Re: [ADMIN] First test

[Eugene Vital]

Ed Leafe wrote:
>   Testing...
>
>   If this makes it through, don't be surprised if the list goes off- 
> line again. I still have to add back in the spam filtering, 
What are you using for spam filtering Ed?  We are currently using Spam 
Assassin on the server but I am not very happy with the results, we 
still get a ton of spam that gets through.


> etc., but  
> I'm making progress!
>
> -- Ed Leafe
> -- http://leafe.com
> -- http://dabodev.com
>   




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[OT] Vote for me, Repeat as needed.

[Stephen Russell]

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
 
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided
missiles and misguided men." 
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.28/518 - Release Date: 11/4/2006
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

VAL()

[Tristan Leask]

Hi Guys,

Does anyone know how VAL() works?  Why is it that when you do a
VAL('701E960') you get a numeric overflow error, but when you do
VAL('701D960'), you don't?

Cheers

Tristan Leask

Software Developer
Marine Software Ltd

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.marinesoftware.co.uk

--
This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in 
writing by Marine Software Limited, 
this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential 
and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the 
purpose for which it was sent.
If you are not the intended recipient of this  communication  you should 
destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents.
Please notify the sender immediately of the error. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VAL()

[Jean Laeremans]

On 11/6/06, Tristan Leask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Does anyone know how VAL() works?  Why is it that when you do a
> VAL('701E960') you get a numeric overflow error, but when you do
> VAL('701D960'), you don't?
>
> Cheers
>
"Val() converts nearly all character strings to numbers—the only
problem is that some of these numbers may be beyond the range FoxPro
can actually work with. Val("1E+307") creates a numeric without an
error message, but this value cannot be stored in a numeric, double,
float or integer field, nor can you do much useful processing on it.
If you are converting character data to numeric in your applications,
you need to range-check the result to ensure you are working with
legitimate numbers."

Hacker's to the rescue 

A+
jml

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.marinesoftware.co.uk
>
> --
> This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise agreed expressly in 
> writing by Marine Software Limited,
> this communication and attachments are to be treated as confidential
> and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the
> purpose for which it was sent.
> If you are not the intended recipient of this  communication  you should
> destroy it without copying, disclosing or otherwise using its contents.
> Please notify the sender immediately of the error.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] IE7 Breaks Older QuickBooks

[Ted Roche]

On 11/4/06, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Or maybe put it on an older computer that you don't use for surfing,
> and leave the older IE on it?
>

It's still playing with fire. Since IE and its rendering engines
(HTML, XML, GIF, etc.) and its runtime engines (Flash, JavaScript,
Java, VBScript) are "an intrinsic part of the operating system," it
difficult to firewall all of that functionality from being invoked. So
many applications invoke part of IE (HTML Help, Explorer, Active
Desktop) that leaving any of it not patched to the latest version is a
liability.

However, maybe I could run it in a VM without any access to the
network or Internet. I don't use the online banking features, so I
might get away with that. Thanks for the idea, Ken!

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

[David Crooks]

On Sunday, November 05, 2006 10:51 PM Michael Madigan wrote:

>We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of ladybugs
everywhere.  Anyone else having a 
>problem with these now?

Check out:
http://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/4438756.html 

About 7 years ago we had a bunch of ladybugs in our condo in Falls
Church, VA.  Haven't seen too many since then.

David L. Crooks


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

[George]

How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with 
CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")?

TIA

George




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

[Kevin Ragsdale]

NULL your object reference.

oMyOutlook = NewObject("Outlook.Application")

** Do your thing here **

oMyOutlook = NULL

HTH,
Kevin


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of George
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:34 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with 
CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")?

TIA

George




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[OT] Show that flag!

[Russell Stephen]

Stephen Russell
.NET Developer/DBA

Gate Gourmet
c/o Ciber

Forum III
1770 Kirby Parkway, Suite 427
Memphis, TN  38138
901.754.6577 Ext. 6736
Direct: 901.752.6736
Toll Free: 1.800.221.1640 Ext. 6736


 


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Typematic rate in List Box

[Philip B]

Hi all,
What is the setting that controls how long VFP waits for you to key in 
the first several characters in a list box to navigate to the closest match?
I have an app that was working so that the user could type in 3 or 4 of 
the first characters before the list box adjusted down to the closest 
match. Now they have a newer, faster computer and it moves on the first 
character typed...
T.I.A.

