firefox3 + qt?
Can anybody tell me the tricks o compile firefox 3 with qt instead of gtk, for a better integrations with kde? Does any one had some success on this in the past? I think that some clues can be found in the kdebase port's Makefile ...? Thanks.
update pbrowser after ports to current?
How do I update pbrowser after updating ports to current? I updated pbrowser to pb-browser-0.4p4 but still doesn read properly the ports tree. What is the next step I am missing, and why it is not included in the install? BTW, why "pbrowser" name in the command line and "pb-browser" name in the ports/packages name, this is confusing, it took me some time and pain (yes I know, OpenBSD is a bit crafted for painers/masochists only, but ... ) to realize that both are the same. Thanks
any quick tutorial to XP on OpenBSD?
Any quick link to a newbie six-clicks qemu-kqemu or any available virtualization equivalen tutorial to set up a licensed production XP? Does anyone had success using XP hosted by OpenBSD? Do I will lost any of the XP features compared to an XP standard install? Does anyone had success when using ActiveX and other MS-only similar "things" required by some corporations servers (Citrix, etc) when you are teleworking. Thanks
Re: update pbrowser after ports to current?
I recall that I should go to the (newly updated) ports dir and make index ? Why when updating pbrowser (make update) it don't remind this? macintoshzoom wrote: How do I update pbrowser after updating ports to current? I updated pbrowser to pb-browser-0.4p4 but still doesn read properly the ports tree. What is the next step I am missing, and why it is not included in the install? BTW, why "pbrowser" name in the command line and "pb-browser" name in the ports/packages name, this is confusing, it took me some time and pain (yes I know, OpenBSD is a bit crafted for painers/masochists only, but ... ) to realize that both are the same. Thanks
Re: firefox3 + qt?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:29:15AM -0600, macintoshzoom wrote: > Can anybody tell me the tricks o compile firefox 3 with qt instead of > gtk, for a better integrations with kde? > > Does any one had some success on this in the past? > > I think that some clues can be found in the kdebase port's Makefile ...? > > Thanks. http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/ "No, you can't." -- viq pgp6HlXEH7XDu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: firefox3 + qt?
Hi viq, Does you post means that by now, firefox3 don't compile at all with qt on OpenBSD? I checked your posted link http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/, "Mozilla Qt Port is available for testing", does this means that I could try this as an experiment? Or do may I will lack something -Qt4.4?-? Did you tried already? Thanks! Mac. viq wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:29:15AM -0600, macintoshzoom wrote: Can anybody tell me the tricks o compile firefox 3 with qt instead of gtk, for a better integrations with kde? Does any one had some success on this in the past? I think that some clues can be found in the kdebase port's Makefile ...? Thanks. http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/ "No, you can't."
Re: firefox3 + qt?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:31:12AM -0600, macintoshzoom wrote: > Hi viq, > > Does you post means that by now, firefox3 don't compile at all with qt > on OpenBSD? Firefox is a gtk program. Qt doesn't enter the picture at any point. > I checked your posted link http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/, > "Mozilla Qt Port is available for testing", does this means that I could > try this as an experiment? Yes, you could try this as an experiment. I haven't done it, and I don't think anyone here did. > Or do may I will lack something -Qt4.4?-? It is not obvious whether it needs Qt 4.4 (which we don't have), or will it build with older versions. Also, dependency on Qt4 suggests rather integration with KDE4, not KDE3. > Did you tried already? No, I don't run KDE. > Thanks! > > Mac. > > viq wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:29:15AM -0600, macintoshzoom wrote: >>> Can anybody tell me the tricks o compile firefox 3 with qt instead of >>> gtk, for a better integrations with kde? >>> >>> Does any one had some success on this in the past? >>> >>> I think that some clues can be found in the kdebase port's Makefile ...? >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/ >> "No, you can't." -- viq pgphwF50ViTcZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ghc-6.6.1 on amd64
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:45:10PM -0600, Matt Jibson wrote: > ghc from the current packages snapshot on amd64 doesn't start for > me--prints some 64/32 bit problem. Works on i386. Same problem when > built from ports. Anyone else seeing this? Simon Kuhnle reported problems, but only for ghci. The non-interactive ghc still worked for him on amd64. Ciao, Kili
4.4-beta shared libs
Hi, Can I safely assume that 4.4-beta binaries will be compatible with 4.4-release? That is, no shared libraries major number will be bumped. Thanks -- Best Regards Edd http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett
Re: 4.4-beta shared libs
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:50:31PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > Can I safely assume that 4.4-beta binaries will be compatible with > 4.4-release? That is, no shared libraries major number will be bumped. This was intended for misc@ sorry. Er.. I guess I'll leave it here to avoid spamming. -- Best Regards Edd http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett
Re: firefox3 + qt?
Thank you viq for your info.
Anyone working on collectd?
Hi there, is anybody of you already working on a collectd (http://www.collectd.org) port by chance? If not, I'd do it as I got it compile and work on OpenBSD recently. Best regards, Michael pgpH1lFhro56r.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: firefox3 + qt?
Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 02:09:32PM +0200, viq ecrivait : > Firefox is a gtk program. Qt doesn't enter the picture at any point. http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/
How to Create an OpenBSD Port and Package
Wanting to learn about porting, I am following: How to Create an OpenBSD Port and
Package from http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=2008031806
Ran into problem with:
# Install myscripts under /usr/local/.
do-install:
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/bin/* ${PREFIX}/bin/
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/share/myscripts/* ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
When I run make makesum, I get:
$ sudo make makesum
"Makefile", line 179: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 180: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 181: Need an operator
Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
referring to the three lines above.
