Re: Thanks! EMA exporter

2004-08-12 Thread Mikael Byström

Michael, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

>Plus,you write "having to fire up FM separately" like it takes a massive
>amount of time to do so. :) Click on the database, a couple dockbar
>bounces, and the database is ready for searches. Boom. The wait is, at
>most, a couple or three seconds. I fritter away more than that when I
>fall asleep at the keyboard each afternoon. :)

What you lose is also your mindset and having to adapt to another GUI,
meaning other ways of navigating around and finding the messages you want. 
Most GUIs of Database backup utilities suck IMHO, including EMA. While
that is not such a big problem for me, except aesthetically, being a
database developer and getting most things at first try, I am
deliberately also a bit lazy using interfaces and rather have one GUI for
my mail messages, that I really like, like PM which happen to be my choice. 
There's in addition the problems involving moving data effectively back
from the backup apps, if you're still using that data actively. This
while avoiding duplication and loss of data or loss of data integrity
(context). While possible to achieve, this can easily take more time than
keeping them in PowerMail, at least if those issuesa re important to you.
This is only my view on message management of course and I welcome
differing attitudes and other ways of managing data as that is always
interesting.

Having said this I also acknowledge the value of backing up and EMA is
one solution that may work for some. Personally, I prefer simple UNIX
mailboxes though.


PM 5.0.1 | OS X 10.3.4 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD






Re: Search needs help

2004-08-12 Thread PowerMail Engineering

A-NO-NE Music wrote:

>I see I should had used Content instead of From or To, and I should had
>not used "-" negation as manual said?

In your case, you probably want to search for [To].
The - operator (as well as | and "") is to be used only when using the
[matches the search pattern] criterion. These operators are ignored when
using the 4 first criterion.


Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering


-
   "I've never seen any search engine work this fast on this much info
before in my life"
  Scott T. Hards, PowerMail user


 Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
-





Re: Search needs help

2004-08-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music

PowerMail Engineering / 04.8.12 / 4:20AM wrote:

>- "do not contain" can only be used in addition to another criterion (for
>example: [content] [includes the exact phrase] [a-no-ne.com], [content]
>[does not include the words] [hiro])


Thank you Jérôme,

It worked!

I see I should had used Content instead of From or To, and I should had
not used "-" negation as manual said?


--

- Hiro

[PROTECTED]
<[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]>






Re: Is PM 4 the last version for Mac OS 9?

2004-08-12 Thread Mirko Kranenburg

Yes, PM4 is the last version, and it is not database compatible with PM 5.
PM4 is a very capable solution for OS 9. If you want to see what you are
missing compared to PM4, check out the what's new on www.ctmdev.com

For most uses under 9 there should not be a problem!

Mirko

Dr Dave said:
> I'm using PowerMail 5.01 on Mac OSX.
> I want to recommend it to people still on OS 9, (and do not have the
> option of upgrading to OSX) but I need to know if they will get the same
> experience that I'm having. It appears that PM 5.01 is only for Mac OS X.
> Is this true? What are the main differences between 5.01 & the version
> for Mac OS 9? Has the database format changed as well?
> Dave
>
>
>


-- 
Mirko Kranenburg
Maastricht, Netherlands
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

OS X 10.3.5
PowerBook G4 1.25 GHz, 768 Mb RAM
Freeway Pro 3.5, NavPak, GraphPak
the whole MarinerPak




Is PM 4 the last version for Mac OS 9?

2004-08-12 Thread Dr Dave

I'm using PowerMail 5.01 on Mac OSX. 
I want to recommend it to people still on OS 9, (and do not have the
option of upgrading to OSX) but I need to know if they will get the same
experience that I'm having. It appears that PM 5.01 is only for Mac OS X. 
Is this true? What are the main differences between 5.01 & the version
for Mac OS 9? Has the database format changed as well?
Dave





Re: Search needs help

2004-08-12 Thread PowerMail Engineering

A-NO-NE Music wrote:

>I want to find all the addresses under @a-no-ne.com
>excluding the real ones such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]  My problem is that I
>can't make them excluded from PM5 search.
>
>"Do not contain" option is grayed (why?).  I tried [-"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>ne.com"] as manual sez but still no exclusion, with or without the quote
>signs.

- "do not contain" can only be used in addition to another criterion (for
example: [content] [includes the exact phrase] [a-no-ne.com], [content]
[does not include the words] [hiro])
- "do not contain" can only be used for words, not for exact phrases

Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering


-
   "I tried PowerMail, and gladly PAID for it. It is blazing fast at
searches on large databases, and I need and want that. It has excellent
filtering, far more powerful than Mail, both incoming and outgoing.
The Recent Mail browser is worth the price alone."
  PowerMail user comment on www.macupdate.com


 Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
-





Re: Search needs help

2004-08-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music

[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 04.8.11 / 6:12PM wrote:

>The best spam filter is webmail.

I still need to shut off catch all since I get bounced SPAM mail which
has my domain name as the sender.

Again, I need to find out all the garbage email addresses I created for
catch all throughout PM data base, and exclude search should work, no?

I was beginning to wonder if the reason of search not working is because
my domain name contains hyphens.


-- 

- Hiro

[PROTECTED]
<[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]>






Re: Search needs help

2004-08-12 Thread moody

The best spam filter is webmail.

1. Use webmail and log into your pop account.  My Isp has one, or you can
use Panadmail or others.  I just start Safari and Powermail at the same
time, and log in through webmail using Safari.  Then...
2. "Select all"
3. Look down the list and uncheck the ones you want to keep.  This way the
spam is still selected.
4. "Delete"  cleans out all the spam and leaves the good stuff
5. log out and then switch to Powermail.  (Using my Kensington 4-button
trackball it's the upper left button, scroll to Powermail & click.
6. log in with Powermail and just download the remaining contents of your
mailbox.

I can clean 120 emails in about 2 minutes this way, usually keeping 3-4. 
The only trick is not to do it backwards and keep the ones you want to
trash and trash the ones you want to keep.  I have done this.  No big
deal.  If it's important they'll email again.




Search needs help

2004-08-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music


Background:
I am in a mess because my server has catch all.  I am now receiving over
120 SPAM mails within every 3-4 hours.  PM5's SPAM filter feature is
great, but I am tired of checking them before deleting.  Once in a while
I find legit one.  This is SPAM Assassin's fault, tho.

Whenever I make online purchase, I used to give a new email address,
i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED]  This way, I was able to identify if the
place is SPAMming me or sold my address to someone else.  It used to work
6-7 years ago this way.

Not anymore.  So, I want to shut off catch all switch, especially my
domain address is now used to other people too, but since I still need to
receive some legit emails under these catch all addresses, I now have to
create these accounts to make them real addresses.

The problem is that I don't remember all of them.  So, here comes the
problem I am having.  I want to find all the addresses under @a-no-ne.com
excluding the real ones such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]  My problem is that I
can't make them excluded from PM5 search.

"Do not contain" option is grayed (why?).  I tried [-"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ne.com"] as manual sez but still no exclusion, with or without the quote
signs.  Just for the heck of it, I tried "!" as in RegEx but to no avail.

Do you know what I am doing wrong?

-- 

- Hiro

[PROTECTED]
<[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]>