Linux (and Related classes) at MCC
Linux (and related) Classes at MCC This Fall (Taught by Phil Waclawski) CIS126DL Linux OS Section 7053 MW 5:20-7:00pm Start off by learning the power of the linux command line, then install your own copy of CentOS 5 and continue to learn the power of the command line (with some of the GUI stuff thrown in of course ;). Including setting up users/groups, sudo, yum repositories, basic security concepts, introduction to shell scripting and much much more! You need to provide a 10Gig or bigger IDE/EIDE HD, we provide the HD bays and CD's. (In the Spring we will be offering CIS226AL, Internet Server Linux ) CIS166AE Web Scripting with Python/MySQL Section 7083 T-Th 5:20-7:00pm We will first focus on learning the basics of the Python Scripting language (very hand for sys admin tasks, and many of the Redhat GUI config scripts are written in Python), then hook it into web page development and database connectivity. Pre-Requesite of CIS133DA (Internet/Web Development level I) or permission of instructor (just demonstrate to me that you can do basic HTML/XHTML including form development). CIS151 Computer Game Development (using PyGames) sect 0928 T-Th 3- 4:15pm Learn basic game programming using PyGames (and a bit of ALICE). New course, should be a lot of fun. Also CIS133DA (Internet/Web Development with XHTML Leavel I) sect 7064 M from 7:10pm-9:50pm and CIS233DA (Level II) Tues 7:10-9:50pm sect 0982 If interested, please sign up as soon as you can to make sure the class has enough students. Taught by Phillip Waclawski, residential CIS Faculty, Mesa Community College Business Department Phillip Waclawski 480 461 7468 Best way to contact: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] &*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* CIS Faculty: Phil Waclawski http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/~waclawski &*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Good news day for Freedom and Open!
"Court Rules: Novell owns the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights! Novell has right to waive!" http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070810165237718 "OOXML Approval Vote Fails in INCITS" (This means the US has voted "No" on approval of OOXML as an ISO standard) http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070810112044631 Nice way to start the weekend! Alan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:51:40PM -0700, Mike Garfias wrote: > RH puts many things in /etc/sysconfig that belong in either the top > level /etc dir or their own dir under /etc (ex: /etc/apache/) > granted some are in the right place, but at best its an inconsistent > mess > > also another bitch: > wtf is /etc/sysconfig/networking and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts? > why not one dir > > its very non-intuitive. With my experience I shouldn't have to hunt > for things for a few minutes, it should be obvious. Solaris never > confused me like this, nor has any of the BSDs (tho the BSD init > process bugs the shit out of me). Ok, I've *almost* entered this discussion about 5 times. The BSD mention finally drew me out. ;-) SysV init annoys some, and BSD init makes others crazy. I'm not going to argue one vs. the other. It's just a fact of life. This split happened a long time ago, and at least there's been a while to get used to it. > I should also point out that 99.999% of the time I'm doing server > stuff. And a lot of servers at that which means I use lots of > scripts and configuration management. This is the real issue. For the VAST majority of home desktop users none of this matters at all as long as the GUI config works. So if whoever at the distro decides to do it a certain way and the GUI works with that, then it's all fine. For those of us who deal with servers in quantity, in racks, or in colo it's a very different picture. I don't give a tinker's darn about GUI config panels. Hey, some of my boxes have neither a video card not a place to put one! I'm not crazy about commandline config tools, either. There's really not much need for them, as long as you can keep configs in a repository, and do a little scripting, etc., etc. If you can't, then you probably should outsource your server admin to someone who can. So, it's nice to have configs in some sensible format, and in some well known place. Why all these distros felt the need to reinvent the wheel on this is beyond me. It just makes life more difficult for people doing admin in a heterogenous environment. It's like the weird djb directories all over again: it doesn't matter if you're right if you violate longstanding conventions and confuse everyone. So there! ;-) -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
RH puts many things in /etc/sysconfig that belong in either the top level /etc dir or their own dir under /etc (ex: /etc/apache/) granted some are in the right place, but at best its an inconsistent mess also another bitch: wtf is /etc/sysconfig/networking and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts? why not one dir its very non-intuitive. With my experience I shouldn't have to hunt for things for a few minutes, it should be obvious. Solaris never confused me like this, nor has any of the BSDs (tho the BSD init process bugs the shit out of me). I should also point out that 99.999% of the time I'm doing server stuff. And a lot of servers at that which means I use lots of scripts and configuration management. And don't even get me started on up2date and/or yum. On Aug 10, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Dan Lund wrote: > Okay, because you confused me... Red Hat doesn't bury the settings, so > that's probably what confused me. > > /etc and /etc/sysconfig --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
Okay, because you confused me... Red Hat doesn't bury the settings, so that's probably what confused me. /etc and /etc/sysconfig Mike Garfias wrote: > actually i'm mostly bitching about RH > i found suse to be even worse the one time i tried it > have since refused to touch it > > On Aug 10, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Dan Lund wrote: > > >> > > --- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: hey
hmm... how did that happen? sorry folks! -jmz On 8/10/07, Ted Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 12:12 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote: > > got your message... ill get back to you soon. thanks, jmz > > No problem, take your time. > > --Ted > > PS - You sent this to PLUG ;) > > --- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > -- --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
