Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
Thanks Ed! On 2019/12/17 19:22, Ed Leafe wrote: On Dec 17, 2019, at 04:18, Koen Piller wrote: These messages are appropriate for a FoxPro audience, and are thus appropriate here. They are correctly labeled with [NF], since it is not about Fox per se. If I had a product that might be of use to FoxPro developers, I would be sure to post about it in every relevant forum. And, as others have pointed out, it’s a simple matter to create a filter, or you can do what I do: press the Delete key. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/07cfa9c0-f160-b75c-38ec-e04b5adfa...@xsinet.co.za ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 4:55 PM Ricardo Araoz wrote: > > Cool > So now I may post about Argentine's politics in this forum... and in > Spanish! > Yes, you may as long as you include [OT] in the subject line. You have always been able to do that. > You may use a filter if you're not interested, and besides, why should I > have to change my stuff to save the FOX list people time? That is EXACTLY what [OT] is for, and I hope you enjoy it. I do use a filter, and won't see your posts, sorry. > I always held > the view that the TOPIC of the list should be meaningless. Don't you > think so? > > (should I declare the irony or you people are smart enough to notice it?) > Perhaps we should have a flag for [IRONY] and [HUMOR] and [SARCASM] too? ;) -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CACW6n4sx-ixt9eh4YJdtB=3zv9wgi-g3ve0hy4-uwh4yjce...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
Normally - the phrase is "Bad Steve"! But, now I have to say - Bad Mike! Careful, your CBD oil comment may drag this thread into the Very depths of the Forbidden Off-Topic Realm!!! :-) -K- On 12/17/2019 7:20 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Btw, this is a good time to hock my CBD oil for those of you who need to chill out. Sheesh. LOL babs4cbd.com -- 60 day money back guarantee! :D On 12/17/2019 10:11 AM, Vince Teachout wrote: On 12/17/19 7:42 AM, Koen Piller wrote: Hi, Correct,however if the #X would open an own email service, one can decide to accept that or not, now I am 'forced' to read those messages several times. As other's have pointed out, a quick filter solves that problem entirely. And nobody is 'forcing' you to read anything. Save me the time please. Why should OTHERS have to change their stuff to save YOU time? If I like to participate to several forums that is my decision but that does not mean that I am pleased to read the same message about #X on every forum. You need not be pleased, that is your right. Just set a filter. If I've offended you, just set a filter on me as well. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/5fbeaa66-e667-f66a-ce2d-0241a1852...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
On Dec 17, 2019, at 15:54, Ricardo Araoz wrote: > > So now I may post about Argentine's politics in this forum... and in Spanish! Sure! Just remember to label it with [OT]. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/f11f0c33-1aad-4bb4-8bee-0c702c4e2...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
On 17/12/19 12:11, Vince Teachout wrote: On 12/17/19 7:42 AM, Koen Piller wrote: Hi, Correct,however if the #X would open an own email service, one can decide to accept that or not, now I am 'forced' to read those messages several times. As other's have pointed out, a quick filter solves that problem entirely. And nobody is 'forcing' you to read anything. Save me the time please. ! Why should OTHERS have to change their stuff to save YOU time? Cool So now I may post about Argentine's politics in this forum... and in Spanish! You may use a filter if you're not interested, and besides, why should I have to change my stuff to save the FOX list people time? I always held the view that the TOPIC of the list should be meaningless. Don't you think so? (should I declare the irony or you people are smart enough to notice it?) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/7d541446-c432-c397-830a-8c477d413...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
It is somehow tied to Log Me In. The pro version is much more robust at twice the price. I use the Lite for demo presentations and support. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 3:22 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I recall the name from a decade ago. I think I used to use them at one point. Can't recall why I dumped them (but it was a legitimate reason, if memory serves me right). On 12/17/2019 11:28 AM, Carl Lindner wrote: > Mike, > > I pay $120/year for join.me light. https://www.join.me/pricing - limited to > 5 participants. Easy and works well. > > Carl > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software > Solutions, LLC > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 9:52 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives > > I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the > purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model > has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a > year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the > need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are > using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used > to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. > > What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC > etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and > user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support > connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and > that's what TV/LMI gave me. > > tia, > --Mike > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/!&!AAAYAIvAKiwigx1GoXoy4UTJzwcimQAAEIRTgOl0ANFLgi5YeSI5f/ABAA==@bdos.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
