Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:41:10AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/10/21 01:29, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2012/10/20 23:55, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just > > > > > > > submitting this > > > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > > > > > Don't do this in ports, ask the upstream to create a proper download > > > (which can be hosted by github), or mirror them instead. These tarball > > > URLs are dynamically generated and the files can change if github > > > update git, tar or gzip. > > > > I just wanted to comment what is the correct url for the autogenerated > > tarballs of github. When I was creating the port for hotot, I didn't > > find the info. Finally I ran grep for search a example in the port tree. > > IIRC you'll need some hack with a dummy query string along the lines of > MASTER_SITES=https://github.com///tarball//?make_a_proper_release_you_slackers= > but in my opinion none of these urls providing dynamically-generated > files are correct to use in MASTER_SITES. > > > Is it acceptable to use two master_sites, the first with the github url > > and the second with a mirror?. > > Just use the mirror, but talk to upstream and ask if they'll make an > actual release first. We have to check hashes against the file that was > originally available when something was ported (there have been plenty > of hacked distribution sites, recently including places like sourceforge > mirrors, so checking hashes is necessary) - it's just not sane to do > this against a file which is generated dynamically. > K, few fixes: - changed the version info ( now 2012.09.13.rc1 ) - removed the extra webkit depend. - removed MESSAGE - added some @sample stuff to give a good default - removed extra tabs and spaces - removed FULLPKGNAME from plist luakit.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:41:10AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/10/21 01:29, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2012/10/20 23:55, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just > > > > > > > submitting this > > > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > > > > > Don't do this in ports, ask the upstream to create a proper download > > > (which can be hosted by github), or mirror them instead. These tarball > > > URLs are dynamically generated and the files can change if github > > > update git, tar or gzip. > > > > I just wanted to comment what is the correct url for the autogenerated > > tarballs of github. When I was creating the port for hotot, I didn't > > find the info. Finally I ran grep for search a example in the port tree. > > IIRC you'll need some hack with a dummy query string along the lines of > MASTER_SITES=https://github.com///tarball//?make_a_proper_release_you_slackers= > but in my opinion none of these urls providing dynamically-generated > files are correct to use in MASTER_SITES. > > > Is it acceptable to use two master_sites, the first with the github url > > and the second with a mirror?. > > Just use the mirror, but talk to upstream and ask if they'll make an > actual release first. We have to check hashes against the file that was > originally available when something was ported (there have been plenty > of hacked distribution sites, recently including places like sourceforge > mirrors, so checking hashes is necessary) - it's just not sane to do > this against a file which is generated dynamically. > Latest version: - now puts configs in xdg - removed FULLPKGNAME from PLIST - only depend on webkit,gtk3 luakit.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:41:10AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/10/21 01:29, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2012/10/20 23:55, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just > > > > > > > submitting this > > > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > > > > > Don't do this in ports, ask the upstream to create a proper download > > > (which can be hosted by github), or mirror them instead. These tarball > > > URLs are dynamically generated and the files can change if github > > > update git, tar or gzip. > > > > I just wanted to comment what is the correct url for the autogenerated > > tarballs of github. When I was creating the port for hotot, I didn't > > find the info. Finally I ran grep for search a example in the port tree. > > IIRC you'll need some hack with a dummy query string along the lines of > MASTER_SITES=https://github.com///tarball//?make_a_proper_release_you_slackers= > but in my opinion none of these urls providing dynamically-generated > files are correct to use in MASTER_SITES. > > > Is it acceptable to use two master_sites, the first with the github url > > and the second with a mirror?. > > Just use the mirror, but talk to upstream and ask if they'll make an > actual release first. We have to check hashes against the file that was > originally available when something was ported (there have been plenty > of hacked distribution sites, recently including places like sourceforge > mirrors, so checking hashes is necessary) - it's just not sane to do > this against a file which is generated dynamically. > Any OK's to import this?
Re: [new] www/luakit
On 2012/10/21 01:29, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/10/20 23:55, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting > > > > > > this > > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > > > Don't do this in ports, ask the upstream to create a proper download > > (which can be hosted by github), or mirror them instead. These tarball > > URLs are dynamically generated and the files can change if github > > update git, tar or gzip. > > I just wanted to comment what is the correct url for the autogenerated > tarballs of github. When I was creating the port for hotot, I didn't > find the info. Finally I ran grep for search a example in the port tree. IIRC you'll need some hack with a dummy query string along the lines of MASTER_SITES=https://github.com///tarball//?make_a_proper_release_you_slackers= but in my opinion none of these urls providing dynamically-generated files are correct to use in MASTER_SITES. > Is it acceptable to use two master_sites, the first with the github url > and the second with a mirror?. Just use the mirror, but talk to upstream and ask if they'll make an actual release first. We have to check hashes against the file that was originally available when something was ported (there have been plenty of hacked distribution sites, recently including places like sourceforge mirrors, so checking hashes is necessary) - it's just not sane to do this against a file which is generated dynamically.
