Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Jerry Wolper]

Good to have you back, Woody. From any address.

-Jerry


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caksnnoh21hxmcpk4wwj4noizc6jr3nhph4-wtjr7zvbdshm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Charlie-gm]

On 10/19/2017 3:51 PM, Eric Selje wrote:

Toilet.Net was actually pretty nice.


I thought that was the ONLY .Net they released...

:)

-Charlie

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/260756d2-c902-3795-193c-796d70d2a...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Bill Anderson]

>>Ah, the DotNet boom/bust timeframe.  Remember when M$ was putting .Net
behind EVERYTHING!?!?!?!  Office.Net, VS.Net, Toilet.Net, <<

Yeah, I wanted someone to put out a Cardfile.NET so that MSFT would promote
it as "revolutionary"...

Bill Anderson


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:38 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 2017-10-19 12:03, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it was at our December 2000 LA Fox meeting.
>>
>
>
> Ah, the DotNet boom/bust timeframe.  Remember when M$ was putting .Net
> behind EVERYTHING!?!?!?!  Office.Net, VS.Net, Toilet.Net, 
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CA+O1enFS7DGdXgX2_JJPZ2yD=zkfxfh50kct0co_fer_ttf...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Eric Selje]

Toilet.Net was actually pretty nice.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Stephen Russell 
> wrote:
> > I did get a chuckle out of that.  Since that time VFP has had how many
> > upgrades?
> >
>
> No need. Unlike DotNet, VFP is a stable and mature product ;)
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAAwxvUnbVzbY_eM=orkcteb8dg_zfhoj_t2urc2j0oaiej3...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Ted Roche]

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Stephen Russell  wrote:
> I did get a chuckle out of that.  Since that time VFP has had how many
> upgrades?
>

No need. Unlike DotNet, VFP is a stable and mature product ;)

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4vjN=bW0M84jqj2K07wfoZHES14tRv-6Hjt4E+0Yxij=g...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Stephen Russell]

I did get a chuckle out of that.  Since that time VFP has had how many
upgrades?



On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:38 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 2017-10-19 12:03, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it was at our December 2000 LA Fox meeting.
>>
>
>
> Ah, the DotNet boom/bust timeframe.  Remember when M$ was putting .Net
> behind EVERYTHING!?!?!?!  Office.Net, VS.Net, Toilet.Net, 
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJOXZKARXnvCofs7EoT7rEa=7hmdns-3qyyuuz4jty...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[mbsoftwaresolutions]

On 2017-10-19 12:03, Bill Anderson wrote:

Michael,

I'm pretty sure it was at our December 2000 LA Fox meeting.



Ah, the DotNet boom/bust timeframe.  Remember when M$ was putting .Net 
behind EVERYTHING!?!?!?!  Office.Net, VS.Net, Toilet.Net, 


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/89aee84bb2db65067e1097f7c493a...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] learn more about what you hate so much.

[Bill Anderson]

Michael,

I'm pretty sure it was at our December 2000 LA Fox meeting.

Bill Anderson

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:17 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 2017-10-05 13:25, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> At our user group we were told by a Microsoft representative (well known
>> to
>> the Fox community) that Dell was throwing away all their internal
>> applications **sight unseen** to rewrite them in the beta version of .NET
>> 1.0.
>>
>> I wonder how that turned out?
>>
>> Bill Anderson
>>
>
>
> That is INSANE!  What year was that???
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CA+O1enG9-scM=ct3R4wWzrv+nOKwRKKRSMMnvugJrsu=zl7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Ed Leafe]

On Oct 19, 2017, at 6:35 AM, Peter Cushing  wrote:
> 
> Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)

Oh, the willpower it is taking not to reply to that setup line!

-- Ed Leafe






___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/41caa575-a473-4c81-9c61-94cad48c8...@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [OT] Test

[Ed Leafe]

On Oct 19, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Jürgen Wondzinski  wrote:
> 
> Just checking in after several years of absence.   
> 
> I sent a more formal message yesterday, but that didn't seem to work, since 
> it's not in the digest and not in the archive, but I also haven't got any 
> mailer-error back?

All mail from non-subscribers is automatically held, and I try to go through 
the list every few days. Seeing this email, I looked through the held queue, 
and found yours, so I released them. They should show up soon.