actually i'm mostly bitching about RH i found suse to be even worse the one time i tried it have since refused to touch it On Aug 10, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Dan Lund wrote: > I assume your talking about SuSE. > > > Mike Garfias wrote: >> I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files. >> >> I do mind some craptastic distro burying the setting in an obscure >> directory and then making it hard to script (or hand edit) a change. >> >> >> On Aug 10, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Dan Lund wrote: >> >> > > --- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > !DSPAM:14,46bc8f3b38421262544236! > > --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
PLUG members introductory profiles
. It would be very beneficial, in many respects, if the PLUG website could include a "gallery" of introductory bios and photos of as many PLUG members as may be willing to participate. A preliminary list of reasons and benefits for doing this, along with a few very preliminary examples of how this might be done, can be found at the following *temporary* web page: http://upquick.com/bios/ Until such time as something like this can be incorporated into the PLUG website, I have set up this temporary page so that any PLUG members who might like to participate can do so. So far, there are five introductory profiles and a dozen member photos available there. (About half of the people who attended last night's PLUG meeting agreed to have their picture taken to help get this started.) While this is obviously a very plain and unglamorous preliminary web page, at least it is a beginning. I hope many more PLUG members will participate by either sending a web page link where they have a personal introductory bio or profile (preferrably with a photo) ... or email their bio and photo to me and I'll add it to this page. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: hey
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 12:12 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote: > got your message... ill get back to you soon. thanks, jmz No problem, take your time. --Ted PS - You sent this to PLUG ;) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
hey
got your message... ill get back to you soon. thanks, jmz -- .. communication. .0001. development. .0010. strategy. .0100. appeal. JOSHUA M. ZEIDNER IT Consultant ( 602 ) 490 8006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Mid Level Linux Systems Admin Job!
My company is looking for JR to Mid-Level Linux Systems Administrator position. I have attached below the job description. If interested please send your resume to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Junior-Mid Level Systems/Network Administrator myGeek is currently seeking a Junior to Mid Level Systems/Network Administrator for a Linux server environment to join our rapidly growing, fun, cash-flow positive company. The successful candidate will serve as a subject matter expert, and be able to work independently with little direct supervision and guidance given. The Junior Systems/Network Administrator will assist in architecting, developing, managing and support myGeek’s high-capacity clustered application service environments and myGeek’s office desktops/ network. The ideal candidate will be able to design and implement complete solutions from initial hardware procurement to final backup process as well as manage all day-to-day functions. Problem solving and investigation skills are a must, as is the ability to anticipate and prevent problems. The position also requires a good understanding of networks, operating systems, and multi-tiered Internet applications. What myGeek Offers: Dynamic company with a great culture to work in We seek balance by providing flexibility between work and family myGeek is a goal driven, performance based environment An opportunity to receive compensation for efforts that are beyond just a base salary Excellent health benefits for you and your family Flexible work hours, goal based perks, and much more! Free water (& coffee) Opportunity for individual achievement and team success What myGeek Does NOT Offer: Layers of management and bureaucracy Cool company cars – Not to be confused with Geek Squad from Best Buy (we can paint the myGeek logo on your car for a small fee) Micro-Management Office Politics Your Qualifications: • 3-4 years enterprise level system/network administration experience in a Linux environment • 3-4 years professional experience with Red Hat Linux • Experience with installing and configuring Linux servers. • Experience with Linux security & hardening Linux systems. • Experience with one of the following Scripting skills (Perl, PHP, csh, bsh) • Systems Administration tools (top, vmstat, sar, uptime, ps) • Understanding of TCP/IP and related Internet protocols, security/firewalls, web servers, and load balancing. • Good understanding of Linux and Linux routing. • Experience working with various open source applications (Apache, LVS, Perl, Bind, NFS, sendmail, qmail, mySQL, cvs, etc.) • Knowledge of network topology including mail routing (MX records), DNS and NFS. • Knowledge of Linux and Windows networking • Strong work ethic and excellent communication skills, with the ability to work with various workgroups and levels (e.g.; sales team, service team, management, etc.) • Ability to multi-task and prioritize on a regular basis • Flexibility in on-call availability is required Not Required, but Preferred: Bachelors degree in Computer Science or Engineering-related field Kernel tuning and performance for Linux Experience with an enterprise level RDBMS (Oracle, Sybase) Experience with Cisco PIX Firewalls & Extreme Switches Experience with Intrusion Detection Systems Experience with Nagios System Monitoring Experience with High Capacity Websites. Are you a geek-worthy? Apply today! Salary Notes: Medical Insurance, Dental Insurance, Life Insurance, LTD Insurance, EAP, Flexible Spending Accounts, 401(k), Paid Time Off and Bonuses available. Qualified candidates should submit a cover letter, salary history & requirements, and resume to [EMAIL PROTECTED]--- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
On Friday 10 August 2007 09:46, after a long battle with technology,
Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
> In essence, it is similar to people fleeing California (because
> California sucks?) to come to Arizona, and then they go about trying
> to create the very thing they left by proposing laws, planting grass
> in a desert and not using their turn signals.
