Re: [PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread nathan w
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 21:32:15 -0700
Daniel Pittman  wrote:

-- snipped --

> Y'know what?  I have better things to do with my time than hang about
> a "Linux" list that will do nothing to prevent trolls making a mess of
> the place.  If I wanted to watch trolls destroying community I already
> know where to find 4chan; I don't need this from a nominally
> Linux-focus group.
> 

+1. i'm out. best wishes to you all.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread Bill Ensley
Michael,

Please remember your miranda rights here.

Remaining silent at this point would be a very smart thing to do.

-Bill Ensley

On 10/9/2011 9:52 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> The
> hatred has to stop, or maybe we can simply take this outside till
> everyone is lying dead face down on the streets of Portland.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread Michael C. Robinson
Liar.  This wasn't a private message to me.  You asked for a response
Daniel by putting this on the list.  I won't email you privately, but
if you get the message because you publicly follow the PLUG list which
you have polluted with your post, that's your problem.  Prove that I
actually intend to destroy the PLUG list.  The only thing I want to
destroy is preferential treatment and blatant prejudice.  Oh and by the
way, suck is a bit juvenile.  The reaction I want Daniel is to wake
people up and if it takes shock and awe to do that, so be it.  The
hatred has to stop, or maybe we can simply take this outside till
everyone is lying dead face down on the streets of Portland.

On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 21:32 -0700, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 21:18, Michael C. Robinson
>  wrote:
> 
> > If you don't like me bringing up open source projects that don't involve
> > Linux, you don't have to read the PLUG list.  You should listen to David
> > Mandel who says that bringing up non Linux OSS is acceptable.
> 
> Y'know what?  I have better things to do with my time than hang about
> a "Linux" list that will do nothing to prevent trolls making a mess of
> the place.  If I wanted to watch trolls destroying community I already
> know where to find 4chan; I don't need this from a nominally
> Linux-focus group.
> 
> Michael, you suck.  Seriously, suck.  Sadly, I know this is the
> reaction you want to get, but whatever.  Continue to try and destroy,
> and hopefully any other places I run into you will take a stand
> against this sort of awfulness.
> 
> Michael, please do not contact me privately to whine about my
> position, or statements.  I have no interest in "discussion" with you
> on the subject.
> 
> Daniel


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread Bill Ensley
We will let Homeland Security decide how literal you are.

-Bill Ensley

On 10/9/2011 9:41 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 21:29 -0700, Bill Ensley wrote:
>> Joking or not, I've just gone to my last PLUG meeting.
>>
>> I'll not even pretend that this guy doesn't scare the crap out of me at
>> this point.
>>
>> -Bill Ensley
> The hyperbole was necessary to communicate a point, there is no need to
> expect an actual attack on a PLUG meeting.  Like I said in my message,
> don't take the next two paragraphs too seriously.  There was a point,
> but you don't see the point if you interpret what I wrote too literally.
>
> Reality check, would I announce that I'm going to blow up a building
> before doing so?  Never mind that I have no idea how to handle dynamite
> and no idea where to get some.
>
> Besides, does it not make sense to you that I'd be angry concerning the
> level of discrimination I've received?
>
> Are you really any better than Keith Lofstrom or Mike Connors responding
> in this way?
>
> Read what I wrote again, but don't be so literal with the two paragraphs
> in question.
>
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 21:18, Michael C. Robinson
 wrote:

> If you don't like me bringing up open source projects that don't involve
> Linux, you don't have to read the PLUG list.  You should listen to David
> Mandel who says that bringing up non Linux OSS is acceptable.

Y'know what?  I have better things to do with my time than hang about
a "Linux" list that will do nothing to prevent trolls making a mess of
the place.  If I wanted to watch trolls destroying community I already
know where to find 4chan; I don't need this from a nominally
Linux-focus group.

Michael, you suck.  Seriously, suck.  Sadly, I know this is the
reaction you want to get, but whatever.  Continue to try and destroy,
and hopefully any other places I run into you will take a stand
against this sort of awfulness.

Michael, please do not contact me privately to whine about my
position, or statements.  I have no interest in "discussion" with you
on the subject.

Daniel
-- 
♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread Bill Ensley
Joking or not, I've just gone to my last PLUG meeting.

