Re: Special method required for Gmail dkim/spf verification

2016-04-13 Thread Tom Hendrikx


On 13-04-16 01:54, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> Google sent me a "fail" on my DMARC.  Everyone else seems happy. It
> turns out much like Google not accepting robots.txt for some search
> engines controls, they expect special fields in their DNS.
> 
> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6227174‎

This page describes use of google's feedback loop. This has nothing to
do with spf, dkim and dmarc. It just gives you more insight into your
delivery results. Most large mailers have such a service, and they all
are specific to that party.

The additional dns records are used to verify that they give access to
the feedback loop to someone that actually owns the domain (or at least,
can add dns entries).

> 
> Why? Because we're Google and we can.
> 
You misunderstood.

Regards,
Tom


Re: Special method required for Gmail dkim/spf verification

2016-04-13 Thread lists
Yesterday's Google report had me passing. Could be related to adding the Google 
term to DNS.


  Original Message  
From: Tom Hendrikx
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:38 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Special method required for Gmail dkim/spf verification



On 13-04-16 01:54, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> Google sent me a "fail" on my DMARC. Everyone else seems happy. It
> turns out much like Google not accepting robots.txt for some search
> engines controls, they expect special fields in their DNS.
> 
> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6227174‎

This page describes use of google's feedback loop. This has nothing to
do with spf, dkim and dmarc. It just gives you more insight into your
delivery results. Most large mailers have such a service, and they all
are specific to that party.

The additional dns records are used to verify that they give access to
the feedback loop to someone that actually owns the domain (or at least,
can add dns entries).

> 
> Why? Because we're Google and we can.
> 
You misunderstood.

Regards,
Tom


Re: Special method required for Gmail dkim/spf verification

2016-04-13 Thread li...@lazygranch.com
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:08:57 -0700
li...@lazygranch.com wrote:

> Yesterday's Google report had me passing. Could be related to adding
> the Google term to DNS.
> 

Hold the presses here. It turns out my domain was spoofed in the
report that failed. The IP address used isn't mine. In the passing
report, it was my IP address, which makes sense since my SPF and DKIM
are fine. 

The offending IP address comes back to UC Berkeley. If I ever
get an official answer regarding the event, I will do a follow up.

Needless to say, I think the DMARC quarantine is a good idea. 


Re: Special method required for Gmail dkim/spf verification

2016-04-14 Thread Joan Aymà
Isn't this SRS SPF about? http://www.openspf.org/SRS