Burning London, the Clash tribute album

1999-04-29 Thread Don Yates


I know I was going on the other day about how dated the Clash sound
nowadays, but jeez, they certainly didn't deserve this abominable
"tribute" album.  It kicks off with a cheesy rendition of "Hateful" from
No Doubt and then gets worse.  The Urge's version of "This Is Radio Clash"
is laughable, Ice Cube should never, ever have attempted "Should I Stay Or
Should I Go," Third Eye Blind do a typically faceless, limp version of
"Train In Vain," the Indigo Girls transform "Clampdown" into gag-inducing
coffeehouse f*lk, the Mighty Mighty Bosstones sound like they're goin'
through the motions on "Rudie Can't Fail," 311 turn "White Man In
Hammersmith Palais" into harmless pop-ska, Silverchair do what sounds like
a Spinal Tap parody of "London's Burning," and Heather Nova and Moby join
forces for a sparse piano-and-synth dirge version of "Straight to Hell."
Rising above the stink are the Clash-inpired Rancid's gutsy,
straightforward version of "Cheat," and Cracker's countrified version of
"White Riot."  Otherwise, this "tribute" album has to be one of the worst
tribute albums ever released by a major label.  Blech!--don




Re: Burning London, the Clash tribute album

1999-04-29 Thread Morgan Keating


I read the list of artists to appear on this a lil' while back and was
pretty horrified...you've now confirmed my suspicions...

morgan


At 10:55 AM 4/29/99 -0700, you wrote:

I know I was going on the other day about how dated the Clash sound
nowadays, but jeez, they certainly didn't deserve this abominable
"tribute" album.  It kicks off with a cheesy rendition of "Hateful" from
No Doubt and then gets worse.  The Urge's version of "This Is Radio Clash"
is laughable, Ice Cube should never, ever have attempted "Should I Stay Or
Should I Go," Third Eye Blind do a typically faceless, limp version of
"Train In Vain," the Indigo Girls transform "Clampdown" into gag-inducing
coffeehouse f*lk, the Mighty Mighty Bosstones sound like they're goin'
through the motions on "Rudie Can't Fail," 311 turn "White Man In
Hammersmith Palais" into harmless pop-ska, Silverchair do what sounds like
a Spinal Tap parody of "London's Burning," and Heather Nova and Moby join
forces for a sparse piano-and-synth dirge version of "Straight to Hell."
Rising above the stink are the Clash-inpired Rancid's gutsy,
straightforward version of "Cheat," and Cracker's countrified version of
"White Riot."  Otherwise, this "tribute" album has to be one of the worst
tribute albums ever released by a major label.  Blech!--don




Re: Burning London, the Clash tribute album

1999-04-29 Thread Svb442

In a message dated 4/29/99 12:59:31 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I know I was going on the other day about how dated the Clash sound
 nowadays, but jeez, they certainly didn't deserve this abominable
 "tribute" album.  

this piece of crap was guaranteed the above by the getting the mostly the 
lamest of bands to contribute. there are so many great rock'n'roll/punk bands 
(backyard babies, streetwalkin' cheetahs, hellacopters, nomads, dimestore 
halos, d generation, etc) that would have done so much of a better job, it's 
pathetic that this is what they came up with. just more proof (as if anyone 
needed it) that the major labels really have their heads up their collective 
butts.

np-flatt  scruggs-back to the cross



Clash tribute

1999-03-15 Thread William F. Silvers

Note the slight relation to a recent thread, or did those 25k posts
constitute a skein? g


 Cover stories

 A tribute to the Clash

 I still remember when I stumbled across an LP of various
 artists performing songs by Neil Young a decade ago and
 thought to myself, "Wow, that's a pretty cool idea." These
 days, of course, tribute albums are a common, even
 mundane part of the endless flood of CDs that arrive in
 stores every Monday at midnight, week after week, on
 big labels and small. I'm not sure why major labels
 continue to devote time and money to the tribute album,
 because for all the publicity generated by compilations
 dedicated to new interpretations of the work of, say, a
 John Lennon, in the end the CDs never sell all that well.
 Old John Lennon fans are probably more interested in
 hearing real John Lennon outtakes than new recordings of
 his old songs by Cheap Trick and a bunch of bands they've never 
heard of. And even if you are a
 Red Hot Chili Peppers fan, you may not want to drop 15 bucks for 
only one Chili Peppers tune
 and a bunch of other tracks by bands you don't care about. My guess 
is that the tribute album has
 survived as something of a creative indulgence for fortunate AR 
types whose jobs otherwise
 consist of chasing new bands around with checkbooks in hand, keeping 
their fingers crossed, and,
 from time to time, getting fired and rehired.

 Whatever the motive, I still look forward to tribute discs, mostly 
out of an abiding fondness for
 cover tunes, a pop novelty unfairly discredited by hordes of GB 
(general business) bands who
 specialize in rote versions of Top 40 hits and, of course, the 
Grateful Dead. Back when I was
 playing in bands, it was considered a point of pride not to do any 
covers -- until we heard the
 Replacements' version of Kiss's "Black Diamond" on Let It Be and saw 
R.E.M. open a show with
 the Velvet Underground's "Femme Fatale." Suddenly, reinterpreting a 
classic took on a whole new
 meaning: covers became an integral part of a band's musical 
identity, and it was perfectly
 acceptable to judge an outfit by their choices. Those choices are 
necessarily narrowed down to
 material by a single artist on a tribute disc -- which isn't as 
revealing as hearing, say, a band like
 Hole pull a Duran Duran tune out of nowhere on stage. But you can 
still judge a band by the quality
 of their cover.

     The new Burning London: The Clash Tribute (Epic; in stores Tuesday, 
March 16) offers a dozen
 or so contemporary artists the chance to do what they will with the 
work of a now ancient punk
 band whose songs have never been as popular to cover as the Ramones 
or even the Sex Pistols.
 That's partly because, with a few notable exceptions ("Train in 
Vain," "Should I Stay or Should I
 Go"), the Clash wrote songs that had some universal resonance as 
anthems but were more often
 than not self-referential ("Clash City Rockers," "This Is Radio 
Clash"). Their best tunes were tied to
 a specific time, place, and situation, whether it was visiting an 
unwelcoming Jamaica as naive young
 reggae fans ("Safe European Home") or simply squabbling with their 
record label ("Complete
 Control"). Their songs are so Clash-identified that they don't leave 
much room for outside artistic
 interpretation.

 That's not a problem for Rancid, a band custom-made to play Clash 
covers. They dig their combat
 boots into the rebel rock of "Cheat" as if they'd been born 
auditioning for the part of the Clash in
 Calling London: The Punk Years, with Tim Armstrong singing as if he 
had a copy of Black
 Market Clash caught in his throat. The Mighty Mighty Bosstones 
handle the ska-flavored "Rudy
 Can't Fail" with appropriate care; 311 put a Southern California 
spin on the lyrics to "White Man in
 Hammersmith Palais" (and prove that they've been a good band in 
search of a good song all along);
 and some outfit called the Urge do a respectable job with "This Is 
Radio Clash," though it might
 have been cool to hear what Fatboy Slim would do with what