Philip


>


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Typematic rate in List Box

[Charlie Coleman]

At 12:23 PM 11/6/2006 -0500, Philip B wrote:
>Hi all,
>What is the setting that controls how long VFP waits for you to key in
>the first several characters in a list box to navigate to the closest match?
...

_DBLCLICK

-Charlie




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:12, Stephen the Cook wrote:
> Virgil Bierschwale <> wrote:
> > Do you honestly believe that because you throw in the towel, that the
> > muslim extremists will stop what they are doing ?
>
> Removing the ass holes from Washington is the best step we could make.

Hi Stephen!

Can't be done. All you have to replace them are more of the same.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Saturday 04 November 2006 08:07, Stephen the Cook wrote:
> Virgil Bierschwale <> wrote:
> > Then you should understand why we are in iraq removing a dictatorship
> > that did the same thing.
>
> I really don't believe that this is the reason we did what we did.  Sorry.
>
> In the situation of a strong person who did keep the fear/peace in a place,
> we goofed in removing him.  The pressure that still gushes from that
> missing plug has been steady for the past 4 years.
>
> It reminds me of lava flowing into the ocean in Hawaii.  You can't stop it.
> And each flow leaves more signs of it's presence.
>
> Do you think that creating three republics

Hi Stephen!

Similar in some respects to the Yalta settlement.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

[Pete Theisen]

On Monday 06 November 2006 00:46, Justin Darnell wrote:

Hi J!

Oh, you guys are talking about real bugs. Never mind (in Emily Latella voice).

> I'm in Knoxville, TN.  We just now stopped the invasion.  There must
> have been 3000 in my living room last week.
>
> J
>
> On 11/5/06, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of
> > ladybugs everywhere.  Anyone else having a problem
> > with these now?
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 18:01, Ed Leafe wrote:
>   As the critical mid-term elections approach, it's time for everyone
> concerned with reversing this march toward endless war and imperial
> executive power to get involved. There are two get-out-the-vote
> drives

Hi Ed!

Gee, I do the same thing every election, wonder of wonders. Do you think it 
works?
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:02, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> El Sábado 04 Noviembre 2006 00:43, Virgil Bierschwale escribió:
> > And you base your understanding of what is happening in iraq from the
> > actual people serving over there or perhaps what you hear from the media
> > ?
>
> Well you see. He uses metaphors, so I gues I can feel empathy. I have
> obviously never served there (have you?), and If I had heard from it from
> people there then it would be hearsay.
> But I endured 7 years of military dictatorship, 60,000 missing people, my
> wife's grandmom kidnapped (by the state forces), raped, tortured
> (electricity, submarine, tweezers, etc). And then some. The funny thing is
> this coup d'etat (as many others all through South America) was backed,
> organized and financed by USA. 

Hi Ricardo!

Whoa! Can you prove this - that the USA financed the coup? Or was it financed 
by rich people who were Americans - not exactly the same thing.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] 1 in 5 children can't find the UK on a map.

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 22:42, Stephen the Cook wrote:
> Pete Theisen <> wrote:
> >> Besides I am a Feminist. I would love it if a woman pays my bills,
> >> and if a woman will open doors for me and give me her seat I am most
> >> thankfull and even willing to cook if she goes to work.
> >
> > Hi Ricardo!
> >
> > I think Feminist means something else here than it does in Argentina.
> > Here is is about complete and total unfairness to men all the time. --
>
> WTF?  Your in some sort of dream, or is that a nightmare?

Hi Stephen!

I think you have been married to a good woman for a long time and you just 
don't know what other women are like nowadays. Nightmare is what it feels 
like, but it is really happening.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

[Pete Theisen]

On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:51, Michael Madigan wrote:

Hi Michael!

I am using Linux, haven't noticed anything. Must be a Windows only bug.

> We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of
> ladybugs everywhere.  Anyone else having a problem
> with these now?
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] The Company You Keep

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 15:12, Ed Leafe wrote:
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Rev. Ted Haggard, who counsels Pres. Bush on a weekly basis and has
> been called his "spiritual consigliere", resigned today as president
> of the National Association of Evangelicals and as pastor of the
> megachurch he founded in Colorado Springs because a gay prosititute
> says he’s been having sex for pay with Haggard for more than three years
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>  hooker-claims-is-bushs-spiritual-consigliore/>
>
> ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yysl9k )

Hi Ed!