Owned by LogMeIn. Who announced today they have been purchased by a private equity group which is taking the company private. If file transfer is a critical component to your remote support needs, I still think LogMeIn is the superior product. I realize that the rather abrupt way LMI went from mostly free to a pay only model left a bad taste in a lot of people's mouths, you get what you pay for, imo. If free is the most important thing then VNC. -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 3:22 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I recall the name from a decade ago. I think I used to use them at one point. Can't recall why I dumped them (but it was a legitimate reason, if memory serves me right). On 12/17/2019 11:28 AM, Carl Lindner wrote: > Mike, > > I pay $120/year for join.me light. https://www.join.me/pricing - limited to > 5 participants. Easy and works well. > > Carl > > -Original Message- > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB > Software Solutions, LLC > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 9:52 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives > > I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the > purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model > has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a > year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the > need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are > using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I > used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. > > What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC > etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy > and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the > support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple > and that's what TV/LMI gave me. > > tia, > --Mike > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/8b8a3fc5-706b-cb73-4206-0a86b561f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Report [OT] Abuse: http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/8b8a3fc5-706b-cb73-4206-0a86b561f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dm6pr10mb3401b35947e4196e5890e4fad2...@dm6pr10mb3401.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
I just use the built in Windows 10 Quick Assist, but * It doesn't allow unattended connection, and * User must type in elevated credentials if necessary So it might not be for everyone. We use Kace Endpoint Manager now so the 2nd point isn't so bad. Eric On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:21 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > I recall the name from a decade ago. I think I used to use them at one > point. Can't recall why I dumped them (but it was a legitimate reason, > if memory serves me right). > > > On 12/17/2019 11:28 AM, Carl Lindner wrote: > > Mike, > > > > I pay $120/year for join.me light. https://www.join.me/pricing - > limited to 5 participants. Easy and works well. > > > > Carl > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software > Solutions, LLC > > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 9:52 AM > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives > > > > I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the > > purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model > > has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a > > year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the > > need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are > > using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used > > to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. > > > > What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC > > etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and > > user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support > > connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and > > that's what TV/LMI gave me. > > > > tia, > > --Mike > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAwxvUm39EqQO3=hrs-5dyguvcbnsjg_xyxzmd-0hv+ynlk...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
I recall the name from a decade ago. I think I used to use them at one point. Can't recall why I dumped them (but it was a legitimate reason, if memory serves me right). On 12/17/2019 11:28 AM, Carl Lindner wrote: Mike, I pay $120/year for join.me light. https://www.join.me/pricing - limited to 5 participants. Easy and works well. Carl -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 9:52 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/8b8a3fc5-706b-cb73-4206-0a86b561f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
Roger -- I think (no, I KNOW) the new TeamViewer mgmt approach is to lock us out to try and get us to upgrade. I tell you...sometimes it seems very shady. Then the TV people send you the automated email saying something like "you were trying to access another session but your license only allows you to do 1 at a time" (or something like that)which is CRAP, imo, because before they changed to the annual subscription model, I was able to open sessions to different clients simultaneously without issue. Again...shady, imo. As such, they're pissing me off to the point I'm considering dumping them...but alas, I haven't yet because, well, I already paid for this perpetual license! :D On 12/17/2019 11:18 AM, roger tremblay wrote: I have used TV for some time now however lately it is locking me out from some clients. I have also been searching for an alternative, I have found Cloud Berry and it seems to work without having the clients do dances to get it to run. If anyone has a better solution please let me know. thanks in advance. On 12/17/2019 9:52 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/a1145f7e-da8a-e63e-fd88-4c45d3bf0...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
