policyd Not connecting/working on postfix

2012-06-18 Thread Naval saini

I have configured policyd v2.0.8 on my postfix mail server i want to apply
mail quota on user that's why i am configuring policyd but i think it's not
connecting on tcp port 10031 
When i check /var/log/cbpolicyd.log file i find this...

[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE: Process Backgrounded
[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CBPOLICYD] NOTICE: Policyd v2 / Cluebringer -
v2.0.8
[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CBPOLICYD] NOTICE: Initializing system
modules.
[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CBPOLICYD] NOTICE: System modules
initialized.
[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CBPOLICYD] NOTICE: Module load started...
[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => AccessControl: enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:40 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => CheckHelo: enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:42 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => CheckSPF: enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:42 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Greylisting: enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Quotas: enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Protocol(Postfix): enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Protocol(Bizanga): enabled
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CBPOLICYD] NOTICE: Module load done.
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE: 2012/06/18-16:38:43 cbp (type
Net::Server::PreFork) starting! pid(18317)
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] NOTICE: Binding to TCP port 10031 on
host *
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] WARNING: Group Not Defined.  Defaulting
to EGID '0 10 6 4 3 2 1 0'
[2012/06/18-16:38:43 - 18317] [CORE] WARNING: User Not Defined.  Defaulting
to EUID '0'
 
now i want to know where am doing mistake or there any issue of selinux...
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/policyd-Not-connecting-working-on-postfix-tp34029961p34029961.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Policyd server closing

2012-06-20 Thread Naval saini

I am configuring policyd for my mail server .i have configured policyd server
as follows 
my /etc/policyd/cluebringer.conf file...


# Server configuration
#
[server]

# Protocols to load
protocols=< AccessControl: enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE:   => CheckHelo: enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE:   => CheckSPF: enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Greylisting: enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Quotas: enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Protocol(Postfix): enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE:   => Protocol(Bizanga): enabled
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CBPOLICYD] NOTICE: Module load done.
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE: 2012/06/20-14:57:43 cbp (type
Net::S  
  
erver::PreFork) starting! pid(7256)
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE: Binding to TCP port 10031 on
host 12 
   
7.0.0.1
[2012/06/20-14:57:43 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE: Setting gid to "500 500"
 NOTICE: Setting gid to "500 500"
[2012/06/20-14:54:19 - 28551] [CORE] NOTICE: 2012/06/20-14:54:19 Server
closing!
[2012/06/20-15:00:36 - 7262] [CBPOLICYD] WARNING: Timeout from => Peer:
127.0.0.
[2012/06/20-15:00:50 - 7256] [CORE] NOTICE: 2012/06/20-15:00:50 Server
closing!

now please help me where's the proble why server is closing when i start
cbpolicyd ?
thank u...



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Policyd-server-closing-tp34042254p34042254.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



DKIM showing bad format

2012-07-16 Thread Naval saini

Setting up DKIM on my Postfix/CentOS 5.6 server.

It sends and signs the emails, but Google still showing it neutral. The
errors I'm getting are:

dkim=neutral (bad format) header.i=@r02.lbsmtp.org

from googles "show original" interface.

This is what my DKIM-signature header look like:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=r02.lbsmtp.org;
s=lbsmtp.org; t=1342436478; bh=KpPvOZhGUmgR1WIhVC9UH5OXzTnwtnGMf7tEwI0nNfw=;
h=To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:From;
b=lWWQQZjSEWwSjanB0btmP0Xg0izkyqDwKsxzlUqsL/tA9JAQau6dNCYdJx7OWuNiv
M3vXqrBe3uzFnvGIrQ2xbZy9DMMPmjiqUKn+KKsvmr873eYq5iG9bw6b53SkSJ6uV5
et0iLL6i3XNt/VDBQKuY1ILs+qRI60Eek/nGaXos=

please suggest me how can i solve this problem.?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/DKIM-showing-bad-format-tp34167419p34167419.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: DKIM showing bad format

2012-07-17 Thread Naval saini
so viktor How can i publish keys in my DNS.. ?

This is my DNS ZONE file entry:

_domainkey.r02.lbsmtp.org.  IN  TXT "t=y; o=-;"
lbsmtp.org._domainkey.r02.lbsmtp.org.   IN  TXT "k=rsa; t=y;
p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC+Nk+qAXShe92GLTe8sXXHFeH+lqZpxWMqCPqRdowGTx3Scrq7mgqEPnc49Po5cS0NjZI/eWF/rzD7/qpbpKLR2eZx3/8JEn67EtjKmuVc/uyejL5WSxkHsj4rhHFnX96yqV0iS+odGqy4c/QWvbbF+LB/rcOXDkvOR544O4LGgwIDAQAB"