The other thing is that a lot of ISPs block email from any IP address that is a 
known virtual machine provider, and my email server is in that category. So you 
may not have gotten a held mail notice, but they are sent.

-- Ed Leafe






___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b0a78df0-e810-4eb1-925f-4e1f53236...@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reactivated old FOXil

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
at ProFox again. 

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2
years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning
at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those steel
boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).  
We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
calculation time :) 

I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around
in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow
those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but
currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software
changes and additions..

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy

"*´¨) 
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨) 
(¸.·´. (¸.·` * 
.·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic ! 
(¸.·``··*




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004301d34819$9c3caa00$d4b5fe00$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: [OT] Test

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

Using a different sender email now .. 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen
Wondzinski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48
An: ProFox@leafe.com
Betreff: [OT] Test

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they
appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/017b01d348c8$acbc5880$06350980$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Kurt Wendt]

Hey Woody - nice to hear from you. I can surely relate to your job hours. I 
leave every morning at 6:40am - commute mostly by trains @ nearly 4.5 Hrs round 
trip - and arrive back to my place in the evenings at 7:05pm (or 19:05). So, 
yeah - nearly a 12.5 Hr day. Not much time left for me personally during the 
week. Although - on the upside - since 3/4 of my time is on the Long Island 
Railroad - I can actually work on my personal 3D CG projects on the train, or 
even do e-mails.

Anyway - best of luck to you on your current job situation. 

Regards,
Kurt

-Original Message-

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a 
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2 years 
ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene amount of 
money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse software. Finally I 
couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning at 
19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1905d...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Ted Roche]

Good to see you here, w00dy!

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jürgen Wondzinski
 wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
> of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
> at ProFox again.
>
> In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a
> freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2
> years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
> amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
> software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
> for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
> 86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning
> at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
> :) )  It could be worse than that 
>
> That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
> customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those steel
> boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
> annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
> VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).
> We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
> statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
> banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
> Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
> calculation time :)
>
> I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around
> in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow
> those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but
> currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software
> changes and additions..
>
> Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)
>
> wOOdy
>
> "*´¨)
> ¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
> (¸.·´. (¸.·` *
> .·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic !
> (¸.·``··*
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4sdcgKtVNLZMFXohySgbvacs+=ji_y7imuhhju11tg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[mbsoftwaresolutions]

On 2017-10-19 07:35, Peter Cushing wrote:

Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)



ROFLMBO!

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/8ca2921e453f1a69a75f484cd89ba...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[mbsoftwaresolutions]

On 2017-10-19 06:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several 
years
of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a 
look

at ProFox again.

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years 
as a
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 
2

years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that 
decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with 
driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and 
returning
at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed 
vacations

:) )  It could be worse than that 

That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those 
steel

boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a 
classic

VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).
We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those 
customers...

Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
calculation time :)

I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling 
around
in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to 
follow
those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, 
but
currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with 
software

changes and additions..

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy



That's great, wOOdy!  Love your story!!!  Welcome back

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/eb53106aa0511dd2df82fc6e28991...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Jean MAURICE]

I happy to see you again Woody !!

By the way I am the only one Foxil ...

The Foxil
In Grenoble - France

PS for some times I don't receive the first mail of a post but only those 
beginning with 'Re:'. I mean 4 posts on 5 are correct (sad news, Trigger design) 
but I didn't receive the original post from Woody).



Le 19/10/2017 14:25, Jean Laeremans a écrit :

ROFL.

Welcome back wOOdy !!

On Oct 19, 2017 2:22 PM, "Dave Crozier"  wrote:


Peter

Oooh Matron!

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing
Sent: 19 October 2017 12:36
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Reactivated old FOXil


On 19/10/2017 11:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several
years of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to
take a look at ProFox again.

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy


Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)

Peter


This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it
is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.
Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone or email.

www.whisperingsmith.com

Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
Tel:0161 831 3700
Fax:0161 831 3715

London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960





[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/59e8a02f@wanadoo.fr
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Jean Laeremans]

ROFL.

Welcome back wOOdy !!