My IT support side colleague (for general computer/IT and network support) uses Splashtop and it is quite easy to use. Our clients have it installed so that we can quickly access their computers. For my MBSS apps customers (and prospects), I don't know that they'd want to install Splashtop; as such, the TV "quick support" app works great for that. Does Splashtop have such a quick, one-time use kind of approach too? On 12/17/2019 11:17 AM, CCTbySteveGraves wrote: I'm pretty pleased with Splashtop ( Which I learned about on this list) .. Steve in central Florida On Tue, Dec 17, 2019, 10:38 AM Jürgen Wondzinski wrote: Hi Mike, Same problems with TeamViewer at my side. Nozt only got it very expensive, the product grew to a moloch with lots of useless features (at least for me). I'm now using www.AnyDesk.com, which is much less expensive, less cluttered and just works. wOOdy -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von MB Software Solutions, LLC Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2019 15:52 An: ProFox Email List Betreff: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/fd68924b-b9f2-0c0d-fc1e-82116ec67...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
+1 Op di 17 dec. 2019 18:22 schreef Ed Leafe : > On Dec 17, 2019, at 04:18, Koen Piller wrote: > > > > I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other > > forums. > > I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is > > launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and > > leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. > > These messages are appropriate for a FoxPro audience, and are thus > appropriate here. They are correctly labeled with [NF], since it is not > about Fox per se. If I had a product that might be of use to FoxPro > developers, I would be sure to post about it in every relevant forum. > > And, as others have pointed out, it’s a simple matter to create a filter, > or you can do what I do: press the Delete key. > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/capqlobxwfpgm8nmb48d4jd7z-qccznp5wz1d6rn2b_phdac...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
Steve, I switched from GoToMyPC (price doubled after the company was sold) to Splashtop for remote access to my office computers and I couldn't be happier. I haven't used their remote support tools as I'm still using GoToAssist, but if the cost of my license for this jumps as well I'll be looking. Are you using the Splashtop SOS tools? Do you have a lot of unattended computers setup? Thanks! PS: For emergencies there is always AnyDesk.com Paul H. Tarver -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of CCTbySteveGraves Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 10:18 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I'm pretty pleased with Splashtop ( Which I learned about on this list) .. Steve in central Florida On Tue, Dec 17, 2019, 10:38 AM Jürgen Wondzinski wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Same problems with TeamViewer at my side. Nozt only got it very expensive, > the product grew to a moloch with lots of useless features (at least for > me). > > I'm now using www.AnyDesk.com, which is much less expensive, less > cluttered and just works. > > wOOdy > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von MB Software > Solutions, LLC > Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2019 15:52 > An: ProFox Email List > Betreff: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives > > I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased > one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and > they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV > license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the > latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy > and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then > their licensing prices went up too. > > What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC > etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and > user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support > connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's > what TV/LMI gave me. > > tia, > --Mike > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/00be01d5b503$df031c30$9d095490$@tpcqpc.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
On Dec 17, 2019, at 04:18, Koen Piller wrote: > > I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other > forums. > I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is > launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and > leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. These messages are appropriate for a FoxPro audience, and are thus appropriate here. They are correctly labeled with [NF], since it is not about Fox per se. If I had a product that might be of use to FoxPro developers, I would be sure to post about it in every relevant forum. And, as others have pointed out, it’s a simple matter to create a filter, or you can do what I do: press the Delete key. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/b31bddaa-66c3-466e-bd9b-15b6c6c57...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
-1 On 17-Dec-2019 3:48 PM, Koen Piller wrote: John, I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other forums. I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. Thanks, Koen Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 02:33 schreef Johan Nel : Hi All, Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into the public domain. https://xsharp.info Johan Nel George, South Africa. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/cc5bbdd4-4f78-f73d-eba8-e1723be7b...@hawthorncottage.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
Mike, I pay $120/year for join.me light. https://www.join.me/pricing - limited to 5 participants. Easy and works well. Carl -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 9:52 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/!&!AAAYAIvAKiwigx1GoXoy4UTJzwcimQAAEFGMeYOOXEBArI/gbQcRw58BAA==@bdos.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
