Discussion list back on line

[PowerMail info]

Folks,

As you've noticed, we've been having major problems with the PowerMail-
discussion list, while the powermail-discuss-digest and powermail-
testing were doing fine.

It seems that the settings for this list became corrupt. Hopefully this
message will now get to you not just as part of the digest, but as part
of the regular feed.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and kind regards,

jean michel/ctm qa

Re: Discussion list back on line

[Mikael Byström]

Matthias Schmidt said:

>it is as it is, software is not perfect, humans aren't perfect, world is
>not perfect 
>life is full of joy, this one part of the fun ;-)
>
>no need being being confused by some clouds in front of the moon :-)

The problem is more harsh than that. Many people may very well not take
the time to be confused of lack of response, they rather just move on.
There are people on this list that are just "looking" and contemplating
Powermail as something for them. Is it in CTM's and ours interest if they
do move on? I don't think so. So an explanation also on the questions Jay
asked wouldn't hurt, really. 

Even if things can't be perfect, they can improve one step at a time.
Consider the methodology of Kaizen: .  I think it's  something to inspired by as the idea to
calmy improve things even if they do seem alright on the surface can open
up for creativity and evolution.

PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD

Re: Discussion list back on line

[Matthias Schmidt]

Jay,

why you're confused ?

it is as it is, software is not perfect, humans aren't perfect, world is
not perfect 
life is full of joy, this one part of the fun ;-)

no need being being confused by some clouds in front of the moon :-)

All the best

Matthias

---
Admilon Consulting GmbH
http://www.admilon.com
iChat/AIM: MatKoyasan
Tel. +81-736-56-3905
---

Am/On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:06:29 -0700 schrieb/wrote Jay:

>On 8/7/05, jean michel declared:
>
>>As you've noticed, we've been having major problems with the PowerMail-
>>discussion list, while the powermail-discuss-digest and powermail-
>>testing were doing fine.
>
>I'm really confused. It seems like six weeks since I last received
>anything from the list, until today. Twice in the past month I've emailed
>PowerMail Support about this issue, but they responded neither time.
>
>Why didn't anybody at PowerMail respond to my two emails? Aren't you
>trying to encourage your clientele? Also, why didn't you simply re-
>subscribe everybody onto the Digest list so that we would continue
>seeking, offering, and receiving assistance? You could post a message to
>the list explaining what is going on, then we would all be informed, we
>would all be involved, and we would all be supportive.
>
>I'm really confused.
>
>---Jay
>
>
>

Re: Discussion list back on line

[Jay]

On 8/7/05, jean michel declared:

>As you've noticed, we've been having major problems with the PowerMail-
>discussion list, while the powermail-discuss-digest and powermail-
>testing were doing fine.

I'm really confused. It seems like six weeks since I last received
anything from the list, until today. Twice in the past month I've emailed
PowerMail Support about this issue, but they responded neither time.

Why didn't anybody at PowerMail respond to my two emails? Aren't you
trying to encourage your clientele? Also, why didn't you simply re-
subscribe everybody onto the Digest list so that we would continue
seeking, offering, and receiving assistance? You could post a message to
the list explaining what is going on, then we would all be informed, we
would all be involved, and we would all be supportive.

I'm really confused.

---Jay

Re: Discussion list back on line

[Marlyse Comte]

Great! 

This seemed to have fixed the problem as I received this as a single message.

---marlyse

 former message(s) quotes: -

>Folks,
>
>As you've noticed, we've been having major problems with the PowerMail-
>discussion list, while the powermail-discuss-digest and powermail-
>testing were doing fine.
>
>It seems that the settings for this list became corrupt. Hopefully this
>message will now get to you not just as part of the digest, but as part
>of the regular feed.
>
>Sorry for the inconvenience, and kind regards,
>
>jean michel/ctm qa