86_64.rpm [463.0K (133.9K/s)]
php70-devel-7.0.33-8.x86_64.rpm: digests OK
Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define 
_check_dirname_deps 1...
warning: 
/root/.poldek-cache/ftp_ftp1.pld-linux.org.dists.th.PLD.x86.64.RPMS/php70-devel-7.0.33-8.x86_64.rpm: 
Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID e4f1bc2d: NOKEY

error: Failed dependencies:
    php70-devel is obsoleted by (installed) 
php74-devel-4:7.4.12-2.x86_64

There were errors
poldek:/all-avail>


___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-22 Thread Neal Gompa 
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:34 AM Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en
 wrote:
>
> W dniu 22.11.2020 o 17:00, Jan Palus pisze:
> > * adding to the list of invalid chars in Obsoletes: '/' (msmtp: Obsoletes:  
> > /usr/lib/sendmail)
> >
> > * python-Cython built with rpm.org has weird unsatisfied R: 
> > python2.7dist(setuptools) / python3.8dist(setuptools)
>
> Could these be https://rpm.org/user_doc/boolean_dependencies.html that
> are not handled by poldek ?
>
> And "/" could be forbidden due to that.

I don't think Cython has a ranged dependency to trigger a boolean
dependency expression.

At least in Fedora, Cython generates a "python3.9dist(setuptools)" dependency.

I would expect python3-setuptools to have a generated "Provides:
python3.8dist(setuptools)" stanza from the pythondist generator.




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-22 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via pld-devel-en 
W dniu 22.11.2020 o 17:00, Jan Palus pisze:
> * adding to the list of invalid chars in Obsoletes: '/' (msmtp: Obsoletes:
>   /usr/lib/sendmail)
> 
> * python-Cython built with rpm.org has weird unsatisfied R: 
> python2.7dist(setuptools) / python3.8dist(setuptools)

Could these be https://rpm.org/user_doc/boolean_dependencies.html that
are not handled by poldek ?

And "/" could be forbidden due to that.

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-22 Thread Jan Palus 
* adding to the list of invalid chars in Obsoletes: '/' (msmtp: Obsoletes:  
/usr/lib/sendmail)

* python-Cython built with rpm.org has weird unsatisfied R: 
python2.7dist(setuptools) / python3.8dist(setuptools)

  python-setuptools built with rpm.org does not have such P:
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-18 Thread Jan Palus 
On 10.11.2020 18:18, Jan Palus wrote:
> On 06.11.2020 20:49, Jan Palus wrote:
> > On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > > All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
> > > any issues.
> > 
> > * poldek appears to still enforce directory deps while rpms does not
> >   (that concerns mainly /usr/lib/.build-id subdirs)
> > 
> > * rpm.org is missing %{__ln} macro. spotted only single occurrence in
> >   xrdp.spec
> 
> * missing __bash macro
> 
> * most noarch conditions stopped working now since 4.16 < 4.6

* Provides for libraries are not populated if %install does not set
  executable bit on ELF file. One such notable example is libgcc_s
  installed with mode 644 by `make install`:

rpm5:

$ rpm -q --provides libgcc | grep libgcc_s
libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4.2)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.2.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.3.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.4.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.5.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.7.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.8.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_7.0.0)
libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4.2)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.4.4)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.2.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.7.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.8.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_7.0.0)(64bit)

rpm4:

$ rpm -q --provides -p libgcc-10.2.0-1.x86_64.rpm | grep libgcc_s
(empty)

Aa a workaround we could remove "exeonly" from %__elf_flags in
/usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/elf.attr but ideally RPM should not look at
actual file mode on disk but rather on mode configured in %files.

Other such example: ossp-uuid

* possibly similar case but I haven't debugged it: perl-modules does not
  provide perl(unicore::Name)

* Requires(triggerpostun) is not supported (pam.spec)

* Obsoletes fails if it does not contain "package name only" examples:
  
  systemd.spec: Obsoletes:  virtual(init-daemon) (illegal char '(')
  perl.spec: Obsoletes: perl-Params::Check < %perl_modverrel Params::Check 99 
(illegal char ':')

* similar thing in Provides:

  perl.spec: Provides: perldoc = 3.14_02@5.30.3 (illegal char '@')
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-13 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 

On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:


All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.


hrmib integration seems to be missing.

➔ l -rt /var/cache/hrmib/ -rt|tail

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 rpm-perlprov-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 rpm-lib-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 rpm-devel-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 rpm-build-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 rpm-base-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 rpm-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 python3-rpm-4.16.0-0.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 poldek-libs-0.42.2-3.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 poldek-0.42.2-3.1-th.x86_64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 26 10:23 lua54-libs-5.4.1-2.x86_64
➔

needed for net-snmp hrSWInstalledTable:

- http://www.net-snmp.org/docs/mibs/host.html#hrSWInstalledTable

it can be queried with something like this:

$ snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost hrSWInstalledTable

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-10 Thread Jan Palus 
On 06.11.2020 20:49, Jan Palus wrote:
> On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
> > any issues.
> 
> * poldek appears to still enforce directory deps while rpms does not
>   (that concerns mainly /usr/lib/.build-id subdirs)
> 
> * rpm.org is missing %{__ln} macro. spotted only single occurrence in
>   xrdp.spec

* missing __bash macro

* most noarch conditions stopped working now since 4.16 < 4.6
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-06 Thread Jan Palus 
On 27.10.2020 23:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
> any issues.