How do I fix this?
Re: How to Create an OpenBSD Port and Package
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Chris Bennett wrote:
Wanting to learn about porting, I am following: How to Create an OpenBSD
Port and Package from
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=2008031806
Check out http://openbsd.org/porting.html too.
Ran into problem with:
# Install myscripts under /usr/local/.
do-install:
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/bin/* ${PREFIX}/bin/
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/share/myscripts/* ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
When I run make makesum, I get:
$ sudo make makesum
"Makefile", line 179: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 180: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 181: Need an operator
Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
referring to the three lines above.
How do I fix this?
Erm what exactly are you trying to do? You normally don't need to use
sudo for "make makesum" and I think you're trying to run it in
the wrong directory. Run it in the port's directory to create
the "distinfo" file after you have fetched the distfiles with
"make fetch".
If the software you're trying to port has been done right you
don't need to do your own "do-install" target
for the port. Sadly this isn't the case always.
The error you are receiving from the "sudo make makesum" command
is usually (always?) caused by trying to parse GNU Makefile
with BSD make. Your port probably needs USE_GMAKE=Yes.
--
Antti Harri
Re: How to Create an OpenBSD Port and Package
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:06:39AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> Wanting to learn about porting, I am following: How to Create an OpenBSD
> Port and Package from
> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=2008031806
>
>
> Ran into problem with:
> # Install myscripts under /usr/local/.
> do-install:
> ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/bin/* ${PREFIX}/bin/
> ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
> ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/share/myscripts/* ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
>
> When I run make makesum, I get:
> $ sudo make makesum
> "Makefile", line 179: Need an operator
> "Makefile", line 180: Need an operator
> "Makefile", line 181: Need an operator
> Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
>
> referring to the three lines above.
You need to use tabs instead of spaces to indent commands
used in your Makefile rules.
do-install:
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/bin/* ${PREFIX}/bin/
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/share/myscripts/* ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
In addition to the guide at undeadly, I recommend you read
this: http://www.openbsd.org/porting.html
Good luck,
Stefan
Re: How to Create an OpenBSD Port and Package
Thanks,
that was the problem.
Cut and paste is mostly helpful ---But...
Chris
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:06:39AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
Wanting to learn about porting, I am following: How to Create an OpenBSD Port and
Package from http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=2008031806
Ran into problem with:
# Install myscripts under /usr/local/.
do-install:
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/bin/* ${PREFIX}/bin/
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/share/myscripts/* ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
When I run make makesum, I get:
$ sudo make makesum
"Makefile", line 179: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 180: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 181: Need an operator
Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
referring to the three lines above.
You need to use tabs instead of spaces to indent commands
used in your Makefile rules.
do-install:
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/bin/* ${PREFIX}/bin/
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/share/myscripts/* ${PREFIX}/share/myscripts/
In addition to the guide at undeadly, I recommend you read
this: http://www.openbsd.org/porting.html
Good luck,
Stefan
Please review sysutils/collectd
Hi, since nobody seems to be working on collectd, I've made my first port. Please review it, I especially am not sure how to handle the messages by make lib-depends-check. You can get the port from https://code.stapelberg.de/OpenBSD/collectd.tgz (uses a certificate signed by CACert, plain HTTP is also available). Thanks in advance and best regards, Michael pgpc5hjluxt6S.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 4.4-beta shared libs
Edd Barrett wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:50:31PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: Can I safely assume that 4.4-beta binaries will be compatible with 4.4-release? That is, no shared libraries major number will be bumped. This was intended for misc@ sorry. Er.. I guess I'll leave it here to avoid spamming. Umm...No, that would be a completely wrong assumption to make. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20080724 2008/07/24 - changes in libc and libm Due to the changes in libc and libm, the following steps have to be taken before the rest of the system is built. Ian McWilliam
Re: How to Create an OpenBSD Port and Package
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 10:28 -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > Thanks, > that was the problem. > Cut and paste is mostly helpful ---But... :set list ...in vim(1) can help find these things. Also Port Lint ?
Re: firefox3 + qt?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:44:01PM +0200, Frank Denis wrote: > Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 02:09:32PM +0200, viq ecrivait : > > Firefox is a gtk program. Qt doesn't enter the picture at any point. > > http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/ Yes, that's the link I posted. That affects current version of firefox how? -- viq pgpjaWpDwGy0L.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: update pbrowser after ports to current?
my recall don't work. macintoshzoom wrote: I recall that I should go to the (newly updated) ports dir and make index ? Why when updating pbrowser (make update) it don't remind this? macintoshzoom wrote: How do I update pbrowser after updating ports to current? I updated pbrowser to pb-browser-0.4p4 but still doesn read properly the ports tree. What is the next step I am missing, and why it is not included in the install? BTW, why "pbrowser" name in the command line and "pb-browser" name in the ports/packages name, this is confusing, it took me some time and pain (yes I know, OpenBSD is a bit crafted for painers/masochists only, but ... ) to realize that both are the same. Thanks
Re: 4.4-beta shared libs
> Can I safely assume that 4.4-beta binaries will be compatible with > 4.4-release? That is, no shared libraries major number will be bumped. You can assume nothing until release.