On Oct 19, 2017 2:22 PM, "Dave Crozier"  wrote:

> Peter
>
> Oooh Matron!
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing
> Sent: 19 October 2017 12:36
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Reactivated old FOXil
>
>
> On 19/10/2017 11:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several
> > years of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to
> > take a look at ProFox again.
> > 
> > Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)
> >
> > wOOdy
> >
> Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)
>
> Peter
>
>
> This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it
> is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.
> Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> www.whisperingsmith.com
>
> Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
> Tel:0161 831 3700
> Fax:0161 831 3715
>
> London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBzKcyGd3Cgg6D=dhasugycb3d5g_yywmhbtzczd4ws...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: [OT] Test

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

I first used "juergen @ woody-soft.de" which is tied / aliased to an
office365 server which originates as "juergen @ wondzinski.onmicrosoft.com"
. This seems to be too much for a simple list server, even though the SPFs
seems to be ok.. I now joined with my private email "juergen @
wondzinski.de", this seems to work..
 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Dave Crozier
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 13:27
An: ProFox Email List 
Betreff: RE: [OT] Test

Will the real Jurgen please stand up!

;-)

Dave


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002e01d348d5$49f67980$dde36c80$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Dave Crozier]

Peter

Oooh Matron!

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Cushing
Sent: 19 October 2017 12:36
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Reactivated old FOXil


On 19/10/2017 11:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several 
> years of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to 
> take a look at ProFox again.
> 
> Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)
>
> wOOdy
>
Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)

Peter


This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is 
addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law. 
Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you 
have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone 
or email. 

www.whisperingsmith.com

Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR. 
Tel:0161 831 3700
Fax:0161 831 3715 

London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2c8d0466-31a2-9a36-f454-f848873aa...@whisperingsmith.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2b48bd...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] Test

[Jean Laeremans]

A blast from the past ?

On Oct 19, 2017 1:27 PM, "Dave Crozier"  wrote:

> Will the real Jurgen please stand up!
>
> ;-)
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen
> Wondzinski
> Sent: 19 October 2017 11:52
> To: ProFox Email List 
> Subject: AW: [OT] Test
>
> Another test about frauding the list...
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen
> Wondzinski
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48
> An: ProFox@leafe.com
> Betreff: [OT] Test
>
> [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they
> appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOByV=ho4zttz7feler6v0y4qdfrii5hu3zdhzepf4be...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Peter Cushing]

On 19/10/2017 11:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
at ProFox again.

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy


Got the message at 11.59   You can't beat a bit of morning wood ;-)

Peter


This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email. 


www.whisperingsmith.com

Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR. 
Tel:0161 831 3700 
Fax:0161 831 3715 


London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2c8d0466-31a2-9a36-f454-f848873aa...@whisperingsmith.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Dave Crozier]

Welcome back Woody!

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen Wondzinski
Sent: 19 October 2017 12:00
To: ProFox@leafe.com
Subject: Reactivated old FOXil

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years of 
silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look at 
ProFox again. 

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a 
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2 years 
ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene amount of 
money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse software. Finally I 
couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning at 
19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000 customers 
and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those steel boxes for 
freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an annual turnarount 
of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).  
We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental statements 
for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do banktransfers of 
about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at 
calculation time :) 

I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around in 
Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow those 
tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but currently 
I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software changes and 
additions..

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy

"*´¨)
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´. (¸.·` *
.·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic ! 
(¸.·``··*




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2b48bd...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Andrew Stirling]

Great to see you back.
I have a whole batch of your one liners in my Dev Help File!

I would have thought that this job would have been more of a Web App. 
Your clients being able to login and see where, when etc their 
containers are. The VFP part being for the admin using a robust SQL.


Kind regards

Andrew Stirling
01250 870397
07910467915
supp...@calcpay.co.uk
http://www.calcpay.co.uk

On 19/10/2017 11:59, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
at ProFox again.

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2
years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning
at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those steel
boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).
We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
calculation time :)

I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around
in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow
those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but
currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software
changes and additions..

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy

"*´¨)
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´. (¸.·` *
.·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic !
(¸.·``··*





[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/e3c78a86-0569-59d6-faa3-61d3f0a9b...@calcpay.co.uk
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [OT] Test

[Dave Crozier]

Will the real Jurgen please stand up!

;-)

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen Wondzinski
Sent: 19 October 2017 11:52
To: ProFox Email List 
Subject: AW: [OT] Test

Another test about frauding the list... 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen Wondzinski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48
An: ProFox@leafe.com
Betreff: [OT] Test

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear 
to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2b48bd...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Reactivated old FOXil

[Richard Kaye]

Welcome back, wOOdy!

