Re: [VOTE] New development build
So in case I wasn't clear myself. +1 for a prod release. I favor 2.something-but-not-1 and -0 for a dev release (its tested enough and lets face it we have a user community primarily of late adopters...people still email me about 1.01 -- a release from like 3 years ago) -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 04:06:21 +051800 > To: POI Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] New development build > > +1 to do a dev and prod release... > > Our version numbers are pretty messed up, I would prefer a 2.1.x dev and a 2.2 > release .. but please do what you prefer. > >> >>> >>> I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a >>> production build. >>> >>> Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the >>> development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively >>> we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care. >>> >>> Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's. >>> >>> BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for >>> this release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end >>> of Feb anyway. Anyone got a conversion script? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Glen Stampoultzis >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] New development build
+1 to do a dev and prod release... Our version numbers are pretty messed up, I would prefer a 2.1.x dev and a 2.2 release .. but please do what you prefer. > > > > > I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a > > production build. > > > > Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the > > development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively > > we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care. > > > > Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's. > > > > BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for > > this release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end > > of Feb anyway. Anyone got a conversion script? > > > > > > > > > > Glen Stampoultzis > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] New development build
+1 2.1 dev (if necessary) 2.5 prod 3.0 Super duper no memory use, instant spreadsheet version... Glen Stampoultzis wrote: I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production build. Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care. Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's. BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for this release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end of Feb anyway. Anyone got a conversion script? Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] New development build
> From: Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:16:43 +1100 > To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] New development build > > At 04:54 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote: >> I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build >> followed by a prod build? > > Yes. I assume it would be best to do a dev release first since it's a > pretty big change. If you'd rather go straight to 2.5 that's okay with me. > I feel comfortable with the amount of testing that we've done and since it has been tested in use. I don't feel we're going to accomplish a great deal with a dev release of it. I do feel there will be point releases once it is in use, but I can live with that. >> The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1). > > Depending on our release date we may not have a choice. This was from Greg: > >> The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to >> the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for >> further instructions on how to "use" the new license. *shrug* - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] New development build
At 04:54 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote: I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build followed by a prod build? Yes. I assume it would be best to do a dev release first since it's a pretty big change. If you'd rather go straight to 2.5 that's okay with me. The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1). Depending on our release date we may not have a choice. This was from Greg: > The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to > the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for > further instructions on how to "use" the new license.
Re: [VOTE] New development build
I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build followed by a prod build? The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1). -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. > From: Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:32:16 +1100 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] New development build > > > I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production > build. > > Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the > development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively we > could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care. > > Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's. > > BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for this > release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end of Feb > anyway. Anyone got a conversion script? > > > > > Glen Stampoultzis > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] New development build
Sorry! Stupid filter here at work. You will have to ignore these lines from me im afraid. Jason -Original Message- From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2004 2:29 PM To: POI Developers List Subject: RE: [SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build >[SPAM Detected] [VOTE] New development build I wasn't spamming... honest! At 01:55 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote: >2.5 production > >+1 > >Jason Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ This e-mail (including attachments) is confidential information of Australian Submarine Corporation Pty Limited (ASC). It may also be legally privileged. Unauthorised use and disclosure is prohibited. ASC is not taken to have waived confidentiality or privilege if this e-mail was sent to you in error. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender promptly. While ASC takes steps to identify and eliminate viruses, it cannot confirm that this e-mail is free from them. You should scan this e-mail for viruses before it is used. The statements in this e-mail are those of the sender only, unless specifically stated to be those of ASC by someone with authority to do so.