I'm pretty pleased with Splashtop ( Which I learned about on this list) .. Steve in central Florida On Tue, Dec 17, 2019, 10:38 AM Jürgen Wondzinski wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Same problems with TeamViewer at my side. Nozt only got it very expensive, > the product grew to a moloch with lots of useless features (at least for > me). > > I'm now using www.AnyDesk.com, which is much less expensive, less > cluttered and just works. > > wOOdy > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von MB Software > Solutions, LLC > Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2019 15:52 > An: ProFox Email List > Betreff: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives > > I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased > one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and > they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV > license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the > latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy > and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then > their licensing prices went up too. > > What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC > etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and > user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support > connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's > what TV/LMI gave me. > > tia, > --Mike > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/cab-spwulgu3zyv22hsaggxbwsg-o5suv+ygevhjmkgh7ws7...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
I have used TV for some time now however lately it is locking me out from some clients. I have also been searching for an alternative, I have found Cloud Berry and it seems to work without having the clients do dances to get it to run. If anyone has a better solution please let me know. thanks in advance. On 12/17/2019 9:52 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/685c840f-1f03-fe4c-58d8-672b1c9c3...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Twilight zone moment for textbox value being different than what it's controlsource evaluates to
Thanks so much, Ted. This was solved with a simple thisform.refresh in my thisform.Show event. Can't get any easier than that. Admittedly, I never liked InteractiveChange so I rarely ever use it if I can avoid it, and in my 20+ years of the Fox, I've not used ProgrammaticChange but I could see me doing that at some point perhaps. Merry Kwanstmasukah or Festivus season, whichever suits you! On 12/17/2019 9:22 AM, Ted Roche wrote: There are a lot of times that the Value of a textbox is different from its underlying ControlSource. If the control has the focus and the Value is updated, either programmatically or interactively, the Control's Value has not been run through the Valid() method and could be different, even invalid, without affecting the ControlSource. This is a feature, not a bug, we use in InteractiveChange() or ProgrammaticChange() to react to changes in Value without affecting the underlying data. Then, there's the whole discussion of buffering. So, perhaps you can tell us a little bit more of the context of when this happens. If you can't reproduce it in a simple example, then it is something with your code, environment or framework, and that's kinda hard for us to guess. On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: See https://www.screencast.com/t/mQEK40Tqp. I don't understand how the thisform.txtDraftingRate.Value is not equal to 1 as well? Causing a bug in my code at the moment. tia, --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/daf45259-70cf-6f0f-1596-92c30b1ec...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
AW: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives
Hi Mike, Same problems with TeamViewer at my side. Nozt only got it very expensive, the product grew to a moloch with lots of useless features (at least for me). I'm now using www.AnyDesk.com, which is much less expensive, less cluttered and just works. wOOdy -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von MB Software Solutions, LLC Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2019 15:52 An: ProFox Email List Betreff: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/028101d5b4ef$eff2d530$cfd87f90$@wondzinski.de ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Twilight zone moment for textbox value being different than what it's controlsource evaluates to
Sorry for the brevity. Will expand later if some more workaround attempts fail. I do appreciate everyone's 2 cents, regardless. Thank you! On 12/17/2019 9:22 AM, Ted Roche wrote: There are a lot of times that the Value of a textbox is different from its underlying ControlSource. If the control has the focus and the Value is updated, either programmatically or interactively, the Control's Value has not been run through the Valid() method and could be different, even invalid, without affecting the ControlSource. This is a feature, not a bug, we use in InteractiveChange() or ProgrammaticChange() to react to changes in Value without affecting the underlying data. Then, there's the whole discussion of buffering. So, perhaps you can tell us a little bit more of the context of when this happens. If you can't reproduce it in a simple example, then it is something with your code, environment or framework, and that's kinda hard for us to guess. On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: See https://www.screencast.com/t/mQEK40Tqp. I don't understand how the thisform.txtDraftingRate.Value is not equal to 1 as well? Causing a bug in my code at the moment. tia, --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/f7dffa4d-28ad-cdca-6734-58936a5be...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
