Yeah, the test only compares "default compression" to "no compression" --
even with the small message, default compression manages to compress a
little bit.
Committed as rev 170.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
> On 2009/07/31 23:56:40, kenton wrote:
>
> This looks great, Kenton. Thanks for cleaning it up! The tests look
> pretty decent as well. With such a small golden message you're probably
> not going to see any difference between the different compression
> levels, and it is just passed through to zlib so there's probably no
> point in testing it here.
>
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/96211
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---