On 7/16/12, Viktor Dukhovni  wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:06:53AM -0700, Naval saini wrote:
>
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;
>>   c=simple/simple;
>>   d=r02.lbsmtp.org;
>>   s=lbsmtp.org;
>>
>> please suggest me how can i solve this problem.?
>
> You may get better results with c=relaxed/relaxed.
>
> I see no DNS records for the selector/domain pair you're signing with:
>
>   $ dig -t txt lbsmtp.org._domainkey.r02.lbsmtp.org
>   ...
>   ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 47502
>   ...
>   lbsmtp.org. 7200 IN SOA enow.mercury.orderbox-dns.com. ...
>
> This is a serious problem, since the public key needed to verify
> the message is not published in your DNS.
>
> --
>   Viktor.
>


Re: DKIM showing bad format

2012-07-17 Thread Naval saini
Actually my Domain name is lbsmtp.org and i relay mails from my domain as
relayhost through MX record in my dns zone file now i want to sign outbound
mails Since i am new postfix user so please can explain me how can i get
DKIM signing mails .
Please explain me about which and what kind of entries required in dns. If
any tutorial please send me the link...

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Viktor Dukhovni  wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:21:50PM +0530, Naval saini wrote:
>
> > This is my DNS ZONE file entry:
> >
> > _domainkey.r02.lbsmtp.org.  IN  TXT "t=y; o=-;"
>
> The above resource record (RR) has no selector, it has no meaning in DKIM.
>
> > lbsmtp.org._domainkey.r02.lbsmtp.org.   IN  TXT
> >   "k=rsa; t=y;
> >p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC+Nk+qAXShe92GLTe8sXXHFeH+
> >lqZpxWMqCPqRdowGTx3Scrq7mgqEPnc49Po5cS0NjZI/eWF/rzD7/qpbpKLR2eZx
> >3/8JEn67EtjKmuVc/uyejL5WSxkHsj4rhHFnX96yqV0iS+odGqy4c/QWvbbF+LB/
> >rcOXDkvOR544O4LGgwIDAQAB"
>
> Congratulations, you're configured a 1024-bit RSA key (many sites have
> foolishly created 512-bit RSA keys, which are too easily factored). That
> said, your DNS does not in fact publish this RR to the world at large:
>
> $ dig -t txt lbsmtp.org._domainkey.r02.lbsmtp.org
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 18036
> lbsmtp.org.  7200  IN  SOA  enow.mercury.orderbox-dns.com. ...
>
> So your DKIM public key is not available for verification. Over
> and out.
>
> --
> Viktor.
>


Re: DKIM showing bad format

2012-07-17 Thread Naval saini
Thank u all i'll try to resolve my problem ...if i'll have any query then
i'll come here again...

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Viktor Dukhovni  wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:45:10PM +0530, Naval saini wrote:
>
> > Actually my Domain name is lbsmtp.org and i relay mails from my domain
> as
> > relayhost through MX record in my dns zone file now i want to sign
> outbound
> > mails Since i am new postfix user so please can explain me how can i get
> > DKIM signing mails.
>
> The best way to get help is to ask specific questions. Questions
> of the form "please explain everything to me with step-by-step
> instructions" are too much to ask of a community of volunteers.
>
> You can search for a step-by-step guide via your favourite search
> engine.
>
> > Please explain me about which and what kind of entries required in dns.
> If
> > any tutorial please send me the link...
>
> This is the Postfix users list. Perhaps you can find a DKIM forum
> that will help you with the specifics of DKIM. You're already
> signing your messages with DKIM, so the Postfix part is done.
>
> The remaining issues are not Postfix related.
>
> Your domain was created on Jul 06 2012 via privacyprotect.org. This
> makes it look a bit suspect...
>
> --
> Viktor.
>


Postix multiple instance creation

2012-07-20 Thread Naval saini

I have centos 6.3 server (with 3 different IP add. and Hostname) with postfix
v2.6 and want to create 2 outbound instace. 
for this i have followed this link 
http://advosys.ca/papers/email/58-postfix-instance.html
http://advosys.ca/papers/email/58-postfix-instance.html  article but it
seems incomplete

I have also read about it from
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html .But it's little bit
confusing..
please any one can tell me steps for creating second,thired outbound
instance.?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Postix-multiple-instance-creation-tp34188800p34188800.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



how to relay mails from outbound instance ?

2012-07-20 Thread Naval saini

I have created postfix-out1 instance on centos 6.3 server which has 3
different IP-address 3 different Hostname now both default postfix and
postfix-out1 instance running.
Hostname=r09.example.com which have IP=x.x.x.x  and i want postfix-out1
instance send all mails from Hostname=r09a.example.com which have
IP=y.y.y.y.
my server currently showing hostname=r09.example.com with IP=x.x.x.x
In /etc/postfix-out1/main.cf
hostname=r09a.example.com
domainname=example.com
inet_interfaces =y.y.y.y
relay_domains =example.com
multi_instance_group = mta
multi_instance_name = postfix-out1
multi_instance_enable = no
master_service_disable = " "
authorized_submit_users =root
smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts = $mynetworks
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 0
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions = $mynetworks
smtp_bind_address = 0.0.0.0
local_header_rewrite_clients =
alias_maps =
alias_database =
local_recipient_maps =
local_transport = error:5.1.1 Mailbox unavailable
recipient_delimiter = +
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
smtpd_timeout = 1200s
smtpd_client_port_logging = no


/etc/postfix-out1/master.cf
127.0.0.1:10026  inet  n   -   n   -   -   smtpd

Now please tell me what configuration i have to make to send mails from
r09a.example.com with IP=y.y.y.y  ?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-relay-mails-from-outbound-instance---tp34189728p34189728.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



How to store /var/log/maillog in sql database..?