--

rk

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen 
Wondzinski
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:00 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Reactivated old FOXil

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
at ProFox again. 

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2
years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning
at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those steel
boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).  
We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
calculation time :) 

I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around
in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow
those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but
currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software
changes and additions..

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy

"*´¨) 
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨) 
(¸.·´. (¸.·` * 
.·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic ! 
(¸.·``··*



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/mwhpr10mb17749d71370ffc5f96b09a67d2...@mwhpr10mb1774.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Paul Hemans]

Funny, I once wrote an application that tracked containers in Fox.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Jürgen Wondzinski 
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
> of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
> at ProFox again.
>
> In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a
> freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2
> years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
> amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
> software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
> for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
> 86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning
> at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed
> vacations
> :) )  It could be worse than that 
>
> That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
> customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those
> steel
> boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
> annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
> VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).
> We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
> statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
> banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
> Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
> calculation time :)
>
> I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around
> in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow
> those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but
> currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software
> changes and additions..
>
> Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)
>
> wOOdy
>
> "*´¨)
> ¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
> (¸.·´. (¸.·` *
> .·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic !
> (¸.·``··*
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cakt3opfuu4rjohuiogh4s8w_p2twg_kfhw3y+ed1btgzmww...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Reactivated old FOXil

[Alan Bourke]

Great to see you still around and Foxing good and hard!

> 30 days of payed vacations

I love being European ;)


-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1508411324.1409511.1144048144.4dba0...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reactivated old FOXil

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

Hi all

Yes, that old wOOdy FOXil is still alive and kicking :) After several years
of silence and self-maintenance, I thought it couldn't hurt to take a look
at ProFox again. 

In the meantime I checked the 60-age mark, managed to survive 5 years as a
freelancer  (after the breakdown of the ProLib companies in 2009), and 2
years ago I changed back into employment. They offered me some obscene
amount of money to get me onboard to manage and enhance their inhouse
software. Finally I couldn't resist, even after sleeping over that decision
for three nights..   Thus now I find myself in a 9 to 18 job, with driving
86km each morning and evening  (which means starting at 7:30 and returning
at 19:30), but I'm very happy with my salary (and 30 days of payed vacations
:) )  It could be worse than that 

That one and only application I'm in charge now, manages about 60.000
customers and their investments of about 1.5 million containers (those steel
boxes for freight), which are rented out to shipping companies; with an
annual turnarount of hundreds of million euros.  All managed in a classic
VFP9 app (based on the VFX framework).  
We print about 80.000 sheets of paper every quarter (that are rental
statements for our customers) with the help of Amyuni and XFRX, and do
banktransfers of about 110 Milion euros every quarter to those customers...
Some big money is involved here.. Talking about rounding differences at
calculation time :) 

I'm stil involved a little bit in alternate dev-tools, stil dabbling around
in Servoy and Lianja, but due to that VFP job I barely have time to follow
those tools extensively.  I wish I could dedicate more time into that, but
currently I and my collegue are still burried up to the nose with software
changes and additions..

Now let's see how often I manage to chime in here :)

wOOdy

"*´¨) 
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨) 
(¸.·´. (¸.·` * 
.·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic ! 
(¸.·``··*




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/018e01d348c9$5f1626f0$1d4274d0$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: [OT] Test

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

Another test about frauding the list... 

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen Wondzinski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48
An: ProFox@leafe.com
Betreff: [OT] Test

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear 
to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/he1p191mb00275bbec113a5acce23dae3f8...@he1p191mb0027.eurp191.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: [OT] Test

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

Cool. I'm a fraud.  Finally...  :)

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Jürgen Wondzinski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 12:48
An: ProFox@leafe.com
Betreff: [OT] Test

[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear 
to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/he1p191mb002793cddbd33f47654299edf8...@he1p191mb0027.eurp191.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[OT] Test

[Jürgen Wondzinski]

Just checking in after several years of absence.   

I sent a more formal message yesterday, but that didn't seem to work, since 
it's not in the digest and not in the archive, but I also haven't got any 
mailer-error back?



wOOdy  


"*´¨) 
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨) 
(¸.·´. (¸.·` * 
.·`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic ! 
(¸.·``··* 



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/he1p191mb0027a4d5943fb8e1aa607402f8...@he1p191mb0027.eurp191.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.