Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Madandgay won't be seeing straight the day after watching this: http://www.cbc.ca/arts/tv/little_mosque.html On 1/11/07, Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Madigan, > > > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > > support the assasination of the president. > > That law only applies in the US... Keep it in mind when Hillary or Barack > or > Edwards or whomever is next becomes President. You may not be seeing > straight the day after election day next year. > > Kristyne McDaniel > http://www.mcstyles.com > http://www.emryldlife.com --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Alan Lukachko wrote: > He's already on the list. There are about 100 key words that Homeland > Security listens for from phone conversations (yes ALL phone calls are > monitored by Homeland security) and searches for on the internet. If you or > the other person you are communicating with use any of these keywords, > you're on their watch list. > > If the use of the keywords persists, you keep getting bumped up to a higher > security risk level. At a certain level, you will be considered a threat to > Homeland Security and you will be denied access to the U.S. > Let me help you: Bomb, Twin Towers, Ahmadinejad, Islam, Arab, Kill, Bombing, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Yankees go home, Saddam Hussein, John F.Kennedy, revolution, oil, conspiracy. Br! Now I can't go to USA I'm sooo disappointed. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:20 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? > > I hope you don't plan on coming here, they may refuse > your visa. > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michael Madigan wrote: >>> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to >>> support the assasination of the president. >>> >> I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws >> (lucky eh?). >> >>> >>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for >>>> Christ's sake, let's find >>>> the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) >>>> >>> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Hal Kaplan wrote: > => Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? > => > => >>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:=> > => BTW, 8% growth for the last 5 years, we're not that bad. > => > > 8% of next-to-nothing is statistically significant but still amounts to > significantly less than next-to-nothing. Our crime rate grows faster than > that! > > And if you are planning on invading the USA, just wait a few more weeks > because it will be a lot easier then. All of our military resources will be > in the ME trying to save Bush's sweet-cheeks. > Hahaha! That's a good one. We're taking note. ;c) > B+ > HALinNY > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
I'll remember to trim his posts next time. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
They couldn't win the Falklands, I'd be more worried about Guatemala --- Hal Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > => Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? > => > => >>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:=> > => BTW, 8% growth for the last 5 years, we're not > that bad. > => > > 8% of next-to-nothing is statistically significant > but still amounts to significantly less than > next-to-nothing. Our crime rate grows faster than > that! > > And if you are planning on invading the USA, just > wait a few more weeks because it will be a lot > easier then. All of our military resources will be > in the ME trying to save Bush's sweet-cheeks. > > B+ > HALinNY > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
He's already on the list. There are about 100 key words that Homeland Security listens for from phone conversations (yes ALL phone calls are monitored by Homeland security) and searches for on the internet. If you or the other person you are communicating with use any of these keywords, you're on their watch list. If the use of the keywords persists, you keep getting bumped up to a higher security risk level. At a certain level, you will be considered a threat to Homeland Security and you will be denied access to the U.S. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:20 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? I hope you don't plan on coming here, they may refuse your visa. --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > > support the assasination of the president. > > > > I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws > (lucky eh?). > > > > > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for > >> Christ's sake, let's find > >> the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) > >> > >> > >> > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
=> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? => => > 8% of next-to-nothing is statistically significant but => still amounts to significantly less than next-to-nothing. => Our crime rate grows faster than that! => => And at least there you're not starting from "nothing' => => A+ => jml Right you are, Jean, as usual. We have a long history of crime in this country that was started by Europeans who were expelled from their own countries because of their criminality. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On 1/12/07, Hal Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > =>Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? > => > =>>>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:=> > =>BTW, 8% growth for the last 5 years, we're not that bad. > => > > 8% of next-to-nothing is statistically significant but still amounts to > significantly less than next-to-nothing. Our crime rate grows faster than > that! And at least there you're not starting from "nothing' A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
=> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? => => >>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:=> => BTW, 8% growth for the last 5 years, we're not that bad. => 8% of next-to-nothing is statistically significant but still amounts to significantly less than next-to-nothing. Our crime rate grows faster than that! And if you are planning on invading the USA, just wait a few more weeks because it will be a lot easier then. All of our military resources will be in the ME trying to save Bush's sweet-cheeks. B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Yes, a week in Seattle for tax reasons. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Hi Adam! Hadn't noticed any posts from you in a while. Been on vacation? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Associated Packaging is the trading name of Eurohill Traders Ltd. Registered in England and Wales : 1114987 VAT : GB210390611 Eurohill Labels Ltd Registered in England and Wales : 1372024 VAT : GB312955757 195 Vale Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1SU. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Friday 12 January 2007 03:51, Adam Buckland wrote: > That's real class, have a "beef" with the US and murder the British > Governor of the Falkland Islands. > > Didn't you have a go at the Falklands a quarter of a century ago and get > your asses kicked then? > > With the state of your economy could you fund a coup d'etat on anything > larger than an iceberg? Hi Adam! Hadn't noticed any posts from you in a while. Been on vacation? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Friday 12 January 2007 03:09, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Pete Theisen wrote: > > On Thursday 11 January 2007 20:04, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > >> Michael Madigan wrote: > >>> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > >>> support the assasination of the president. > >> > >> I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). > > > > Hi Ricardo! > > > > Thank you for your candor. We will take this into consideration every > > time we see anything from you from now on. > > Hi, my dear Pete! > > Ok. Please also take into consideration I live in a SOVEREIGN country, > and that I have a SOVEREIGN mind Hi Ricardo! I think I would consider "IMPERIAL mind" to be more accurately descriptive. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Adam Buckland wrote: > That's real class, have a "beef" with the US and murder the British Governor > of the Falkland Islands. > > Didn't you have a go at the Falklands a quarter of a century ago and get your > asses kicked then? > > With the state of your economy could you fund a coup d'etat on anything > larger than an iceberg? > > ::a > Christ! Does anybody know the meaning of the word 'irony'??? Anybody BTW, 8% growth for the last 5 years, we're not that bad. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz > Sent: 12 January 2007 08:31 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? > > Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> Virgil Bierschwale wrote: >>> And I would consider it VERY POOR TASTE.. >>> Shows a total lack of class in my opinion. >>> >> Hahaha! >> The fact is we consider the US is hiding weapons of mass destruction, >> and furthermore that the US president is a tyrant with a dangerous >> behavior. So we'll probably invade the US (preventively, of course), and >> then hang it's president. Do you think that would also show a lack of class? >> > > Ooops! I was forgetting we will instruct our intelligence agency to > murder the governor of Malvinas (Falklands to you) because the island is > too near our coasts (kind of Cuba to the US). And we will also finance a > coup d'etat in Uruguay and will then instruct their military to torture > any opposition, after all we consider Uruguay our 'backyard'. > > Classy enough? > > >>> Virgil Bierschwale >>> http://www.virgilslist.com >>> http://www.tccutlery.com >>> http://www.bierschwale.com >>> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >>> Of Michael Madigan >>> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:38 PM >>> To: ProFox Email List >>> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? >>> >>> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination >>> of the president. >>> >>> >>> >>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's >>>> find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) >>>> >>>> > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
That's real class, have a "beef" with the US and murder the British Governor of the Falkland Islands. Didn't you have a go at the Falklands a quarter of a century ago and get your asses kicked then? With the state of your economy could you fund a coup d'etat on anything larger than an iceberg? ::a -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 12 January 2007 08:31 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Virgil Bierschwale wrote: >> And I would consider it VERY POOR TASTE.. >> Shows a total lack of class in my opinion. >> > > Hahaha! > The fact is we consider the US is hiding weapons of mass destruction, > and furthermore that the US president is a tyrant with a dangerous > behavior. So we'll probably invade the US (preventively, of course), and > then hang it's president. Do you think that would also show a lack of class? > Ooops! I was forgetting we will instruct our intelligence agency to murder the governor of Malvinas (Falklands to you) because the island is too near our coasts (kind of Cuba to the US). And we will also finance a coup d'etat in Uruguay and will then instruct their military to torture any opposition, after all we consider Uruguay our 'backyard'. Classy enough? >> Virgil Bierschwale >> http://www.virgilslist.com >> http://www.tccutlery.com >> http://www.bierschwale.com >> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of Michael Madigan >> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:38 PM >> To: ProFox Email List >> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? >> >> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination >> of the president. >> >> >> >> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's >>> find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) >>> >>> > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Virgil Bierschwale wrote: >> And I would consider it VERY POOR TASTE.. >> Shows a total lack of class in my opinion. >> > > Hahaha! > The fact is we consider the US is hiding weapons of mass destruction, > and furthermore that the US president is a tyrant with a dangerous > behavior. So we'll probably invade the US (preventively, of course), and > then hang it's president. Do you think that would also show a lack of class? > Ooops! I was forgetting we will instruct our intelligence agency to murder the governor of Malvinas (Falklands to you) because the island is too near our coasts (kind of Cuba to the US). And we will also finance a coup d'etat in Uruguay and will then instruct their military to torture any opposition, after all we consider Uruguay our 'backyard'. Classy enough? >> Virgil Bierschwale >> http://www.virgilslist.com >> http://www.tccutlery.com >> http://www.bierschwale.com >> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of Michael Madigan >> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:38 PM >> To: ProFox Email List >> Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? >> >> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination >> of the president. >> >> >> >> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's >>> find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) >>> >>> > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > And I would consider it VERY POOR TASTE.. > Shows a total lack of class in my opinion. > Hahaha! The fact is we consider the US is hiding weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that the US president is a tyrant with a dangerous behavior. So we'll probably invade the US (preventively, of course), and then hang it's president. Do you think that would also show a lack of class? > > Virgil Bierschwale > http://www.virgilslist.com > http://www.tccutlery.com > http://www.bierschwale.com > http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:38 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? > > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination > of the president. > > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's >> find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) >> >> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:26, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > > Hi Ricardo! > > Spoken like a real foreign enemy. > >> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find >> the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) > Hi Baldy! It would be 'foreign' to you. To me, you are the foreigner. AFAIK this list is international, so in here there are no foreigners. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:37, Michael Madigan wrote: >> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to >> support the assasination of the president. > > Hi Michael! > > He is in some foreign coward's haven, safe from justice, I'm afraid. > Hi Curly! If you ever come around this 'coward's haven' send me a few lines so we may meet and talk about this interesting concept. BTW, it's 'safe from US laws' (not justice). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 11 January 2007 20:04, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> Michael Madigan wrote: >>> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to >>> support the assasination of the president. >> I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). > > Hi Ricardo! > > Thank you for your candor. We will take this into consideration every time we > see anything from you from now on. Hi, my dear Pete! Ok. Please also take into consideration I live in a SOVEREIGN country, and that I have a SOVEREIGN mind (I think and express myself in whatever manner I think is correct). BTW, 'we' will also take into consideration that you would FORCE us into your ways if you had the power (which you don't). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 20:04, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > > support the assasination of the president. > > I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). Hi Ricardo! Thank you for your candor. We will take this into consideration every time we see anything from you from now on. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:37, Michael Madigan wrote: > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > support the assasination of the president. Hi Michael! He is in some foreign coward's haven, safe from justice, I'm afraid. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:26, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Hi Ricardo! Spoken like a real foreign enemy. > Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find > the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
And I would consider it VERY POOR TASTE.. Shows a total lack of class in my opinion. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln? Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's > find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions > of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This > statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too > stupid to see the obvious. > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Michael Madigan wrote: > I hope you don't plan on coming here, they may refuse > your visa. > Nope. Lots of interesting places to visit first. > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michael Madigan wrote: >>> Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to >>> support the assasination of the president. >>> >> I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws >> (lucky eh?). >> >>> >>> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
I hope you don't plan on coming here, they may refuse your visa. --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > > support the assasination of the president. > > > > I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws > (lucky eh?). > > > > > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for > >> Christ's sake, let's find > >> the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) > >> > >> > >> > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Michael Madigan wrote: > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > support the assasination of the president. > I don't give a damn. I'm not subject to YOUR laws (lucky eh?). > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Let's suppose the subject is true Then for >> Christ's sake, let's find >> the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) >> >> >> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
You can bet I won't joke about assasinating them. --- Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Madigan, > > > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > > support the assasination of the president. > > That law only applies in the US... Keep it in mind > when Hillary or Barack or > Edwards or whomever is next becomes President. You > may not be seeing > straight the day after election day next year. > > Kristyne McDaniel > http://www.mcstyles.com > http://www.emryldlife.com > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Madigan, > Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to > support the assasination of the president. That law only applies in the US... Keep it in mind when Hillary or Barack or Edwards or whomever is next becomes President. You may not be seeing straight the day after election day next year. Kristyne McDaniel http://www.mcstyles.com http://www.emryldlife.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Be careful, it is illegal in the United States to support the assasination of the president. --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's suppose the subject is true Then for > Christ's sake, let's find > the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Let's suppose the subject is true Then for Christ's sake, let's find the new Wilkes Booth. ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Thursday 11 January 2007 07:21, Ed Leafe wrote: > Hardly, despite all the constant dropping of Lincoln's name. But it > seems that Bush is actually the new LBJ. Hi Ed! Wow! Did you notice that they both wear pants as well? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam Whoops - sorry for the copy/paste duplication. Read the link instead! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Bush is the new Lincoln?
Hardly, despite all the constant dropping of Lincoln's name. But it seems that Bush is actually the new LBJ. You know all those weird parallels between Kennedy and Lincoln? Well, it was forty years to the day that LBJ gave his speech announcing the escalation of the war in Vietnam that Bush announced his plans for the escalation of the occupation of Iraq. This site compares LBJ's words with Bush's: http://www.attytood.com/2007/01/eday_it_was_40_years_ago_today.html ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yx6sop ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam in an attempt to prevent a larger war--a war almost certain to follow, I believe, if the Communists succeed in overrunning and taking over South Vietnam by aggression and by force. I believe, and I am supported by some authority, that if they are not checked now the world can expect to pay a greater price to check them later. GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: Tonight in Iraq, the Armed Forces of the United States are engaged in a struggle that will determine the direction of the global war on terror – and our safety here at home. The new strategy I outline tonight will change America's course in Iraq, and help us succeed in the fight against terror. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam in an attempt to prevent a larger war--a war almost certain to follow, I believe, if the Communists succeed in overrunning and taking over South Vietnam by aggression and by force. I believe, and I am supported by some authority, that if they are not checked now the world can expect to pay a greater price to check them later. GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict. It is the decisive ideological struggle of our time…In the long run, the most realistic way to protect the American people is to provide a hopeful alternative to the hateful ideology of the enemy – by advancing liberty across a troubled region. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