Btw, this is a good time to hock my CBD oil for those of you who need to chill out. Sheesh. LOL babs4cbd.com -- 60 day money back guarantee! :D On 12/17/2019 10:11 AM, Vince Teachout wrote: On 12/17/19 7:42 AM, Koen Piller wrote: Hi, Correct,however if the #X would open an own email service, one can decide to accept that or not, now I am 'forced' to read those messages several times. As other's have pointed out, a quick filter solves that problem entirely. And nobody is 'forcing' you to read anything. Save me the time please. Why should OTHERS have to change their stuff to save YOU time? If I like to participate to several forums that is my decision but that does not mean that I am pleased to read the same message about #X on every forum. You need not be pleased, that is your right. Just set a filter. If I've offended you, just set a filter on me as well. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/e8d22764-87cc-8246-d4cf-1e922bf7f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
+1 On 12/17/2019 8:03 AM, Richard Kaye wrote: Thanks for the notification, Johan. 😊 -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Johan Nel Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 8:32 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public Hi All, Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into the public domain. https://xsharp.info Johan Nel George, South Africa. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ab9cb570-b2a4-3ab0-31a0-26663c673...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
I'm with Charlie. This is the only Fox list I subscribe to, so if I don't see it here, I don't see it at all. Just add a rule, Koen, as Charlie described. Problem solved. On 12/17/2019 6:54 AM, Charlie Coleman wrote: I, on the other hand, do not subscribe to many other forums, so I much appreciate the notices. Since this is an 'email list' I expect to receive many 'notice' kinds of emails and many repeating emails on a given topic. If you know you're getting your info regarding X# from other sources, a quick email rule could automatically drop all the X# messages here. I try to go look at the X# site every now and then, and I am 'signed up' on it (I think). But with work as it is I can't regularly visit all the sites that interest me. So the occasional pings here are nice. -Charlie On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:19 AM Koen Piller wrote: John, I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other forums. I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. Thanks, Koen Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 02:33 schreef Johan Nel : Hi All, Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into the public domain. https://xsharp.info Johan Nel George, South Africa. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/48d9c5c8-58f3-4dc9-899a-30d5bd118...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
On 12/17/19 7:42 AM, Koen Piller wrote: Hi, Correct,however if the #X would open an own email service, one can decide to accept that or not, now I am 'forced' to read those messages several times. As other's have pointed out, a quick filter solves that problem entirely. And nobody is 'forcing' you to read anything. Save me the time please. Why should OTHERS have to change their stuff to save YOU time? If I like to participate to several forums that is my decision but that does not mean that I am pleased to read the same message about #X on every forum. You need not be pleased, that is your right. Just set a filter. If I've offended you, just set a filter on me as well. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/0f2974ea-3650-9655-4af8-7a5a15d5a...@caracal.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] TeamViewer alternatives
I bought a TeamViewer (TV) license a few years back and it's the purchased one-and-done lifetime license. TeamViewer's business model has changed and they've been pushing annual licenses now for over a year. I like my TV license and it works great for me; I don't see the need to upgrade to the latest. That said, I wondered if others are using another tool they enjoy and isn't expensive. Prior to TV, I used to use LogMeIn (LMI) but then their licensing prices went up too. What's your current remote support tool of choice (other than UltraVNC etc. I wasn't a fan of VNC as YES, IT WORKED, but it wasn't as easy and user-friendly as TV or LMI. My clients on the other end of the support connection are NOT tech folks. I needed it to be super simple and that's what TV/LMI gave me. tia, --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/a7dde52b-ab6d-838a-93fa-e9c47e78b...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Twilight zone moment for textbox value being different than what it's controlsource evaluates to
There are a lot of times that the Value of a textbox is different from its underlying ControlSource. If the control has the focus and the Value is updated, either programmatically or interactively, the Control's Value has not been run through the Valid() method and could be different, even invalid, without affecting the ControlSource. This is a feature, not a bug, we use in InteractiveChange() or ProgrammaticChange() to react to changes in Value without affecting the underlying data. Then, there's the whole discussion of buffering. So, perhaps you can tell us a little bit more of the context of when this happens. If you can't reproduce it in a simple example, then it is something with your code, environment or framework, and that's kinda hard for us to guess. On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > See https://www.screencast.com/t/mQEK40Tqp. > > I don't understand how the thisform.txtDraftingRate.Value is not equal > to 1 as well? Causing a bug in my code at the moment. > > tia, > --Michael > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/cacw6n4uwkc0+wvkq_adb5jy339f_nbjw7cmpn0-ath+w0ph...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
Thanks for the notification, Johan. 😊 -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Johan Nel Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 8:32 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public Hi All, Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into the public domain. https://xsharp.info Johan Nel George, South Africa. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dm6pr10mb34014b19bae18de9d0a0b9fad2...@dm6pr10mb3401.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Twilight zone moment for textbox value being different than what it's controlsource evaluates to
