[libreoffice-projects] Nominating NA Community DVD - cover art
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 07:47 -0700, C. Olofson wrote: On 04/11/2011 06:57 AM, drew wrote: So - is #8 and #8-wht good with you? Sharp-looking product (both #8 -wht). Thanks Drew! I've come to this convo very late so please take these suggestions accordingly. Most have to do with what my failing eyes would like to think of as legibility... - Change the suite-er font to match one of those (more legible) already used - Is there a grey-scale version of this yet? (otherwise some people /will/ just print bw) - Would it be a good idea to indicate the folding-lines? - Do we have anyone to scan this from a legal perspective? Very clean, very professional work. I'd be happy to distribute represent this. Hi Craig, Thanks and you aren't late at all, in fact I'd been looking at that (the slogan font) and thinking along the same lines, that it needed changing. So - one last (maybe) tweak(s): - Reduced number of fonts -- Front and Back cover - opened up the curve in scatter patter on front cover - lightned background w/ slight tint change - added more white space around logos - softened the shadows by 1/2 under module icons -- asking for a dispensation on the branding guidelines for this - offset version designator and looking at that it looked enough to merit the full print ready version to the wiki. [ where it goes back to being a version of alt-3.png ] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png I think it's a winner? Thanks Drew Letting the other lists know also -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-projects] Nominating NA Community DVD - cover art
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:32 -0700, Jeff Chimene wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:24 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 07:47 -0700, C. Olofson wrote: On 04/11/2011 06:57 AM, drew wrote: So - is #8 and #8-wht good with you? Sharp-looking product (both #8 -wht). Thanks Drew! I've come to this convo very late so please take these suggestions accordingly. Most have to do with what my failing eyes would like to think of as legibility... - Change the suite-er font to match one of those (more legible) already used - Is there a grey-scale version of this yet? (otherwise some people /will/ just print bw) - Would it be a good idea to indicate the folding-lines? - Do we have anyone to scan this from a legal perspective? Very clean, very professional work. I'd be happy to distribute represent this. Hi Craig, Thanks and you aren't late at all, in fact I'd been looking at that (the slogan font) and thinking along the same lines, that it needed changing. So - one last (maybe) tweak(s): - Reduced number of fonts -- Front and Back cover - opened up the curve in scatter patter on front cover - lightned background w/ slight tint change - added more white space around logos - softened the shadows by 1/2 under module icons They did seem a bit thick. Nice touch to add them in the first place -- asking for a dispensation on the branding guidelines for this Why do we need this? - offset version designator You're correct, it doesn't need centering. and looking at that it looked enough to merit the full print ready version to the wiki. [ where it goes back to being a version of alt-3.png ] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lrge-cover-alt-3.png I think it's a winner? Thanks Drew Letting the other lists know also I like it. Thank-you for making the other changes, btw (logos, text). Why aren't we using the slogan Freedom never tasted so suite? I'm reminded of this after watching Italo's presentation. The consistent font looks much cleaner. LOL - you know ... 9a might be on the way...I don't why I bastardized that slogan.. Cheers, jec -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-projects] [Idea] MailMerge 2.0
Mail Merge becomes a necessary tool in many cases and not always is used to create a letter or email as the wizard says. I think achieving the mentioned task using LibreOffice needs to be a easier. That's why I'd like to propose: * Rename: As the name seems to condition the application functionality, DataMerge or InfoMerge would be more appropriate and provides the idea of greater functionality. * Advanced Editing: If I'm not writing a letter, why should I assign fields? an option to skip the wizard and include fields manually would be welcome. what do you think? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Escuelas Libres :: Porque la educación es mucho mejor cuando es libre http://www.escuelaslibres.org.ar/ --- Para entrenar, cualquier programa sirve. Para educar, sólo Software Libre. (Federico Heinz) --- -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
