Re: Remote Desktop and Foxpro for Windows 2.6
Thanks Mike! Nice to see there are some other people out there still dealing with FPW apps! -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF]was Dell once again offers Windows XP - Vista upgrade
I almost forgot to add, Vista is noticeably slower than XP on the HP laptop. God only knows what kind of progress that is supposed to be. OK, that's one laptop which Vista is slower on. On the one I'm using to type this, it's at least as fast and noticeably faster at dealing with several large apps being open at the same time. I have to say that at the minute I don't see any major reason to go for Vista over XP SP2. Down the line a ways, after a Vista SP1 release, that situation will probably reverse. Having said that, I didn't pay for Vista, I got it via our corporate MSDN sub. I have to say I was looking at the pricing for MS Office Small Business Edition in PC World yesterday and it is very expensive. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Remote Desktop and Foxpro for Windows 2.6
Michael Madigan wrote: Just a heads up. IF you have your colors set to 256 in the Remote Desktop Client Options, the entry fields don't get refreshed fast enough. So you'll be typing, but won't see what you've typed until you go to the next field. Updating the number of colors to the highest setting (24-bit color on my machine) fixes the problem That's surprising...I would have thought the less colors, the better? Then again, does using the BITMAP option in the config file help towards this problem? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Remote Desktop and Foxpro for Windows 2.6
On 4/22/07, MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Just a heads up. IF you have your colors set to 256 in the Remote Desktop Client Options, the entry fields don't get refreshed fast enough. So you'll be typing, but won't see what you've typed until you go to the next field. Updating the number of colors to the highest setting (24-bit color on my machine) fixes the problem That's surprising...I would have thought the less colors, the better? Then again, does using the BITMAP option in the config file help towards this problem? Just a thought, if the screen depth of the remote desktop is the same as the local one rendering is faster. Probably does a straight blit, rather than pixel-by-pixel colour conversion. -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Remote Desktop and Foxpro for Windows 2.6
You're right, 16 color settings used to fix other problems. I haven't tried the bitmap setting, that may help too. --- MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Just a heads up. IF you have your colors set to 256 in the Remote Desktop Client Options, the entry fields don't get refreshed fast enough. So you'll be typing, but won't see what you've typed until you go to the next field. Updating the number of colors to the highest setting (24-bit color on my machine) fixes the problem That's surprising...I would have thought the less colors, the better? Then again, does using the BITMAP option in the config file help towards this problem? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: My appalling ignorance - creating visual classes
Jaime Vasquez wrote: Vince Teachout wrote: Use PrgToVcx, a utility by Tom Rettig, is in the download section: ftp://leafe.com/PrgToVcx.zip Boy, I'm really glad to know that it WASN'T something simple and obvious after all! Thanks. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Good overviews of Open Source?
Ted Roche wrote: On 4/20/07, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's unclear from your post what your client is supposed to be considering. I wasn't aware just how unclear it was, until you started asking questions. I'm looking for basic What is Open Source and Why is Open Source a GOOD thing? type articles, preferably with statistics. He has a 2 main products that are written in VFP. When I made the offhand remark that there is a push going on to try and get VFP source to become open source, his reaction was Oh No! That's bad, right? He's recently understood that he might be losing out on a business opportunity by not having a browser app, but when I mentioned PHP he said No, a lot of our clients shops are MS only, so it has to be ASP or Dot Net. They won't allow us to run PHP on their machines anyway And later he called back to say that he had mentioned PHP to someone, and they told him it was ok for small hobby sites, but couldn't scale to large sites and wasn't secure. Finally, he thinks that open source means we have to give away our intellectual property (source code). I'm trying to steer him towards XAMP in the future ( in addition to our current VFP software), because the Linux market for our product appears to be completely untapped, and I think the write-once deploy-many cross platform nature of Python would be a huge money maker. But I have a lot of 'splaining to do, first. I will be Googling my own homework, but I thought maybe others may have had this similar situation, and had standard links they might point their clients too. I did look at Cathedrial and Bazaar, btw, but way more techie than I'm looking for. Thanks! -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Good overviews of Open Source?
Heya Vince -
you said, He's recently understood that he might be losing out on a
business opportunity by not having a browser app,
hm... Curiouser and Curiouser -
Did you do any staging for him with IIS, Active FoxPro Pages, and VFP ?
You can also do wintel Apache, Active FoxPro Pages, and VFP.
You can also do staging with him for IIS and Fox#, see
www.foxaccelerated.com . Ya - there's lots o 'stuff' out there on da site
, but once you start working with the framework and the smart client, it's
NICE to keep it all in VFP.
