Unsupported TEC Encoding Errors in PM 5.2.1b1
I can't type anything in the new PM beta when I try to compose a message; with each letter I get unsupported TEC encoding error pop- ups. Just before I installed 5.2.1b1, I noticed that my typing in a composition window showed the wrong font--I don't know which font it was, but it wasn't Courier (the font chosen in my preferences). What's wrong? Thanks, Emily -- If it seem slow, wait for it; it will surely come, it will not delay. Emily Jackson http://home.hiwaay.net/~emilyj/missjackson.html
Re: [ANN] [reposted] private 5.2.1b1 available
Ray wrote: This may be a stupid question, but I've only just started using PoweMail. How do you go about upgrading 5.2 with this? I dragged it into the applications folder expecting it to replace 5,2 but all it did was give me another install of PowerMail. As beta versions should generally not be used on your main data (or at your own risk), it uses a different user environment. You may switch to your mail environment from the mail/database menu. Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering - PowerMail is the email client for me for several reasons: (1) the integrity of the database, (2) the incredible searching speed, (3) the filtering system meets all my needs, (4) I absolutely LOVE the Recent Mail browser, (5) SpamSieve meets all my spam blocking needs Sherman Wilcox, PowerMail user Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com -
Re: [ANN] [reposted] private 5.2.1b1 available
Thanks for your email :Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:31:13 -0400 Hi Ray, This may be a stupid question, but I've only just started using PoweMail. How do you go about upgrading 5.2 with this? I dragged it into the applications folder expecting it to replace 5,2 but all it did was give me another install of PowerMail. I think all you need to do is start using this version instead of the old version, there's no special install and no settings need to be changed. It hasn't picked up any of my accounts, address book settings or the mail database. It's empty. Meanwhile 5.2 continues to work.
Re: [ANN] [reposted] private 5.2.1b1 available
Hi Ray, This may be a stupid question, but I've only just started using PoweMail. How do you go about upgrading 5.2 with this? I dragged it into the applications folder expecting it to replace 5,2 but all it did was give me another install of PowerMail. I think all you need to do is start using this version instead of the old version, there's no special install and no settings need to be changed. Jim -- Jim Pistrang JP Computer Resources Certified Member, Apple Consultants Network 413-256-4569 http://users.crocker.com/~pistrang
Re: [ANN] [reposted] private 5.2.1b1 available
We are pleased to announce a bug fix for PowerMail which is now available for testing from: This may be a stupid question, but I've only just started using PoweMail. How do you go about upgrading 5.2 with this? I dragged it into the applications folder expecting it to replace 5,2 but all it did was give me another install of PowerMail.
[ANN] [reposted] private 5.2.1b1 available
[Folks - just reposted the disk image to fix the issues with non-english languages] Greetings, We are pleased to announce a bug fix for PowerMail which is now available for testing from: http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/ctm/pm5.2.1b1.dmg (If this link displays odd characters, try pasting it into the URL field of your browser and then use option-return instead of return ) PowerMail 5.2.1b1 change list (from 5.2) Fixes * PowerMail 5.2 could hang for about a minute when accessing the network under certain circumstances * The load images button (when displaying an HTML message, and image display is turned off in the preferences) did not work with Mac OS X 10.3.9 or Tiger * When creating a new PowerMail database on Mac OS X 10.4, Spotlight indexing is now turned on by default * Dates in PowerMail 5.2 were displayed as specified by the system preferences on Mac OS X 10.2 or 10.4, but not on 10.3. Additionnally, dates in non roman character sets (japanese etc) were partially displayed on Mac OS X 10.3 or 10.4 Please report your findings back to the PowerMail-testing or PowerMail- discuss lists, thank you. Kind regards, the PowerMail team
[ANN] private 5.2.1b1 available
Greetings, We are pleased to announce a bug fix for PowerMail which is now available for testing from: http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/ctm/pm5.2.1b1.dmg (If this link displays odd characters, try pasting it into the URL field of your browser and then use option-return instead of return ) PowerMail 5.2.1b1 change list (from 5.2) Fixes * PowerMail 5.2 could hang for about a minute when accessing the network under certain circumstances * The load images button (when displaying an HTML message, and image display is turned off in the preferences) did not work with Mac OS X 10.3.9 or Tiger * When creating a new PowerMail database on Mac OS X 10.4, Spotlight indexing is now turned on by default * Dates in PowerMail 5.2 were displayed as specified by the system preferences on Mac OS X 10.2 or 10.4, but not on 10.3. Additionnally, dates in non roman character sets (japanese etc) were partially displayed on Mac OS X 10.3 or 10.4 Please report your findings back to the PowerMail-testing or PowerMail- discuss lists, thank you. Kind regards, the PowerMail team
Re: Filters: Checking address book entries
That did the trick. Thanks, Jérôme. z On 6/9/2005 at 11:01 AM, PowerMail discussions wrote: What criteria is PM52 checking when comparing a sender to address book entries? It only checks the email address. Account is XXX Sender is not in address book Execute if all conditions are met Maybe you should modify the filter to from (instead of sender) is not in address book? The sender field is generally used for the address of a mailing list.
