GCC4: To bump or not to bump?

2010-05-28 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Everytime an architecture switches to GCC4, there are dependency
changes for all ports that use MODULES=gcc4 and C++ on that arch.
Normally, this would require a PKGNAME bump.  On the other hand,
the gcc4 switch is something of a flag day for that arch anyway.
So...
... to bump or not to bump?

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de



Re: GCC4: To bump or not to bump?

2010-05-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
Everytime an architecture switches to GCC4, there are dependency
changes for all ports that use MODULES=gcc4 and C++ on that arch.
Normally, this would require a PKGNAME bump.  On the other hand,
the gcc4 switch is something of a flag day for that arch anyway.
So...
... to bump or not to bump?

When we are un-cautious about this, I would like to request
a second approach:

Gaurantee a crank before the next release happens.