[protobuf] Allocator Support for strings
Hi, In the application, i am working on, we are managing the memory of strings using allocators. But i find that the protobuf uses strings without any allocator support. Is there a plan to provide allocator support for strings in future? Or can someone guide me on how to go about implementing this change? I would need a typedef somewhere to mention the string type and the library should generate the appropriate code for it. Thanks, Gokul. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 296 in protobuf: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
Comment #15 on issue 296 by jhuxh...@googlemail.com: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296 Thanks! The artifact has just reached the central maven repository. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/protobuf/protobuf-java/ And LOL @ http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296#c12 ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 296 in protobuf: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #14 on issue 296 by g...@google.com: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296 Deployed to oss.sonatype.org and released. Sorry about the wait. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 296 in protobuf: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
Comment #13 on issue 296 by g...@google.com: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296 Ha. Yes it did. Then I got distracted by a long holiday weekend. Resuming now. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 296 in protobuf: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
Comment #12 on issue 296 by trobi...@gmail.com: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296 Has the build finished yet? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Safe way to access the functionality of MutableCProtoInsidePyProto
I am writing a python extension (in C++) which needs to work with protobufs. I would also like to make use of the experimental C++/ Python extension in my application. (i.e. I would like my extension to handle python protobuf messages which are actually backed by c++ messages.) Is there a reasonable way to do this right now? It appears that the secret to doing this would lie gaining access to the MutableCProtoInsidePyProto method which exists down inside the protobuf pyext code. However, this method is only implemented in the internal _net_proto2___python.so library, which is a python extension itself, and not suitable for 'general' linking to another library (e.g. it has no soname defined). It seems like maybe this could be solved by creating a separate 'implementation' library which would contain the implementation of MutableCProtoInsidePyProto (and its sibling method). This would also require moving the CMessage struct out of the python-proto2.cc file and into a header file so it could be used for both the python extension, and the implementation library. Thoughts? Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] Re: Exceptions when reading protobuf messages in Java which were created in C++
Can you not control the number of messages? In any event, I think the problem is the memory lifetime of the streambuf. >From the docs on async_write: b A basic_streambuf object from which data will be written. Ownership of the streambuf is retained by the caller, which must guarantee that it remains valid until the handler is called. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, platzhirsch wrote: > I find it difficult to check this by so many messages. This approach > was suggested by some people already, I don't know how I would realize > this. > > On Jul 6, 6:56 pm, Jason Hsueh wrote: > > I'm not familiar with the boost libraries you're using, but the use of > > "async_write" and the stack-allocated streambuf looks suspect. If nothing > > jumps out there, I would first check that the data read from the socket > in > > Java exactly matches the data on the C++ side. > > > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, platzhirsch < > konrad.rei...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some other exceptions I receive as well: > > > > > Protocol message tag had invalid wire type. > > > Protocol message end-group tag did not match expected tag. > > > While parsing a protocol message, the input ended unexpectedly in the > > > middle of a field. This could mean either than the input has been > > > truncated or that an embedded message misreported its own length. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Protocol Buffers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] Re: Exceptions when reading protobuf messages in Java which were created in C++
Basic rule: if the memory is used outside the lifetime of the function call, you don't want it on the stack. Async_write very much requires the memory to be around later. --Chris On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:10 AM, platzhirsch wrote: > I find it difficult to check this by so many messages. This approach > was suggested by some people already, I don't know how I would realize > this. > > On Jul 6, 6:56 pm, Jason Hsueh wrote: >> I'm not familiar with the boost libraries you're using, but the use of >> "async_write" and the stack-allocated streambuf looks suspect. If nothing >> jumps out there, I would first check that the data read from the socket in >> Java exactly matches the data on the C++ side. >> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, platzhirsch >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Some other exceptions I receive as well: >> >>> Protocol message tag had invalid wire type. >>> Protocol message end-group tag did not match expected tag. >>> While parsing a protocol message, the input ended unexpectedly in the >>> middle of a field. This could mean either than the input has been >>> truncated or that an embedded message misreported its own length. >> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Protocol Buffers" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Exceptions when reading protobuf messages in Java which were created in C++
I find it difficult to check this by so many messages. This approach was suggested by some people already, I don't know how I would realize this. On Jul 6, 6:56 pm, Jason Hsueh wrote: > I'm not familiar with the boost libraries you're using, but the use of > "async_write" and the stack-allocated streambuf looks suspect. If nothing > jumps out there, I would first check that the data read from the socket in > Java exactly matches the data on the C++ side. > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, platzhirsch > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Some other exceptions I receive as well: > > > Protocol message tag had invalid wire type. > > Protocol message end-group tag did not match expected tag. > > While parsing a protocol message, the input ended unexpectedly in the > > middle of a field. This could mean either than the input has been > > truncated or that an embedded message misreported its own length. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Protocol Buffers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] Re: Exceptions when reading protobuf messages in Java which were created in C++
I'm not familiar with the boost libraries you're using, but the use of "async_write" and the stack-allocated streambuf looks suspect. If nothing jumps out there, I would first check that the data read from the socket in Java exactly matches the data on the C++ side. On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, platzhirsch wrote: > Some other exceptions I receive as well: > > Protocol message tag had invalid wire type. > Protocol message end-group tag did not match expected tag. > While parsing a protocol message, the input ended unexpectedly in the > middle of a field. This could mean either than the input has been > truncated or that an embedded message misreported its own length. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re:Re: Re:Re: [protobuf] Re: Is any method available to convert a protobuf object to XML?
Thanks Wright; Yes, protostuff has serialize tool for XML, but written by JAVA and my project is native C++. At 2011-06-27 22:15:48，"Ben Wright" wrote: Have you tried http://code.google.com/p/protostuff/ ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To view this discussion on the web visithttps://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/hTS8SDZLVvgJ. To post to this group, send email toproto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 289 in protobuf: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010
Comment #14 on issue 289 by m...@bakedbeans.com: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=289 Thanks for resolving this issue! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 289 in protobuf: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010
Comment #13 on issue 289 by liuj...@google.com: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=289 A Node for myself: The reason that gtest 1.6 didn't pass, because this diff http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/diff?spec=svn500&r=500&format=side&path=/trunk/include/gtest/internal/gtest-death-test-internal.h&old_path=/trunk/include/gtest/internal/gtest-death-test-internal.h&old=482 In 2.4.0 release, protobuf GOOGLE_CHECK will throw an exception(FatalException derived from std::exception) by default instead of exit(0) which isn't compatible with gtest 1.6 death check. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 289 in protobuf: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010
Comment #12 on issue 289 by m...@bakedbeans.com: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=289 No, I haven't defined PROTOBUF_USE_EXCEPTIONS anywhere. I tried using gtest 1.5, now all tests pass in release and debug modes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 289 in protobuf: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010
Comment #11 on issue 289 by liuj...@google.com: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=289 Wait, did you define PROTOBUF_USE_EXCEPTIONS? That seemed to be the reasons of these error. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 289 in protobuf: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010
Comment #10 on issue 289 by liuj...@google.com: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=289 Can you try gtest 1.5 instead? The death test change in gtest doesn't seem to be compatible with protobuf unittest. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 289 in protobuf: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010
Comment #9 on issue 289 by m...@bakedbeans.com: 64 bit release build unit tests fail in MSVC 2010 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=289 I've applied the patch in r402, done a full clean rebuilds of both release and debug, but these unit tests still fail in both cases. Strangely both fail a different number of tests. I've attached both test outputs. Attachments: debug.txt 113 KB release.txt 103 KB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