I thought he was looking haggard, too much poontang.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:13, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote:
> > Removing the ass holes from Washington is the best step we could make.
>
>   Washington, like Nature, abhors a vacuum. Remove the current
> assholes, and they will soon be replaced by others. The only hope is
> to regularly wipe them clean.  ;-)

Hi Ed!

I think they prefer to be licked.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Election Fraud already in Tennessee

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:31, john harvey wrote:
> Where you been? I'm all over it. Visit my blog at
> http://votinginmemphis.blogspot.com or  http://www.instapundit.com/  or
> http://www.volunteervoters.com/
>
> I've found 12 people who appear to have voted twice in early voting and 360
> more who hadn't voted over the past 10 years, but all of the sudden, get
> the urge to vote.

Hi John!

So, officer Harvey, did you arrest them?
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] No children left behind vs military recruitment

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:54, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:

Hi Virgil!

Just think how many Ms you could kill before you were beheaded. I bet being 
beheaded is better than cancer.

> I did 6 and hated it, BUT I also learned a lot, so I don't regret it..
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Dial-up hell

[Pete Theisen]

On Thursday 02 November 2006 01:01, john harvey wrote:

Hi Michael!

It wasn't that bad back in the day when that was all there was. But once 
anyone had it the websites began to load up the graphics and it all came to a 
halt.

> Been there, done that.
>
> John
>  
> I'm sitting at a timeshare in Nashville and the only
> highspeed they have here is at their welcome center.
>
> Savages.
>
> How do people use dialup?
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Saturday 04 November 2006 08:15, Ed Leafe wrote:

>   Does that accurately reflect what you've been saying? No, of course
> not. But that's how your writing looks to everyone else.

Hi Ed!

Everyoneelse includes me, so I guess you have told me what my preceptions are. 
Odd that you hit the roof when anyone else does that.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

[Pete Theisen]

On Monday 06 November 2006 09:50, David Crooks wrote:

Hi David!

They don't tell you that they have a "politically correct" agenda.

> On Sunday, November 05, 2006 10:51 PM Michael Madigan wrote:
> >We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of ladybugs
>
> everywhere.  Anyone else having a
>
> >problem with these now?
>
> Check out:
> http://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/4438756.html
>
> About 7 years ago we had a bunch of ladybugs in our condo in Falls
> Church, VA.  Haven't seen too many since then.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] No children left behind vs military recruitment

[David Crooks]

On Monday, November 06, 2006 2:59 PM Pete Theisen wrote for the second
time:

>Just think how many Ms you could kill before you were beheaded. I bet
being beheaded is better than 
>cancer.

Do we really need to see all of Pete's e-mails?  Once was enough... 

David L. Crooks


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Election Fraud already in Tennessee

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 13:52, Michael Madigan wrote:
> Could someone tell me why we need early voting?  It
> just gives the savages time to vote multiple times at
> multiple locations.
>
> The Democrats are going to do everything to steal this
> election.
>
> Criminals.

Hi Michael!

Now, now. This is what Ds are and what they do. We should be used to it by 
now.

We have a whole bunch of lawyers watching the polls here. Catch  most of them 
red handed. No one prosecutes, though, just void the ballot.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Pete Theisen]

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:12, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> > Do you honestly believe that because you throw in the towel, that
> > the muslim extremists will stop what they are doing ?
>
>   Do you honestly believe that your question has any resemblance to
> what myself and others who oppose the Bush Administration approach
> are calling for?
>
>   If you want to be taken seriously, don't insist on mis-
> characterizing someone's position. "Throw in the towel" is such a
> loaded and incorrect term that it calls into question your honesty or
> your ability to listen.

Hi Ed!

If by some miracle the Ds win they will stay the course. And the rabid left 
will be perfectly happy to let them, unless there is a draft, of course.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Fat Lesbian comment gets radio host fired

[Pete Theisen]

On Saturday 04 November 2006 00:55, Michael Madigan wrote:
> Which part was untrue?  She's fat and she's a lesbo.
>
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/03/D8L5ODTO0.html

Hi Michael!

But Massachusetts may be the most liberal place in the world, Whole different 
set of rules for Massachusetts, truth doesn't enter into rules.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] More Junk Science from the Libs

[Pete Theisen]

On Saturday 04 November 2006 01:00, Michael Madigan wrote:
> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061103/D8L59FQ00.html
>
> Right Wing Gear
> http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike

Hi Michael!