2012-07-25 Thread Naval saini

I have configured postfix mail server and i use it for sending mails from my
clients. when they send mails some mails are delivered, some are
bounced,deferred,expire. and they report me that mails are not delevering.
Now i want if we can store to,from address and status of mails in database
and can be viewed graphically.
Is there any way to accomplish this task.?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-store--var-log-maillog-in-sql-database..--tp34209278p34209278.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Mail relaying issue.

2012-07-31 Thread Naval saini

I have configured postfix mail server(r11.example.com)  with multiple
instances and in /etc/postfix/main.cf relayhost=example.com 
Now i want my php application (bou...@ab.example.com) on ab.example.com
.when mails bounce back to application mails are not deliverd to
bou...@ab.example.com 
what should i do .where i should make changes please suggest ?
Thank u in advance.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Mail-relaying-issue.-tp34235087p34235087.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



How to write a script for postfix-out instance creation ?

2012-08-04 Thread Naval saini

I have configured postfix with multiple instance (around 10) on my centos 6.2
server with postfix 2.6.6 .It's working fine but when server get blacklisted
or down I need to configure other server which takes a lot of time that's
why i want to create a script for multiple postfix instance creation but i
am facing a problem ... How can i add new configuration settings or line in
my /etc/postfix-out/main.cf file I think postconf -e ' ' will insert in
/etc/postfix/main.cf file so please tell me the correct syntex by whice i
can make entry in my instance main.cf file ? thank's in advance.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-write-a-script-for-postfix-out-instance-creation---tp34254206p34254206.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Can we balance the load of outgoing emails from Haproxy with heartbeat

2012-08-14 Thread Naval saini
I want to relay 100 mails per day from my server for this purpose i want
to use haproxy load balancing can go with this.?
please if any one can suggest me the best way to do this i appreciate the
suggestions.
  



--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Can-we-balance-the-load-of-outgoing-emails-from-Haproxy-with-heartbeat-tp35396.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Postix multiple instance creation

2012-08-19 Thread Naval saini
http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/postfix_sbr.html

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Naval saini  wrote:

>
> I have centos 6.3 server (with 3 different IP add. and Hostname) with
> postfix
> v2.6 and want to create 2 outbound instace.
> for this i have followed this link
> http://advosys.ca/papers/email/58-postfix-instance.html
> http://advosys.ca/papers/email/58-postfix-instance.html  article but it
> seems incomplete
>
> I have also read about it from
> http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html .But it's little bit
> confusing..
> please any one can tell me steps for creating second,thired outbound
> instance.?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Postix-multiple-instance-creation-tp34188800p34188800.html
> Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


Can we balance the Load of outgoing mails using Haproxy

2012-08-29 Thread Naval saini
I have a php application from which mail should be delivered on Haproxy Load
Balancer and then load balancer should distribute all mails coming from php
application to It's Node whice are another smtp server and then this nodes
should relay mails to public domains ?
In short.
php application--->Haproxy Load Balancer->smtp server (Load
Balancer Nodes)->Internet(public domains)

can i get this using Haproxy and heartbeat to balance my outgoing mails ?



--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Can-we-balance-the-Load-of-outgoing-mails-using-Haproxy-tp50137.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-06 Thread Naval saini
I want to configure Haproxy for load balanceing of outgoing mails . for this
configuration of haproxy and postfix  i have googled various artical since
last month finally i got some information from Haproxy mailling list.
To balance postfix i am using ..
HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev11 2012/06/04
postfix mail_version = 2.10-20120902

 In /etc/main.cf
postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy

In /etc/haproxy.cfg

global
maxconn 4096 # Total Max Connections. This is dependent on
ulimit
nbproc  4
log 127.0.0.1 local4
defaults
modetcp
#   timeout connect 20s
#timeout client 20s
#timeout server 22s
frontend smtp_proxy 0.0.0.0:10021
mode tcp
log global
option tcplog
default_backend bk_postfix
backend bk_postfix
mode tcp
log global
option tcplog
balance roundrobin
#source 0.0.0.0 usesrc clientip
server postfix 127.0.0.1:25 send-proxy
server r23.mtp.org 74.117.56.x:25 send-proxy
server r17.mtp.org 199.71.212.x:25 send-proxy
both service haproxy and postfix running
but when i relay mails from my php application and from load balancer to
another smtp (which also have postfix 2.10) this shows error 
"  status=deferred (host r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x] refused to talk to me: 421
4.3.2 No system resources)
 
and i am testing this all on vps server with centos 5.8 
Is this configuration error or system resource related error.?
please help me thank you in advance




