Re: remove www/junkbuster?
On 2016/03/17 23:15, Michael McConville wrote: > Rationale: > > o it's been unmodified since import in 2001 > o there are patches fixing a bunch of obvious dangerous buffer issues > o it's an ad-filter proxy, so it's very exposed > > Any objections? Kill it - privoxy replaces this.
Re: remove www/junkbuster?
Makes sense to me. Plus we have www/privoxy. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Michael McConville wrote: > Rationale: > > o it's been unmodified since import in 2001 > o there are patches fixing a bunch of obvious dangerous buffer issues > o it's an ad-filter proxy, so it's very exposed > > Any objections? >
Re: remove www/junkbuster?
Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2016/03/17 23:15, Michael McConville wrote: >> Rationale: >> >> o it's been unmodified since import in 2001 >> o there are patches fixing a bunch of obvious dangerous buffer issues >> o it's an ad-filter proxy, so it's very exposed >> >> Any objections? > > Kill it - privoxy replaces this. > +1 -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
remove www/junkbuster?
Rationale: o it's been unmodified since import in 2001 o there are patches fixing a bunch of obvious dangerous buffer issues o it's an ad-filter proxy, so it's very exposed Any objections?