Well, they will probably set up some new rules, drive a bunch of small 
fisherpersons out of business and then the fish will be just fine.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

[Ed Leafe]

I thought that the lists were working OK, but I just found out that no 
one on the profoxtech list was getting mail. Can at least on PFT 
subscriber respond to let me know that this made it through? Before you 
reply, please check that someone hasn't already replied, so that the 
list doesn't get flooded with "I got it!" replies.

   ___/
  /
 __/
/
   /
   Ed Leafe
   http://leafe.com/
   http://dabodev.com



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

[Hal Kaplan]

I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since you sent 
it.

HALinNY 

=> -Original Message-
=> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
=> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 14:27
=> To: ProFox List
=> Subject: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech
=> 
=>  I thought that the lists were working OK, but I just 
=> found out that no one on the profoxtech list was getting 
=> mail. Can at least on PFT subscriber respond to let me know 
=> that this made it through? Before you reply, please check 
=> that someone hasn't already replied, so that the list 
=> doesn't get flooded with "I got it!" replies.
=> 
=>    ___/
=>   /
=>  __/
=> /
=>    /
=>    Ed Leafe
=>    http://leafe.com/
=>    http://dabodev.com
=> 
=> 
=> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

[Leland Jackson]

Yeap, it worked for me.

Regards,

LelandJ

Hal Kaplan wrote:

>I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since you 
>sent it.
>
>HALinNY 
>
>=> -Original Message-
>=> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
>=> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 14:27
>=> To: ProFox List
>=> Subject: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech
>=> 
>=> I thought that the lists were working OK, but I just 
>=> found out that no one on the profoxtech list was getting 
>=> mail. Can at least on PFT subscriber respond to let me know 
>=> that this made it through? Before you reply, please check 
>=> that someone hasn't already replied, so that the list 
>=> doesn't get flooded with "I got it!" replies.
>=> 
>=>___/
>=>   /
>=>  __/
>=> /
>=>/
>=>Ed Leafe
>=>http://leafe.com/
>=>http://dabodev.com
>=> 
>=> 
>=> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Hentzenwerke, Report Writer & sp2

[Lew Schwartz]

Does anyone know if Hentzenwerke is planning an eRevision of
their book/white papers re Report Writer upgrades in the upcoming sp2?
I'm looking for something to get me up to speed, but I don't want to
spend my money too soon.
Whil?
-Lew


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

[Ed Leafe]

UPDATE @4:30pm EST: trying again. Found another problem and fixed it, 
but I need to make sure that this is working OK. Can at least one 
profoxtech subscriber respond to let me know that this made it through? 
Before you reply, please check that someone hasn't already replied, so 
that the list doesn't get flooded with "I got it!" replies.

   ___/
  /
 __/
/
   /
   Ed Leafe
   http://leafe.com/
   http://dabodev.com



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

[David Crooks]

On Monday, November 06, 2006 4:32 PM Ed Leafe wrote:

>   UPDATE @4:30pm EST: trying again. Found another problem and
fixed it, but I need to make sure 
>that this is working OK. Can at least one profoxtech subscriber respond
to let me know that this made >it through? 
>Before you reply, please check that someone hasn't already replied, so
that the list doesn't get 
>flooded with "I got it!" replies.

I got it!

David L. Crooks


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

[Kevin Ragsdale]

Got it...

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:32 PM
To: ProFox List
Subject: [ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

UPDATE @4:30pm EST: trying again. Found another problem and fixed
it, 
but I need to make sure that this is working OK. Can at least one 
profoxtech subscriber respond to let me know that this made it through? 
Before you reply, please check that someone hasn't already replied, so 
that the list doesn't get flooded with "I got it!" replies.

   ___/
  /
 __/
/
   /
   Ed Leafe
   http://leafe.com/
   http://dabodev.com



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Ed Leafe]

Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you up! I've found 
yet another setting that changed from the previous version that was now 
wrong, so I'm sending another test.

If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, please reply so that I know that 
this made it through OK. If you have been getting mail all day, then 
you're on the regular ProFox list, and there is no need to reply.

   ___/
  /
 __/
/
   /
   Ed Leafe
   http://leafe.com/
   http://dabodev.com



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Ed Leafe]

still testing...