It's a nice pool to swim in.
Although I'm a fan o open source (love those postGreSql backends, dontcha
know), I am sticking mostly with VFP for workstation development (with a
punch through for Dabo this year).
Mondo Regards [Bill]
--
William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
VFP Webhosting? You BET! - http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
Failing dotNet Project? - http://www.dotnetconversions.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Remote Desktop and Foxpro for Windows 2.6
I'll try that too. --- Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/22/07, MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Just a heads up. IF you have your colors set to 256 in the Remote Desktop Client Options, the entry fields don't get refreshed fast enough. So you'll be typing, but won't see what you've typed until you go to the next field. Updating the number of colors to the highest setting (24-bit color on my machine) fixes the problem That's surprising...I would have thought the less colors, the better? Then again, does using the BITMAP option in the config file help towards this problem? Just a thought, if the screen depth of the remote desktop is the same as the local one rendering is faster. Probably does a straight blit, rather than pixel-by-pixel colour conversion. -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Free software, Open source
The protester is having his kidneys harvested as we speak. LOL --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Open source protester crashes speech by Bill Gates News at http://english.sina.com/technology/1/2007/0420/110104.html Photo at http://news.sina.com.cn/c/p/2007-04-20/110312826613.shtml Video at http://tech.sina.com.cn/it/bn/2007-04-20/1405564.shtml - Tuberose ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Free software, Open source
Michael Madigan wrote: The protester is having his kidneys harvested as we speak. LOL --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Open source protester crashes speech by Bill Gates News at http://english.sina.com/technology/1/2007/0420/110104.html Photo at http://news.sina.com.cn/c/p/2007-04-20/110312826613.shtml Video at http://tech.sina.com.cn/it/bn/2007-04-20/1405564.shtml - Tuberose Hi Tuberose, When reading the news article, I was reminded of another recent article that said only approx. 244 genuine licenses of Vista had been sold. LOL!!! They (the Chinese) might love the guy (Bill Gates), but they're certainly not paying for his software (Switched to NF, as its not Fox but tech related!) -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Buying the War, on PBS next wed
Pete Theisen wrote: On Saturday 21 April 2007 3:03 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Pete Theisen wrote: On Saturday 21 April 2007 2:11 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: snip BTW Petey, if you ever come to my country make sure I don't find out. You might... 'ask for it'. Hi Ricardo! You want to kill me? Hi Petey! No, heavens! I would never say that. I just intend to wage war on terrorism (of whatever sign) inside my country. Just don't make sudden moves. Hi Ricardo! Is terrorism really any problem in Argentina? Particularly terrorism from aged Americans whose only sudden moves are in the direction of the toilet? No! We have no issues with TRUE Americans, like Mexicans, Canadians, Brazilians, etc. But we will wage war on terrorist USA's old people. We have intelligence information and we will be including them in OUR 'axis of evil'. Unless you cease and desist we'll wage preventive war on you. We have strong reasons to believe you are manufacturing and using canes for non-civilian uses. And unless you allow the 'World Cane Control Organization' (WCCO) to inspect your country looking for illegal cane facilities we will be forced to attack you. We admit we are the biggest cane manufacturers in the world, and the only ones who have used two canes to beat a couple of babies. But we are a responsible nation. We will not let any upstarts to start fabricating these canes for themselves. If you need them, then we'll sell you some canes for peaceful uses, but you're not allowed to manufacture them yourselves, only us, our allies and those nations who are strong enough that we don't dare attack can make canes. So beware, you have been notified! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Good overviews of Open Source?