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/10/20 23:55, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting > > > > > this > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > Don't do this in ports, ask the upstream to create a proper download > (which can be hosted by github), or mirror them instead. These tarball > URLs are dynamically generated and the files can change if github > update git, tar or gzip. I just wanted to comment what is the correct url for the autogenerated tarballs of github. When I was creating the port for hotot, I didn't find the info. Finally I ran grep for search a example in the port tree. Is it acceptable to use two master_sites, the first with the github url and the second with a mirror?. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:47:33AM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:27:50PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:55:17PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting > > > > > > this > > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > > > This only work if the project has manually set a download. > > > > ===> Checking files for luakit-9.13 > > >> Fetch > > >> https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit/tarball/2012.09.13-41/luakit-2012-09-13-r1.tar.gz > ^^ > You have a typo in the tag :) Had another typo :P ===> Checking files for luakit-9.13 >> Fetch >> https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit/tarball/2012.09.13-r1/luakit-2012.09.13-r1.tar.gz 2012.09.13-r1 100% |*| 210 KB00:00 >> Size does not match for >> /usr/ports/distfiles/luakit-2012.09.13-r1.tar.gz ^^^ works - but as per sthen@ - I am not going to add this. > > -- > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info >
Re: [new] www/luakit
On 2012/10/20 23:55, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > can use this in the Makefile: > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// Don't do this in ports, ask the upstream to create a proper download (which can be hosted by github), or mirror them instead. These tarball URLs are dynamically generated and the files can change if github update git, tar or gzip.
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:47:33AM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:27:50PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:55:17PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting > > > > > > this > > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > > > This only work if the project has manually set a download. > > > > ===> Checking files for luakit-9.13 > > >> Fetch > > >> https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit/tarball/2012.09.13-41/luakit-2012-09-13-r1.tar.gz > ^^ > You have a typo in the tag :) Indeed I did.. however: ===> Checking files for luakit-9.13 >> Fetch >> https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit/tarball/2012-09-13-r1/luakit-2012-09-13-r1.tar.gz ftp: Error retrieving file: 404 Not Found > > -- > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info >
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:27:50PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:55:17PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting > > > > > this > > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > > can use this in the Makefile: > > > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// > > This only work if the project has manually set a download. > > ===> Checking files for luakit-9.13 > >> Fetch > >> https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit/tarball/2012.09.13-41/luakit-2012-09-13-r1.tar.gz ^^ You have a typo in the tag :) -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:55:17PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you > can use this in the Makefile: > > MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// This only work if the project has manually set a download. ===> Checking files for luakit-9.13 >> Fetch >> https://github.com/mason-larobina/luakit/tarball/2012.09.13-41/luakit-2012-09-13-r1.tar.gz ftp: Error retrieving file: 404 Not Found > > And the content of the tarball is --. In the > ports tree exist some examples. > > Long time ago some users of github requested a more traditional/standard > style for the tarballs generated by github but they never have been > interested in this. > > Cheers. > > -- > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info >
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:47:47PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > Holla! > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. For projects that only uses the autogenerated tarballs of github, you can use this in the Makefile: MASTER_SITES = https://github.com///tarball// And the content of the tarball is --. In the ports tree exist some examples. Long time ago some users of github requested a more traditional/standard style for the tarballs generated by github but they never have been interested in this. Cheers. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/10/08 16:47, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > Anyone have any wicked cool ideas? or should I just host the tarball? > > Yes that is what we have to do with these stupid projects who won't make > proper releases... > Here is the latest luakit - works with the recently submitted luajit. luakit.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/10/08 16:47, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > > Holla! > > > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > > > Anyone have any wicked cool ideas? or should I just host the tarball? > > Yes that is what we have to do with these stupid projects who won't make > proper releases... Bummer! Anyone else test luakit out? I have been running it on i386 and amd64 with no issues or ~ aw week now. >
Re: [new] www/luakit
On 2012/10/08 16:47, Aaron Bieber wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > Holla! > > > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't > figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. > > Anyone have any wicked cool ideas? or should I just host the tarball? Yes that is what we have to do with these stupid projects who won't make proper releases...
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > Holla! > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. Upstream doesn't seem to keen on adding tarball releases, and I can't figure out a way to pull github///tarball/. Anyone have any wicked cool ideas? or should I just host the tarball? > > > > Let me know if I missed anything or did something stupid! > > Hi, > > I had to google what is this luakit ;) > > > Luakit is a highly configurable, browser framework based on the > WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, > extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is > primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with > too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control > over their web browsers behaviour and interface. > > > I haven't tested but I will get it a try. > > j. >
Re: [new] www/luakit
Here is the latest version of luakit, I still haven't checked with upstream to see if they can do tagged release, but this is pretty functional. This version implements a series of fixes from gsoares@, and a fix for jquery not being found ( was breaking the help / download pages ). An alternative download is available on http://deftly.net/luakit.tgz and http://qbit.devio.us/luakit.tbz Cheers, Aaron On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > Holla! > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > Let me know if I missed anything or did something stupid! > > Hi, > > I had to google what is this luakit ;) > > > Luakit is a highly configurable, browser framework based on the > WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, > extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is > primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with > too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control > over their web browsers behaviour and interface. > > > I haven't tested but I will get it a try. > > j. > luakit.tbz Description: Binary data
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:00:47PM -0400, Jiri B wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > Holla! > > > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > > > Let me know if I missed anything or did something stupid! > > Hi, > > I had to google what is this luakit ;) Thanks! - here is an updated version ( thanks gsoares@ for the tips! ) > > > Luakit is a highly configurable, browser framework based on the > WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, > extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is > primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with > too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control > over their web browsers behaviour and interface. > > > I haven't tested but I will get it a try. > > j. > luakit.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: [new] www/luakit
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:43:28PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > Holla! > > Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this > for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github > tagged-tarball-release to pull from. > > Let me know if I missed anything or did something stupid! Hi, I had to google what is this luakit ;) Luakit is a highly configurable, browser framework based on the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control over their web browsers behaviour and interface. I haven't tested but I will get it a try. j.
[new] www/luakit
Holla! Here a port for luakit ( http://luakit.org ). I am just submitting this for testing / advice for now. I want to see if I get get a github tagged-tarball-release to pull from. Let me know if I missed anything or did something stupid! Cheers, Aaron luakit.tgz Description: application/tar-gz