   ___/
  /
 __/
/
   /
   Ed Leafe
   http://leafe.com/
   http://dabodev.com



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Hal Kaplan]

I am not sure which list I am on.  I am getting your test messages but little 
else.

HALinNY 

=> -Original Message-
=> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
=> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 17:30
=> To: ProFox List
=> Subject: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test
=> 
=>  Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you 
=> up! I've found yet another setting that changed from the 
=> previous version that was now wrong, so I'm sending another test.
=> 
=>  If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, please reply so 
=> that I know that this made it through OK. If you have been 
=> getting mail all day, then you're on the regular ProFox 
=> list, and there is no need to reply.
=> 
=>    ___/
=>   /
=>  __/
=> /
=>    /
=>    Ed Leafe
=>    http://leafe.com/
=>    http://dabodev.com
=> 
=> 
=> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

[ed]

Leland Jackson wrote ..
> Yeap, it worked for me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> Hal Kaplan wrote:
> 
> >I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since
> you sent it.

Both of you are subscribed to the regular ProFox list. The problem is with the 
ProFoxTech subscribers not getting anything.

--Ed


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
---


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

[ed]

Leland Jackson wrote ..
> Yeap, it worked for me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ

OK, I found another glitch that I ironed out. Let's see if this one works...

--Ed


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
---


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Helio W.]

Hi.

On 11/6/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you up! I've
> found
> yet another setting that changed from the previous version that was now
> wrong, so I'm sending another test.
>
> If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, please reply so that I know
> that
> this made it through OK. If you have been getting mail all day, then
> you're on the regular ProFox list, and there is no need to reply.
>
>___/
>   /
>  __/
> /
>/
>Ed Leafe
>http://leafe.com/


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[mrgmhale]

Ed, I am certain I am on the ProFox Tech list.  I got the eMail Helio sent
out, but not the original eMail Helio replied to.

The 6 most dangerous words in the American language are, "All you have to do
is..." 


Gil

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Helio W.
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 5:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test
>
>
> Hi.
>
> On 11/6/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you up! I've
> > found
> > yet another setting that changed from the previous version that was now
> > wrong, so I'm sending another test.
> >
> > If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, please reply so that I know
> > that
> > this made it through OK. If you have been getting mail all day, then
> > you're on the regular ProFox list, and there is no need to reply.
> >
> >___/
> >   /
> >  __/
> > /
> >/
> >Ed Leafe
> >http://leafe.com/
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Francis \(net\)]

ProFoxTech! ... Bingo!

Best,

Francis I. Coppage, Jr.

-Original Message-
From: Helio W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

Hi.

On 11/6/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you
up! I've
> found
> yet another setting that changed from the previous version that
was now
> wrong, so I'm sending another test.
>
> If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, please reply so
that I know
> that
> this made it through OK. If you have been getting mail all day,
then
> you're on the regular ProFox list, and there is no need to
reply.
>
>___/
>   /
>  __/
> /
>/
>Ed Leafe
>http://leafe.com/


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the
opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical
advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers
who are too stupid to see the obvious.










___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Whil Hentzen (Pro*)]

Ed Leafe wrote:
> still testing...

I got this original but not the other one.

"How hard could it be?"

I think your problem is that you're not using MICROSOFT software, 
because everyone knows that it's Quick and Easy (r) to build all sorts 
of complex Enterprise-capable software with GENUINE MICROSOFT software.

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

[Virgil Bierschwale]

I just formatted the drive on the spare computer, removed fedora and I'm in 
the process of putting xp on it and thinking about vista on my laptop 
(worried about quicken and zip forms)

My opinion of linux.
Could be very nice, but you need to be a tinkerer and I don't want to spend 
time tinkering as I want to turn the key and run with it..

Final analysis, back to windows for me and linux isnt ready for the average 
user.