What do you see in the property sheet when editing the form, Mike? Set a breakpoint on that control value and run your form object. -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 5:33 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Twilight zone moment for textbox value being different than what it's controlsource evaluates to See https://www.screencast.com/t/mQEK40Tqp. I don't understand how the thisform.txtDraftingRate.Value is not equal to 1 as well? Causing a bug in my code at the moment. tia, --Michael ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dm6pr10mb34013fa422e7abb0b19367b4d2...@dm6pr10mb3401.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
Hi, Correct,however if the #X would open an own email service, one can decide to accept that or not, now I am 'forced' to read those messages several times. Save me the time please. If I like to participate to several forums that is my decision but that does not mean that I am pleased to read the same message about #X on every forum. Regards, Koen Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 12:55 schreef Charlie Coleman : > I, on the other hand, do not subscribe to many other forums, so I much > appreciate the notices. > > Since this is an 'email list' I expect to receive many 'notice' kinds of > emails and many repeating emails on a given topic. > > If you know you're getting your info regarding X# from other sources, a > quick email rule could automatically drop all the X# messages here. > > I try to go look at the X# site every now and then, and I am 'signed up' on > it (I think). But with work as it is I can't regularly visit all the sites > that interest me. So the occasional pings here are nice. > > -Charlie > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:19 AM Koen Piller wrote: > > > John, > > > > I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other > > forums. > > I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is > > launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and > > leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. > > Thanks, > > > > Koen > > > > Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 02:33 schreef Johan Nel : > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into > > > the public domain. > > > > > > https://xsharp.info > > > > > > Johan Nel > > > George, South Africa. > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CACUu1SuQCM3J16nX1_ZwKmA=tq6ewczwxjvg9mptuar_swg...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
I, on the other hand, do not subscribe to many other forums, so I much appreciate the notices. Since this is an 'email list' I expect to receive many 'notice' kinds of emails and many repeating emails on a given topic. If you know you're getting your info regarding X# from other sources, a quick email rule could automatically drop all the X# messages here. I try to go look at the X# site every now and then, and I am 'signed up' on it (I think). But with work as it is I can't regularly visit all the sites that interest me. So the occasional pings here are nice. -Charlie On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:19 AM Koen Piller wrote: > John, > > I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other > forums. > I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is > launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and > leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. > Thanks, > > Koen > > Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 02:33 schreef Johan Nel : > > > Hi All, > > > > Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into > > the public domain. > > > > https://xsharp.info > > > > Johan Nel > > George, South Africa. > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/cajgvlx0qrxrpn1vdyrcjxuxq1bo_ffup1prdv72sntamabh...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
+1 -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Koen Piller Sent: Tuesday, 17 December 2019 9:19 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public John, I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other forums. I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. Thanks, Koen Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 02:33 schreef Johan Nel : > Hi All, > > Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into > the public domain. > > https://xsharp.info > > Johan Nel > George, South Africa. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/01d5b4cd$e17f0130$a47d0390$@ozemail.com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Twilight zone moment for textbox value being different than what it's controlsource evaluates to
See https://www.screencast.com/t/mQEK40Tqp. I don't understand how the thisform.txtDraftingRate.Value is not equal to 1 as well? Causing a bug in my code at the moment. tia, --Michael ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ee95902c-262b-b55c-0926-f3b3a7421...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] X# Bandol 2.2 released to the public
John, I would appreciate if you would stop hitchhike your messages on other forums. I have now received for the third time a message that a new version is launched, I strongly advise you to open a mailservice dedicated to X# and leave Foxite, Level Extreme, ProFox, TekTips (did I forget one) alone. Thanks, Koen Op di 17 dec. 2019 om 02:33 schreef Johan Nel : > Hi All, > > Just a short note that the latest X# Bandol 2.2 was also released into > the public domain. > > https://xsharp.info > > Johan Nel > George, South Africa. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CACUu1SuP42PsSSSFLe_-BJ=UtqmX6OieF_zqO=aaivsf055...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