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-06 Thread Naval saini
this are the log of r23.mtp.org
/var/log/maillog

Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtpd[13312]: connect from unknown[199.83.x.x]
Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtpd[13312]: lost connection after CONNECT from
unknown[199.83.x.x]
Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtpd[13312]: disconnect from unknown[199.83.x.x]
Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtpd[12286]: warning: 199.83.x.x: hostname
unassigned.psychz.net verification failed: Name or service not known
Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtpd[12286]: connect from unknown[199.83.x.x]
Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtpd[12286]: lost connection after CONNECT from
unknown[199.83.x.x]


On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Wietse Venema [via Postfix] <
ml-node+s1071664n50316...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > another smtp (which also have postfix 2.10) this shows error
> > "  status=deferred (host r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x] refused to talk to me:
> 421
> > 4.3.2 No system resources)
>
> Look for warnings in the mail logfile of r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x].
>
> Wietse
>
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315p50316.html
>  To unsubscribe from postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue, click 
> here<http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=50315&code=c2FpbmluYXZhbDU4QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw1MDMxNXwyODE4NTg0MTY=>
> .
> NAML<http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315p50322.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-06 Thread Naval saini
my load balancer /var/log/maillog file

Sep  6 16:36:04 r22 postfix/smtp[3985]: 062058B074B: to=,
relay=r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x]:25, delay=5.3, delays=0.2/0.01/5.1/0,
dsn=4.3.2, status=deferred (host r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x] refused to talk to
me: 421 4.3.2 No system resources)
Sep  6 16:37:48 r22 postfix/postscreen[3992]: warning: haproxy read: time
limit exceeded
Sep  6 16:45:38 r22 postfix/qmgr[3978]: 062058B074B: from=,
size=297, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep  6 16:45:38 r22 postfix/smtp[5228]: connect to r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x]:25:
Connection refused
Sep  6 16:45:39 r22 postfix/smtp[5228]: 062058B074B: to=,
relay=none, delay=580, delays=580/0.01/0.04/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred
(connect to r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x]:25: Connection refused)
Sep  6 16:46:51 r22 postfix/postscreen[5233]: warning: haproxy read: time
limit exceeded
Sep  6 16:48:18 r22 postfix/postfix-script[5250]: stopping the Postfix mail
system
Sep  6 16:48:18 r22 postfix/master[3549]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  6 16:48:19 r22 postfix/postfix-script[5325]: starting the Postfix mail
system
Sep  6 16:48:19 r22 postfix/master[5327]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  6 16:49:20 r22 postfix/pickup[5329]: 67C068B075C: uid=0 from=
Sep  6 16:49:20 r22 postfix/cleanup[5398]: 67C068B075C: message-id=<
20120906124920.67c068b0...@r22.mtp.org>
Sep  6 16:49:20 r22 postfix/qmgr[5328]: 67C068B075C: from=,
size=297, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep  6 16:49:20 r22 postfix/smtp[5400]: connect to r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x]:25:
Connection refused
Sep  6 16:49:20 r22 postfix/smtp[5400]: 67C068B075C: to=,
relay=none, delay=0.23, delays=0.17/0.01/0.05/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred
(connect to r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x]:25: Connection refused)
Sep  6 16:50:49 r22 postfix/postscreen[5448]: warning: haproxy read: time
limit exceeded
Sep  6 16:52:47 r22 postfix/pickup[5329]: 46C908B0761: uid=0 from=
Sep  6 16:52:48 r22 postfix/qmgr[5328]: 46C908B0761: removed
Sep  6 16:57:48 r22 postfix/postfix-script[5591]: stopping the Postfix mail
system
Sep  6 16:57:48 r22 postfix/master[5327]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  6 16:57:49 r22 postfix/postfix-script[5665]: starting the Postfix mail
system
Sep  6 16:57:49 r22 postfix/master[5667]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  6 16:57:49 r22 postfix/qmgr[5668]: 062058B074B: removed
Sep  6 16:57:49 r22 postfix/qmgr[5668]: 67C068B075C: removed
Sep  6 16:58:19 r22 postfix/pickup[5669]: 8D1CE8B0737: uid=0 from=
Sep  6 16:58:19 r22 postfix/cleanup[5677]: 8D1CE8B0737: message-id=<
20120906125819.8d1ce8b0...@r22.mtp.org>
Sep  6 16:58:19 r22 postfix/qmgr[5668]: 8D1CE8B0737: removed
Sep  6 17:02:18 r22 postfix/postscreen[5791]: warning: haproxy read: time
limit exceeded
Sep  6 19:05:53 r22 postfix/postscreen[11662]: warning: haproxy read: lost
connection



