Re: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-07 Thread Ted Roche
On 2/6/07, James E Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We're considering moving our Front Page 2003 web site (currently hosted by
 Comcast).


I don't use FP extensions, but noted this while shopping for a new
hosting provider:

Source: http://www.verio.com/unix-hosting-plans/

† What happened to FrontPage and FrontPage extensions?
After nine years of being a popular Web authoring tool, FrontPage has
been discontinued by Microsoft in late 2006. Effective June 30, 2006
support for the Microsoft FrontPage 2002 Server Extensions for UNIX
has also been stopped by Microsoft. There are no plans for a FP2003
Server Extensions for UNIX release. Please refer to Microsoft for
additional information. You may continue to use the FPSE kit that you
have previously downloaded. There will be no future releases, bug
fixes or security patches.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche  Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-07 Thread Kristyne McDaniel
Ted,

 additional information. You may continue to use the FPSE kit that you
 have previously downloaded. There will be no future releases, bug
 fixes or security patches.

That, in a nutshell, is why I've been moving my web sites out of FrontPage
and into Dreamweaver. But it isn't exactly a simple move if the site is a
large one. FrontPage does not do things in a 'standard' way, any more than
the rest of what Microsoft has put out over the years.

Kristyne McDaniel
http://www.mcstyles.com
http://www.shamrocktrails.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-07 Thread Helio W.
Kristyne,

What about using a CMS like Joomla?

On 2/7/07, Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That, in a nutshell, is why I've been moving my web sites out of FrontPage
 and into Dreamweaver. But it isn't exactly a simple move if the site is a
 large one. FrontPage does not do things in a 'standard' way, any more than
 the rest of what Microsoft has put out over the years.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread James E Harvey
We're considering moving our Front Page 2003 web site (currently hosted by
Comcast).

A potential hoster we're talking to does not do Microsoft web servers,
only UNIX.

How feasible is it to run a FP web site on a Unix server?

TIA

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Almost all ISP will support the FP extension in their Unix and Linux 
environment.  I would guess about 95% or better of ISP are running the 
apache web server on their Unix/Linux servers.  Apache is a great web 
serve, and as I said, it will support FP extensions.

Regards,

LelandJ

James E Harvey wrote:
 We're considering moving our Front Page 2003 web site (currently hosted by
 Comcast).

 A potential hoster we're talking to does not do Microsoft web servers,
 only UNIX.

 How feasible is it to run a FP web site on a Unix server?

 TIA

 James E Harvey
 Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
 bus: 717-637-8931
 fax: 717-637-6766



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread Kristyne McDaniel
Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread James E Harvey
I've found one local provider, DE Jazzd,
http://www.dejazzd.com/hosting/plans/shared.php and they have a plan that
supports FoxPro tables  dlls.

We're not doing anything in that area currently, but it's nice to know we
could when we decide to go that route.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread Leland F. Jackson, CPA
I haven't used FP since I did my first install of window 95 a while 
back.  I switched off FP as soon as I found another web page editor.

I did a search on the web regarding the FP extension running in an 
Apache Server, and found some post that indicated minor issues with FP 
running in Apache, which were easily overcome with the right expertise.

If  you like a What you see is what you get web page editor, you might 
take a look at Coffeecup's VisualSite Designer.  It creates web pages as 
CSS and allows for plenty of special effects to be added to objects on 
the web page.  When the Objects on the web pages are published, they are 
transformed into .gif images.  The CSS then calls the art from the CSS 
it creates, and places it in the correct location on the web page.  
VisualSite Designer is simple to use.  I couple the VisualSite Designer 
with the Coffeecup html IDE to work on the same web page, and this make 
a very good combination to accomplish about any basic web page task.

For more serious web applications I use perl, PostgreSQL, and Apache.  I 
use the Komodo IDE to work with the perl scripts in which the html is 
streamed to the clients browser.

Coffeecup has a lot of tools to work with Flash, but I generally try to 
stay away from Flash, since it requires a special plugin be installed on 
the client's browser.

I run coffeecup VisualSite Designer and HTML editor in a Windows XP Pro 
Virual machine hosted in FC6, (eg the Coffeecup stuff only runs in 
windows).  I FTP the published web site to my apache web server, which 
is running FC6.  My web Server is on a credenza only feet away from my 
desk, which make the web server very convenient.

It may be that Coffeecup's VisualSite Designer and HTML editor would be 
better suited to your task than FP.

Here is a link to the Coffeecup offerings:

http://www.coffeecup.com/software/

Regards,

LelandJ



James E Harvey wrote:
 We're considering moving our Front Page 2003 web site (currently hosted by
 Comcast).

 A potential hoster we're talking to does not do Microsoft web servers,
 only UNIX.

 How feasible is it to run a FP web site on a Unix server?

 TIA

 James E Harvey
 Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
 bus: 717-637-8931
 fax: 717-637-6766



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread john harvey
Why don't you host it yourself?

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I've found one local provider, DE Jazzd,
http://www.dejazzd.com/hosting/plans/shared.php and they have a plan that
supports FoxPro tables  dlls.

We're not doing anything in that area currently, but it's nice to know we
could when we decide to go that route.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread James E Harvey
I'm too old, too tired, too busy, too ... :)


James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:52 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Why don't you host it yourself?

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I've found one local provider, DE Jazzd,
http://www.dejazzd.com/hosting/plans/shared.php and they have a plan that
supports FoxPro tables  dlls.

We're not doing anything in that area currently, but it's nice to know we
could when we decide to go that route.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread john harvey
Then you may become too dissatisfied too. I'm not REALLY a control freak, it
just seems that way! I wouldn't even think about putting my eggs in someone
else's server. At least, not if I had my core business running off it.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:00 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I'm too old, too tired, too busy, too ... :)


James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:52 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Why don't you host it yourself?

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I've found one local provider, DE Jazzd,
http://www.dejazzd.com/hosting/plans/shared.php and they have a plan that
supports FoxPro tables  dlls.

We're not doing anything in that area currently, but it's nice to know we
could when we decide to go that route.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread James E Harvey
You have a point regards being dissatisfied, we've never been totally happy,
but I don't have enough knowledge to begin to even think about how to setup
a web server.

Also, our ISP is Comcast, and I hate even the thought of contacting them
about getting enough bandwidth to properly run the site.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 6:05 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Then you may become too dissatisfied too. I'm not REALLY a control freak, it
just seems that way! I wouldn't even think about putting my eggs in someone
else's server. At least, not if I had my core business running off it.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:00 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I'm too old, too tired, too busy, too ... :)


James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:52 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Why don't you host it yourself?

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I've found one local provider, DE Jazzd,
http://www.dejazzd.com/hosting/plans/shared.php and they have a plan that
supports FoxPro tables  dlls.

We're not doing anything in that area currently, but it's nice to know we
could when we decide to go that route.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread john harvey
I'm setting up a site for a client this week and he uses Comcast for his
isp. You might want to look at getting someone to consult with you for
setting up the IIS and teaching you how to administer it. It's really very
straight forward. The issue of control is critical with me. I've had too
many people promise me stuff, then fail miserably to put faith in someone
else. If my project fails, I want it to be my fault, not someone else who is
going to say, blah blah blah blah.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:22 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

You have a point regards being dissatisfied, we've never been totally happy,
but I don't have enough knowledge to begin to even think about how to setup
a web server.

Also, our ISP is Comcast, and I hate even the thought of contacting them
about getting enough bandwidth to properly run the site.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 6:05 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Then you may become too dissatisfied too. I'm not REALLY a control freak, it
just seems that way! I wouldn't even think about putting my eggs in someone
else's server. At least, not if I had my core business running off it.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:00 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I'm too old, too tired, too busy, too ... :)


James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of john harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:52 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Why don't you host it yourself?

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

I've found one local provider, DE Jazzd,
http://www.dejazzd.com/hosting/plans/shared.php and they have a plan that
supports FoxPro tables  dlls.

We're not doing anything in that area currently, but it's nice to know we
could when we decide to go that route.

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kristyne McDaniel
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:29 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

Kevin,

The only issue would be if your FP site has data connections to a database
that is not supported, or if the extensions are older than the ones your
code is written to support.

I've got sites that are using FP on Unix that have been running that way for
many years. 




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread David Smith
Frontpage sites will run but check the provider to see if they can run the
FP extensions ( for things like in-site search engines, databases, email
forms and so on) within a Unix environment. If your site uses FP extensions
than you may have problems.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of James E Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] Front Page on Unix

We're considering moving our Front Page 2003 web site (currently hosted by
Comcast).

A potential hoster we're talking to does not do Microsoft web servers,
only UNIX.

How feasible is it to run a FP web site on a Unix server?

TIA

James E Harvey
Corresponding Officer/M.I.S.
bus: 717-637-8931
fax: 717-637-6766



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Front Page on Unix

2007-02-06 Thread Sales Info
James,

 You have a point regards being dissatisfied, we've never been totally happy

We're using www.lunarpages.com as are several others on this list. I've
been extremely pleased with the quality of LunarPage's service (uptime,
performance, customer service, price, features, and user forums). Highly
recommended!

BTW: They have both Linux and Windows plans. Both support FrontPage
Extensions. (We're on their Linux plan - I have no experience with their
Windows plan).

Malcolm


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.