Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-20 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:24:33 -0500
Simon Brereton articulated:

 On Jan 19, 2012 7:13 PM, Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
  From: Robert Fitzpatrick rob...@webtent.org
  To: Postfix postfix-users@postfix.org
  Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
  Subject: Spamcop listed gmail?
 
  Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing
  list on the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is
  experienced by others. Got two calls this morning, both not
  receiving mail from gmail users and both being blocked by my usage
  of 'reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net'. Anyone other users of this
  config parameter seeing this?
 
  You should not block outright. Either use a scoring system (perhaps
 postscreen), or, DNSWL to first whitelist the servers.
 
  I personally report yahoo, gmail, etc. all the time via Spamcop
  when I
 get spam from them. My hope is they will at least find the account and
 disable it, possibly, with luck, even block emails going out just
 like it in the future.
 
 What he said...

Personally, I have found NOT receiving mail from Google to be a plus.
In any case, the is a forum on SPAMCOP that is active. I have used it
in the past, although several years ago. I just checked and it is still
there. There is also information on possible configurations for the
Spamcop lists and Postfix that might prove useful.

-- 
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html

Maslow's Maxim:
If the only tool you have is a hammer,
you treat everything like a nail.


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-19 Thread Steve Fatula
From: Robert Fitzpatrick rob...@webtent.org
To: Postfix postfix-users@postfix.org 
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
Subject: Spamcop listed gmail?
 
Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
users and both being blocked by my usage of 'reject_rbl_client
bl.spamcop.net'. Anyone other users of this config parameter seeing this?

You should not block outright. Either use a scoring system (perhaps 
postscreen), or, DNSWL to first whitelist the servers. 

I personally report yahoo, gmail, etc. all the time via Spamcop when I get spam 
from them. My hope is they will at least find the account and disable it, 
possibly, with luck, even block emails going out just like it in the future.

Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-19 Thread Simon Brereton
On Jan 19, 2012 7:13 PM, Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Robert Fitzpatrick rob...@webtent.org
 To: Postfix postfix-users@postfix.org
 Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
 Subject: Spamcop listed gmail?

 Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
 the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
 others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
 users and both being blocked by my usage of 'reject_rbl_client
 bl.spamcop.net'. Anyone other users of this config parameter seeing this?

 You should not block outright. Either use a scoring system (perhaps
postscreen), or, DNSWL to first whitelist the servers.

 I personally report yahoo, gmail, etc. all the time via Spamcop when I
get spam from them. My hope is they will at least find the account and
disable it, possibly, with luck, even block emails going out just like it
in the future.

What he said...

Simon


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-17 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On 1/16/2012 2:28 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
 We recommend that when using any spam filtering method, users be given
 access to the filtered mail - don't block the mail as documented here,
 but store it in a separate mailbox. Or tag it and provide users
 documentation so that they can filter based on the tags in their own
 MUA. We provide this information only for administrators who cannot use
 a more subtle approach for whatever reason.

And then I just followed their listed examples, crazy I know. The thing
that gets me is these are the first and only calls I have received on
this in all our years of using this config parameter. I'll definitely
look into it more...thanks.
--
Robert rob...@webtent.org


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-17 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On 1/17/2012 2:08 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
 why do you use spamcop ?

Why wouldn't I?

--
Robert rob...@webtent.org


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-17 Thread Bill Cole

On 17 Jan 2012, at 8:20, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:


On 1/17/2012 2:08 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:

why do you use spamcop ?


Why wouldn't I?


Because it has a long-running tendency to intermittently list various 
major legitimate freemail outlet points. This is not a new behavior or 
a rare one. It happens less than it did inn the early years of SpamCop, 
but it still happens  frequently enough that I would guess that there's 
never a version of the SpamCop BL that does not have one IP listed which 
emits some legitimate mail from one of the Big 4.


That's actually not enough of a reason to not use SpamCop for many 
people, both because some people can tolerate rejecting a few hundredths 
of a percent of their non-spam freemail flow (which may make the losses 
so sparse as to be essentially invisible) and because DNSBL's can be use 
in non-absolute ways.




Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 1/16/2012 1:12 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
 Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
 the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
 others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
 users and both being blocked by my usage of 'reject_rbl_client
 bl.spamcop.net'. Anyone other users of this config parameter seeing this?
 