and r23.mtp.org /var/log/maillog

Sep  6 21:03:04 r23 spamd[1667]: logger: removing stderr method
Sep  6 21:03:09 r23 spamd[1670]: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.3.1)
Sep  6 21:03:09 r23 spamd[1670]: spamd: server pid: 1670
Sep  6 21:03:09 r23 spamd[1670]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 1671
Sep  6 21:03:09 r23 spamd[1670]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 1672
Sep  6 21:03:09 r23 spamd[1670]: prefork: child states: IS
Sep  6 21:03:09 r23 spamd[1670]: prefork: child states: II
Sep  6 21:03:18 r23 postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
Sep  6 21:03:18 r23 postfix/master[1756]: daemon started -- version 2.3.3,
configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  6 21:38:16 r23 postfix/postfix-script[13489]: stopping the Postfix
mail system
Sep  6 21:38:16 r23 postfix/master[1756]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  6 21:38:16 r23 postfix/postfix-script[13563]: starting the Postfix
mail system
Sep  6 21:38:16 r23 postfix/master[13565]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  6 21:48:42 r23 postfix/postfix-script[13824]: stopping the Postfix
mail system
Sep  6 21:48:42 r23 postfix/master[13565]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  6 21:48:43 r23 postfix/postfix-script[13898]: starting the Postfix
mail system
Sep  6 21:48:43 r23 postfix/master[13900]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  6 21:58:28 r23 postfix/postfix-script[14160]: refreshing the Postfix
mail system
Sep  6 21:58:28 r23 postfix/master[13900]: reload -- version 2.10-20120902,
configuration /etc/postfix

if u need any thing else please tell me...i'll try to provide ..


On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Wietse Venema [via Postfix] <
ml-node+s1071664n50326...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > "  status=deferred (host r23.mtp.org[74.117.x.x] refused to talk to me:
> > 421 4.3.2 No system resources)
>
> Note: the above is a POSTSCREEN error reply. There is no other
> program in Postfix 2.10 that responds with that text.
>
> Naval saini:
> > Sep  5 13:35:32 s1 postfix/smtp

Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-07 Thread Naval saini
I have did
tcpdump -s0 -w file.cap this shows

tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
191 packets captured
192 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

when i capture for port 25 this shows

 tcpdump -ni venet0 -s0 -w file.cap port 25
tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
0 packets captured
1 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

and regarding to smtp trafic when i connect my load balancer from my php
application this shows
"* 421 4.3.2 No system resources"*
this problem start when i upgrade postfix from  2.3 to 2.10.
in older version of postfix this load balancer server was sending mails
successfully .
due to this relay error how can i put smtp load on load balancer.


On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Willy Tarreau  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:40:38PM +0530, Naval saini wrote:
> >  tcpdump -i venet0 -e host 199.83.x.x
> > tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back
> to
> > cooked socket
> > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
> decode
> > listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 96
> > bytes
> > 11:07:38.787889 Out ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 252: r22.mtp.org.ssh
> >
> > 117.203.6.14.58397: P 836101525:836101721(196) ack 2820479482 win 17424
> (...)
>
> You need to put this into a file (-s0 -w file.cap) otherwise this is not
> exploitable at all. Also there is no smtp traffic here at all. I suggest
> you limit the capture to port 25 :
>
>tcpdump -ni veth0 -s0 -w file.cap port 25
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315p50347.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-07 Thread Naval saini
When mails are submited from application these parameter commented in
main.cf file
#postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
#postscreen_upstream_proxy_timeout = 1s
#smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy

server relaying mails and and tcpdump shows

tcpdump -s0 -w file.cap
tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
294 packets captured
296 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

 tcpdump -ni venet0 -s0 -w file.cap port 25
tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
323 packets captured
324 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel


When mails are submited from application these parameter are not commented
in main.cf file
postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
postscreen_upstream_proxy_timeout = 1s
smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy

server stops relaying of  mails and and tcpdump shows
tcpdump -s0 -w file.cap
tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
41 packets captured
43 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel



tcpdump -ni venet0 -s0 -w file.cap port 25
tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
40 packets captured
41 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
 now tell me where the problem and logs of load balancer are
/var/log/mailllog
Sep  7 17:12:14 r22 postfix/smtp[7362]: 47A8B1F54156: to=<
bournbo...@gmail.com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.64.26]:25,
delay=1.9, delays=0.4/0/0.21/1.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK
1347023531 b10si6583182oee.33)
Sep  7 17:12:14 r22 postfix/qmgr[6035]: 47A8B1F54156: removed
Sep  7 17:12:14 r22 postfix/cleanup[7175]: 154991F54154: message-id=<
a68a1d0a9b810e18fb79787cd9e20...@test.25smtp.com>
Sep  7 17:12:14 r22 postfix/postfix-script[7386]: stopping the Postfix mail
system
Sep  7 17:12:14 r22 postfix/master[6034]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  7 17:12:30 r22 postfix/postfix-script[7461]: starting the Postfix mail
system
Sep  7 17:12:30 r22 postfix/master[7463]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  7 17:12:30 r22 postfix/qmgr[7464]: 1F2FF1F54153: from=<
bou...@test.25smtp.com>, size=7874, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Sep  7 17:12:31 r22 postfix/smtp[7468]: 1F2FF1F54153: to=,
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.64.26]:25, delay=25,
delays=24/0.01/0.21/0.58, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1347023548
b10si6586615oee.28)
Sep  7 17:12:31 r22 postfix/qmgr[7464]: 1F2FF1F54153: removed
Sep  7 17:12:31 r22 postfix/postscreen[7469]: warning: haproxy read: time
limit exceeded
Sep  7 17:13:02 r22 last message repeated 15 times
~