I think people do that no matter where they're trying to flee or what
they're trying to flee from. It's not quite as ironclad as "upper
management do completely moronic things", but it's a useful general
rule.
> I use a spiffy little C compiler called TinyCC that is fast enough to
> compile a Linux kernel from source in about 12 seconds.
Whoa. Which options were turned on? Was it a full build, or partial?
Did the compiled kernel work properly, without userspace displaying
strange behavior? I'd guess so, but more info would be interesting.
> Same thing with AOLserver. People complain that it doesn't have
> Apache features like php and perl modules, .htaccess, etc. No it
> doesn't. It's not Apache and hopefully will never be! It fills a
> very specific need and does it quite well.
"Feature creep". It happens all over the place. (Well, maybe not with
Slackware.) It's sort of like the old story about Stone Soup, although
every feature requester tends to put in bugs as well as new features.
> If someone is used to Suse, use Suse! If they are forced to move to
> a new platform, learn the new platform and don't look back.
Retaining knowledge from the old platform can be really useful in some
cases, though. My SuSE knowledge is years out of date, but I could
probably still fix a SuSE box. ("grep -ri" is *never* out of date
though.)
> Every O/S project fills a certain niche market and if we go about
> trying to unify them all then all we will end up up with is bloated
> MS type products.
I hear you about the niches. (You will take my vim and my slrn when
you've pried my keyboard from the shattered skulls of my enemies!)
Bloat, though, tends to result from users wanting new features. And
they *always* want new features.
--
I think I'll have to put on 500 pounds of subwoofers, amps, and other
delicious herbs. --MegaHAL, trained on ASR
There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Internet Woes Redux
Hi all, After having installed several distros and actually building a new computer, I finally found out on the net why I was having so much trouble with Qwest DSL. The default DNS numbers were wrong. The solution: System > Administrator > Network > DNS TAB: Primary DNS = 205.171.2.65 Secondary DNS = 205.171.3.65 Tertiary DNS = Blank DNS search path set at DEFAULT That was it. Now I access the net and also my email just as I should. I KNEW that the answer to the problem would be something relatively simple (although, in this case, obscure). I suppose that if I knew more about debugging, I might have found the answer myself. Naaah! My hat's off to whoever found that DNS hack. Bob Eaton --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
> Shame on you Kurt for thinking that Red Hat should pander to your SuSE > driven expectations. Though I'm not much interested in the thread anymore, I still find the psychology of it all pretty interesting. In essence, it is similar to people fleeing California (because California sucks?) to come to Arizona, and then they go about trying to create the very thing they left by proposing laws, planting grass in a desert and not using their turn signals. I use a spiffy little C compiler called TinyCC that is fast enough to compile a Linux kernel from source in about 12 seconds. One of the demos is a live CD that compiles the kernel before loading it. Over the years I have seen more and more people rant about cramming more and more into it, that if allowed would turn it into gcc. If they want gcc, why not just use gcc? Same thing with AOLserver. People complain that it doesn't have Apache features like php and perl modules, .htaccess, etc. No it doesn't. It's not Apache and hopefully will never be? It fills a very specific need and does it quite well. If someone is used to Suse, use Suse! If they are forced to move to a new platform, learn the new platform and don't look back. Every O/S project fills a certain niche market and if we go about trying to unify them all then all we will end up up with is bloated MS type products. Sorry for the ramble/rant. Daniel -- | --- | Daniel P. Stasinski | http://www.saidsimple.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.disabilities-r-us.com | Google Talk: mooo| http://www.scriptkitties.com | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.avenues.org --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
I assume your talking about SuSE. Mike Garfias wrote: > I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files. > > I do mind some craptastic distro burying the setting in an obscure > directory and then making it hard to script (or hand edit) a change. > > > On Aug 10, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Dan Lund wrote: > > --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