Php scales and is cross platform. http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/10/15/php_scalability.html Java scales and essentially equivalent to Dot Net. The big difference between java and Dot Net is Java is a little more mature, more widely used, and run on Linux, Mac, Solaris, and about everything else, and its free. Also, perl and python scale and are cross platform. You might also take a look a Ruby on Rail as an application foundation. It uses AJAX which is good. There are a number of other AJAX application foundations that are commercial as well. Many large companies that develop all their software in house have taken advantage of the open source opportunity to add to their bottom line by reducing expenses while maintaining commercial grade quality. Advantages of open source are: It is free. The source code is made available, so application can easily be modified by a user. Also, security is increased when the source code is made available to everyone, so bug are spotted more quickly, and fixed more rapidly. Many commercial applications are developed using free open source software like perl, php, python, and Ruby on Rails, Also, many commercial applications take advantage of free open source databases like SQLite and PostgreSQL,. Many web based commercial application run on the Apache web server which works not only in Windows, but in Linux, Mac and Unix computers. Such Commercial applications will also run in Windows IIS. One big advantage of open source is choice. With open source you do not get locked into a single platform and vendor, and the Windows churn which keeps everyone reaching for their wallets to buy new software and computers is somewhat alleviated. These advantage certainly help me sleep better at night. Regards, LelandJ Vince Teachout wrote: Ted Roche wrote: On 4/20/07, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's unclear from your post what your client is supposed to be considering. I wasn't aware just how unclear it was, until you started asking questions. I'm looking for basic What is Open Source and Why is Open Source a GOOD thing? type articles, preferably with statistics. He has a 2 main products that are written in VFP. When I made the offhand remark that there is a push going on to try and get VFP source to become open source, his reaction was Oh No! That's bad, right? He's recently understood that he might be losing out on a business opportunity by not having a browser app, but when I mentioned PHP he said No, a lot of our clients shops are MS only, so it has to be ASP or Dot Net. They won't allow us to run PHP on their machines anyway And later he called back to say that he had mentioned PHP to someone, and they told him it was ok for small hobby sites, but couldn't scale to large sites and wasn't secure. Finally, he thinks that open source means we have to give away our intellectual property (source code). I'm trying to steer him towards XAMP in the future ( in addition to our current VFP software), because the Linux market for our product appears to be completely untapped, and I think the write-once deploy-many cross platform nature of Python would be a huge money maker. But I have a lot of 'splaining to do, first. I will be Googling my own homework, but I thought maybe others may have had this similar situation, and had standard links they might point their clients too. I did look at Cathedrial and Bazaar, btw, but way more techie than I'm looking for. Thanks! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
tracing via remote desktop connection
I've got a new program that I need to learn inside out asap. Its on a network drive and I have to access it via remote desktop connection. We have a test area set up on drive C and the EXE that I build runs fine. However, I want to trace my way through the program so I will know what calls what. I've tried copying the .SC* down to my test area and I still end up missing a bunch of files. Is there something I'm missing, or do I simply need to track down all the missing files and put them in my test directory in order to step through the program ? At this point, I do NOT know where all the files are located at. Thanks, Virgil Bierschwale Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate (830) 329-6774 Cell (830) 864-4799 Fax (830) 864-4726 Home http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Free software, Open source
MB Software Solutions wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Hi Tuberose, When reading the news article, I was reminded of another recent article that said only approx. 244 genuine licenses of Vista had been sold. LOL!!! They (the Chinese) might love the guy (Bill Gates), but they're certainly not paying for his software (Switched to NF, as its not Fox but tech related!) I think that China is given the country key much like India has for M$ software. Businesses pay for it but the local public doesn’t have to. OS or dev tools no difference. Easiest way to grow a set of developers. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good. ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.7/771 - Release Date: 4/21/2007 11:56 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Good overviews of Open Source?
On 4/22/07, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wasn't aware just how unclear it was, until you started asking questions. I'm looking for basic What is Open Source and Why is Open Source a GOOD thing? type articles, preferably with statistics. On the economics of running your applications on Open Source? Perens has a high-level view: http://perens.com/Articles/Economic.html The Harvard Business School has a 55-page PDF written way back in 2000: http://www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner/simple.pdf but those are both too high-minded for what you're looking for, I think. He's recently understood that he might be losing out on a business opportunity by not having a browser app, but when I mentioned PHP he said No, a lot of our clients shops are MS only, so it has to be ASP or Dot Net. They won't allow us to run PHP on their machines anyway And later he called back to say that he had mentioned PHP to someone, and they told him it was ok for small hobby sites, but couldn't scale to large sites and wasn't secure. Nonsense. Some of the biggest sites in the world run on PHP. Finally, he thinks that open source means we have to give away our intellectual property (source code). Another common misconception. I'm trying to steer him towards XAMP in the future ( in addition to our current VFP software), because the Linux market for our product appears to be completely untapped, and I think the write-once deploy-many cross platform nature of Python would be a huge money maker. I think you have your work cut out for you. I am not convinced of WAMP, as I have very limited experience with Apache on Windows. If you have to buy the Windows server license anyway, what's the difference between IIS and Apache, well, besides security? I am less comfortable running *anything* on Windows, since exploits are so much more common on the platform. A workstation can be replaced if it goes hinky, but what about the server? I'd prefer to have a headless Linux box running the show than a Windows server someone decides to use as a spare internet browsing machine. I just don't see the compelling story for Windows on servers. But I have a lot of 'splaining to do, first. I will be Googling my own homework, but I thought maybe others may have had this similar situation, and had standard links they might point their clients too. I did look at Cathedrial and Bazaar, btw, but way more techie than I'm looking for. Thanks! Googling Business Case for Open Source yields some good hits, too: http://www.opensource.org/advocacy/case_for_business.php -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Why not just cut 'em into smaller pieces?