log of node server
/var/log/maillog

Sep  7 16:31:40 r23 postfix/master[1783]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  7 16:31:40 r23 postfix/postfix-script[2019]: starting the Postfix mail
system
Sep  7 16:31:41 r23 postfix/master[2021]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix
Sep  7 16:55:14 r23 postfix/postfix-script[5465]: stopping the Postfix mail
system
Sep  7 16:55:14 r23 postfix/master[2021]: terminating on signal 15
Sep  7 16:55:15 r23 postfix/postfix-script[5539]: starting the Postfix mail
system
Sep  7 16:55:15 r23 postfix/master[5541]: daemon started -- version
2.10-20120902, configuration /etc/postfix



On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Wietse Venema [via Postfix] <
ml-node+s1071664n50354...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > and regarding to smtp trafic when i connect my load balancer from my php
> > application this shows
> > "* 421 4.3.2 No system resources"*
>
> You have haproxy turned on in postscreen, but your load
> balancer is not sending the haproxy protocol.
>
> Where is the tcpdump output file?
>
> Wietse
>
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315p50354.html
>  To unsubscribe from postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue, click 
> here<http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=50315&code=c2FpbmluYXZhbDU4QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw1MDMxNXwyODE4NTg0MTY=>
> .
> NAML<http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.templa

Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-07 Thread Naval saini
Than please tell me how can i balance load of outgoing mails using haproxy
and what postfix program i should use to receive mails from php application
and balancing load using haproxy backhand servers.
Does relayhost parameter play any role in haproxy like it plays in DNS load
balancing.
please help me.

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Wietse Venema  wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > When mails are submited from application these parameter are not
> commented
> > in main.cf file
> > postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
> > postscreen_upstream_proxy_timeout = 1s
> > smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
> >
> > server stops relaying of  mails
>
> Your first mistake is to use postscreen to submit mail from
> an application.
>
> postscreen is a ZOMBIE DETECTOR.
>
> Wietse
>


Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-08 Thread Naval saini
*As you told now i have turned off postscreen and using *
smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
smtpd_upstream_proxy_timeout = 5s
 in my /etc/postfix/main.cf file


*
and in /etc/postfix/master.cf*
smtpinetn   -   n   -   -   smtpd -o
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
*
and my /etc/haproxy.cfg file looks like*

global
maxconn 4096 # Total Max Connections. This is dependent on
ulimit
daemon
nbproc  4 # Number of processing cores. Dual Dual-core Opteron
is 4 cores for example.
log 127.0.0.1 local4
defaults
modetcp
clitimeout  4s
srvtimeout  4s

frontend smtp_proxy 0.0.0.0:10021
mode tcp
log global
option tcplog
default_backend bk_postfix
backend bk_postfix
mode tcp
log global
option tcplog
contimeout 3000
srvtimeout 3000
balance roundrobin  # here i am testing things only one node
server r23.mtp.org 74.117.x.x:25 send-proxy


And Now i am submiting mails from another mail server on load balancer
using sasl authentication but now it not receiving mails
and When i submit mails to load balancer* /var/log/maillog showing *

Sep  8 13:09:47 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Sep  8 13:09:47 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
Sep  8 13:09:53 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: warning: haproxy read: timeout error
Sep  8 13:09:53 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Sep  8 13:09:53 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
Sep  8 13:09:58 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: warning: haproxy read: timeout error
Sep  8 13:09:58 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Sep  8 13:09:58 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
Sep  8 13:10:04 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: warning: haproxy read: timeout error

now please tell me where i am doing mistake ..?




On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Wietse Venema  wrote:

> Wietse:
> > Your first mistake is to use postscreen to submit mail from
> > an application.
>
> Naval saini:
> > Than please tell me how can i balance load of outgoing mails using
> haproxy
> > and what postfix program i should use to receive mails from php
> application
> > and balancing load using haproxy backhand servers.
>
> Turn off postscreen.
> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#turnoff
>
> Turn on smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol.
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol
>
> > Does relayhost parameter play any role in haproxy like it plays in DNS
> load
> > balancing.
>
> Your problem is RECEIVING mail. relayhost is for SENDING mail.
> http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
>
> Wietse
>


Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-08 Thread Naval saini
*this the output of dump file tcpdump -s 0 -w file.cap port 25*
tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to
cooked socket
tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture
size 65535 bytes
260 packets captured
261 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

what i am thinking regarding this problem
If you check haproxy listening on port 10021
*frontend smtp_proxy 0.0.0.0:10021*
 according to me this means haproxy will accept client request on port
10021 and will respond by* backend bk_postfix* servers which are listed i
have checked the* log of bakend servers *looks like

warning: hostname unassigned.psychz.net does not resolve to address
199.83.95.70: Name or service not known
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: connect from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: lost connection after
CONNECT from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: disconnect from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: warning: hostname
unassigned.psychz.net does not resolve to address 199.83.95.70: Name
or service not known
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: connect from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: lost connection after
CONNECT from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: disconnect from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: warning: hostname
unassigned.psychz.net does not resolve to address 199.83.95.70: Name
or service not known
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: connect from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: lost connection after
CONNECT from unknown[199.83.95.70]
Sep  8 17:00:59 r23 postfix/smtpd[30403]: disconnect from unknown[199.83.95.70]

means haproxy sending proxy on bakend server.
But it not accepting mails.
And the reason for this according to me (not sure but) we are sending mails
to postfix on port 25 while haproxy listening on port 10021 how it will
accept mails.
is this correct. if this is the issue than please tell me on which port i
have to bind frontend and on which i have to bind postfix. ?


On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Wietse Venema  wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > Sep  8 13:09:47 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: connect from unknown[unknown]
> > Sep  8 13:09:47 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
> > Sep  8 13:09:53 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: warning: haproxy read: timeout
> error
> > Sep  8 13:09:53 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: connect from unknown[unknown]
> > Sep  8 13:09:53 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
> > Sep  8 13:09:58 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: warning: haproxy read: timeout
> error
> > Sep  8 13:09:58 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: connect from unknown[unknown]
> > Sep  8 13:09:58 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: disconnect from unknown[unknown]
> > Sep  8 13:10:04 r22 postfix/smtpd[3170]: warning: haproxy read: timeout
> error
> >
> > now please tell me where i am doing mistake ..?
>
> Capture a session with:
>
> tcpdump -s 0 -w OUTPUTFILE port 25
>
> Make THAT OUTPUTFILE available so that Willy and I can have a look.
>
> Then we can make progress.
>
> Wietse
>


Re: postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue

2012-09-08 Thread Naval saini
wietse
 This is the tcpdump output file i am sending u please find the attachment.

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Wietse Venema [via Postfix] <
ml-node+s1071664n50405...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > *this the output of dump file tcpdump -s 0 -w file.cap port 25*
> > tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back
> to
> > cooked socket
> > tcpdump: listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked),
> capture
> > size 65535 bytes
>
> I asked for the OUTPUTFILE CONTENT of this command:
>
> tcpdump -s 0 -w OUTPUTFILE port 25
>
> In your case, the file.cap CONTENT file.cap, not the error messages.
>
> Wietse
>
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315p50405.html
>  To unsubscribe from postfix version 2.10-20120902 relay issue, click 
> here<http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=50315&code=c2FpbmluYXZhbDU4QGdtYWlsLmNvbXw1MDMxNXwyODE4NTg0MTY=>
> .
> NAML<http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-version-2-10-20120902-relay-issue-tp50315p50409.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mail relaying using smtpd setting?

2012-09-17 Thread Naval saini
I want to relay mails from another postfix server without using sasl
authentication and to prevent from open relay i want to allow recipient
server to accept mails using *smtpd_recipient_restrictions* settings
currently i am using *smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unknown_helo_hostname reject_unauth_destination*

when i relay mails from postfix server it log says 
 /var/log/maillog

Sep 17 11:11:24 r23 postfix/smtpd[17860]: connect from
r22.lbsmtp.org[199.83.95.70]
lost connection after DATA from r22.lbsmtp.org[199.83.95.70]
Sep 17 11:11:24 r23 postfix/smtpd[17860]: disconnect from
r22.lbsmtp.org[199.83.95.70]
Sep 17 11:11:24 r23 postfix/cleanup[17863]: 0FBC672825A:
message-id=<20120917071124.0fbc6728...@r23.lbsmtp.org>
Sep 17 11:11:25 r23 postfix/smtpd[17860]: connect from
r22.lbsmtp.org[199.83.95.70]

please suggest me what setting i should use here.



--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Mail-relaying-using-smtpd-setting-tp50699.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


sasl authentication reject after upgrading postfix from 2.3 to 2.10?

2012-09-19 Thread Naval saini
I have postfix running with multiple postfix-out instances i upgrade postfix
version from 2.3  to 2.10 before upgrade sasl authentication was fine after
upgradation sasl authentication rejecting.
logs of /var/log/maillog showing
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SASL support is not compiled in.
how i can fix this issue.?



--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/sasl-authentication-reject-after-upgrading-postfix-from-2-3-to-2-10-tp50796.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


can we sign outgoing mails with DKIM and spf for a particular sasl username ?

2012-10-23 Thread Naval saini
I have configured a postfix mail server on my centos 6.3 server.my spf and
DKIM signing working for all sasl user . i have 3 sasl user on my server i
want that when first user sends mails it sign mail with dkim of a domain
name when another user send mails his mails should sign with different
domain name. Is it possible in postfix ?