Mike Garfias wrote: > I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files. > > I do mind some craptastic distro burying the setting in an obscure > directory and then making it hard to script (or hand edit) a change. But the argument can be made, again, that if you are familiar with a distro, then it's not as big a deal. In my job, my coworkers & I often times write scripts, be they Perl or Bash scripts, that rewrite, or alter configuration files. Myself, I am very familiar with Gentoo, Slackware & RedHat (CentOS) and can find any config file I generally want... and all three distros vary greatly from one another. This goes the same for people who like SuSe & Debian, even though myself, I don't like them at all. But... to each their own. ~ Tony E --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
I don't mind tools editing the standard conf files. I do mind some craptastic distro burying the setting in an obscure directory and then making it hard to script (or hand edit) a change. On Aug 10, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Dan Lund wrote: > This argument has gone on since the beginning of Red Hat being the > "Windows" of Linux. Thankfully Red Hat has done a bit of shifting in > their strategy and become less like that. > It smacks of remnants of that argument, just completely backwards... > back then it was people saying that it's better to edit the files > directly versus using a tool. Now we have someone saying that there's > not enough tools? > lol > > > On 8/9/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:03 -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote: >>> Craig White wrote: Shame on you Kurt for thinking that Red Hat should pander to your SuSE driven expectations. >>> >>> Yes, shame on me for expecting that Red Hat behave like an OS >>> worthy of >>> being the class leader. >> >> somewhat argumentative considering that you are not using an >> installer >> but rather an image created by others. The reality is, changing >> hostname, etc. is a rather simple process for those who know Red Hat >> topology and for those who are reduced to Linux server management via >> Yast, it's going to be painful. From your perspective, I can see >> where >> you're coming from. From a Red Hat perspective, you bring a limited >> skill set that they are unlikely to satisfy regardless of their >> efforts. >> Installing X and the various system-config-*utils* or Webmin are the >> most reasonable options. > -- > "Courage is like love; it must have hope to nourish it." > -Napoleon Bonaparte > --- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > !DSPAM:14,46bc7d3738429971910183! > > --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
This argument has gone on since the beginning of Red Hat being the "Windows" of Linux. Thankfully Red Hat has done a bit of shifting in their strategy and become less like that. It smacks of remnants of that argument, just completely backwards... back then it was people saying that it's better to edit the files directly versus using a tool. Now we have someone saying that there's not enough tools? lol On 8/9/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:03 -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote: > > Craig White wrote: > > > Shame on you Kurt for thinking that Red Hat should pander to your SuSE > > > driven expectations. > > > > Yes, shame on me for expecting that Red Hat behave like an OS worthy of > > being the class leader. > > somewhat argumentative considering that you are not using an installer > but rather an image created by others. The reality is, changing > hostname, etc. is a rather simple process for those who know Red Hat > topology and for those who are reduced to Linux server management via > Yast, it's going to be painful. From your perspective, I can see where > you're coming from. From a Red Hat perspective, you bring a limited > skill set that they are unlikely to satisfy regardless of their efforts. > Installing X and the various system-config-*utils* or Webmin are the > most reasonable options. -- "Courage is like love; it must have hope to nourish it." -Napoleon Bonaparte --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
On 8/10/07, der.hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The firstboot routine is a script, isn't it? Can it be run again later to > go through the same questions for setting up the system? Yes, edit /etc/sysconfig/firstboot and set to YES/ Daniel -- | --- | Daniel P. Stasinski | http://www.saidsimple.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.disabilities-r-us.com | Google Talk: mooo| http://www.scriptkitties.com | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.avenues.org --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Re: Pointless rant: Red Hat Enterprise Server sucks!
Am 09. Aug, 2007 schw�tzte Craig White so: hostname & ethernet configurations, date/time, etc. are also part of the 'firstboot' routine which apparently wasn't included in your 'image' either - too bad...not Red Hat's fault. The firstboot routine is a script, isn't it? Can it be run again later to go through the same questions for setting up the system? ciao, der.hans -- # https://www.LuftHans.com/http://www.CiscoLearning.org/ # Molotov Bible - religion thrown at other people in order to cause an # explosive situation - der.hans--- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