* poldek appears to still enforce directory deps while rpms does not
  (that concerns mainly /usr/lib/.build-id subdirs)

* rpm.org is missing %{__ln} macro. spotted only single occurrence in
  xrdp.spec
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-06 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 


On 28.10.2020 00:21, Jan Rękorajski wrote:

All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.


--blink option is gone.

the option was useful to tell what was previous version installed of the 
same package.



$ rpm -q libvterm --blink
rpm: --blink: unknown option

___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-03 Thread Jakub Bogusz via pld-devel-en 
More differences/issues:

* patch run with different args: --no-backup-if-mismatch '--fuzz=0'
  - there is no .orig file when patching fails, so updating patches needs
more effort
  - fuzz=0 will require updating many patches in repo


* rpmbuild with non-UTF-8 locale in environment fails on some packages
  with gettext catalogs, e.g.:

Pakiet libreoffice-i18n-cs: nieprawidłowe kodowanie utf-8 w| Classdict: GNU 
message catalog (little endian), revision 0.0, 674 messages, 
Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION 'Barva textu aktivnĂ­ho vĂ˝bÄ\233ru' -- 
Błędny lub niepełny znak wielobajtowy

It's side effect of libmagic trying to extract too many information in rules 
for "gnu" files;
I'm going to patch Magdir/gnu rules and disable printing of text next to 
Project-Id-Version.
I don't know what it was meant for, but it doesn't show anything useful
now (just some semi-random translation).


* absolute symlinks are reported as warning (even if they cross /)

  (my personal preference is to use relative symlinks unless they cross /,
   in which case I prefer absolute ones)


* symlinks are always packaged with 777 mode and using %attr() for
  symlink is reported as warning


-- 
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-01 Thread Jakub Bogusz 
On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 09:23:36AM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> 
> On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> >All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
> >any issues.
> 
> i've created wiki section for this topic.
> 
> 
> https://www.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm#rpm_416_porting_status
> 
> 
> perhaps we can keep it updated, with documenting at least incompatible 
> changes (changes we have no plans to fix)

One such change, just found accidentally (libreoffice.spec) - spaces
around operators in BR were used because of preferred style, in rpm.org
they are obligatory:

-%{?with_system_hunspell:BuildRequires: hunspell-devel >=1.2.2}
+%{?with_system_hunspell:BuildRequires: hunspell-devel >= 1.2.2}

Original notation caused parse error.

(no need to change anything in rpm, just fix a few(?) specs in repo)


-- 
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 


On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:

All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.


i've created wiki section for this topic.


https://www.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm#rpm_416_porting_status


perhaps we can keep it updated, with documenting at least incompatible 
changes (changes we have no plans to fix)




___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-11-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe 


On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:

All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.



[~/rpm/packages/php(ERR) (PHP_5_6)★] ➔ rpm --version
RPM version 4.16.0

[~/rpm/packages/php(ERR) (PHP_5_6)★] ➔ rpm -q rpm
rpm-4.16.0-0.4.x86_64


php.spec @PHP_5_6:

warning: line 423: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: 
Obsoletes:   phpfi
warning: line 439: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: 
Obsoletes:   phpfi

error: line 527: Illegal char '/' (0x2f) in: Obsoletes: /usr/bin/php
error: line 527: Only package names are allowed in Obsoletes: 
Obsoletes:    /usr/bin/php

error: query of specfile php.spec failed, can't parse


php.spec @master:


warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 161: %{orgname}-%{version}.tar.xz
warning: line 378: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: 
Obsoletes:   phpfi

error: line 466: Illegal char '/' (0x2f) in: Obsoletes: /usr/bin/php
error: line 466: Only package names are allowed in Obsoletes: 
Obsoletes:    /usr/bin/php

error: query of specfile php.spec failed, can't parse
[~/rpm/packages/php(ERR) (master)★] ➔


___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: rpm4 on carme*

2020-10-27 Thread Jakub Bogusz 
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:21:17PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
> any issues.

One so far (very short testing):

rpm -qi prints summaries/decriptions in UTF-8 regardless of current
locale encoding.


(anyway, great work with bringing rpm.org!)


-- 
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

rpm4 on carme*

2020-10-27 Thread Jan Rękorajski 
All carme machines are now running rpm 4.16.0. Please test and report
any issues.

-- 
Jan Rękorajski| PLD/Linux
SysAdm | bagginspld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en