--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/can-we-sign-outgoing-mails-with-DKIM-and-spf-for-a-particular-sasl-username-tp51781.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Can we send mails from a single IP in multiple instances.

2012-11-02 Thread Naval saini
I have configured postfix with multiple outbound instances with a null
client.working fine Now i want to configure postfix in such a way that a
single sasl user can send mails from a sing IP from available multiple IP's.
Is possible with postfix ?



--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Can-we-send-mails-from-a-single-IP-in-multiple-instances-tp52094.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Can we send mails from a single IP in multiple instances.

2012-11-06 Thread Naval saini
Hello wietse,
This is working fine. Now i have to do one more thing which is "i used to
send mails from a php application.when i send mails from php application to
server using sasl authentication. I use multiple or different-2  from
address in php application for a single sasl user Now by using sender
dependent relaying i am not able to relay through specific host. Means i
can use anything in from address or for *unknown sender* but known *sasl
user* can we relaying through specific server. "
Thanks

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Wietse Venema  wrote:

> Naval saini:
> > No i don't require this one i am already using smtp bind address . I need
> > to explain my scenario again.
> > I have a main postfix for mail submission to outbound instances and 4
> > postfix-outbound mail instances which deliver mails on public domain.
> Now i
> > have created 3 sasl user for main postfix instance which accepts mails
> from
> > php application and the work of  main postfix instance is to relay mails
> > from 4 outbound instance. Now i want that when 3 sasl user's of main
> > postfix instance submit mail to main postfix instance than each user must
> > send all mails from only a single instance every time or in other words
> one
> > sasl user should send all out bound mails from a single outbound
> instance.
> > thanks
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
>
> Wietse
>


Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2013-07-25 Thread Naval saini
LinkedIn




Wietse,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- naval

naval saini
part time job for studentts,employes and for all at part time jobe
Noida Area, India

Confirm that you know naval saini:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/6mopu-hjjqfw4f-d/isd/15261975361/FMQOwbEs/?hs=false&tok=2LqOWp3Yh-DlQ1

--
You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/6mopu-hjjqfw4f-d/vXbF9X4UeW86b6Gojq5DRCgArEzG4zZo12Nv0aQAT3X7QFZIkXb-ZpT_9S/goo/ml-node%2Bs1071664n50316h17%40n5%2Enabble%2Ecom/20061/I5082301244_1/?hs=false&tok=1cYgba6A9-DlQ1

(c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.


  




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Invitation-to-connect-on-LinkedIn-tp59966.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2013-07-25 Thread Naval saini
LinkedIn




Wietse,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- naval

naval saini
part time job for studentts,employes and for all at part time jobe
Noida Area, India

Confirm that you know naval saini:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/tpiwn5-hjjqfw0b-1t/isd/15261975316/rGdEtTyS/?hs=false&tok=0ByICMHmV-DlQ1

--
You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/tpiwn5-hjjqfw0b-1t/q9clebiGwLpE4HuB4D1oSYW69U2LK7rBbysgg1K6NC6i_UrDn9cOvzGBs5/goo/ml-node%2Bs1071664n52101h52%40n5%2Enabble%2Ecom/20061/I5082301206_1/?hs=false&tok=1GevZBaB1-DlQ1

(c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.


  




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Invitation-to-connect-on-LinkedIn-tp59965.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2013-07-25 Thread Naval saini
LinkedIn




Wietse,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- naval

naval saini
part time job for studentts,employes and for all at part time jobe
Noida Area, India

Confirm that you know naval saini:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/tpiwn5-hjjqhda8-3f/isd/15261975316/rGdEtTyS/?hs=false&tok=1KhOKULBd_DlQ1

--
You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/tpiwn5-hjjqhda8-3f/q9clebiGwLpE4HuB4D1oSYW69U2LK7rBbysgg1K6NC6i_UrDn9cOvzGBs5/goo/ml-node%2Bs1071664n52101h52%40n5%2Enabble%2Ecom/20061/I5082307112_1/?hs=false&tok=2SgPfjTY5_DlQ1

(c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.


  




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Invitation-to-connect-on-LinkedIn-tp59967.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2013-07-25 Thread Naval saini
LinkedIn




Wietse,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- naval

naval saini
part time job for studentts,employes and for all at part time jobe
Noida Area, India

Confirm that you know naval saini:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/6mopu-hjjqhege-4b/isd/15261975361/FMQOwbEs/?hs=false&tok=1eCUHJHCN_DlQ1

--
You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/6mopu-hjjqhege-4b/vXbF9X4UeW86b6Gojq5DRCgArEzG4zZo12Nv0aQAT3X7QFZIkXb-ZpT_9S/goo/ml-node%2Bs1071664n50316h17%40n5%2Enabble%2Ecom/20061/I5082307188_1/?hs=false&tok=1-xSMlLMl_DlQ1

(c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.


  




--
View this message in context: 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Invitation-to-connect-on-LinkedIn-tp59968.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.