Obesity Crisis Hits Crematoriums http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070422100247.htm -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Why not just cut 'em into smaller pieces?
Show a little respect and honor for the dear departed Ed. Besides, I'm sure there must be code standards that must be observed to retain a license. Regards, LelandJ Ed Leafe wrote: Obesity Crisis Hits Crematoriums http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070422100247.htm -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Buying the War, on PBS next wed
On Sunday 22 April 2007 3:44 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: snip BTW Petey, if you ever come to my country make sure I don't find out. You might... 'ask for it'. You want to kill me? No, heavens! I would never say that. I just intend to wage war on terrorism (of whatever sign) inside my country. Just don't make sudden moves. Is terrorism really any problem in Argentina? Particularly terrorism from aged Americans whose only sudden moves are in the direction of the toilet? No! We have no issues with TRUE Americans, like Mexicans, Canadians, Brazilians, etc. But we will wage war on terrorist USA's old people. We have intelligence information and we will be including them in OUR 'axis of evil'. Unless you cease and desist we'll wage preventive war on you. We have strong reasons to believe you are manufacturing and using canes for non-civilian uses. And unless you allow the 'World Cane Control Organization' (WCCO) to inspect your country looking for illegal cane facilities we will be forced to attack you. We admit we are the biggest cane manufacturers in the world, and the only ones who have used two canes to beat a couple of babies. But we are a responsible nation. We will not let any upstarts to start fabricating these canes for themselves. If you need them, then we'll sell you some canes for peaceful uses, but you're not allowed to manufacture them yourselves, only us, our allies and those nations who are strong enough that we don't dare attack can make canes. So beware, you have been notified! Hi Ricardo! Oh. Thanks for clearing that up. Here I thought it was Singapore who was caning people. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Why not just cut 'em into smaller pieces?
On Monday 23 April 2007 12:23 am, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: Show a little respect and honor for the dear departed Ed. Besides, I'm sure there must be code standards that must be observed to retain a license. Hi Leland! The cremation ovens are due for replacement. I say we should make them really big, then if a lot of people die at once we will be ready. Run them through, however fat they are, in batches of say, 600 at a time. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
ProFox Advertisements for Monday, Apr 23, 2007
The following advertisements are brought to you as a free service of the ProFox mailing list. To enter your own ad, visit http://leafe.com/adpost.html, and follow the instructions on that page. There is no charge for posting an ad, and the only restriction is that all ads must in some way relate to the needs and interests of Visual FoxPro and FoxPro developers. ** ** Help support ProFox! If you're browsing anywhere on the leafe.com site, and see a Google ad that interests you, click it! This will help target the ads on the site better, and keep me from going broke! ;-) Please don't cheat and click everything, though - that's against Google's policy, and not what I want. Only click if the ad is something that truly interests you. Thanks for your support! ** * The Los Angeles Visual Foxpro Developers Group has posted the details on Boot Camp VII. The all day event will be held on Saturday, April 28. Topics will be presented by Burt Rosen and Michael Cummings. This will be a hands-on session. Bring your laptop! Details on this event can be found at http://www.lafox.org/html/bootcamp2007.htm Note that the speakers are doing the Boot Camp for expenses only. All income from the event goes to support LA Fox and the SoCal User Group Tour expenses. We look forward to seeing you there! If you have any further questions, feel free to contact Bill Anderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] * == = Southwest Fox 2007 October 18 - 21, 2007 Announcing the fourth annual Southwest Fox Conference, presenting the latest in Microsoft Visual FoxPro development techniques, new changes in VFP 9.0 SP2, Sedna Components, and interop with other technologies with sessions from some of the best and the brightest VFP speakers. Location: Arizona Golf Resort and Conference Center, Mesa, Arizona A VFP conference for VFP Developers http://www.swfox.net Important dates coming up: May 1, 2007 - Registration starts July 1, 2007 - Early Bird registration ends October 18, 2007 - Conference starts Early bird registration includes a free pre-conference session. Lots of other surprises are in the planning stages. For more information, please contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
