[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #16 on issue 247 by xiaof...@google.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #13 on issue 247 by compuwar...@gmail.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 Discussion for implementing Java Parser moved to Issue 263 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=263colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20FixedIn%20Owner%20Summary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #14 on issue 247 by compuwar...@gmail.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 Discussion for implementing Java Parser moved to Issue 263 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #11 on issue 247 by compuwar...@gmail.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 Shall I create a new issue to track java parser so it can have it's own fair discussion instead of being buried in this issue? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #12 on issue 247 by ken...@google.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 Sure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #9 on issue 247 by compuwarescc: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 I've been thinking a lot of the use of run-time usage of .proto files in java (I use this technique) and I've gone through two uses now - both involve invoking protoc from java and then using the output. The first was to perform actual code generation, compile, and load. The second (and better i think) was to use the FileDescriptorSet output and load that into FileDescriptor(s). The primary limitation of both approaches was the need to 1) invoke protoc through the shell (not very platform independent) 2) manipulate files when everything could/should be done in memory The more I think on it, the more I think taking the this is an advanced use of protobuf approach and saying the most flexible solution to users that want to do this kind of work is to provide a java version of the current C library used to translate between .proto files and FileDescriptorProto protobufs. This is the one big piece missing from the run-time java capability, everything but going .proto = FileDescriptorProto is in there already. I'm interested in what Kenton or other active developers of the library think about this - how difficult would it be to port the C code to java? how much of a maintenance problem would this make? I would be willing to assist with this effort if it is thought a useful contribution to the java library. If it is believed this is a worthwhile pursuit, I believe that would supersede the need for console output from protoc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #8 on issue 247 by mike.wel...@gmail.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 You're also forgetting the C++/C world where each code generation will output at least 2 files, a .cpp and a .h. So you would pretty much have to output in some sort of standard tar/jar container format for this to work nicely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #5 on issue 247 by compuwarescc: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 After further use, I think it's also (and possible more) important to stream the output of the -o tag (a FileDescriptorProto buffer) to stdout. If this gets implemented I would hope support for the -o flag would be included. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #6 on issue 247 by ken...@google.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 For -o, you can do: protoc my.proto -o/dev/stdout This just doesn't work with --java_out (or whatever lanugage) because it would interpret /dev/stdout to be a directory and would try to create files inside it, which would fail. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #7 on issue 247 by compuwarescc: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 Seems to me that will only work on linux where /dev/stdout is a file pointer to stdout. Do you know of any way to do this on a windows platform? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Updates: Status: Accepted Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Comment #4 on issue 247 by ken...@google.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 We do already have the ability to output to a jar file. I suppose dumping the jar to stdout would not be so bad. Might not make it into the upcoming release, though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #2 on issue 247 by ken...@google.com: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 What happens if multiple files are generated? For example, if you have option java_multiple_files = true; in your .proto file. This seems like it could get weird. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 247 in protobuf: Ability to redirect file output to stdout
Comment #1 on issue 247 by moofish32: Ability to redirect file output to stdout http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=247 I think this would be a very beneficial enhancement for the same reason. Solves any concerns over permissions in the unix environment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