Virgil Bierschwale
Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate
(830) 329-6774 Cell
(830) 864-4726 Home
(830) 864-4799 Fax
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.virgilslist.com
- Original Message - 
From: "Whil Hentzen (Pro*)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test


> Ed Leafe wrote:
>> still testing...
>
> I got this original but not the other one.
>
> "How hard could it be?"
>
> I think your problem is that you're not using MICROSOFT software,
> because everyone knows that it's Quick and Easy (r) to build all sorts
> of complex Enterprise-capable software with GENUINE MICROSOFT software.
>
> Whil
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

[Ricardo Aráoz]

El Lunes 06 Noviembre 2006 17:00, Pete Theisen escribió:
> On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:02, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> > El Sábado 04 Noviembre 2006 00:43, Virgil Bierschwale escribió:
> > > And you base your understanding of what is happening in iraq from the
> > > actual people serving over there or perhaps what you hear from the
> > > media ?
> >
> > Well you see. He uses metaphors, so I gues I can feel empathy. I have
> > obviously never served there (have you?), and If I had heard from it from
> > people there then it would be hearsay.
> > But I endured 7 years of military dictatorship, 60,000 missing people, my
> > wife's grandmom kidnapped (by the state forces), raped, tortured
> > (electricity, submarine, tweezers, etc). And then some. The funny thing
> > is this coup d'etat (as many others all through South America) was
> > backed, organized and financed by USA.
>
> Hi Ricardo!
>
> Whoa! Can you prove this - that the USA financed the coup? Or was it
> financed by rich people who were Americans - not exactly the same thing.

Hi Pete.
Well I'm not a lawyer nor a detective nor a historian. But it is common 
knowledge here that Gral.Videla Cdore.Agosti and admral Massera had a green 
light from Washinton. The govt was recognized next day by USA. The minister 
of economics (don't know what that would be in USA) was educated and trained 
in USA. This was the time of the 'National Security Doctrine', a school of 
thought held by the "School of the Americas" (not sure if that's the correct 
name in english) which was a training school in USA for all of the top 
military ranks in South America, and the domino theory (whatever happened to 
that! There was no domino when Russia fell! Look at China, VietNam, Corea and 
even Cuba!). The coup was organized and financed by the CIA. Same thing 
happened in Chile with the coup against president Allende by Grl. Pinochet. 
Here it was even more documented (even a CIA agent in Chile declared so).



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

[George]

How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with
CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")?

TIA

George





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

[Malcolm Greene]

Ed,

Just got this email (19:14 EST).

Good to see you up and running!

Malcolm


- Original message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:57:29 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

Leland Jackson wrote ..
> Yeap, it worked for me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> Hal Kaplan wrote:
> 
> >I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since
> you sent it.

Both of you are subscribed to the regular ProFox list. The problem is
with the ProFoxTech subscribers not getting anything.

--Ed



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] 1 in 5 children can't find the UK on a map.

[Stephen the Cook]

Pete Theisen <> wrote:
 
> I think you have been married to a good woman for a long time and you
> just don't know what other women are like nowadays. Nightmare is what
> it feels like, but it is really happening. -- 

Maybe you need to go to different locations to find more variety. Or get one
off the internet out of the Philippines.  

Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided
missiles and misguided men." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.28/518 - Release Date: 11/4/2006
 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

[Richard Kaye]

oo=CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")
do stuff
oo.Quit


George wrote:
> How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with
> CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")?
>
> TIA
>
> George
>   
-- 
Richard Kaye
Artfact/RFC Systems
Voice: 617.219.1038
Fax:  617.219.1001

For the fastest response time, please send your support
queries to:

Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
-



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

[Pablo H Rivera Sr]

Coming through fine. 

Pablo
Value persons above all, not things. 
Valora personas sobre todo, no cosas.
Peace! *** Paz!
**
 

*  -Original Message-
*  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
*  Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:53 PM
*  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*  Subject: Re: HowTo Close Outlook after 
*  CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")
*  
*  oo=CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")
*  do stuff
*  oo.Quit
*  
*  
*  George wrote:
*  > How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with 
*  > CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")?
*  >
*  > TIA
*  >
*  > George
*  >   
*  --
*  Richard Kaye
*  Artfact/RFC Systems
*  Voice: 617.219.1038
*  Fax:  617.219.1001
*  
*  For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to:
*  
*  Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian 
*  Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - 
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*  
*  -
*  This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
*  -



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Difference between MSFT and Leafe tech support (Was: [ADMIN] Server changes)

[Whil Hentzen (Pro*)]

This is _too_ appropos. 

> 
> I regret the inconvenience, and have retained Microsoft Customer 
> Service to ensure that your future ProFox experience is as rewarding and 
> trouble-free as possible. If you have any further comments, please 
> direct them to that department, and I'm sure you'll be as content and 
> satisfied as all of Microsoft's customers!

http://www.hentzenwerke.com/support/techsupport.htm

Whil



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.