 Jan 16 13:52:25 mx1 postfix/smtpd[72538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
 mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com[209.85.214.175]: 554 5.7.1 Service
 unavailable; Client host [209.85.214.175] blocked using bl.spamcop.net;
 Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.85.214.175;
 from=u...@gmail.com to=u...@example.com proto=ESMTP
 helo=mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com

From:  http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/291.html
How do I configure my mailserver to reject mail based on the blocklist?

We recommend that when using any spam filtering method, users be given
access to the filtered mail - don't block the mail as documented here,
but store it in a separate mailbox. Or tag it and provide users
documentation so that they can filter based on the tags in their own
MUA. We provide this information only for administrators who cannot use
a more subtle approach for whatever reason.

In other words, maybe it's best to not use bl.spamcop.net for outright
rejections at smtp time.  Alternatively, you can change the reply code
for this dnsbl or all your dnsbls to a 4xx so the sending host can get
the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing the world.
See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client

-- 
Stan


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Benny Pedersen

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:48 -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:


Jan 16 13:52:25 mx1 postfix/smtpd[72538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com[209.85.214.175]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client host [209.85.214.175] blocked using 
bl.spamcop.net;

Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.85.214.175;
from=u...@gmail.com to=u...@example.com proto=ESMTP
helo=mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com


thats why dnswl exists ?

http://moensted.dk/spam/?addr=209.85.214.175Submit=Submit


--


dash dash space





Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Benny Pedersen

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing the world.
See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client


http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#permit_dnswl_client
http://www.dnswl.org/tech#postfix





Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
 the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing the world.
 See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client
 
 http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#permit_dnswl_client
 http://www.dnswl.org/tech#postfix

Given the amount of leakage out of Gorilla mailers, especially Google
and especially Google Groups, why would you use dnswl to accept every
message from their outbounds, given they have a trustworthiness score of
1?  IMHO this is the only sane default setting:

permit_dnswl_client list.dnswl.org=127.0.[2..14].[2..3]

which doesn't automatically allow Google originating email into the
queue, nor Yahoo, nor AOL, etc.

No, permit_dnswl_client isn't the right solution for the OP in this case.

-- 
Stan


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 16.01.2012 22:22, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
 On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
 the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing the world.
 See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client

 http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#permit_dnswl_client
 http://www.dnswl.org/tech#postfix
 
 Given the amount of leakage out of Gorilla mailers, especially Google
 and especially Google Groups

naturally big players like google, yahoo... have a big
amount of mails each day and 1% of a big amount is
a hughe number - that does not classify them as spammer

if you send only 1000 messages each day and 900 of them are
spam you have a lower total count as google but percentual
90% junk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Benny Pedersen

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:22:41 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
No, permit_dnswl_client isn't the right solution for the OP in this 
case.


its a free world :-)

yep sure one could skip dnsbl from freemail domains if wanted that way


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Tonu Samuel

On 01/17/2012 07:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:


naturally big players like google, yahoo... have a big
amount of mails each day and 1% of a big amount is
a hughe number - that does not classify them as spammer

if you send only 1000 messages each day and 900 of them are
spam you have a lower total count as google but percentual
90% junk


Still they are ignorant and I report daily about one of their mails to 
spamcop. I tried contacting their abuse@, I tried to contact listowner 
etc but
 I still receive mailing list I never asked for. And this is their 
problem if they do not report spam reports either.


And please, if anyone from Google reads, remove that annoying 
shiitenews coming to me.


   Tõnu


Re: Spamcop listed gmail?

2012-01-16 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 16.01.2012 20:12, schrieb Robert Fitzpatrick:
 Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
 the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
 others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
 users and both being blocked by my usage of 'reject_rbl_client
 bl.spamcop.net'. Anyone other users of this config parameter seeing this?
 
 Jan 16 13:52:25 mx1 postfix/smtpd[72538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
 mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com[209.85.214.175]: 554 5.7.1 Service
 unavailable; Client host [209.85.214.175] blocked using bl.spamcop.net;
 Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.85.214.175;
 from=u...@gmail.com to=u...@example.com proto=ESMTP
 helo=mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com
 --
 Robert rob...@webtent.org

why do you use spamcop ?

-- 
Best Regards

MfG Robert Schetterer

Germany/Munich/Bavaria