Re: Will Not Send, Schedules will not run
I finally got mine to work...after rebuilding the schedule for a fourth time. I had previously had it set up the way I wanted it.it just quit working for some strange reason shortly after I did a clean re- install of Tiger. John Derry Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PowerMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 8/6/05 8:06 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My PowerMail (5.2) has quit sending mails, and the schedules no longer run, although it will receive mail if I tell it to connect again. I have tried reinstalling, tried starting with the command and option keys held down. I'm stumped. When I go to the setup for the schedules, their is a yellow ball/button next to the scheduledoes that indicate a problem there? The yellow ball indicates the active schedule (in case you have multiple ones). Verify that the correct accounts are checked, by clicking the accounts buttons in the schedulings dialog. To make things a bit more confusing, it WILL send if I use the connection/send waiting messages method. My Powermail is now doing this too. Most annoying, Also verify that immediately when queued is checked in the schedulings dialog. It is. I've recreated the schedules too, and it still won't send immediately. -- Derry Thompson g l o d e r w o r k s | Design - Hosting - Programming http://www.gloderworks.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 44 (0) 1562 631430 t + 44 (0) 7976 802487 m
Help, Jerome!
Hello, Jerome - I'm writing this in Mail because my PM is completely down, and I can't get to, or remember your address. PM cannot send. Trying to do so locks everything up. It will receive, but very very slowly, and even then, it's iffy. Then it started crashing I've tried all the database rebuilds, flushed all the caches I could find, repaired permissions, ran DiskWarrior. My Mac is very well backed, and I tried replacing the PowerMail folder in /Library/Mail, and the ctm and PowerMail pref's, as well as the PM application folder (from backup and a fresh download). I did this over various dates going back two weeks, but none of these files worked. So I would guess that it is not a database or corrupted prefs problem. I have the most recent crash log. It seems to be a computer problem, but then I don't know how to read these things. Let me know and I'll send it. Thanks. Tony
Re: Filters: Checking address book entries
Zeph wrote: What criteria is PM52 checking when comparing a sender to address book entries? It only checks the email address. Account is XXX Sender is not in address book Execute if all conditions are met Maybe you should modify the filter to from (instead of sender) is not in address book? The sender field is generally used for the address of a mailing list. Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering - The better and the best... PowerMail is the real and only continuation of Emailer... that's all ;-) Serious e-mail users, you know what we speak about. PowerMail user comment on www.versiontracker.com Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com -
Re: PM on Mactels?
Ben Kennedy on 6/9/05 said (similar to saying Xbox 360 has PowerPC, now we should be able to run Mac OS X on it!) Well, someone did do this, I read... they said it ran really really slow. -- Barbara Needham
Filters: Checking address book entries
Greets - I have a filter which conditions are Account is XXX Sender is not in address book Execute if all conditions are met The action is to raise the spam rating +50. Problem is, it doesn't appear to work; my sender appears to be considered as not in the address book, when she surely is. What criteria is PM52 checking when comparing a sender to address book entries? The discrepancy on my end seems very minor: Address Book: Reginald Bruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] From Header : Reginald Bruber, aka Reginald Sandolphon [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email address is precisely the same; is PM checking the name as well in its comparison? Or am I missing some other solution to this problem? Thanks, z
Re: PM on Mactels?
Michael Lewis said: I like Macintel. picks up the in of MacINtosh and INtel, melding the two words nicely. Plus, there used to be a clone maker named MacTell. Top! You have my vote. :) PM 5.2b6 | OS X 10.3.6 | Powerbook G4/550 | 512 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
Re(2): PM on Mactels?
Yeah, and my concern is that they will probably change the Mac startup- chime to that dreadful Intel dingle-thing :-P Karel Op woensdag, 8 juni 2005 schreef A-NO-NE Music: The first dev machine with, not Pentium M, but P4 is scheduled to ship in two weeks as I heard. Anyway, my only concern is dreaded Intel Inside sticker. That would turn me off for ever!