I'll not even pretend that this guy doesn't scare the crap out of me at 
this point.

-Bill Ensley

On 10/9/2011 9:18 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> Know what I should do, I should come to the PLUG meeting with enough
> dynamite strapped to my body to take out a building.  I'd go to hell
> for it, but at least I'd take some bigots down with me.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Ban me? Ban yourselves.

2011-10-09 Thread Michael C. Robinson
If you don't like me bringing up open source projects that don't involve
Linux, you don't have to read the PLUG list.  You should listen to David
Mandel who says that bringing up non Linux OSS is acceptable.

If you don't like religious comments from me, you don't have to put up
with them from Keith or anyone else either.

Same goes for political comments.

"--Don't take the next two paragraphs too seriously--"

Know what I should do, I should come to the PLUG meeting with enough
dynamite strapped to my body to take out a building.  I'd go to hell
for it, but at least I'd take some bigots down with me.

Seriously though, I'm not going to join the conservative army of the
Midwest unless Obama becomes president again and ruins whats left of our
economy.  When that happens, all bets are off.  When the second civil
war comes, at least I know which side I'll be on.  When eastern Oregon
purges western Oregon of liberal life hating democrats, I know which
side I'll be on.  Those who pollute my home with their socialist and
anti life rhetoric will see no mercy shown to them.

Still reading?  No, I'm not a sleeping terrorist.  This should be seen
as far enough out there that it can make a point, but not cause undo
alarm.  How do you think the list reads for me when people twist every
comment I make and preferentially target me for ridicule?

I don't believe in worship of one's wife.  I do not believe that high
taxes on the rich is a legitimate strategy to stimulate the economy, but
I am adamant about protecting the environment and helping the poor.
Taxing the rich to give jobs to the poor will only undermine people's
incentive to work.  I am still deeply offended by Keith's wife worship
and I will never apologize to Keith concerning the vulgar display he put
on here.

Indeed, nobody can have a religious or political opinion that is not in
line with those who are receiving preferential treatment here.  Why
should I have to put up with wife idolatry or comments on how great
Obama is?  Do I have to care about Obama's shoe problems?  How about the
way Obama pulled us out of a fight we were winning in Iraq only to
bungle the fight in Afghanistan?  How many people have to die in
Afghanistan before we realize that being there isn't the answer?  It's
just Vietnam all over, we don't know who to trust and our people are
frequently outgunned and outflanked.  How many Chinook helicopters do we
have to lose?

The civil war I speak of is fictional at the moment, thank God.  Thing
is, if we the American people don't get our moral bearings, we can
expect one soon enough.  The way liberal news reporters rip at
Republican candidates, there is going to be a backlash.  There is more
than just a difference of opinion between liberals and conservatives,
Republicans and Democrats, there is genuine hatred bubbling up.
Unfortunately, I see both Republicans and Democrats heading to the
extremes.  This is dangerous, the need for common ground and common
values is greater than it has been for probably a century.  I want a
candidate who: respects human life, respects the environment, sees the
need to replace our reliance on foreign oil with hydrogen, and I want a
candidate who will get us out of Afghanistan as soon as possible.  I
want a candidate who will not endanger marriage by giving the title
married to same sex couples.  Every child deserves to be the result of a
loving union between a husband and a wife, not two women and a dozen
anonymous sperm donors.  We deserve male and female parents and we
deserve to be both well treated and well raised by them.

In short, tune out if you must.  Let the hatred bubble and the country
turn in on itself.  Democracy is fragile where only the grace of God,
because there is freedom of religion, allows our democracy to persevere.
There is no religious freedom when idolatry is the norm and you can't
protest it.  There is no religious freedom when an anti life president
is literally worshiped by his most ardent followers and his detractors
are excluded from public discourse.  Obama is the least ethical and
weakest president this nation has ever had.  Obama has almost, by his
policies, set off another great depression.  Ban me?  Ignore me at your
peril.  There is another viewpoint that is opposite to the preferred
one, a viewpoint that could be correct and that could carry with it dire
consequences.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not pull this nation out of the Great
Depression, World War 2 did.  Obama is not the answer.  Civil war is not
the answer.  If the exodus from moderate politics continues though,
civil war will come.

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug