Re: More BLAT /CDO problems
Lew wrote: This may be related to the recent BLAT thread. My sendmail app which used blat.dll successfully for years has also stopped working, so I'm wondering if, perhaps, my isp changed something so as to prevent email automations. CDO won't work on my machine either so I wonder ... is it possible for my isp to detect the smtp client I'm using? Outlook can't be automated an longer due to the (in)security messages it generates. Also *free* alternatives would be appreciated. -Lew Lew -- I know there was some sort of workaround for the LookOut security messages so that they were averted, but I can't recall the details. Also, not sure if it was free (but I *thought* it was?!?!?). I'm testing blat now with the many postings from the recent thread and will report when successful! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: More BLAT /CDO problems
I've not tested this latest version, Dimac Development has a Free ActiveX control for sending email. Find it here. http://tinyurl.com/cwzdn I'm using a Codestone ActiveX, it does cost some money: http://www.codestone.ltd.uk/ Tracy -Original Message- From: Lew Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 5:10 PM This may be related to the recent BLAT thread. My sendmail app which used blat.dll successfully for years has also stopped working, so I'm wondering if, perhaps, my isp changed something so as to prevent email automations. CDO won't work on my machine either so I wonder ... is it possible for my isp to detect the smtp client I'm using? Outlook can't be automated an longer due to the (in)security messages it generates. Also *free* alternatives would be appreciated. -Lew ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: More BLAT /CDO problems
On 5/30/07, Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may be related to the recent BLAT thread. My sendmail app which used blat.dll successfully for years has also stopped working, so I'm wondering if, perhaps, my isp changed something so as to prevent email automations. CDO won't work on my machine either so I wonder ... is it possible for my isp to detect the smtp client I'm using? No, but there are a lot of other possibilities, including SMTP AUTH or other requirements. Their support staff should be able to tell you if they've made any recent changes. Many tools have a Verbose capture option that will let you see all of the validation messages that go back and forth between client and server. I've used that in a couple of installations where basic email was a problem to get set up. Outlook can't be automated an longer due to the (in)security messages it generates. Also *free* alternatives would be appreciated. The suugestions are a few years old, but most of the stuff I covered in the white papers on Outlook automation and (better idea!) Email without Outlook still apply: http://www.tedroche.com/papers.php -- Ted MAPI Bad, SMTP Good Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: More BLAT /CDO problems
I remember your papers. That's why I began to use blat in the first place. I'm not broad siding you here, the article was indispensable at the time. Unfortunately, blat has no verbose option, but, since it does go through authentication, I'll bet the isp can detect it. There have not been any recent access changes, otherwise I'd have to change the account settings in outlook as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 5:42 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: More BLAT /CDO problems On 5/30/07, Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may be related to the recent BLAT thread. My sendmail app which used blat.dll successfully for years has also stopped working, so I'm wondering if, perhaps, my isp changed something so as to prevent email automations. CDO won't work on my machine either so I wonder ... is it possible for my isp to detect the smtp client I'm using? No, but there are a lot of other possibilities, including SMTP AUTH or other requirements. Their support staff should be able to tell you if they've made any recent changes. Many tools have a Verbose capture option that will let you see all of the validation messages that go back and forth between client and server. I've used that in a couple of installations where basic email was a problem to get set up. Outlook can't be automated an longer due to the (in)security messages it generates. Also *free* alternatives would be appreciated. The suugestions are a few years old, but most of the stuff I covered in the white papers on Outlook automation and (better idea!) Email without Outlook still apply: http://www.tedroche.com/papers.php -- Ted MAPI Bad, SMTP Good Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: More BLAT /CDO problems
On 5/30/07, Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember your papers. That's why I began to use blat in the first place. I'm not broad siding you here, No offense taken. the article was indispensable at the time. Unfortunately, blat has no verbose option, Try -debug with the exe and capture the output. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
